The Jew Wife Problem


I spent hours yesterday reading about the doxxing of the main TRS hosts – the dox themselves, and comments from others about it. I’ve enjoyed listening to their shoot-the-shit Daily Shoah podcast, the future of which is now uncertain, as well as the political analysis on Fash the Nation, which has been shut down by its own hosts, presumably to deter their own doxxing.

Whether any of what they discussed was to your liking, I think it’s fair to say that Whites talking to Whites about things that concern Whites is good for Whites. TRS not only did that, they inspired and facilitated many others to do so as well.

From what I can see, the initial doxxing – first Ghoul, then Bulbasaur, then Seventh Son – didn’t reveal anything especially interesting. They are the ordinary White Americans they presented themselves as. Their doxxing was personally punitive, the main result being that anyone who wants to give them grief IRL will have an easier time doing so now.

It’s not difficult to understand why so many of the few Whites who feel compelled to speak out choose to use a pseudonym. Those whose personal concerns prevail over racial concerns simply keep their mouths shut, and are far more numerous. Like White flight, this is as much a reflection of the utter wickedness of the current anti-White/pro-jew regime as it is an expression of collective White fear and demoralization.

Mike Enoch’s doxxing is qualitatively different. First, because he has been the most pensive and eloquent voice at TRS, its hub, its guru. Without Enoch, TRS would not exist and probably will not continue. The more important difference is the jew wife thing.

A few Daily Stormer commenters argued about the apparent similarity to my situation. The main difference is that I disclosed it myself. I’ve never wanted to be popular, or a leader, but I do care about my race and want to speak the truth about its foremost pathogen, the jews. I’m sure there are many other people in my situation, more than even most jew-aware people realize. Many see their situation differently than I do. I’m not at all surprised some would try to speak some truths while compartmentalizing others.

The truth is that race-mixing is an existential threat to any race, including Whites. Race-mixing with jews is the worst because it helps jews infiltrate and manipulate Whites to think otherwise. As a result even many Whites who aren’t race-mixing deal with such truths by denying them, by denying race exists, or that it matters. And among the Whites who don’t deny that race matters many won’t accept that jews are a racial, existential threat to Whites. The more Whites are forced to confront and overcome any form of this denial, the better.

The most important point that can be made about the jew wife thing is that it is a problem. It matters. It isn’t irrational or immoral for Whites to despise and reject race-mixers, as the jews want us to believe. Quite the contrary, those who deny the problem, lie about it, or try to hush it up are only making it worse.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

Dylann Roof’s Jail Journal


Pages from a journal Dylann Roof wrote in the weeks after his arrest were presented as evidence and read aloud in court last week. Many jewsmedia articles have appeared over the past several days providing certain excerpts, but none quote or link the full document.

Finding the document was not easy, and though Roof’s handwriting is clear, the scan quality is low, making some words difficult to read. To make the document more easily accessible to others I have transcribed it and present the bulk here in plain text – lightly edited for spelling, punctuation, and format.

The PDF has 40 pages, each with a unique page number (“-XX-”) printed in the lower left corner and an ID (“US-0606XX”) in the lower right. The sequence of page numbers and IDs correspond to each other, but for some reason these pages/IDs are presented partly out of order in the PDF. This is especially true for the first few pages in the PDF, which contain sketches and lists of Roof’s favorite music and films.

Each page in the PDF is labeled “RESTRICTED MATERIAL” in red at the top and bottom. The first/title page is labeled “Contents of cell search 8-3-15″ and “GOVERNMENT Exhibit 500″. The lowest page/ID is “-1-”/”US-060652″, the highest is “-42-”/”US-060693″. Pages/IDs “-40-”/”US-606091″ and “-41-”/”US-606092″ are missing.

Roof’s sketches include various arrangements of the following symbols: “14″, “88″, life rune, odal rune, sig and double-sig runes, swastika/hakenkreuz, celtic/Russian Orthodox cross, and “D S R” (Dylann Storm Roof).

The body of Roof’s prose begins on the 14th page of the PDF. A triple asterisk (***) denotes illegible words. A single asterisk is attached to words whose interpretation is uncertain.


I would like to finish writing my opinions, I was unable to finish before because I was in a hurry to get to Charleston. I would also like to make some clarifications.

Jews are an enigma

I can’t pretend to understand why the Jews do what they do. A person can only speculate. I don’t think the Jews themselves understand why they do these things.

I have tried, when I write, to not state statistics or facts or things people can read for themselves with a little research. This doesn’t mean I don’t know them or am ignorant. I would consider myself well-versed on almost* every issue* facing* White people around the world*.

That being said, the Jews have played a major role in literally every thing that has proved destructive to our race, culture, and society. The truth is that at the moment it is much easier to talk about blacks or muslims or hispanics to other Whites because it is easier for them to relate.

I would not deny for a moment that the Jews have made many wonderful, and truly great contributions to the world. But the bad outweighs the good. Lets take Hollywood as an example. The Jewish control of Hollywood allows for Hollywood films to have bigger budgets because of the amount of Jewish money in the industry. Because of this some amazing films have been made. But this same networking has probably prevented some of the best films of all time from being made, beause a man who has a great idea, or script, or screenpay, may not be able to have it seen because he isn’t Jewish.

So the Jewish control of Hollywood has benefits and drawbacks. Obviously the other drawback of their control of the film industry, as well as every other media industry, is the introduction of vile, disgusting filth into our society. At the same time, some of the most wholesome classic films have been directed or produced by Jews.

Some of the best composers have been, and are, Jewish. Jews have written many great books and contributed greatly to world literature, and not always with dirty or degenerate writing. But just as with the film industry, who is more likely to have their manuscript read by a Jewish run publishing house? Therefore what have we missed out on that great White minds have or could have produced?

