Just in advance of election day in Britain both the political and media wings of the anti-White regime have pulled out all the stops in their reality-inverting propaganda. Discarding their masks as sober statesmen and unbiased journalists, as well as their usual lip-service in support of democracy, they are shamelessly, hypocritically resorting to the most extreme and prejudicial language to gin up fear and loathing against those they accuse and condemn for doing the same.
They’re projecting their own guilty minds of course. The difference between the BNP and the anti-White bastards in control is that the BNP don’t currently control anything. It is the anti-White anti-BNP forces who have made all the failing policies and who control and censor all the established megaphones with iron fist.
The thrust of the anti-BNP propaganda campaign is that voters should fear what the BNP might be and might do, even though much of the scare-mongering is fabricated from whole cloth. Repeated often enough they hope their snide smears will make White voters forget what they can see with their own eyes: the imported anti-White hate and violence wreaking havoc all around them, and the traitorous leaders who brought it, rejoice in it, and have themselves attacked native Britons in order to defend it.
If any part of what I’m writing seems like an exaggeration, review for yourself the media’s own product.
Go to the polls to fight BNP hate, The Guardian, 2 June 2009:
We love Britain precisely because of its tolerance and diversity. The British National party and its allies are a threat to everything that makes us proud of this country we love. The BNP is working hard to conceal its extremism because it knows that people in Britain totally reject the politics of racism and hatred.
This statement, signed by Prime Minister Gordon Brown, amounts to: “We love aliens more than we love native Britons, it is the aliens who make Britain great.” With native leaders like this, who needs alien enemies?
Voters urged not to support BNP in poll, Alex Forsyth, Portsmouth Today, 2 June 2009:
Fears have been raised that the far-right party could win seats on Hampshire and West Sussex county councils because voters have lost faith in mainstream parties.
Fears are being raised alright. By the media. Only in far-wacko minds is the simple act of voting your interests considered “far-right”.
Europe braces for extremist gains in elections, Paisley Dodds, The Associated Press, 2 June 2009:
In some of Manchester’s bleakest neighborhoods where unemployment is rife and anxiety about an immigration influx is palpable, one of Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s worst fears is unfolding before Thursday’s European Union elections.
The British National Party, which doesn’t allow nonwhites as members and is against membership in the European Union, is gaining ground in former Labour Party strongholds that once threw their support behind Brown and his predecessor, Tony Blair.
More rhetoric of fear.
Most anti-BNP articles won’t even admit that reaction to the regime’s support for genocidal immigration is a well-spring of support for the BNP. This article does but inverts reality, painting opposition to genocide as “extremist”. The suggestion is that the BNP incites racial hatred, though the reality is that mass immigration bringing in other races is the more proximate cause.
Shameful day if BNP wins seat, says David Miliband, James Kirkup, Telegraph, 3 June 2009:
Mr Miliband, whose Jewish father fled Belgium before the Nazi invasion, added: “This is the country that flew the flag of freedom against fascism in the 1940s.
“It will be a day of shame if we send fascists to the European Parliament.”
David Miliband has no ground on which to stand. He should be ashamed for trying to shame native Britons for voting their own interests in their own homeland. He should bugger off to Belgium, or better, to israel, if he doesn’t like that the British people today still wish to defend their homeland from being overrun by outsiders as their forefathers did. That was, after all what the Battle of Britain and the larger carnage of World War II was about, wasn’t it? Or was it all, then and now, really about doing what’s best for jews? Miliband’s idea of shame assumes the latter.
Why you should not vote for the BNP, Kevin Maguire, mirror.co.uk, 3 June 2009:
The extremist BNP are thick, as well as nasty, thugs.
Please don’t be conned into voting for this vile, racist, incompetent mob tomorrow.
This is a prime specimen of the kind of pure hypocrisy published by major media outlets. Though it is an opinion/editorial rather than “journalism”, it’s easy to see how the one colors the other. No major media outlet would publish a similarly worded piece about any other political party, never mind anything like the continuous stream of vile, nasty, thuggish “opinion” aimed at smearing the BNP.
BNP bigots are racist AND sexist, Fiona Phillips, mirror.co.uk, 2 June 2009:
As a Briton, enjoying our rich and diverse country. As a mother, wondering what future my children will grow up in.
