Genocidal Immigrationists

Or immigration genocidalists. Either phrase captures the meaning of the point I’m going to make here.

Several items in the news recently provide strong indications that our hostile, illegitimate rulers are preparing to once again foist amnesty and more aliens upon us. Whether they succeed or not hardly matters in the long term. The West is already brimming with aliens. Many are illegal and most are producing babies at a faster rate than the natives. Even so, legitimizing those aliens and inviting more is one of the highest priorities of our ruling class. After being rebuffed in their last treacherous attempt in the US in 2007 the housing bubble burst. Obviously then, at least to bubblists, a big part of getting the Holy Global Economy back on track is to jack up the already unprecedented migration of human herds to ever more unprecedented levels.

I wrote about one of the signs of this preparation in my last post, Now the NYT Wants to Talk About Immigration. Below are several more.

– – –

In October 2008 the Sunday Express article titled Secret plot to let 50million African workers into EU revealed:

A controversial taxpayer-funded “job centre” opened in Mali this week is just the first step towards promoting “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”.

Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe. 

The report, by the EU statistical agency Eurostat, warns that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population.

It states: “Countries with low fertility rates could require a significant number of immigrants over the coming dec­ades if they want to maintain the existing number of people of working age. 

“Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.” 

The report, by French MEP Francoise Castex, calls for immigrants to be given legal rights and access to social welfare provision such as benefits. 

Ms Castex said: “It is urgent that member states have a calm approach to immigration. To say ‘yes’, we need immigration … it is not a new development, we must accept it.”

No. We do not need immigration, we know this treachery is not new, and no we don’t have to accept it. And by “we” I mean as in “We the People”, as opposed to the royal “we” bureaucratic servants of the plutocrats are wont to use.

The proposals include the creation of a “blue card” system, based on the American green card, that provides full working and welfare rights.

Blue card holders would be entitled to move freely across the EU, setting up home in any of the 27 member states.

This is how a bait-and-switch works. First they create the EU, telling everyone what an advantage it will be for Europeans to visit each other. Then they make Africa part of the EU. Et voila, métissage EU-wide! Instead of co-opting the elected leaders of 27 countries all the immigrationists had to do was co-opt one. They may be genocidal, but they’re not stupid.

The proposals – part of the Africa-EU Partnership signed in Portugal last December – also warns of the negative effects of mass immigration and calls for “better integration of African migrants”.

It calls too for a compassionate approach to the eight million illegal immigrants already living in the EU.

It states: “Irregular migrants must not be treated like criminals. Many risk their lives seeking freedom or the means of subsistence in Europe. As long as the EU has a higher standard of living than those countries to its south and east, the temptation to come will exist – especially if there are jobs to be had.”

Eight million invaders and umpteen million guest aliens isn’t genocidal enough for the immigrationists.

If our leaders were not hostile toward us then this concern they constantly express for the well-being of “migrants”, “irregular” and otherwise, would instead be directed at least once in a while toward the natives. In the past this “there are jobs to be had” line was a dishonest way of saying “there are wages to be lowered”. Today, with jobs evaporating, it’s a dishonest way of saying “jobs, schmobs, all we care about is getting more africans into Europe”.

The declaration calls on the EU to assist African governments to set up migration information centres “to better manage labour mobility bet­ween Africa and the EU”.

One of the “negative effects of mass immigration” is that it lowers the quality of living of the natives and depresses their rate of reproduction. In consciously pursuing a policy that assists non-European “migration” and “labour mobility” the EU is perpetrating genocide on Europe’s native people.

– – –

Today in Tom Friedman disses Mexicans Steve Sailer links Friedman’s The Open-Door Bailout:

“All you need to do is grant visas to two million Indians, Chinese and Koreans,” said Shekhar Gupta, editor of The Indian Express newspaper. “We will buy up all the subprime homes. We will work 18 hours a day to pay for them. We will immediately improve your savings rate — no Indian bank today has more than 2 percent nonperforming loans because not paying your mortgage is considered shameful here. And we will start new companies to create our own jobs and jobs for more Americans.”

While his tongue was slightly in cheek, Gupta and many other Indian business people I spoke to this week were trying to make a point that sometimes non-Americans can make best: “Dear America, please remember how you got to be the wealthiest country in history. It wasn’t through protectionism, or state-owned banks or fearing free trade. No, the formula was very simple: build this really flexible, really open economy, tolerate creative destruction so dead capital is quickly redeployed to better ideas and companies, pour into it the most diverse, smart and energetic immigrants from every corner of the world and then stir and repeat, stir and repeat, stir and repeat, stir and repeat.”