All this being said, the Jews are undoubtedly our enemies, indeed our greatest enemy and obstacle in saving our race. One could very well say that, all Jewish acheivments are a result of their White blood.

Hispanics are a tough issue. Living in South Carolina, I haven’t had too much contact with hispanics, but within the past few years I have witnessed their population spike in my area. Do we as Americans have to accept that we will always have a decent sized hispanic population? ABSOLUTELY NOT, and at the moment we have to do something before they completely overrun us.

The hispanic population percentile is rising very quickly, and it isn’t slowing down. Many hispanics have significant amounts of White blood, although the vast majority do not. I believe the White hispanics are worth saving as long as they wholeheartedly identify as White and align themselves in that fashion. This would also mean turning against part of their heritage, and indeed some of their relatives.

There is enough good White blood in the USA that we could survive and prosper even with a large non-White hispanic population. But even if that population wasn’t rising, it would still drag us down and definitely keep us from reaching our full potential. In the event of a race war, you would have the hispanics who would align with the blacks, the hispanics who would side with the Whites, and then the ones who didn’t align with anyone.

It is hard for me to write about the hispanic issue because I have little experience to draw on. The bottom line is that they are our enemies, and introduce crime and violence to our country, and therefore deserve no place in it. (***) – I realize that other minority populations have an increasing population, such as muslims. But the hispanic population poses the strongest immediate threat.

As a small, rather funny sidenote, I have noticed that hispanic television channels are actually more White than regular American stations.

If there is one group I have almost zero experience with, it would be muslims. I feel very sorry for my European brothers that their main adversary has to be so seriously formidable. In a way the muslims in Europe could be compared to the hispanics in the USA, the obvious difference being a toxic religion.

I would say that hispanics and muslims have similar IQs and violence levels, but unfortunately the muslim’s violent behavior is increased exponentially by their sick religion. Again I feel sorry for, and a little bit scared for my European brothers. Many of them don’t realize how serious their enemy is. Not that I think the muslims could stand half of a chance against a united White front.

I am not trying to give the muslims undue credit, but their presence is a huge issue for everyone.

Asians have and continue to endure the most discrimination in America, even more than Whites.

When I look at East Asian countries such as Japan and Korea, I see what White countries could be like if we win. Not only could we be as good, we could be 10 times better. But as of now these countries have passed us. I admire the East Asians just like they used to admire us. They are not better than Whites, but they are living better because the don’t face the problems we do. I can’t help but feel a small amount of jealously.


In the White Nationalist movement, many have the idea that Slavs are these great White warriors that won’t put up with the things Western Europeans do. Although this is true in a way, it have nothing to do with them being Slavic. It is simply because they haven’t been subjected to the same mental manipulation.

I will use Russia as an example. In Russia, most people are racist, or in the very least conservative, and all Russian people know this. So the far-right in Russia feels, and is, empowered. If in England, for example, the skinheads thought they had popular opinion’s support, they would and could act more brashly.

Now, is the reason Russia is a conservative, racially aware country because it is Slavic? Of course not. It is because their government supports these beliefs and has pride in its people, as well as the fact that their media doesn’t have a far-left agenda, and neither do their schools.

But I would also like to touch on the Slavic identity itself. I think the Slavic identity is needless and could end up being divisive. I think that once Europe has taken care of its immigration problem, it could become a source of tension, needlessly.

That being said, the Eastern Europeans will surely play an important, and positive role in the future of Europe if they choose to do so, hopefully without shedding the blood of their White brothers.

To wrap this up. White people are pretending. Grown adults waiting around playing pretend. Pretending we are all the same and equal, pretending that nothing bad is happening, and pretending like they have a future. Well unless we take real, possibly violent action, we have no future, literally. I am 21 years old and I don’t play pretend.

I couldn’t go another day without doing something, I couldn’t live with myself seeing these things happen to my people and doing nothing about it. Sometimes sitting in my cell, I think about how nice it would be to watch a movie, or eat some good food, or drive my car somewhere, but then I remember how I felt when I did these things, and how I knew I had to do something. And then I realize it was worth it.

I would rather live imprisoned knowing I took action for my race than to live with the torture of sitting idle. It isn’t up to me anymore. I did what I could do, I’ve done all I can do. I did what I thought would make the biggest wave. And now the fate of our race sits in the hands of my brothers who continue to live freely.

I would like to make it crystal clear. I do not regret what I did. I am not sorry. I have not shed a tear for the innocent people I killed. I do feel sorry for the innocent White children forced to live in this sick country, and I do feel sorry for the innocent White people that are killed daily at the hands of the lower races.

I have shed a tear of self pity for myself. I feel pity that I had to do what I did in the first place. I feel pity that I had to give up my life because of a situation that should never have existed.


I don’t believe homosexuality exists. I think it is nothing more than a sick fetish. I find evidence for this in the multitude of married men, with children, that come out, or lead secret gay lives. It is obvious that they can perform like a normal man. But that isn’t their preference.

In the very least, “homosexuality” should be reinstated as a mental illness, and a severe one at that. I will not lower myself to even comment on transgenderism.

Feminism is bad. Modern psychology is Jewish and evil. Abortion, of White children, is wrong. Social services are evil, sometimes.

I would have liked to adopt a White child if I had had the means.

My Race is My Nation. My only nation is my race.


I never planned on shooting up the College of Charleston. This is ridiculous and has no basis in reality.

I did not do it because of a girl.

Many of the people who claimed to have known me, I have never heard of in my life. Anything these so-called friends have said about me should be interpreted as lies.