And as a woman, because the BNP isn’t just a racist, homophobic, xenophobic party, it’s a sexist party too. Whatever they pretend, they just aren’t a normal party.
And don’t forget, they beat their spouses, molest children, lay about, and drink blood too! The media really knows no bounds when it comes to smearing anyone who stands up for White interests.
Even if any of the trash talk is true, the BNP’s saving grace is that they aren’t guilty of genocide. They don’t want Britain flooded with surly hostile aliens. They’re against that. So if it’s really all about your children then stopping the genocide should be your first priority. If you favor the aliens, well then be honest, for you it’s really all about their children, isn’t it?
Racist campaigning for BNP, Chris Osuh, Manchester Evening News, 2 June 2009:
A CONVICTED racist is boasting about his leading role in the British National Party’s campaign to win votes in this week’s European elections.
Roy West, from Dukinfield, pleaded guilty to racial harassment at Tameside Magistrates’ Court in February after telling his German next-door neighbour to ‘go back to Krautland and kill some more Jews.’
Astounding. The media normally (see Miliband’s comment above) see self-righteous speech that puts jews on a pedestal as virtuous, but here they’ve managed here to turn it into racist hate. It’s amazing to see the kind of contradictions created when all pretense at being consistent is discarded, except the rock solid consistent hatred for Whites standing up for their interests.
How BNP tries to hide its racist core, Harry Underwood, The First Post, 2 June 2009:
The BNP claims to have modernised, but its championing of British jobs for British people cannot hide its insistence that its members are white
Hide? The BNP is quite open about who they represent. You’ll find it in their Mission Statement:
The British National Party exists to secure a future for the indigenous peoples of these islands in the North Atlantic which have been our homeland for millennia.
We use the term indigenous to describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the historic migrations from mainland Europe.
It’s the first thing anyone who’s at all curious about the BNP find out. Logically a party so organized would restrict membership to the very people it purports to represent. It is not morally or ethically wrong, nor is it hidden.
Accusations otherwise are the projections of people who hide their hatred for Whites behind a false love of aliens.
Denial is opening the door to the extremists, Alice Miles, Times Online, 3 June 2009:
These were not skinhead thugs that I met on Monday. We should not stand, fingers in ears, pretending that such views do not exist on some of the ordinary housing estates of Britain.
Some anti-BNP articles are more subtle, being aimed at the regime’s thought-leaders rather than voters. This one admits the “hate” rhetoric isn’t working, arguing against pretense that it is, while pretending that the regime has simply not been listening. The reality is that the regime has been actively squelching and pathologizing any and all dissent to their genocidal policies on immigration and “diversity”.
The regime is far more likely to continue its denial, to the point of denying legitimacy to the BNP by outlawing opposition to immigration. To accept opposition to immigration would be a dangerous step toward admitting past wrong-doing. To do that, when the wrong-doing is genocide, would be suicidal, and the regime knows it. Those at the top are not in any way noble enough to stand down now.
BNP eyes ‘seismic’ breakthrough, BBC News, 2 June 2009:
The BNP was on course to win a seat in the North West, [Spokesman Simon Darby] said, and attract up to 12% of the vote in some regions.
Mr Darby said BNP candidates attracted unparalleled hostility from the media, campaigners, celebrities and other political parties – who accuse it of being racist and divisive – but said the election of a BNP MEP would “change the rules of the game”.
Native Britons on the fence should clearly see who their enemy is by comparing the hysterical anti-BNP smears and slander passed off by the media as news and opinon with the language used and positions taken by The British National Party itself.
Here are the anti-BNP headlines above gathered together to better illustrate the poison the media is trying to place in every readers’ mind:
Go to the polls to fight BNP hate
Voters urged not to support BNP in poll
Europe braces for extremist gains in elections
Shameful day if BNP wins seat, says David Miliband
Why you should not vote for the BNP
BNP bigots are racist AND sexist
Racist campaigning for BNP
How BNP tries to hide its racist core
Denial is opening the door to the extremists
I suppose it’s pretty simple.
Left-wingers are all would-be Lenins, who hate the well-off because they’re well-off, and hate the “working class”, because they want to work and not storm the palace in line with the fantasies of these socially defective people.
Mr. Griffin BNP provides the following
Source to suggest the jewish conspiracy is either not worth focusing on or mere myth. I cant say I came away with that conclusion.
