Tag Archives: anti-white

Bernie Sanders on Jewing

Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders wrote an op-ed for Jewish Currents on what jewing means to him.

Speaking for jews, to jews, Sanders jewsplains why jews are anti-White, how unlike Whites jews have a “right of self-determination”, how they serve their own interests by preaching “solidarity” and “equality” while demonizing and attacking Whites, and how this is all also a “conspiracy theory”. He then points out how jews have been doing this for centuries, screeching about “oppression” and “persecution” long before any other non-White/anti-White parasites showed up.

YouTube Bans “Hateful Supremacism”, as Defined by Jews

In late March Facebook announced an explicit ban on “White this” and “White that”, or in practical terms, any content which the Facebook/ADL/SPLC jews interpret as implying that it’s OK for Whites to be White.

Yesterday YouTube followed suit, announcing that its ban on Whites being too White was specifically in defense of jewry and their jewing. Official YouTube Blog: Our ongoing work to tackle hate:

Removing more hateful and supremacist content from YouTube

YouTube has always had rules of the road, including a longstanding policy against hate speech. In 2017, we introduced a tougher stance towards videos with supremacist content, including limiting recommendations and features like comments and the ability to share the video. This step dramatically reduced views to these videos (on average 80%). Today, we’re taking another step in our hate speech policy by specifically prohibiting videos alleging that a group is superior in order to justify discrimination, segregation or exclusion based on qualities like age, gender, race, caste, religion, sexual orientation or veteran status. This would include, for example, videos that promote or glorify Nazi ideology, which is inherently discriminatory. Finally, we will remove content denying that well-documented violent events, like the Holocaust or the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, took place.

Most of YouTube’s verbiage remains intentionally vague and generic-sounding, but at root they are discriminating and trying to segregate “holocaust” believers from “Nazi ideology” believers, promoting the former while excluding the latter.

Enabling jewing while disabling (until they can criminalize) whoever and whatever vexes jews is basically what the past several decades of “hate” rhetoric has always been about. During the Trump era the jew war on Whites has simply been transitioning from more stealthy to more overt form.

The Jew Card

Over the past few years the anti-White/pro-jew regime has been increasingly frank in expressing its sympathy for jews and antipathy for Whites. Mainstream political discourse turned a corner somewhere between Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” speech in 2016 and Facebook’s decision to specifically ban pro-White speech in 2019. So in less than three years the regime’s anti-White attitude has gone from better left unsaid to matter of course, now quickly being codified into law. And at every turn the best interests of jews as a collective are cited as justification for each statement or act taken against Whites.

It isn’t the words nationalism or supremacy which make “White nationalism” and “White supremacy” shibboleths. It’s the word White. And that’s entirely due to jewing.

A small signpost in the anti-White zeitgeist flew by less than a year ago. When the jewsmedia screeched that Darren Beattie, a minor figure in the kikeservative-in-chief’s White House, was too White, Beattie immediately lost his job. Now Beattie’s back, and there’s a telling twist in the story.

When Beattie was first fired, or quit, there was to my knowledge no denouncement from him or his conservative colleagues about the explicitly anti-White nature of the jewsmedia attack. One pitiful objection used the same line of argument as “Wagner’s music” above, claiming that The Menchken Club is not a White thing but a jew thing, or at least an alt-jew thing, founded and led by Paul Gottfried.

Since then the jewsmedia attacked Steve King in the same way, and he had the temerity to coyly wonder out loud what it was all about. King was immediately denounced by the entire regime, “left” and “right”, and even lamely joined them in officially condemning any form of White this or White that. King started out pretending he didn’t understand the jewy nature of this anti-White zeitgeist. He quickly changed his tune and let it slip that he actually did understand, and sided with the “innocent jews”, against Whites.

Beattie may be confused and create confusion in others because he’s some kind of mischling or crypto-jew. That’s a feature, not a bug. The Mencken Club, and alt-jewing generally, plays up and feeds upon such confusion. The alt-jew stands athwart mainline jewing shouting, “NOT THAT IT SHOULD MATTER!” Though insisting jews are “white” remains a popular delusion, when push comes to shove the difference between Whites and jews is getting harder to deny. Increasingly even in popular semitically correct political discourse jews are not merely distinguished from Whites, the two groups are regarded as utter political opposites.

The cognitive dissonance results from a clash of jew narratives. Putting “Whites are racist” together with “jews are white” logically produces “jews are racist”. But then that’s “anti-semitism”, which totally trumps the “racism”. You can try to pretend you don’t understand what “combating racism and anti-semitism” means. But those are the marching orders of the anti-White/pro-jew regime, and even its dimmer bulbs get the gist, that jews are good and Whites are evil. The most reasonable conclusion is that jew narratives are just lies, part of what even ordinary people recognize as “fake news”. The intent behind those lies is to create racial confusion, because jews are not White, they’re anti-White.