I haven’t had a black friend in years, and have never had a close black friend.

I am not and have never been obsessed with the Trayvon Martin case. I simply use it a reference point for when I woke up. I couldn’t care less about it in reality.

I have never in my life been addicted to any drug.

I realize that if I was to receive life imprisonment, I would eventually be pardoned.

I was not suicidal or seen crying in my room. This is ridiculous. I was placed on suicide watch when I arrived at the jail, for no reason.

Anything anyone says about me, including family, should be taken with a huge grain of salt.

Never in my life have I stated that blacks are “taking over the country.” This is ignorant and I never said it. How are blacks “taking over the country” when their population percentile is stagnant? If any race is taking over the country, it would be hispanics.

During the shooting, I said “you blacks are killing White people on the streets everyday and raping White women everyday.”

I never wanted my writing to be called a “manifesto”. That is why I just put “text” on my website.

I did not have a so called troubled childhood. I had everything I needed and then some. Having divorced parents doesn’t mean that your have a “troubled childhood”. This accusation is asinine.

I never used drugs to “drown the pain.” I have never had any pain to drown.

I never intended to shoot the young girl in the church. I never aimed at her and never would have, therefore I resent the attempted murder charge. For the same reason, I resent the two other attempted murder charges.

You see, many White people don’t want to know the truth. Because once you know what is happening, you feel like something needs to be done about it. It is an irritating feeling. So even if they do stumble across or hear about what is happening to White people, they deny it, or say that it is lies, because they don’t want to believe it. Once you admit that it is true, you have two choices. You either do something about it, or you don’t.

At this point you fall into a “someday” mentality. You say “One day there will be a race war.” “One day things will change.” “One day we will live in this White utopia.” “One day someone else will do something, so I don’t need to.”

And this is where most White nationalists end up. So nothing happens. And this has to change. There is a lot of big talk from White nationalists, with no one backing it up.

Socialism is used as a sort of buzzword amongst so called conservatives. In reality socialism isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

For example, proponents, usually leftists, liked to point to the Scandinavian countries as successful examples of socialism at work. And for a long time they may have had a point. But these countries have rather small, homogeneous populations. Or at least they used to. The point is that socialism can work when a population is homogeneous, and even better when the population is smaller. But when a population is diverse, you are bound to have problems.

For example one group may notice that another, distinct, group uses a disproportionate amount of welfare, and get annoyed. But in a homogeneous population this is almost impossible, because everyone is the same, and there would be nothing to notice.

I believe one day that Adolf Hitler will be inducted as a Saint. I can see an icon of him in my mind.

I do not want to live in the past. I do not wish that I was was living in the 1850s, or the 1940s. I want to live now, with all the modern advancements and conveniences that we have, and I think we could have even more of these if we weren’t being dragged down. I wish some things were as they were in the past, but I want to live now. I want to see a future. I want to help make the way, to help create the path to that great future.

How can people blame young White people for having no ambition, when they have been given nothing, and have nothing, to look forward to? Even your most brain-dead White person can see that there is nothing good on the horizon. And even your most brain-dead White person can be saved. Almost no one is beyond saving.

We also need to remember that no one is stopping us. We are only stopping each other. White people are the ones keeping other White people from standing up for themselves.

If we were to, for example, become completely ruthless to the blacks, or implement a harsh eugenics program, who could stop us? Is Kenya or Nigeria or South Africa going to send troops to stop us? Of course not. If White people were united, would it matter if the whole of Africa put sanctions on us? Would the Asians or Arabs even care? Without White people telling them to, I doubt they would.

The saddest part when it comes to blacks is that it didn’t have to be this way. In other words, now we have to get revenge. If the Jews had never forced integration, the blacks would have never had a chance to do as much harm to us as they have. But its too late now, so they have to pay for what they have done, even though the Jews are the ones truly responsible.


I cannot agree with the form of Christianity most modern preachers preach. It seems to me that this form of Christianity says, “Leave it to God” “There is nothing you can do about it.” “Ok, well maybe you can do something, but don’t, because its not your place.” And I can’t agree with this.

I see some people who seem to use Christianity as an excuse for not doing anything. They tell themselves they are being pious, but they are really being cowardly. Their piety is their excuse. But Christianity doesn’t have to be this weak, feeble, cowardly religion. There is plenty of evidence to indicate that Christianity can be a warrior’s religion.

I think that once White Nationalists have gained control of their respective countries, we should sent troops, together, into South Africa to save the remaining Whites, and possibly help them reinstate a new White government if it is still feasible.

We could also encourage immigration from our countries into South Africa to boost the White population. If not, we could at least help them to secure the portions they want and let the blacks have the rest. If their numbers are very small by the time we are able to do this, then we could give remaining population citizenship and help them to move to our countries.

Not only is it our responsibility to help them, but it would also be symbolic and motivating to the worldwide White population.

Sometimes I think it would be nice and peaceful to be deaf. Specifically to go deaf. Ideally I wish I could just be very hard of hearing, like a very old person.

It is important to accept what you are. You cannot change where you come from. You can’t decide where you are born or who you are born to. So you must try to find pride and be proud of your heritage even if you don’t have anything to be proud of. Obviously this *** the case for White people. But even if it was.

We cannot just dwell and imagine a great future without taking the steps to attain that future. This could very well mean not being able to see or enjoy that future. Some would then say, “Then what is the point?” We are only a continuation of our ancestors, and our children are continuations of us. In a way, we are one and the same. So by making* the way and creating the path to that future for the ones who come after us to see, we are at the same time doing it for ourselves. By letting the future be stolen from our children we are letting it be stolen from ourselves.