“Roy West, from Dukinfield, pleaded guilty to racial harassment at Tameside Magistrates’ Court in February after telling his German next-door neighbour to ‘go back to Krautland and kill some more Jews.”
Huh… was that anti-German or anti-Jew… both?
Griffin writes:
We are against overseas military adventures generally (though sending an SAS platoon to arrest and hang Robert Mugabe, and halt the persecution and extermination of the last white Rhodesians would be the exception to prove the rule.
He’s got my support.
The Regime is going to be in a real pickle when the Orwellian NewSpeak of ‘racism’, ‘hate’, ‘denial’ no longer works!
Apparently because of the gains of the BNP those in Britain are rapidly reaching that point!!!
Thanks to the internet and blogs the lid is being lifted off of Leftist Media Control (the hypocrisy of ‘journalists’ who spout off about democracy and then condemn a Party in an election is duly noted!) and people are actually utilizing Critical Thinking (the horror!) and coming to conclusions that differ from the multi-racial Establishment.
Discarding their masks as sober statesmen and unbiased journalists, as well as their usual lip-service in support of democracy, they are shamelessly, hypocritically resorting to the most extreme and prejudicial language to gin up fear and loathing against those they accuse and condemn for doing the same...
It worked so well for The Kenyan, they figure why not try it again…and again…and again. It will get worse and more blatant over time. When this is finally over…and it will be. We need to remember what the appropriate punishment for treason is.
The following link and quote come from a comment by Guessedworker at Majority Rights – And the winner is …
The Board of Deputies of British Jews – BOARD LAUNCHES 1000 GRASSROOTS CAMPAIGNS AGAINST THE BNP:
On Sunday March 15th, members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews stood together against racism and extremism to send a message to those who advocate the politics of hate.
A new campaign kit was launched to assist grassroots activities in the run up to the June European Elections, with the slogan ‘Your Voice or Theirs’. The aim is to encourage local communities and groups to unite to run local campaigning events to highlight the threat faced from the British National Party and the importance of voting for a mainstream political party.
This orwellian language is mind numbing. Sixty years of chipping away at our self-esteem and the meaning of our words leaves us in this disgusting place, with most every White convinced now that an instinctual love for our own is “racist” “hate” “extremism” while the hate these genocidal maniacs have for us and which they coldly calculate and organize to magnify is some form of “grassroots” “anti-racist” “tolerance”.
Obviously the BNP and its supporters are fueled by a love for Britons and the Britain they created. They want to put the Great in Britain again, for it to be as it was not so long ago – clean, peaceful, and populated by the descendents of those who fought and toiled to build it. If no aliens were threatening them there would be no BNP. Neither the BNP nor its messages incite racial hatred. Immigration incites racial hatred.
Those who oppose the BNP, which include not only this prominent board of jews but also those who rule the government, own and edit the media, and lead the clergy, are the ones filled with race-based hate. They must hate native Britons to want them displaced and dispossessed by aliens. That is the inevitable result of their enthusiastic support for immigration and the official policy of “diversity”, which disfavors native Whites and favors alien non-Whites. It makes them complicit in genocide.
This slogan “Your Voice or Theirs” is obscene, as jews in particular have agitated long and hard across the West for totalitarian restrictions on speech. Protecting themselves from criticism is all that matters, regardless of what harm that causes Whites or how it violates our traditional values. They would like nothing better than to silence the BNP and disenfranchise its supporters. They want only their own voices to be heard and their own votes to be counted.
The balance is ridiculously lopsided already. Look again at the noxious media messages cited in this blog post. They represent only the tip of an iceberg of hate and fear projected freely and continually from their mouths and fingers, subsidized and amplified by the blood money reaped from selling out Britain.
These greedy selfish hypocrites and their allies have no grounds to moralize about anything, much less “threats” or “hate”. They’re the ones full of hate. They and the violent aliens they’ve imported threaten the very existence of Britain and its native people.
“The truth was inescapable. In not one single case could I find any prominent, powerful and influential Jewish personage who identified himself or herself with any cause complementary to the interests of the British Nation. . . .
“Quite the contrary, every cause inimical to these things seemed to have Jewish participation and backing. Looking back to the political arguments I had had earlier, it now occurred to me, as it had not done at the time, that the most vociferous and aggressive opponents of all I believed in had been Jews.”