How very slick of him to attribute the idea, and the backlash, to Gupta. Note however that Friedman quotes his own imagination in the second paragraph. The hooey about creative destruction and dead capital might smell less fragrant if it weren’t being spouted in the wake of a trillion dollar save-the-financiers bailout, a trillion dollar printing frenzy by the Fed, and a multi-trillion dollar save-the-financiers stimulation. And that’s in just the last six months. Imagine what kind of wage-slave-funded prizes the coming months hold for our wealthiest risk-takers.

In truth what fuels the “open economy”, and what the financiers really want, is much closer to what Gupta describes. Billions of little worker bees, working their little hearts out for the profit of rootless cosmopolitan bankers who have no scruples whatsoever about saying whatever they have to to keep the whole rotten scheme rolling. Gupta isn’t trying to sell his idea to the American public. He’s selling it to our hostile rulers. Through propaganda like Friedman’s (stir and repeat) nearly everyone is convinced that America is a big multicult corporation, and “wealth” is the only measure of what is good and right.

Friedman goes on to complain about restrictions on using bailout money to hire H-1B visa holders:

In an age when attracting the first-round intellectual draft choices from around the world is the most important competitive advantage a knowledge economy can have, why would we add barriers against such brainpower — anywhere? That’s called “Old Europe.” That’s spelled: S-T-U-P-I-D.

There’s a part of “Old Europe” these immigrationists seem very eager to reproduce across the entire West. It’s spelled: B-A-L-K-A-N-S.

The fantasy Friedman has for America already exists in San Diego. As recently as 25 years ago San Diego and it’s suburbs were populated mostly by conservative Whites with small town values. The blacks and latinos lived in enclaves. Today it’s one giant sprawl. The Whites who remain are mostly liberals who live in gated enclaves. The older communities have fractured and shrank faster than new ones could be built. Whites have been fleeing this dystopia for years but with the bubble bursting and a bankrupt government in denial the trend will accelerate. Replacing us is a tossed salad of aliens flowing in from every corner of the planet who want their piece of America.

The latinos dominate numerically, and once they’re legalized they’ll dominate politically too, as they already do in Lost Angeles. Lunch time at the food court in Sorrento Valley (home of Qualcomm and other high-tech employers) is a thoroughly multicult experience. A glimpse of what Friedman desires. It consists of predominantly latino food servers and custodians, supervised predominantly by middle easterners, serving a wide variety of foreign cuisine to a geeky clientele whose racial ratio is roughly 7-3-2-1 indians/pakis-“white”-chinese-other. By my inexpert eye a large fraction of the “whites” are related to Friedman.

“If you do this [H-1B hiring restriction], it will be one of the best things for India and one of the worst for Americans, [because] Indians will be forced to innovate at home,” said Subhash B. Dhar, a member of the executive council that runs Infosys, the well-known Indian technology company that sends Indian workers to the U.S. to support a wide range of firms. “We protected our jobs for many years and look where it got us. Do you know that for an Indian company, it is still easier to do business with a company in the U.S. than it is to do business today with another Indian state?”

Each Indian state tries to protect its little economy with its own rules. America should not be trying to copy that. “Your attitude,” said Dhar, should be “ ‘whoever can make us competitive and dominant, let’s bring them in.’ ”

This indian technocrat wants us to think he wants us to do something bad for his relatives. Hire them. Keep them from enriching india. Uh huh. Right. Remember this pitch isn’t aimed at the typical American, it’s aimed at our treacherous ruling class. “If you don’t hire us we’re going to compete with you!” That isn’t a threat, it’s a lame attempt to take American jobs without competing and to move into our nice society without having to create one of their own. They have the internet in india. They can do these “knowledge economy” jobs there. The cost of living is much cheaper. But who could blame them for not wanting to live in Mumbai? Of course they want to live in the kind of society Whites produce. Everyone does. They prove it every time they scream in our faces over the prospect that we might keep them out. The big problem for all of us is that wherever enough mexicans, indians, or chinese collect you get mexico, india, or china. Where they mix you get something like San Diego circa 2009. The weather is nice, but it’s not America.

Message to Tom Friedman, the NYT, and all the rest of you genocidal freaks: It doesn’t matter to me whether you think importing latinos, indians, chinese, or koreans is “profitable”. It’s destroying my society. I’d rather be poor, unemployed, and starving – and keep my society.

One last thing. Notice how Friedman appeals to “competitive advantage” and Dhar appeals to “competitive and dominant”. It echoes the “competition” rhetoric Obama occasionally used on the campaign trail. The weird thing about these globalists is they never explain who “us” is or who “we” are competing against. In fact most of the time they’re saying competition is a bad thing, “we” are all the same, and “we” don’t need borders.