Confusion on this elementary point prevails throughout the portion of dar al goyim that kikeservatives and alt-jews call judeo-Christian civilization. Here in Jewmerica the anti-White/pro-jew regime is most blatant, operating under a two-party system which makes its mechanics more transparent. One party is more overtly anti-White, the other more overtly pro-jew. Thus the partisans on one side imagine that the other side is too pro-White, and the other side responds by imagining that their accusers are too anti-jew.

A perfect illustration of this totally jewed blatantly anti-White political environment occurred earlier this month, when Ilhan Omar called Stephen Miller a White nationalist. From the get go the jewsmedia has promoted this reality-inverting con, screeching as if Trump and his administration are too White. Even before Darren Beattie was sacked the mask had already slipped.

Though the jewsmedia has sometimes recognized Miller’s influence, they’ve never harped on it, much less made his racial identity the basis for their attack, as they have with King, Bannon, and Gorka. Why? The same reason they’ve given President Kushner a pass – because Miller is a jew.

It you prefer to hear it jewsplained, Eric Levitz did a perfectly toxic job. Half of it is right in the title: “If You Are Defending Stephen Miller, You Are an Ally of Anti-Semitism”. The other half was in the original title: “Ilhan Omar Is Right: Stephen Miller Is a White Nationalist”. This is the jew normal. They regard Whites as their enemy. The animus is racial. Thus they see any jew they imagine might be aiding and abetting Whites as a traitor to their tribe.

This is the point that kikeservatives and alt-jews try to dance around. Whites have a jew problem. It isn’t a new problem, and it isn’t up for debate. The jewsmedia reports on the problem all the time, they simply present it the other way around.

Jewy Anti-White Conversations Disguised as Something Else

Last night I finally pushed through and finished listening to an item I had put on TFeed in mid-February: This conversation (between two jews) will change how you understand misogyny. Several times over the past months I had stopped listening, in disgust, after only a few minutes. It is that bad. I can’t even recall why I thought it was worth putting on my feed in the first place, other than the general notion of listening in on enemy conversations.

Ezra Klein and Kate Manne talk for two hours and 15 minutes. They spend the first 50-60 minutes beating around the bush – speaking in platitudes and generalities, and in feminized academic jargon so thick that it’s hardly possible to see any point to what they’re saying. What makes it worse, especially in this first part, is how all the while they’re heaping praise on each other for their supposed bold insight and explication.

I want this hour of my life back, and I apologize for subjecting other listeners to it. If you haven’t listened yet you can skip it and lose nothing.

In the second hour the two jews loosen up and speak more plainly. At this point it becomes clear that what they are really talking about, and the cause for their mutual admiration, is not about sex or gender but about race. They share a loathing and resentment not toward men in general, but specifically toward White men for being White.

The last 15 minutes are the best. Having revealed the subtext of Manne’s book and this discussion as an extension of the broader long-running Freud/Authoritarian Personality shtick – to psychopathologize White men, to convince us to further lower our defenses – the two jews finally feel comfortable enough to confide that the driving force, their central concern, has everything to do with their jewness and their congenital anxiety about soap and lampshades.

By the by we learn Klein’s debate with tribemate Sam Harris still dogs him. That conversation was shorter and more worth listening to on the whole. Two anti-White jews, dissimulating as “white guys”, debating what take on race is best for the jews. Harris plays the “race realist”, Klein the anti-“racist”. As with Klein’s conversation with Manne, the crucial fact that both participants are jews, and hyperconscious of it, doesn’t come out until after an elaborate song and dance.

Klein’s toxic jewing first came to my attention ten years ago, during the Journolist scandal.

Jews Hunting King

anti-white_jews_attack_steve_kingIn the wake of yesterday’s midterm selections one of the top stories in the jewsmedia concerns the seething fear and loathing jews are directing at Steve King.

Steve King, dubbed America’s ‘white supremacist congressman,’ wins re-election – U.S. News – Haaretz.com:

King has been criticized by members of his own party for comments and support for candidates with white supremacist affiliations – The New York Times has dubbed him the “White Supremacist Congressman” in a recent article.

Last month, King tweeted a photo of multiple breeds of dogs, noting “all the diversity” at his annual pheasant hunt.

King has a long track record of remarks decried as racist, but the comments came under renewed scrutiny after a massacre at a Pittsburgh synagogue in late October.

. . .