-John Tyndall
http://www.toqonline.com/2009/05/tyndall-on-the-jewish-question/
Thanks for that link to John Tyndall on the Jewish Question. Five years old it’s still timely and relevant. Tyndall relates the following story about BNP rallies ten years ago:
We experienced great difficulty in obtaining premises for the event until one was eventually acquired in the West Midlands. A year previously we had run up against the same problem when a hotel booking in Shepperton, Middlesex, had been canceled at the last moment as a result of threatening telephone calls to the management. In reply to our inquiries about these threats, a management representative had admitted that they had come from “a Jewish organization.” Now, for the 1998 rally, we had booked a large room at the Moat House Hotel in Northampton. Shortly afterwards, this booking was terminated. The manager told us quite openly on the telephone that the cause of the termination was a telephone call threatening demonstrations which he had received from the “Jewish Board of Deputies” (customary shorthand for the Board of Deputies of British Jews).
Organized jewish efforts to hinder and harrass native Britons peacefully and democratically pursuing their own interests. Some things never change.
In White Guilt, Catholic Guilt, Jewish Guilt, Sailer makes the point:
In other words, in the classic example of Jewish guilt, Portnoy’s Complaint, Jewish guilt is the opposite of white guilt: Portnoy’s feelings of Jewish guilt stem not from his ancestors being too ethnocentric (as in “white guilt”) but from himself not being ethnocentric enough to please his ancestors. His parents make him feel guilty because he’s individualistically ignoring his racial duty to settle down and propagate the Jewish race.
Such is the rank hypocrisy of David Miliband, the Board of Deputies of British Jews, and every other jew who attack the BNP, smearing them and their supporters as “racists” and “supremacists”. If they oppose “racists” and “supremacists” they can find plenty among their own kind in their own “racist” country: YouTube – Feeling the Hate In Jerusalem on Eve of Obama’s Cairo Address.
What is the deal with Sailer on the JQ overall?
I wonder if a BNP state would make it easier for white American men to come to Britain and bang your bosomy dishwaster-blond women. Otherwise I want no part of such a hateful, misogynistic, blood-thirsty, bigoted party of lunatic thugs.
“bang your bosomy dishwaster-blond women“
A purient-minded cousin of Philip Roth I presume.
“I want no part of such a hateful, misogynistic, blood-thirsty, bigoted party of lunatic thugs.“
And a self-righteous hypocrite to boot. What a surprise.
“What is the deal with Sailer on the JQ overall?“
Sailer’s father is jewish.
Even so he has focused attention on things banned from the mainstream, including things most jews would rather not become more widely known to non-jews (like Roth’s animus or Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together). He provides a fairly open forum and passes at least some comments critical of jewish malfeasance, though it helps if those comments are intelligent and made in response to some blatant attempt to transfer guilt to Whites.
“Sailer’s father is jewish.”
Isn’t Steve adopted? His birth or adopted father?
How is this known for sure?
Sailer’s adopted father is Swiss-German Catholic, a retired engineer in fact. Sailer doesn’t know who his birth father is, but it is believed that his birth father was Jewish and his birth mother Catholic, thus his adoption by a Catholic couple.
It was irresponsible for me to say that so definitively. Frankly I don’t remember where I got the impression. It might have been Auster, but I really don’t feel like searching.
I found the energy to search and found nothing.
Oddly enough the top google result for “steve sailer adopted” is this blog.
In Multilingualism and Democracy: The Swiss Exception he writes:
“the Sailers are Swiss German Catholics”
There was a comment on Happy 92nd birthday to my dad asking if he was adopted. I didn’t see an answer.
Sailer has said that he’s adopted, and that one of his biological parents was “probably Jewish”. It seems like a topic he doesn’t want to pursue. I remember he said that his adopted parents were slightly anti-Semitic.
He writes a bit about it here:
As an adopted child myself, I found it beneficial to look like my (adoptive) parents. We didn’t hesitate to tell anybody we liked that I was adopted. But the fact that strangers just assumed I was the biological child of my parents saved me from pestering.
