Blog

Endgame

27 Comments

More fictitious conflict – alt-jews screeching at alt-jews about how dangerous a world full of toxic jewing is for jews.

Claire Lehmann (founder of alt-jew organ Quillette):

James Lindsay is now peddling White Genocide Theory. Implying that a genocide against whites in the US is imminent has the potential to inspire racist violence. Such comments are extreme, reckless, & irresponsible. They should be denounced.

Opposition to “wokeness” & Critical Race Theory is one thing. Suggesting that the majority racial group in the US is on the verge of being slaughtered is another. If a sharp line is not drawn between the 2, they will become conflated by progressives to discredit anti-CRT efforts;

And possible maniacs / extremists / people who have become insane via over-exposure to the internet may also feel inspired, emboldened, & validated to commit terrorist violence. James Lindsay needs to stop. Now.

Oy vey, shut it down. Sounds just like Greenblatt.

Lehmann’s hysterical reaction was apparently triggered by this twit from Lindsay:

In light of “On Having Whiteness,” which characterizes white people as parasites with no known permanent cure, I’m going to re-up this statement I made before about Wokeness containing the seed of a genocide.

Lindsay is arguing that Whites are being treated like jews, and Lehmann is screeching that comparing Whites to jews is the real crime.

Lindsay was talking about On Having Whiteness, a particularly toxic bit of anti-White jewing written by Donald Moss and published recently by PubMed. Here’s the abstract:

Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has-a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites-to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.

The jews describe “anti-semitism” in the same terms – as a disease, rooted in biology.

This is a good example of White-washing. Moss, a typically racially hyperconscious and neurotic jew psychoanalyst, is characteristically projecting his own peculiar tribe’s parasitic behavior onto Whites.

Lindsay and Lehmann’s screeching is, of course, also characteristically jewy, born out of their shared concern that the increasingly explicit anti-White “wokeness” jewing might blowback onto jews. Their fake fight is part and parcel of the increasingly lame anti-White “classical liberal” jewing that “wokeness” is supplanting.

Lindsay’s frequent collaborator and co-author Helen Pluckrose just spoke with Lehmann. During their chummy conversation Pluckrose awkwardly tried to explain the larger fake conflict between “liberalism” and “wokeness”:

[T]hey decided that liberalism couldn’t do the job that it was meant to do, and they decided this precisely at the time when it had just done it, it was still doing it. It’s, ha ha, it’s infuriating.

To put it more directly, jews decided that “liberalism”, an outgrowth of their Enlightenment psyop, had done its job. The basic idea of “liberalism” was that jews are just like Whites, only better. It enabled jews to more thoroughly infiltrate and exploit their White host. Now, having just about sucked that host dry, the basic idea of “wokeness” is that jews are just like non-Whites, only better. This enables jews to detach themselves from Whites even as they shift the blame for all their jewing onto us.

27 thoughts on “Endgame”

  1. The day is fast approaching when Whites are going to have to fully and consciously admit to themselves that Adolf Hitler was right about Jews, that the National Socialists were the good guys in WW2, that Jewishness is anti-Whiteness, and that the ultimate Jewish goal is the genocide of the White race. The Whites who don’t have the mental strength to admit those obvious truths are going to find themselves in the same position that so many peoples like the Russians, Ukrainians, Romanians, Hungarians, Germans, Poles, and Palestinians found themselves: being slaughtered by genocidal Jews like Donald Moss without understanding why.

  2. James Lindsay:

    I read the “On Having Whiteness” paper. It’s genuinely psychotic. Here are some samples.

    Note this sample: https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1402842145296375810/photo/2

    Of course there’s nothing genuine or psychotic about this jew Moss writing “Whiteness” wherever “jewing” would be a better fit. Moss knows well his tribe’s parasitic mindset and behavior. He’s projecting it onto their White host, shifting blame for it away from his tribe. It is perfectly typical of Freudian psychoanalysis.

  3. This Jew James Lindsay is too clever by half. In trying to restrain Jewish overreach so as to prevent a White backlash Lindsay is only succeeding in drawing further attention to Jewish parasitism. The Jews won’t listen to Lindsay, they tell him to get lost, but apparently they don’t have the will to just silence him. All told, it is another Jewish own goal.