– – –

The last item is Progress by Pesach:

Progress by Pesach is endorsed nationally by American Jewish Committee (AJC), Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B’nai B’rith International, Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA), Jewish Reconstructionist Federation (JRF), National Council of Jewish Women (NCJW), The Rabbinical Assembly, Union for Reform Judaism, and Uri l’Tzedek: The Orthodox Social Justice Movement . Progress by Pesach is endorsed locally by Am Kolel Jewish Renewal Center (Rockville/Beallsville, MD), Jewish Community Action (St. Paul, MN), Jewish Community Relations Council of Southern Arizona (Tucson, AZ), Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington (Rockville, MD), Jewish Council on Urban Affairs (Chicago, IL), Jews for Racial and Economic Justice (New York, NY), Jews United for Justice (Washington, DC), MIKLAT! A Jewish Response to Displacement (Milwaukee, WI), and the Progressive Jewish Alliance (Los Angeles, CA).

Progress by Pesach is the national Jewish campaign to encourage the new administration and congress to choose humanitarian immigration reform over the failed policy of exclusively relying on raids and enforcement tactics as a means of controlling immigration.

Passover is a time when we celebrate our freedom from bondage and remember when we were strangers in a strange land. Connecting our history to the struggles of immigrants today is the inspiration behind Progress by Pesach.

From Patrick Cleburne comes The Kvetcher: Who the hell do these Jews think they are?

Kvetcher’s post is titled Jewish Far-Leftist Boasts Goal of ‘Progress By Pesach’ is to Thwart the Will of the Majority Population! He writes:

I would love to declare that people like Rosenthal do not represent the mainstream Jewish organizations. But how can I reasonably claim that? Look at their “partners” list. These aren’t only radical and consistently shrill organizations…there are also mainstream Jewish organization that have signed on as well.

Who the hell do these Jews think they are?

Cleburne writes:

The Kvetcher’s Blog is inwardly directed to the Jewish community. In that respect, it could be very valuable. I appeal to’s unjewish friends not to intervene. The Kvetcher has his hands more than full.

No intervention here. I’d just like to echo Kvetcher’s question. I’ll take it one step farther and say I’d really like to live in an ethnostate with a big concrete wall around it. And I’d like it by Easter. Got that Obama? Short of that I’d like to encourage these oh-so-self-righteous Pesachers to choose to progress themselves over to israel and take up their important humanitarian immigration reform work there. After all, israel is a nation of immigrants. They should be looking for whoever can make them competitive and dominant. Stir and repeat, stir and repeat.

– – –

The comment I left on Sailer’s post regarding Friedman reads:

Being a world-class progressivist-globalist economist is simple. There’s only one principle to remember. It holds under all circumstances – boom, crash, or in between.

“We need more immigrants.”

Of course we need more immigrants like we need more gangs, more shortages, more diseases, more crowding, more deficits, more taxes, more slums, more distrust, and more violence.

We need immigrants like we need more houses and less farmland, woods, marsh, and wildlife. The rationale, such as it is, was described by Sailer in The circular logic of the bubble economy, 2002-2007:

Hire illegal aliens to build new houses in the exurbs for people wanting to get their kids out of school districts overwhelmed by the children of illegal aliens.

Except the circular logic didn’t stop in 2007 and it isn’t restricted to illegals. It transcends bubbles. It transcends parties. It’s hard to imagine anything that would stop it – unless enough people recognize it for what it is: a crime of monstrous proportions.

It’s difficult for that to happen because the media aids and abets the crime by downplaying its importance and pathologizing the opposition.

The crime is a pyramid scheme motivated in part by greed and in part by malice. Those who believe in limitless growth, regardless of the costs, are frauds. Those who believe in limitless immigration, regardless of the consequences and over the objections of the natives it is displacing and dispossessing, are genocidal maniacs.

9 thoughts on “Genocidal Immigrationists”

  1. You’re right that “us” just means the ruling elite and the media and academia which echoes their world-views. “Us” never includes, well, us. You and I, average people.

  2. In the UK we were told for the last decade that we need immigration – especially subcon and african – for “our economy”. What crap will they make up now it’s all gone bust?

    The rate of change in the last decade has been astonishing.

  3. Do chinese-americans recreate china?

    As far as I know they make more money than whites do.

    As for Indian americans, I Know they don’t recreate India in America. They are actually the richest demographic in America. Even richer than jews.