More: Sailer is quoted here elaborating on his Jewishness:
For an extreme example of how pro-Semitism can come about within an individual merely through genes alone, consider me. Although I’m Catholic, I became very pro-Semitic at the age of 13 when my powers of logic kicked in(and my hair turned curly). I quickly noticed that a high percentage of the thinkers I either agreed with (e.g., Milton Friedman) or whom I considered it a worthy challenge to argue against were Jewish. Since I was adopted, a few years later I concluded that it was likely that I was half-Jewish biologically, (which indeed appears to be the case based on evidence my wife dug up when I was 30). It’s important to understand the chain of causation: having a very Jewish-style brain (e.g., enjoying logical argument), I sought out the best logical arguers to read, very many of whom were Jewish. (You may object that my political views today don’t sound much like those of the majority of American Jews, but I was enormously influenced by Jewish neoconservatives in the 1970s and 1980s. Having gone to some lengths to expose myself to Jewish thinkers (not because they were Jewish per se, but because those who most stimulated my kind of mind more than writers from other ethnic groups), I absorbed from them a lot of typically Jewish political stances: e.g., pro-Israel and pro-immigration.
Now, my pro-Semitism came about even though I was being raised in my (adoptive) family, which has no Jewish relatives, and, in fact, has a slight anti-Semitic mindset. (I realize my case is only a single data point, so I recommend somebody conduct a formal adoption study of Jews and part-Jews adopted by gentile families.) In the future, however, most children of the IQ elite will have Jews in their extended relatives, which will make my kind of pro-Semitism even more widespread in the future.
Interesting, if a bit vague research, guys. It still seems more speculative than definitive regarding Steve’s potential Jewishness, even according to him.
Either way, Steve E. Sailer is a fine man, who permits a great and open discussion on his blog, even about the ‘JQ’! Wish I could say the same for many other White male bloggers and commentators.
“G-d’ bless him!!!
That last quote from Anon is particularly interesting.
Whether or not Sailer’s biological dad was jewish, between his wife’s research and his own recognition of characteristically jewish patterns of thought he concludes that he is.
How the BBC handled the BNP on the airwaves this morning according to guardian.co.uk:
With the BNP getting two members elected to the European parliament and broadcasters committed to “comprehensive, authoritative and impartial coverage” (BBC producer guidelines) we’ll hear more from Griffin and his ilk.
Such is the media’s hypocrisy. They shamelessly scaremonger, implying that native Britons voting their own interests is entirely different than any other group or race doing the same (which it is, because they celebrate them), mainly because it will lead inevitably to conflagration (which they seem very keen to incite), and all of which is to blame entirely on the “racists” (Whites only of course).
One of the common scare tactics is to imply that the BNP are out to turn society upside down, changing all the rules and oppressing everyone who isn’t White. This it seems is just more projection, reflecting the very jewish desire for constant change and their need to harass Whites. In this article the author is clearly unhappy that almost a million Britons voted BNP, despite the media’s anti-BNP hyperbole and hysterics, and he’s unhappy that the rules haven’t yet been changed to more completely silence (the threats of violence and loss of employment not being enough) even the “racists” and “nazis” who dutifully follow the rules to get elected.
“Whether or not Sailer’s biological dad was jewish, between his wife’s research and his own recognition of characteristically jewish patterns of thought he concludes that he is.”
This argumentum seems more in line with a recognition of who runs the establishment in the US of A rather than being based on any meaningful evidence. I mean c’mon, ‘jews’ are ‘logical thinkers’—ha ha ha ha ha! They are tribal sophists to the marrow of their bones, something the very logical Sailer is the polar opposite of.
This may shed some light on the issue:
“As Sunic points out, in both Europe and America, White attitudes towards Jews have come to be defined in modern times by mendacity and intellectual servility. Faced with a political, academic, and media establishment —the current masters of discourse — configured around a colossal concentration of Jewish power, Whites have not only trained themselves to avoid Jewish wrath by keeping any critical opinions about Jews to themselves, but they have also learnt to curry Jewish favor by flaunting their admiration for Jewish superiority and achievement, by piously demonstrating their conformity to Semitically-correct cognitive structures, and by loudly championing Jewish causes — even when these run directly counter to White interests.”
Alex Kurtagic – “I am Not Racist, but…”
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/
Anyway, this was more the older Sailer, when he was, or was trying to be, more ‘mainstream’–he really seems to have come a long way since then. And I agree with Herr Kronprinz, Steve is a fundamentally good and decent man and human being, then and now.