  4. I’ll tell you right now where this Lindsay situation is going to end up – it is going to explode like a ticking time bomb. Eventually enough Jews are going to question Lindsay’s commitment to the Jewish people that Lindsay is going to get pissed and say, “I’m the true voice of the Jewish people, not you. Why, do you think being Jewish means hating White people?” At that point the issue will be irretrievably framed as Jews arguing over whether or not Jews are anti-White. Boom!

  5. I haven’t read this particular paper that Tanstaafl refers to, but I did read that 16-page paper written back around the year 2001 by the jew Steven Steinlight – where he attempted a similar approach, and tried to warn his fellow tribesmen that it might be wise for them to ratchet down their obsession with flooding America with hundreds of millions of non-whites from the third world.

    For anyone who hasn’t read that paper and would like to, here is a link where it can be found and there is a download link for a pdf copy, as well:

    https://cis.org/Report/Jewish-Stake-Americas-Changing-Demography

    My main point is this – jews didn’t listen to Steinlight back in 2001, and they aren’t going to listen to this jew James Lindsay’s warning today. The jews who comprise the so-called ‘ruling elite’ class are pathologically consumed with, and motivated by, a hatred so deep and so intense and they have convinced themselves that they’ve got the White European race on the ropes and those prodigious sized hook noses of theirs can smell the sweet and tantalizing aroma ‘victory’ over the White man – that they refuse to see just how dangerous the future might be for them if the White race ever wakes up and decides to put a permanent stop to this jewish White genocide agenda.

    And, the sad thing – is that maybe they are right. Just the other day, a story emerges where a self-hating, self-loathing, racially castrated and emasculated White male cuck who is a high ranking battalion commander allegedly said the following:

    Army LTC to Troops, “If You Are a White Male You’re Part …
    [Search domain sofrep.com] https://sofrep.com/news/army-ltc-to-troops-if-you-are-a-white-male-youre-part-of-the-problem/
    Army LTC to Troops, “If You Are a White Male You’re Part of the Problem” … he would be perfectly justified in saying that white men are the problem because that is exactly what it teaches.

    When the jews have managed to spend the last 70 years spewing their anti-White brainwashing without any blowback or backlash from the White majority population of America – or basically, from almost no other historic White nation – maybe they are justified in believing that their White genocide agenda is unstoppable?

  7. Greg Johnson has no problem with a Judaised White elite and does not consider half-Jews to be an issue:

    01:47:00

    https://counter-currents.com/2021/05/ccr-342/

    I think he is really talking about himself when he anticipates a White elite with Jewish ancestry. This from a man who considers himself a super-wasp and other Americans to be Amerimutts. He wants to appeal to upper-middle class people (‘SWPLs’) and now I think I know why. I just find his snobbery and superficiality so damn tiresome.

  8. Alt-jew Darren “not that it matters” Beattie has written a piece putting the Lehmann/Lindsay/Moss screeching in a broader context: America’s Rotten Academic Establishment Vomits Out More Demented Anti-White Rhetoric – Revolver.

    Beattie’s argument is sound, so far as it goes. He argues that “the right” (other than himself and Lindsay) tries to ignore the fact that “the left” is anti-White and screeches down anyone who doesn’t. Like other alt-jews, Beattie is a dissident who questions just about everything – except the “White jew” lie:

    Let’s not beat around the bush. This is anti-white hatred. It doesn’t matter at all if Moss is white.

    His conclusion:

    From now on, it is the duty of the right’s opinion leaders to openly say what the extremist anti-white left is doing: Deliberately tolerating and enabling violent, dehumanizing, and yes, pre-genocidal rhetoric against innocent American white people. Americans of all races will be ready to resist this. But they need leaders who will honestly say what is happening.

    The problem with Beattie’s argument is that he himself isn’t honest about what’s happening. He ignores jew hostility toward Whites, and the influence jews have in academia and media, though that is the key to understanding “wokeness” as well as the fake opposition to “wokeness”. Beattie continues to insist on pretending as if “the right” and “the left” are opponents, rather than anti-White/pro-jew co-conspirators who put a slightly different emphasis on one or the other side of a common agenda.