I don’t have a child, but I wish I did and I regret not being able to before I did what I did. I can only imagine the love a parent must feel for their child, especially* when young. And for White men and women to be able to look at their children and know they are threatened and resign themselves and their children to that fate is shameful.

I find it quite comical when I hear White men talk about how they will defend their home and their family no matter what, or how they “dare someone” to break into their home. They feel courageous when they say “but if someone trys to harm me or my family…” when in reality they couldn’t be more pathetic cowards.

It is so nice to be able to say these things, to call my fellow White men pathetic cowards, because that is what they are, and with my deed behind me I have every right, possibly the most right, to say it. So they claim they will defend what is theirs, yet everything is being stolen from them in front of their eyes, and they know it. Yet they stand idle with their tails between their legs.

I enjoy self pity. It gives me great delight to pity myself. I am a realist, a strict one. I never, ever, ever lie to myself in order to make myself feel better or more comfortable. I think this may be my best, strongest trait.

I also, like many other people, find it pleasurable to be sad. I “get off” on it. I wonder why so many people enjoy being sad. I think it may be that they can be sad while remaining comfortable. So they can experience sadness without hardship, and therefore call feel a strong emotion, that much of the time is easier to induce than happiness, without suffering………any real injury from it.

Sadness is considered a bad feeling.

I don’t like it when people try to read into things, or try to find, or create meaning that isn’t there. I don’t like it when people put so much weight on the things I say. Sometimes, more now that before the incident, I feel that the people I talk to hang on my words as if they were all important or offer some sort of insight into my being. But this isn’t the case; it never is with anyone.

This is part of the reason I hate psychology. A psychologist, often with more mental issues than their “patient” proceeds to put labels on them and tell them they have issues that they don’t really have, and half the time are completely invented “diseases” that have no scientific foundation.

For example, I stated before that I never used drugs to “drown the pain”, or “self medicate”. I used drugs because they get you high. There is no deeper meaning behind this. There is no deeper meaning behind any of my behavior. These things don’t apply to me or any number of people.


I feel like I stated my opinions in the text I put on my website, but I can’t remember so I will put it here anyways.

Modern American patriotism, or really modern patriotism in most White countries, is an absolute joke. Firstly, what is there to be patriotic about? I find it beyond comical when I hear people thank veterans of any war after Vietnam for their service. Even more hilarious is that golden line, “Thank you for protecting us.”

Modern military men disgust me in a way. They walk around as if someone owes them something. I think many of them really believe that we do owe them something. They truly believe that they are “protecting our way of life.” What way of life they are referring to, I’m not sure of. Maybe they are referring to the homosexual, race-betraying, self-destructive, anti-White way of life. I think some of them have this mystical view of America, truly a delusional view that they are fighting or have fought for an America that in reality ceased to exist long ago.

If it is true that what doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger, then maybe there is a benefit to our race going through this trying time. Maybe when we come out of this we will truly be stronger, more aware, and smarter than ever before. And maybe, because this period is so severe, we won’t soon forget about it. And won’t soon let it happen again.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

David Cole’s Muh Israel Argument


Cole makes the perennial argument made by all “right”-posing jews: White nationalists should support “muh Israel” because it’s stupid and crazy to do otherwise.

The Alt-Right Gets a Wedgie at Taki’s Magazine:

During my Holocaust revisionist years in the 1990s, I encountered—no surprise here—lots and lots of “anti-Zionists.” After my forced reemergence as David Cole in 2013, I encountered even more. People in those circles continue to be amazed that I’m a supporter of Israel. I, on the other hand, continue to be amused at the level of anti-Israel sentiment that exists among self-described white nationalists and alt-rightists. I don’t quite get it. Israel is the closest thing to “the West” in that fetid sandlot known as the Middle East, and Israelis do exactly the types of things that white nationalists and alt-rightists want to do themselves (build walls to halt immigration, unapologetically racially profile in the name of safety, unashamedly fight to preserve an ethno-state, etc.). Yet rather than admiration from the “white right,” Israel gets hostility.

Those [Palestinian/pro-Palestinian] guys were like the Islamic version of the most exaggerated Hollywood stereotypes of hillbillies. “Muh lah-yand! Git off muh lah-yand! They dun took muh lah-yand!” Anytime I would try to have a rational discussion with one of those sad sacks, the discussion would always revert back to “the Jews took our land,” as though that magical statement had the power to kill any debate about tactics.

I really don’t understand why the whining of Palestinians catches the ear of anyone on the alt-right. I mean, the cornerstone of the Palestinian cause is that they were “colonized by Europeans” who “grabbed land via warfare.” And you, Mr. Alt-Righter, are sympathetic to that complaint? You think we should force Israel to “give that land back”? Funny, because when the Aztlán loons in the Southwest also claim to have been “colonized by Europeans” who “grabbed land via warfare,” and when they claim that Mexico deserves to “get that land back,” I don’t hear a lot of sympathy. In fact, all I hear from alt-rightists is “Hey, wars happen. The Indians fought; they lost. The Mexicans fought; they lost. We don’t owe them their land back.”

I just don’t accept the notion that gaining territory through war suddenly became a crime against humanity in 1945, right after—and what a coincidence this is!—the victorious Allies gained a shitload of territory from Germany following World War II. That 1945 “deadline” is arbitrary, and I don’t buy into it. As far as I’m concerned, Israel has a right to keep every damn square inch of land it won, and I don’t see that as a position that betrays any particular pro-Jewish or anti-Muslim bias.