Guys,
What is the lowdown, the ‘brass tacks’–if you will, with “Guy ‘White”?
Talk about servility and currying favor… Oy!
There is a lengthy comment containing my opinion of Guy White vis-a-vis Auster and Jobling in Fruitloopable Presumption. I have no idea about his personal details.
This is in honour of Nick Griffen and the BNP–and other nationalist parties among our Northern European bretheren winning significant ground in the EU elections!:
Some talk of Alexander
and some of Hercules
Of Hector and Lysander
and such great names as these.
But of all the world’s great heroes,
there’s none that can compare.
With a tow, row, row, row, row, row,
to the British Grenadiers.
Those heroes of antiquity
ne’er saw a cannon ball,
Or knew the force of powder
to slay their foes withal.
But our brave boys do know it,
and banish all their fears,
Sing tow, row, row, row, row, row,
for the British Grenadiers.
Whene’er we are commanded
to storm the palisades,
Our leaders march with fusees,
and we with hand grenades.
We throw them from the glacis,
about the enemies’ ears.
Sing tow, row, row, row, row, row,
the British Grenadiers.
And when the siege is over,
we to the town repair.
The townsmen cry,
“Hurrah, boys, here comes a Grenadier!
Here come the Grenadiers,
my boys,
who know no doubts or fears!
Then sing tow, row, row, row, row, row,
the British Grenadiers.
Then let us fill a bumper,
and drink a health to those
Who carry caps and pouches,
and wear the loupèd clothes.
May they and their commanders
live happy all their years.
With a tow, row, row, row, row, row,
for the British Grenadiers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=7…feature=related
Full Version – http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=n…feature=related
~
Have No Fear
Be of Good Cheer
The {Anglo-Teutonic} Grenadiers.
Corrected links for “The British Grenadiers”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7x0aE14YoAc&feature=related
Full Version (Traditional) – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTJfKrT-ddE&feature=related
~
Without brave, gallent men such as these, Britain and Europa would never have achieved the greatness and dominance it did, and those cosmopolitan ninnies passing as ‘English’men’ and ‘Euro-peons’ today would not have anything, since parasites need a host to leech off of!
Thank you for your ceaseless efforts Mr. Griffen, and our other Anglo-Saxon bretheren in continental Europe, like Belgium and Holland. Your courageous tenacity over all the years has/is beginning to really pay off!
Like the song says – “May they and their commanders
live happy all their years”…!
Domino Gloria!
James Edwards: Jews want BNP outlawed:
If you can’t beat ‘em, ban ‘em. That’s the philosophy of Jews in Europe, (just like Jews in America) who are calling for European governments to use laws against “racism” and “intolerance” to ban groups like the BNP.
—If you can’t beat ‘em, ban ‘em. That’s the philosophy of Jews in Europe, (just like Jews in America) who are calling for European governments to use laws against “racism” and “intolerance” to ban groups like the BNP.—
*
‘But our brave boys do know it,
and banish all their fears…,’
Right on, Herr Angel-Sachsen, mein Teutonischer bruder!
Guy “White” is a Soviet-loving, Zionist provacateur mole! The vermin has the chutzpah to–believe it or not, mendaciously claim that a soviet jew commissar was fighting in stalin’s army ‘on behalf of Whites’:-(!
http://guywhite.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/hitler-as-a-white-nationalist/
He is an absolutely psychotic, anti-German (not merely ‘anti-Nazi’) vermin, and any self-respecting White person who belives what his and his sock puppet ‘friends’ say should be ashamed of themselves.
This ‘guy’ is pure cancer, an infectious disease, with his jew-fawning. All you get by visiting his site is a zionist viral meme.
He should be quarantined as such, and avoided if one does not want to come down with his sickness of servile supplication!!!
=
“As Sunic points out, in both Europe and America, White attitudes towards Jews have come to be defined in modern times by mendacity and intellectual servility. Faced with a political, academic, and media establishment —the current masters of discourse — configured around a colossal concentration of Jewish power, Whites have not only trained themselves to avoid Jewish wrath by keeping any critical opinions about Jews to themselves, but they have also learnt to curry Jewish favor by flaunting their admiration for Jewish superiority and achievement, by piously demonstrating their conformity to Semitically-correct cognitive structures, and by loudly championing Jewish causes — even when these run directly counter to White interests.”