    The pretense that Lehmann and Lindsay are members of “the right” is just as absurd as the pretense that Moss is “white”. It makes little sense except to serve as a narrative fig leaf for jewing.

  9. In his disingenuousness Beattie is very much like the guru of contemporary alt-jewing, the formerly “left”-posing now “right”-posing jew Paul Gottfried. At the end of May, amidst a great clash of jew narratives, Gottfried wrote to defend the toxic jewing inside jewland from the toxic jewing outside jewland. He chose a particularly apt title to jewsplain how it is all about “the left” versus “the right”. The Continuing Fictitious Struggle › American Greatness:

    What happens politically or culturally must be understood through these ideologically shaped lenses: Antifascists believe they are still in a struggle that erupted between Right and Left almost 90 years ago, and whomever they designate as “fascists” become the heavies in this morality play.

    There are two problems with this game. First, the Right—or what is designated as such—keeps changing so that it ceases to resemble what it once was. Second, the antifascist, pro-LGBT, feminist Left is not the equivalent of the old interwar Left. The fascist enemy, one may be led to believe from reading Bray or Jason Stanley, the author of How Fascism Works, is white, male, Christian, and a sworn enemy of Third World immigration, gay marriage, and other current sacred cows.

    Among their other enormities, fascists are also occupying land that nonwhites or Muslims are now claiming. The Israelis, for example, are surrogates for the hated Christian West, who keep postcolonial Muslim revolutionaries from taking back Palestine, where presumably they would erect an antifascist state. If there is a connection between Hitler’s Third Reich and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, we may have to leave it to antifascist luminaries to explain it to us.

    There’s no need to wonder what motivates Jason Stanley. His book’s About the Author section makes his tribalism plain enough:

    Stanley cites his jewish heritage as having informed his writing on fascism: “To me, my judaism means an obligation to pay attention to equality and the rights of minority groups.”

    Gottfried is playing the very game he’s describing. He’s arguing that the conflict between “the left” and “the right” is fictitious while he himself insists on pretending there is some substantial difference between “the left” and “the right”. He’s helping perpetrate the very fraud he’s screeching about.

    Gottfried clearly sees the “anti-fascist” jewing is anti-White. What disturbs him is that this “anti-fascist” jewing might somehow blowback onto jews if some of the dimmer goyim treat jews as if they are White.

  10. As to the speculation that Greg Johnson is part Jewish, or the problem of Jewish crypsis generally, a stop can be put to all this shit with DNA testing. In the coming North American Republic citizenship will be defined by unmixed European racial ancestry. This will be established with a DNA test.

  11. In Tucker Carlson’s June 14 monologue he talked about the desire of the wealthy White suburb of Buckhead to secede from Atlanta due to rising violent crime. Carlson attributed this rise in crime to “diversity” and criticized CNN anchors for opposing Buckhead’s secession from Atlanta. He went on to point out that CNN anchors are hypocritical in that they personally refuse to live in racially diverse areas.

    There we have it, a conservative pundit has placed secession on the table as a solution to racial issues, just as I predicted.

    This is officially the beginning of the end for ZOG – the clock is now ticking.

  13. Sam Hoadley-Brill:

    Rufo, like Lindsay, is now incorporating the idea that the (Jewish) Frankfurt School engineered CRT to promote division between White and Black Americans so that they could overthrow White rule and install a Communist government. This is literal neo-Nazism, plain as day. https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1404520152536735750/pu/vid/1280×720/0cUEFQhsRQhLiANB.mp4

    Rufo, like Lindsay, champions “liberalism”, or anti-“racism” jewing 1.0.

    In their critiques of “wokeism”, or anti-“racism” jewing 2.0, which Rufo here calls “the new orthodoxy” (loljews), they go out of their way to avoid pointing out the jewing, the hyperconscious tribalist force animating and directing it all. Lindsay has actually stated that he sees this new phase of jewing as “the biggest threat to jews”. Rufo has probably made similarly cucky statements.

    You can try to avoid calling it jewing, euphemize and dance around it, even cry that you’re on their side. The jews understand what you’re criticizing is jewing.