During a recent trip to Europe financed by a Holocaust memorial group, King met with officials from an Austrian far-right party with ties to neo-Nazi groups after touring Holocaust sites, according to the Washington Post and other media outlets.

After the Pittsburgh shooting, King told the Washington Post he was not anti-Semitic. He also retweeted a Twitter post quoting the late Pope John Paul II saying that Jews are “dearly beloved brothers.”

White Nationalist Rep. Steve King Reelected In Iowa – The Forward:

In his interview, King also accused billionaire liberal megadonor George Soros, who is Jewish, of being behind the Great Replacement and funding the U.S. midterm elections, the Washington Post reported.

King also endorsed a white nationalist candidate for Toronto mayor who’s running to prevent “white genocide,” according to Esquire, and retweeted a British neo-Nazi.

Following the shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue late last month, some religious communities in Iowa came together to denounce King and urge donors to dump him. Two Jewish leaders said he is “an enthusiastic crusader for the same types of abhorrent beliefs held by the Pittsburgh shooter.”

Antisemitic candidate wins tight race in U.S. House – American Politics – Jerusalem Post. The text of this article is a subset of the other two. The key word, “antisemitic”, is in the title.

The gist of these jewsmedia articles is to assert a very specific racial grievance. King is being attacked for acting too White. He is being attacked by jews, who are making it clear that they are anti-White because they are jews.

King’s jew problem stretches back several years. As King increasingly saw and described himself as a defender of Western civilization, jews have become increasingly hostile toward him. In March of 2017 yids flipped their lids when King indicated that he understood Western civilization as a racial construct, and more to the point, that he saw a difference between the us responsible for constructing it and the them who can only deconstruct it.

Are Jews Part Of Steve King’s ‘Western Civilization’?“, jews mockingly-aggressively ask. They know how crucial the perception of us and them is. They know the answer to their coy question.

Unfortunately for Whites, King and similar self-described defenders of Western civilization imagine jews and their jew-first state as part of the us they seek to defend. To the extent such people think in racial terms at all they see jews as “white”. They imagine the jew-first state as an outpost of Western civilization, its greatest ally, a bulwark against the muslim them who threaten us.

In fact, when called out directly on this point King defended himself by citing his life-long support for the jew-first state. Steve King shouts down question linking his worldview to Pittsburgh shooter’s | The Times of Israel:

Iowa Republican, who has been accused of supporting white nationalism, defends himself by pointing to his support of Israel

. . .

“Do not associate me with that shooter,” King interrupted, pointing at the questioner. “I knew you were an ambusher when you walked in the room, but there is no basis for that and you get no question and no answer.”

When the questioner, speaking calmly, attempted to speak, King said loudly: “No, you’re done, we don’t play those games in Iowa. You have crossed the line. It is not tolerable to accuse me of being associated with that guy who shot 11 people in Pittsburgh. I am a person who has supported Israel since the beginning. The length of that nation is the length of my life and I’ve been with them all along, and I will not answer your question and I will not listen to another word from you.”

The jews attacking King know all about his life-long support for the jew-first state. They condemn him in spite of this support, and specifically for also supporting a future for White babies. Will the pro-Israel community separate itself from Rep. Steve King? | JNS.org:

“Faith Goldy, an excellent candidate for Toronto mayor, pro Rule of Law, pro Make Canada Safe Again, pro balanced budget, &…BEST of all, Pro Western Civilization and a fighter for our values. @FaithGoldy will not be silenced,” tweeted King, who represents his state’s 3rd congressional district.

Members of the pro-Israel community slammed King’s endorsement.

“I fervently condemn any support for despicable, racist white supremacists,” national president of the Zionist Organization of America Mort Klein told JNS. “Congressman King should retract his support of this bigot immediately.”

Professional jews, openly organizing and speaking as jews, are accusing people like King (and Goldy, Gorka, Trump) of being too White, and for that reason attack them. They despise White Western civilization.

To objective observers it might seem bizarre to see professional jews so explicitly directing such bile and vehemence at Whites for being White in our own countries, for merely wanting some semblance of what jews have in their own jew-first state on the other side of the planet. It can only seem all the more bizarre that the people jews most viciously attack have only ever professed their deference and fealty to jews and their jew-first state.

This seemingly bizarre behavior is easily understood. Just accept the nature and substance of the accusation and reverse it. The jews agree there is an us and a them – they just see jews as us and Whites as them. They realize most people mistake jews for “white”, but know they identify as jews first and foremost. You can see them dancing around this distinction whenever they try to jewsplain how they feel about “White privilege”. And you can see it whenever unapologetic supporters of an alien jew-first state brazenly condemn domestic White nationalism.