Alex Kurtagic – “I am Not Racist, but…”
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/
“Guy” “White” – I womder if he is even a ‘guy’, ’cause he certainly isn’t ‘White’!
This not the same ‘Truth’ who frequents Steve Sailer’s place is it?
Somehow I think not.
“This not the same ‘Truth’ who frequents Steve Sailer’s place is it?”
Noooooooooooooo!
The other guy is a smart-aleck :-)!
Didnt think so!
Hmm, the MSM didn’t do so well even with 24/7 propaganda. Perhaps because their foaming-at-the-mouth white-genocidal lunacy was made obvious with such obsessive, psychotic raving as they indulged in.
I suppose the masses of asses are realizing, though dimly, that the media and the jews in general are not people we should be listening to under any circumstances. It’s about freaking time, people!
Tan,
What is the deal with this guy ‘Appollonian’?
He has started his ranting over at VA’s site and is leaving lengthy dissertations as ‘comments’ — disrupting the conversation there…
Provacateur or just selfish fool?
Provacateur or just selfish fool?
I think more likely the former.
*9-1-1 to TANSTAAFL*
http://www.haloscan.com/comments/vanam/178023254629602902/
Corrected links to above:
http://tinyurl.com/lwfzjy
http://tinyurl.com/kpu5wq
In a comment on When do we get back to 1983? Desmond Jones quotes the following from the wikipedia page for Margaret Thatcher:
In an interview in January 1978, Thatcher remarked, “people are really rather afraid that this country might be rather swamped by people with a different culture”.[40] Critics regarded the comment as a veiled reference to people of colour, thus pandering to xenophobia and reactionary sentiment. She received 10,000 letters thanking her for raising the subject and the Conservatives gained a lead against Labour in the opinion polls; both parties were at 43% before Thatcher’s interview, but the Conservatives took a 48% to 39% lead over Labour immediately after.
He provides a link to a transcript of that Thatcher interview, which includes the following exchange:
Thatcher
Well now, look, let us try and start with a few figures as far as we know them, and I am the first to admit it is not easy to get clear figures from the Home Office about immigration, but there was a committee which looked at it and said that if we went on as we are then by the end of the century there would be four million people of the new Commonwealth or Pakistan here. Now, that is an awful lot and I think it means that people are really rather afraid that this country might be rather swamped by people with a different culture and, you know, the British character has done so much for democracy, for law and done so much throughout the world that if there is any fear that it might be swamped people are going to react and be rather hostile to those coming in.
So, if you want good race relations, you have got to allay peoples’ fears on numbers.
. . .
Burns
But if 45 to 50,000 per year is too many, what figure is acceptable?
Thatcher
Well, it must be very much less but you cannot decide the figure until you know those who at present have a right to come in.
Our treasonous leaders have known for decades that the people whose interests they are supposed to represent and protect have been opposed to immigration. They have deliberately and continuously betrayed us, saying what they knew we were starved to hear in order to get votes, then helping expand immigration rather than stopping or reversing it.
This is just one more very solid example.
This comment has been removed by the author.
This comment has been removed by the author.
In the last couple of years I’ve pretty much lost my inculcated faith in democracy.
It seems to be a system (in the US, UK, etc) where powerful corporate, elite, foreign (800 billion dollar/year trade deficit, K-street, corrupt academics and think tanks), leftist and Jewish interests use the full power of our “civil society”, including the mainstream media, culture production (Hollywood, BBC, etc), education, etc., to brainwash the general public into choosing between Kang or Kodos. Either way the elites always win and increase their stranglehold on power and enervate what remains of our traditional nation, culture and rights.
Do people think the claims of Alex Jones or Gerald Celente (youtube these guys if you haven’t heard them) are plausible or (deluded) conspiracy theory?
Alex Jones like David Icke hypes and euphemizes, and they do so to such an extent as to cause confusion and bring discredit to the very things they claim to be concerned about.
They also seem more motivated by their own short-term fame and fortune than any long-term collective White interest.
Based on his wikipedia bio the same criticism would appear to apply to Celente.
“Alex Jones like David Icke hypes and euphemizes, and they do so to such an extent as to cause confusion and bring discredit to the very things they claim to be concerned about.”