    In the current jewed anti-White regime’s political discourse anything Whites do is called “White supremacism”, and even the slightest pushback again jewing is called “literal neo-Nazism, plain as day”. These are two sides of the same shekel, with hysterical jews continually screeching that whoever or whatever they don’t like is “anti-semitism”.

  15. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/National-Strategy-for-Countering-Domestic-Terrorism.pdf

    Domestic terrorism is not a new threat in the United States. It has, over centuries, taken many American lives and spilled much American blood – especially in communities deliberately and viciously targeted on the basis of hatred and bigotry. After the Civil War, for example, the Ku Klux Klan waged a campaign of terror to intimidate Black voters and their white supporters and deprive them of political power, killing and injuring untold numbers of Americans. The Klan and other white supremacists continued to terrorize Black Americans and other minorities in the decades that followed. In recent years, we have seen a resurgence of this and related threats in one horrific incident after another: the shooting and killing of 23 people at a retail store in El Paso; the vehicular killing of a peaceful protestor in Charlottesville; the shooting and killing of three people at a garlic festival in Gilroy; the arson committed at a mosque in Victoria, Texas; the appalling rise in violence and xenophobia directed against Asian Americans; the surge in anti–Semitism; and more.

    According to this assessment, one key aspect of today’s domestic terrorism threat emerges from racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists and networks whose racial, ethnic, or religious hatred leads them toward violence, as well as those whom they encourage to take violent action. These actors have different motivations, but many focus their violence towards the same segment or segments of the American community, whether persons of color, immigrants, Jews, Muslims, other religious minorities, women and girls, LGBTQI+ individuals, or others. Their insistence on violence can, at times, be explicit. It also can, at times, be less explicit, lurking in ideologies rooted in a perception of the superiority of the white race that call for violence in furtherance of perverse and abhorrent notions of racial “purity” or “cleansing.”

    Domestic terrorism can take many forms, inspired by a wide range of violent ideologies whose common, dangerous feature is the resort to violence rather than the peaceful expression of views and resolution of differences. Individuals subscribing to violent ideologies such as violent white supremacy, which are grounded in racial, ethnic, and religious hatred and the dehumanizing of portions of the American community, as well as violent anti–government ideologies, are responsible for a substantial portion of today’s domestic terrorism.

    Although the U.S. Government must do everything it can to address enduring challenges like racism and bigotry in America, the Federal Government alone cannot simply “solve” these challenges quickly or on its own. On the other hand, tackling the threat posed by domestic terrorism over the long term demands substantial efforts to confront the racism that feeds into aspects of that threat. We are, therefore, prioritizing efforts to ensure that every component of the government has a role to play in rooting out racism and advancing equity for under–served communities that have far too often been the targets of discrimination and violence. This approach must apply to our efforts to counter domestic terrorism by addressing underlying racism and bigotry.

    That imperative includes ensuring that domestic terrorism threats are properly identified and categorized as such and addressed accordingly. That is a determination that must be made free of all forms of bias. All Americans deserve Federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement that approach their critical tasks without any racial bias or any other biases and in strict adherence to the law. That is why we are working to bolster efforts to ensure that law enforcement operates without bias as it identifies and responds to domestic terrorism threats and, in turn, that law enforcement provides for the public safety of all Americans.

    This is “wokeness”. It’s the same old “classical liberal” “civil rights” “affirmative action” double-talk, official JOG rhetoric since the 1960s, updated with a few newer bits of jargon.

    The anti-White/pro-jew premise is more explicit than before, spelled out here in the introduction, but the narrative is the same as it ever was: Racial bias is a problem, the perpetrators are White, the victims are non-White, therefore the government must be anti-White.

  16. thanks again Kikes…..for bringing your own peculiar and spirit-destroying brand of chaos and divisional confusion to America from your Eastern European shetl shitholes…,

    you are an absolute and obscene scourge on this planet…..particularly The Western Hemisphere.

    not only was Adolf Hitler “right “……he didn’t go far enough in his rightness….