In the 1980s, South African blacks, on advice from leftist whites (and, ironically, Jews) decided to take a very sound piece of advice: Stop committing terrorist acts against white South Africans. Don’t traumatize the folks who have to approve the dissolution of their own rule. Reserve your violence (like, say, those snazzy burning-tire “necklaces”) for the traitors in your own ranks. But to whites, be all Gandhi-like, be all “oh, heaven forbid, I’d never use violence in my quest for freedom,” and in no time at all, the name Mandela will become synonymous with Jesus. And it worked. Black South Africans got majority rule, and slowly but surely they’re getting the ethnic cleansing that their PR machine promised they didn’t seek.

Overreaching and overarching conspiracy theories about “Zionist influence” might be comforting to those who want to see Israel as the octopussian world center of all that is evil, but don’t expect Trump to share that worldview.

Like most jews, Cole has nothing but contempt for Whites. Essentially he’s whining because he imagines alt-right Whites might sympathize more with other goyim than jews, and he’s worried that might be bad for the jews.

Beside deliberately misrepresenting the relationship between jews and Whites this particular type of you-goyim-should-support-Israel argument also falsely equates jew-first “zionism” with nationalism. The fact is that the jews have always been parasites, living among and feeding upon Europeans before and after Europe divided into ostensibly sovereign nationalist states.

“Zionism” is a euphemism for the more blatant form jew parasitism has taken specifically after jew-firstism prevailed over White racialism in World War II. It is the idea that jews get a sovereign jew ethnostate and everyone else gets “democratic” states with governments, full of jews, dedicated to “combating racism and anti-semitism” and serving the alien jew ethnostate. And whatever else anyone pretends it means, “muh holocaust” serves as the primary rationale for this grotesque reality.

Jews don’t feel guilty about any of this. On the contrary, even before White resentment can coalesce jews screech as one that the real harm is being done to them. Many jews regurgitate some form of “singling-out the jews” counter-accusation, projecting their own jew-centric mindset, trying to guilt-trip deracinated “liberal” Whites for caring. Cole is aiming at more race- and jew-conscious Whites. Rather than deny the impact of jewing he attempts to obscure and minimize it. He sneers “you’re just jealous”, as if it were more desirable to ape jew parasitism than end it.

Once you properly perceive the jews for what they actually are this type of disingenuous argument not only falls flat, it comes across as a particularly insidious form of hostility. The answer is simple. Jews aren’t White, they’re anti-White. White nationalism and jew parasitism aren’t alike, they’re antithetical. There is no moral or logical obligation to sympathize with an enemy, and jews posing as allies, advising Whites how to better serve jews, are the worse kind of enemy.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

The Jew-State Solution


Secretary of State John Kerry’s Remarks on Middle East Peace:

Throughout his Administration, President Obama has been deeply committed to Israel and its security, and that commitment has guided his pursuit of peace in the Middle East. This is an issue which, all of you know, I have worked on intensively during my time as Secretary of State for one simple reason: because the two-state solution is the only way to achieve a just and lasting peace between Israelis and Palestinians. It is the only way to ensure Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state, living in peace and security with its neighbors. It is the only way to ensure a future of freedom and dignity for the Palestinian people. And it is an important way of advancing United States interests in the region.

Despite our best efforts over the years, the two-state solution is now in serious jeopardy.

The truth is that trends on the ground – violence, terrorism, incitement, settlement expansion and the seemingly endless occupation – they are combining to destroy hopes for peace on both sides and increasingly cementing an irreversible one-state reality that most people do not actually want.

Today, there are a number – there are a similar number of Jews and Palestinians living between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. They have a choice. They can choose to live together in one state, or they can separate into two states. But here is a fundamental reality: if the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic – it cannot be both – and it won’t ever really be at peace. Moreover, the Palestinians will never fully realize their vast potential in a homeland of their own with a one-state solution.

Now, most on both sides understand this basic choice, and that is why it is important that polls of Israelis and Palestinians show that there is still strong support for the two-state solution – in theory. They just don’t believe that it can happen.

After decades of conflict, many no longer see the other side as people, only as threats and enemies.

Kerry’s assertion that “Israel can either be jewish or democratic” touched a nerve, causing yids everywhere to flip their lids.

The context provided by Kerry is testimony to the inordinate power jews wield outside Israel, right now, an open admission that a pro-jew mindset prevails at the highest levels of USGOV and distorts policy-making in the most profound ways. The unhinged response from jews – inverting the situation, imagining themselves victims of powerful enemies – serves mainly to distract from the fact that, as usual, the entire argument is all about what’s best for the jews.

As infuriated jewess Mona Charen put it in Stupid Anti-Israel Policy, there are so many ways the stupid goyim could be better serving the jews:

The world is aflame with threats and instability, yet Kerry and Obama, petulant leftists with an Israel fixation, could not resist this last kick in the teeth to the region’s sole democracy. They knew it would harm Israel’s moral standing – now the delegitimizers can claim that Israel is in violation of “Security Council” resolutions – and give an unmerited win to the Palestinians. Perhaps most infuriating of all, they claim to be doing it all for Israel’s own good.

Kerry presents “democracy” and the jew ethnostate as two mutually exclusive ideas, as if jews will some day have to choose one or the other. Yet the two ideas are best understood as complementary outgrowths of the same whatever’s-best-for-the-jews premise. The political reality is that the jews have their ethnostate, and its form of government, whatever anyone might call it, has been and will continue to be decided exclusively by jews. When apologists like Charen emphatically advertise Israel as “the region’s sole democracy” all they’re really saying is that they see it as the duty of everyone else’s “democracy” to serve this jew ethnostate. The “two-state solution” Kerry prefers is moot. It’s not good enough for the jews, who see no compelling reason to concede anything to their enemies. They already have a “two-state solution” – their ethnostate and a USGOV which serves them too.