Tan the Man coming through again!
These ridiculous geezers are narcissistic egomaniacs to the marrow of their bones, acting like what they say they actually did the homework and research on, the ‘gruntwork’–when they didn’t.
They are largely just showboating self-promoters, who, with full complicity of the controlled press here (media and alternative) are doing their job of ‘making things safe’ for a particular group of people within White patriotic circles by taking the spotlight off of ’em (wink wink).
“In the last couple of years I’ve pretty much lost my inculcated faith in democracy.”
Good! Excellent! Delighted to hear it!
The Founding Fathers HATED democracy. Said, it’s mob rule. It’s 2 wolves and a sheep voting on lunch.
They set America up to be a Constitutional, representative, Republic form of gov’t, NOT a democracy. The individual is sovereign. Gov’t is limited.
A republic is, the sheep has a gun.
And the purpose of having indirectly elected senators was to make it TOO expensive for the really-rich to buy them off.
Ben Franklin advocated a specific clause in the Constitution barring jews from entering, lest they, within 200 years, own it all.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/repute.htm
Bill will ban ‘white-only’ BNP (via Vanishing American).
BNP ordered to accept ethnic minority members or face prosecution – Telegraph:
The British National Party has been ordered to accept members from ethnic minorities and employ black and Asian staff or face prosecution.
In a letter from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Nick Griffin, the BNP leader, was told that he had less than a month to provide written undertakings that the party would abide by race relations legislation.
John Wadham, legal director of the Commission, said that the watchdog was concerned that the BNP’s constitution and membership criteria could be in breach of the law.
Party membership was said by the Commission to be restricted to those with white skin and a small number of other ethnic groups.
In a statement, the watchdog added: “This exclusion is contrary to the Race Relations Act which the party is legally obliged to comply with. The Commission therefore thinks that the BNP may have acted, and be acting, illegally.“
Are we to believe that the same regime which asserts “diversity is strength” and hates the BNP with a passion really intends to strengthen the BNP? On the contrary this move by the regime proves that diversity is not good, or even harmless, but is in fact a weapon, a way of aggressing against “those with white skin”.
If the BNP violates “race relations legislation” then surely so do the social, political, and business organizations of non-Whites. Are they hounded by “watchdogs” to diversify their membership? Why not?
“Knife crime” is a black thing. Gang rape is an asian thing. Legal assault is a jewish thing.
In The don’t ask, don’t tell approach to immigration is what has given the BNP an opportunity, Fraser Nelson says so what if the economic justification for immigration is a lie? What’s really important is that treasonous elite recognize that trouble is brewing.
As usual for such op-eds the reader comments are also interesting.
Of course there’s the fingers-in-ears immigration apologist, desperately denying:
Ivan D
June 28th, 2009 2:28pm
What’s your point? Your point can’t possibly be that the new jobs have been created for immigrants, so it must be that, ‘the new jobs that have been created have gone overwhelmingly *to* immigrants’. But this, of course, to use a technical economic term, is balls, total and utter balls. And if you understood even a fraction of basic, free market economic theory you would see that it’s precisely the new immigrants who have created the ‘new’ jobs. Hence, neither cause nor consequence but correlation.
The new immigrants created the jobs, see? This is correlation not causation, see?
Someone else calls Nelson on his bolshevist premises and the fingers-in-ears act:
Verity
June 29th, 2009 3:39am
Fraser Nelson writes: “The don’t ask, don’t tell approach to immigration is what has given the BNP an opportunity…”
Why shouldn’t they have “an opportunity”, Mr Nelson?
Who the hell are you and your trendy little cohorts to shut out opposing thoughts because you absolutely, cannot, cannot, cannot, fingers-in-ears – cannot abide their dreadful little thoughts? I mean, eeeeeeeek! The little people are too dreadful!
My favorite:
Chris Barnett
June 30th, 2009 11:48am
It’s not enough to just get my country back. New Labour and the Tories let British pensioners die while pandering for the ethnic vote.
I want the BNP in, because I want those who betrayed my country to be hung until they live no more, I want them dead, I want justice.
Understand the anger of the white working classes, we want justice, we want Blair, Brown and all the other traitors publically executed.
We will not forget, we will not forgive.