  17. Yesterday Beattie retwitted part of an interview originally posted in July 2020:

    Darren Beattie on our moral framework: “the worst conceivable moral offense is not rape… it’s not murder… the worst conceivable offense is so-called “racism”… ambiguously defined, so as to keep those who are in charge in possession of the dominant moral high ground”

    https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1288596580988141569/pu/vid/1280×720/TAc6yAe2SIls6zOo.mp4

    Yes, but… Who defines “racism”? Who is doing the moralizing? Who is in charge?

    In two other snippets (which Beattie also retwitted, and appear to be from the same conversation) he blames “the left” and says “the right” should grow a moral backbone and fight back.

    To make sense of Beattie you could read “the left” and “the right” roughly as jews and Whites, with jews in a moral fervor aggressing against confused and demoralized Whites. He knows well enough that under the current regime there is indeed an offense on beyond “racism”. They call it “anti-semitism”. He simply ignores this.

    You find this same punch-pulling whenever alt-jews do their half-truth-telling shtick, posing as an authority and purporting to describe how the world really works. They’re counting on the audience they’re lecturing to join them in pretending not to notice the blatant jewing behind what they’ll only outline in abstract terms.

    Alt-jews have some criticisms of the anti-White regime, but the fact it is totally jewed is not one of them. They pretend “the left” and “the right” is the clearest way to see things, right up until someone else fills in the blanks. Then they screech “anti-semitism”, revealing themselves as charlatans.

  18. Rod Dreher, Coming Race Crack-Up? | The American Conservative:

    If you’ve been reading me for any time, you know that I have been yelling foryears that all this insane neoracist crap from the Left was bound to call up white-power demons from the Right. You cannot have one without the other. Both make us blind with hatred. Tribalism is the normal condition of human societies. If this were to happen in America, God forbid, we would only be reverting to the historical norm.

    . . .

    People who say there has been no meaningful progress on race are pig-ignorant of history. But so are people who think that white power is a relic of a distant past. It was kind of traumatizing to learn as a teenager that some of the white men I grew up respecting as solid citizens had been Klansmen in the 1960s.

    Typical “classical liberal”. Standing athwart the jewed anti-White regime’s agenda shouting, “I’M ON YOUR SIDE!!1!”

  19. The American Jewish Congress Calls For Destruction Of The 1st Amendment To Shut Gab Down | Andrew Torba ✝️

    Torba is responding to this op-ed in Jewsweek, We Need to Stop Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Online Extremism Before It Gets Violent | Opinion, which argues that White speech must be shut down because jews.

    Greene grovels to the jews swarming and screeching for her head, discrediting herself. Torba recognizes this, calls the anti-White jewing what it is, refers to his enemies as enemies.

  20. Critical Race Theory as a Jewish Intellectual Weapon – The Occidental Observer, by Edmund Connelly:

    We’ve reached the point where some are stepping forward to point out the obvious truth that CRT is in fact “anti-White racism.” Much to my surprise, however, I’ve seen little or no evidence that people have pointed to the far more instructive issue that while it is of course anti-White racism, it has been propagated by a long string of Jews for over fifty years. This is because Jews are prosecuting a deadly war on Whites, with previous examples such as the Bolshevik era in Russia, the Holodomor, and the various “cold” strategies documented in The Culture of Critique such as boosting non-white immigration and depressing White family formation. This is the point I am at pains to emphasize.

    The consequences of this are immense, beginning with MacDonald’s claim in his 2008 TOO article that after demonizing Whites (or “Whiteness”), “it doesn’t take much imagination to suppose that actual genocide of Whites is the next step.” I couldn’t agree more and have stressed this point for over twelve years here on TOO.

    Hooray, MacDonald is finally allowing authors to capitalize White. Has he stopped promoting Jared Taylor’s jew-excusing “white pathology” meme?

  21. Connelly:

    What frustrated me, however, was the fact that Hughes completely neglected to address the “meta-complaint” in the West from which all lesser complaints emerged. To wit, Hughes failed to see how The Holocaust Narrative had been so successful in advancing Jewish interests that naturally other groups eagerly imitated this successful model.

    I’ve never heard of Hughes, but I get Connelly’s point. The jews created the oppression narrative and positioned themselves as the first and foremost victims of the White man. They have been screeching in this same vein continuously as far back in history as you care to go.