Ezra Pound is purported to have noted that “democracy is now currently defined in Europe as a country run by jews”. It fits this jew ethnostate, overtly run by jews, just as well. Where Kerry and other “petulant leftists” get hung up is in the pretense there is any more sensible definition.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

The Menorah Just Got Ten Feet Higher




National Menorah | About Us:

The lighting of this menorah – the world’s largest – is attended by thousands every year and seen via TV newscasts, internet feeds and other media by tens of millions across the nation and around the world, many of them hundreds of miles from any Jewish community.

Indeed, this menorah has become a premier national and even international symbol of the festival of Chanukah, inspiring many communities across the globe to sponsor more and greater public menorah lighting ceremonies of their own. After all, this is the essence of the celebration – to increasingly proclaim and celebrate the miracle of Chanukah – The Festival of Lights, in the most public manner possible.

In this way, we actively reaffirm the celebration of our freedom, inspired by the historic and present victory of right over might, light over darkness, and understanding and justice over intolerance and bigotry.


Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

Charles Jewsplains The Difference Between Populists and Refugees


The Prince of Wales reads Thought for the Day:

We are now seeing the rise of many populist groups across the world that are increasingly aggressive towards those who adhere to a minority faith. All of this has deeply disturbing echoes of the dark days of the 1930s.

I was born in 1948, just after the end of World War II, in which my parents’ generation had fought and died in a battle against intolerance, monstrous extremism and an inhuman attempt to exterminate the jewish population of Europe.

That nearly 70 years later we should still be seeing such evil persecution is to me beyond all belief. We owe it to those who suffered and died so horribly not to repeat the horrors of the past.

Normally at Christmas we think of the birth of our lord Jesus Christ. I wonder though if this year we might remember how the story of the nativity unfolds with the fleeing of the holy family to escape violent persecution.

And we might also remember that when the prophet Mohammed migrated from Mecca to Medina, he did so because he too was seeking the freedom for himself and his followers to worship.

Whichever religious path we follow the destination is the same, to value and respect the other person, accepting their right to live out their peaceful response to the love of god.

That’s what I saw when attending the consecration of the Syriac Orthodox cathedral in London recently. Here were a people persecuted for their religion in their own country, but finding refuge in another land and freedom to practice their faith according to their conscience. It is an example to inspire us all this Christmas time.

Nearly two years after the invasion of Europe kicked into high gear the moral fraud justifying it remains the same.

Charles draws a clear distinction between the “populists” and “refugees”/”minorities”. The former he sees as inhuman and associates with intolerance, monstrous extremism, and evil persecution of the latter, whom he sees as peaceful people whose beliefs should be valued and respected. Another important distinction is that “refugees”/”minorities” have their own countries, but also have rights and freedoms to “find refuge” in “other lands” currently populated by evil “populists”, who don’t.

Charles is not just saying that “populists” are bad and “refugees”/”minorities” are good. He is explaining that this is the moral of stories told by the jews, the ur-”refugees”/”minorities”. He is echoing self-serving jew-centric moralizing to justify the ongoing dispossession and extermination of the European population of Europe and Whites worldwide.

The jews and the traitors who serve them are troubled. Every time they screech about “populism” they are in effect acknowledging their fraud, the unpopularity of their lies, the rejection of the pathological beliefs they espouse. They are increasingly expressing their fear and loathing for Whites, demonstrating that it has everything to do with the jews.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

The Jewed Establishment is Anti-White


In their own ways Bill O’Reilly and Bill Clinton have just highlighted the defining character of the political zeitgeist – a clash of establishment narratives.

Referring to Trump’s selection, Clinton said, “He doesn’t know much. One thing he does know is how to get angry White men to vote for him.”

Referring to the jewed establishment’s response to Trump’s selection, O’Reilly said, “The left wants power taken away from the White establishment and they want a profound change in the way America is run.”

Trump and his campaign manager responded to Clinton. Trump, as usual, refused to even say the word White. Conway, rather than noting Clinton’s invective was anti-White, simply accepted his premise and responded in kind.

The jewed establishment’s response to O’Reilly has been to shit on O’Reilly for having the temerity to defend the establishment, specifically because he imagines it is White. Bill O’Reilly rose to the defense of white privilege in America’s presidential voting process, from The Washington Post, and Bill O’Reilly, in Defending “the White Establishment,” Nails a Liberal Vision of America, from Salon, capture the gist of this response.

Both little Bill scandals are merely reverberations of the recently completed hyper-racialized selection process. To recap, the Clinton team went with an anti-White strategy. Meanwhile, the Trump team wanted White votes, but wouldn’t even speak to Whites as such.

The jewsmedia, which in effect served as part of the Clinton team, has been pushing two conflicting narratives before, during, and now after the campaign.

The first narrative – decrying “White supremacism”, “White privilege”, “institutional racism”, and even lowly working-class White voters – is based on the premise that the current establishment is White. The second narrative decries the same thing – Whites, specifically because they are White – but is based on the premise that Whites have been emboldened by Hitler 2.0 to rebel against the current establishment, which alarms organized jewry and the jewsmedia precisely because they perceive this as a threat to jews.

There is some truth in both narratives. The apparent contradiction is resolved by putting them together.

The Clintons and the Trumps and many other individual members of the establishment may look White but their words and behavior aren’t pro-White. They all recognize the difference White votes can make, but none will so much as speak explicitly in favor of Whites. And even when the Conways or O’Reillys do use the word White, it’s only because they have internalized and are regurgitating the anti-White premise they are responding to, not to defend Whites as Whites.

The larger truth is that jews aren’t White, they’re anti-White. The establishment is anti-White because it is so thoroughly jewed. That’s why members of the current establishment, whether they look White or not, won’t say anything positive about Whites or negative about jews. Those who do dare are denounced and excluded.

Jews currently rule and are pushing a genocidal anti-White agenda. This is what’s making Whites angry. The jewsmedia reports every aspect of this situation, they simply report it from a point of view entirely sympathetic to jews and other non-Whites, and antipathetic to Whites.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

Jew Identity: Non-White, Anti-White


The jews have noticed that White racial consciousness is growing. A few are freaking out and screeching to each other that Trump’s selection and the rise of the jew-aware alt-right is why jews, as jews, should freak out and screech more. This hysterical reaction, which only further exposes jew malevolence and power, is collective. It is what they are. The internet merely amplifies their jewing, allowing more of us to see it more clearly.

The essence of jew identity is inherently schizophrenic – a loud-furtive tribe of name-changing shape-shifting fraudsters who insist they are the victims of the many peoples they’ve parasitized and ultimately offed. They have thrived as a group because they are so keenly aware of themselves as a group, but also because they are aware that they thrive at the expense of others, their hosts, whose awareness jews spend a great deal of effort monitoring and ruthlessly manipulating – to suppress or redirect toward their own ends.

Phoebe Maltz Bovy is a jewsmedia jewess whose long-term special concern has been to jewsplain, specifically to jews, how two toxic jew-driven anti-White memes – that jews are White, and that “White privilege” is evil – are colliding, and how this collision might ultimately not be good for the jews.

In a recent piece published by The Forward, Bovy empathizes with another, younger jewsmedia jewess, Sydney Brownstone. ‘Oh Man, Do I Look Too Jewish?’:

I have lived for 26 years under the illusion that I am unconditionally white, for example, and in pictures recently I have started looking at my face and going, oh man, do I look too Jewish? I’ve never done that before or at least not since I was 13 and like comparing myself to girls wearing Abercrombie.

Brownstone expressed this perfectly typical cryptic jew expression of hostility in a conversation with two other blabbermouth-stranger jewsmedia jews.

Brownstone was describing her concern about an impending alt-right revolution. She explicitly connected her antipathy for “a bunch of gun nuts shooting people” to her own conflicted self-image – a lifetime comfortably posturing as White while simultaneously seeing herself and her own violent, nutty tribe as separate from and at odds with Whites:

It’s just really weird to see this rise of anti-semitism, and think about kind of umm the historical pathway that even got my family on this continent and I know that, Eli, you share kind of a similar history. But I feel like there are ghosts that live in our blood and those ghosts are telling us to run or to remember the revolutions that our families survived and to look out for the signs that are happening now.

History is kind of umm weird because jewing. As White racial consciousness rose a hundred years ago jews as a group were compelled, by the Whites who ostensibly still governed America at that time, to resolve the weirdness, to present an argument that jews were racially “white”. Galvanized by this threat to their jewness a few jews went through the required motions. At the same time, other jews set out to remove the threat by constructing anti-”racism”.

Bovy offers an intimate and explicitly racial interpretation of Brownstone’s feels:

In one sense, pale-skinned American Jews are only now experiencing a shift in our racial self-conception. But if you step back and look at how these same Jews — specifically, the Jewish girls — often experience their teen and preteen years, it starts to seem as if maybe this experience of racist anti-Semitism isn’t entirely new.

And it feels a bit full-circle-ish, I must say, when you learn (on Facebook, where else?) that your 13-year-old self’s Abercrombie-girl equivalent now supports Trump.

Bovy, like Brownstone, clearly sees two separate groups – jews, whom they identify and sympathize with, versus Whites, whom they don’t. They act conflicted because there is a conflict, and they know they are on the jew side, against Whites.

No group is more conscious of race and identity than jews, who are well aware of the privilege they enjoy when Whites mistake them as White. They never tire of expressing their dislike and distrust for Whites, but also recognize the value of the error, the advantage it provides them to manipulate White thoughts and actions: “As a White, I think my fellow Whites suck.” At other times, especially when such goyposing fails, they revert to more explicit jewing: “As a jew, I can’t believe this craaaaaazy anti-semitism exists, shut it down.”

In this respect Bovy is full-time one-jewess band – more overt jew, less pretend “white”, but constantly dancing around the fault line. Bovy titled her take on Trump’s selection Between Guilt and Fear: White, Jewish, and Female after a Trump Victory:

But when I see “white women” posts from white Jewish women, I pause. Are we white women? Today? That is, are we complicit in what’s just happened?

The short, honest answer is no, jews aren’t White, they’re anti-White. But while Brownstone and Bovy provide one of the more blatant examples, it isn’t the only one.

Another jewsmedia jewess, Emma Green, coyly asks Are Jews White? (This article was published by The Atlantic, a “jewish Commentary” in the same sense as The Jew Republic.) Like Bovy, Green blames all this jewy double-talk, which has been going on forever, on the alt-right and Trump.

On the extreme right, Jews are seen as impure—a faux-white race that has tainted America. And on the extreme left, Jews are seen as part of a white-majority establishment that seeks to dominate people of color. Taken together, these attacks raise an interesting question: Are Jews white?

“Jewish identity in American is inherently paradoxical and contradictory,” said Eric Goldstein, an associate professor of history at Emory University. “What you have is a group that was historically considered, and considered itself, an outsider group, a persecuted minority. In the space of two generations, they’ve become one of the most successful, integrated groups in American society—by many accounts, part of the establishment. And there’s a lot of dissonance between those two positions.”