    It’s one thing when ordinary people who are relatively ignorant of history grouse about “political correctness”, anti-“racism”, “CRT”, “wokeness”, or whatever other euphemism for jewing is trending. It’s another thing entirely when someone posturing as an expert on the subject deliberately looks the other way, or worse, somehow White-washes the jewing.

  22. Christopher F. Rufo:

    Last week, I hosted a conference with the incredible @reihan in Bozeman, Montana. We broke down the features of woke ideology, then plotted out ways to defeat it. We are building a movement to fight for the values of individualism, pluralism, dignity, and excellence.

    Follow the participants here: @kimmiehermann, @wil_da_beast630, @ConceptualJames, @peterboghossian, @MsMelChen, @AsraNomani, @docMJP, @ShellenbergerMD, @Rhetors_of_York, @ShellenbergerMD, @wokal_distance, @walterkirn.

    Alt-wokeness? Neo-IDW? Team OG anti-White/pro-jew?

  23. Christopher F. Rufo:

    @DrKarlynB Borysenko is right about this. Critical race theory and white identitarianism are two sides of the same coin. They are both poison for our country and should be rejected.

  24. Critical race theory is beginning to be recognized as anti-White. ZOG is officially pushing CRT. Big Tech censorship of political dissidents is well known and today Biden announced his desire to ban assault weapons in response to the recent spate of nigger gun crime. Muh constitution is considered holy writ by patriotards, particularly the first and second amendments. Before the year is out I predict these issues will become inextricably linked in the minds of these ordinarily thick-skulled, Trumptarded rubes. They will come to the understanding that CRT dictates that they be silenced and disarmed because they are White. This is now ZOG’s policy. That is just the hook we need to get in these retards’ mouths to pull them towards secession and it’s going to happen.

    Get off their useless asses to defend their race? Apparently not bloodly likely. But for muh fucking constitution? We’ll see, or at least I’m somewhat optimistic. Anyway, some kind of damned galvanization needs to occur.

  25. Rufo talking about his debate with Joy Reid:

    Here’s the takeaway: the political Left is running away from critical race theory as fast as it can. They know it’s intellectually bankrupt and politically toxic. They’re retreating to language games and shell games because they cannot defend it on the substance.

    “The right” said the same about communism. It is always a dissimulating dissembling “right” leading the retreat while bragging that they’re attacking and even winning.

    This is how “democracy” works. Both jew-directed jew-serving sides play these language/shell games, where they call the jewing by some other name, which naturally most non-jews dislike. And under cover of their fictitious conflict and various names the jewing continues.

    The Rufos prefer to overlook it, but the jew-led war on Whites went overt and became official in the Trump era. Before the jewsmedia shifted to Floyd/BLM/CRT as their pretext and focus, from 2015 to 2017 their screeching was almost entirely dedicated to “anti-semitism”. And it was after Charlottesville that the federal government, under Trump, began making explicit bipartisan proclamations that Whites are Enemy #1 because “anti-semitism”.

  26. Jews are going to start demanding the end of elections, and subsequently, single party rule through the DNC. They will paint the GOP as some kind of White supremacist/Russia-backed organization and call for its abolition in the name of “national security” and “our democracy.” Jews needed the GOP to act as a foil for the DNC to placate White America in their lib-con puppet show, but a dumber, brown-majority America has no interest in politics, only gibs, fast food, and Netflix. The puppet show is no longer necessary.
    The mask is already off. Biden and the dems are making no attempt to appear as legitimate leaders. They’re openly calling Americans “domestic terrorists” merely for not voting for them. Now we have generals like Mark Milley reading communist propaganda and defining Whites as an internal enemy. Things are about to get very bad. Now more than ever Whites need to develop racial solidarity and form a political party that advocates for our interests.

  27. It is possible the Jews themselves may retreat behind a shield of highfalutin sophistry while presenting CRT so as to conceal their personal involvement. Yet should we expect anything but a simple and blunt presentation of CRT when intended for a general audience? I think not. We must recall that CRT is largely intended for a low IQ, non-White audience. The purpose of CRT is this: “Alright mud golem, now go smash Whitey!” CRT must be pitched at a level that the Jews’ mud goons can understand their marching orders.

Comments are closed.