There’s that weird, jewed history again. The tales jews tell only seem paradoxical and contradictory to those who refuse to accept their implication. Jews, as a group, see themselves as distinct from and at odds with Whites. The confusion on this point persists because jews foment and perpetuate it. While fewer jews may believe that masquerading as White is still what’s best for the jews, they all peddle a version of history which hinges on the same stark distinction: excusing jews, faulting Whites.

Green’s coy bit triggered a jewlash much like the one just a week earlier, and for the same reason – jews lash out in anger when their jewing gets exposed. Green responded with Jews and the Social Construction of Race. The first article rehashed the old jew narrative on race, “It’s complicated, goyim, trust me.” The second article taps a more up-to-date jew narrative, “It’s imaginary, goyim, trust me.”

“Race” is a historically contingent and subjective category that is used to justify violence against minority groups. I specifically wrote about American Jews because their experiences—which are incredibly diverse and varied—show the hypocrisies and limits of these racial categories. Looking at the historical experiences of this one particular group, and the present-day tensions its faces, is a means of critiquing the way “whiteness” is used to delineate who is and isn’t considered powerful and valuable in society.

A lot of people seem to feel strongly that talking about Jews in terms of race—even to challenge the notion that Jews could ever fit neatly into a single racial category, which is what my article is about—is thought-provoking or, at worst, dangerous.

Here’s what I’d say to these objections: Racial categories exist in American society. Everyone—including and especially Jews, a group that is arguably constructed not just around religious identity, but also ethnicity—has to grapple with their relationship to those racial categories. As I argue in the piece, racial categories are flawed, socially constructed, and ultimately premised on control and power. But ignoring questions about race is not a way of bringing about racial justice or overturning white supremacy. It’s a way of stifling understanding, debate, and awareness.

Many jews realize they can’t talk about race without contradicting themselves, so they try to forbid the subject to everyone. Many others instead embrace the sort of weaponized racial double-talk Green uses in her second article – an overtly anti-White narrative about “white supremacy” and “control and power”, constructed by jews inside universities and broadcast to the masses by their corporate media. Both of Green’s narratives hammer home the same point. Jews aren’t White, they’re anti-White.

Then there are some jews who speak relatively plainly about jew identity and their historic racial animus toward Whites, like Micha Danzig, an Israeli soldier and NYPD cop. Anti-Semitism in America is Nothing New. Don’t Deny Jewish History and Culture by Calling Us “White”:

Ruiz-Grossman also apparently believes that Jews in America have been hiding behind their “skin privilege” instead of being at the forefront of the civil rights movement. Perhaps Ruiz-Grossman never learned that Henry Moskowitz, an Ashkenazi Jew, was one of the founders of the NAACP in 1909, and that many, if not most, of the civil rights attorneys fighting for racial equality in the South in the 1950’s and 1960’s were Jewish. Maybe she never learned that half of the famous volunteer “freedom riders” in the early 1960’s were Jewish, or that it was the murder by the KKK of three such freedom riders, two Jews, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, along with an African-American, James Chaney, that helped galvanize the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

As if ignoring Jewish history in America is not enough, Ruiz-Grossman also disregards her own Jewish identity and Jewish history by characterizing herself and presumably all (Ashkenazi) Jews as “white.”

This is wrong and offensive. Anyone that understands Jewish history as well as the history of the entire development of the idea or construct of the “white race” should understand how that no Jew, Ashkenazi or otherwise, is “white.”

Ashkenazi Jews have been the victims of European and Western oppression and violence for centuries precisely because they were perceived as not being a part of the “white” world, beginning with the Roman colonialism of Judea and continuing through the 20th Century with arguably the worst genocide in history based on racial classification, the murder of more than 6 million, primarily Ashkenazi Jews, precisely because they were non-whites. The characterization of Jews as now somehow “white” and beneficiaries of “white privilege” is one of the main fallacies behind the relatively recent identification of some self-identified progressives with the demonization of Israel, a hateful cause to wipe off the map the world’s only Jewish state and to once again destroy the indigenous homeland of the Jewish people.

This is not merely a semantic issue. Jews are not “white.” We are a tribal people from the Levant. Many of our people were forcibly exiled out of and into other nations, including in Europe, where we were taken in chains and often subjected to brutal and oppressive institutional racism based on our ethnicity, tribal affiliation, culture and faith. For thousands of years, including nearly 2000 years where the majority of the Jewish people lived without the protection or comfort of having a Jewish homeland, we still maintained our indigenous culture, passing on from generation to generation our traditions, our language, and our sacred texts, all of which are entirely based on our indigenous tribal faith and affiliation. To call us “white,” when the notion of a “white” race was created by indigenous Europeans as a basis for supporting the “White Man’s Burden” and European imperialism, which certainly persecuted and oppressed Jews, in addition to numerous other non-Europeans, is a gross travesty and distortion.

No one that wants to end anti-Semitism and to fight against bigotry and racism should be claiming that Jews are “white.” People who try to depict or describe Jews as “white” are (albeit likely unintentionally) nullifying Jewish history and identity, and they are (again albeit likely unintentionally) essentially supporting Western imperialism, or at least it’s cultural imperialism, by imposing an artificial European creation (of a “White people”) on Jews — who regardless of our shade or whether we are Ashkenazi, Sephardic, or Mizrahi — are genetic brothers and sisters who have more in common genetically with each other than with most ethnic Europeans or “whites.”

Read that last paragraph again. Same anti-White jew narrative, yet another form. This is the ordinary jew-sixpack’s take on the weaponized double-talk produced by more subtle, polished jews, though his point about genetics is something none of them would be foolish enough to mention.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light