    Likewise, Korean americans don’t recreate North Korea in America, they simply found businesses and get rich.

    It’s obvious some groups are genetically equivalent to whites but suffer from poor cultural choices which holds them back in the mother-country, but does not when they adopt the white culture of America. These immigrants assimilate into the superior white culture rather than require we assimilate into their inferior mother countries. The only genocidal threat you could claim from them is their tendency to vote democrat, and the idea that they might some day ‘fill up America’ to the point that whites can no longer fit another person on our soil. Since everyone on earth could still fit onto the island of zanzibar, this is hardly a big worry. So long as they produce more money than it costs to upkeep them, immigrants do zero, zilch, nada harm to native whites. They don’t restrict the white birth rate, white ability to work at jobs, or anything else. For once I’d like to understand the argument about how an immigrant working inside America, making more money than he costs, somehow harms americans. Why, because he provided a valuable good or service to everyone nearby worth a lot of money? Because an inefficient white monopoly could not keep gouging its customers for high prices and poor products like GM?

    There is only one way rich productive law-abiding non-whites hurt whites, and that is by voting democrat. By voting democrat, they empower poor law-breaking non-whites who really do hurt whites. The answer is then to get them to change their voting habits, or to change democracy. As for any complaints about non-whites ‘drinking our water’ and ‘eating our crops,’ it is pure economic ignorance because before they did any of that they had to produce for us something of equal or higher value, or they couldn’t have afforded it.

    The economy really would be boosted by a bunch of intelligent hard-working non-whites coming into America, adopting our culture and capitalism, and reviving a country increasingly degenerate if left to itself. Look for instance at the UK. People continuously complain about the Polish immigrants, but did the Poles force the UK to pick up drinking and drug habits? Did the Poles force the UK to have a 50% illegitimacy rate? No, the country was forced to hire Poles because the british had rendered themselves unemployable through their own degenerate cultural choices. Substitute Sikhs for Poles, or some other high-performing immigrants, the argument would still be the same.

    The real reason to oppose immigration is we are letting in subhuman Africans, stupid muslims, stupid mexicans, and stupid southeast asians onto our shores, who then do crime, take welfare handouts, breed bundles of bastards (yes, the correct term for out-of-wedlock children!), and in general wreck everything they touch. The touchstone is not ‘are they white’? The touchstone is ‘are they stupid impoverished criminal civilization wreckers?’ If so, they shouldn’t be allowed to immigrate.

  4. Do chinese-americans recreate china?

    You’ve never been to a “chinatown”?

    The only genocidal threat you could claim from them is their tendency to vote democrat, and the idea that they might some day ‘fill up America’ to the point that whites can no longer fit another person on our soil. Since everyone on earth could still fit onto the island of zanzibar, this is hardly a big worry.

    Six billion people on zanzibar? Hell, have everybody carry someone on their shoulders and you can fit 12 billion!

    Maybe you want to live like that. I don’t. Your big worries and mine obviously don’t coincide.

  5. Drew Fraser:

    “Apart from the objective genetic interests at stake, a multiracial society forces white Australians to bear other, more subjectively painful social, economic and political costs. At the high end of Australia’s immigrant intake, a growing cognitive elite of East Asians threatens to become similar to “market-dominant minorities” such as the overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia, Jews in Russia or Indians in East Africa. [47] Faced with competition from a growing East Asian population, white Australians will find themselves outgunned: Western-style “old boy” preference networks are only weakly ethnic in character, and, thus, permeable, making them no match for the institutionally-directed, in-group solidarity or “ethnic nepotism” practiced by other groups. Endowed with an edge in IQ and a temperament conducive to rigorous regimes of coaching, rote learning and stricter parental discipline, young East Asians already dominate the competition for places in universities and professional schools. Within two to three decades, it is not unreasonable to expect that Australia will have a heavily Asian managerial-professional, ruling class that will not hesitate to promote the interests of co-ethnics at the expense of white Australians.”

    Occidental Observer

    David Duke recently summarized the issue well:

    “Most people know that most universities have programs of admittance that give less-qualified minorities preference over better-qualified Whites. Almost all of the Fortune 500 largest corporations have affirmative action and diversity programs that discriminate against White people, both male and female, in hiring. They also have programs of discrimination that favor non-Whites in promotions and advancement. This is true in the academic area as well. You can look at almost any academic department of any American university and you will see in place a strong racial bias for “minorities” in preference over Whites in hiring and advancement. Whether you are talking about a university History, English or Math department in almost any university, these policies are in place and powerful. These racial discriminatory policies are real, and they can be easily proven to exist.”

    ” Unz, himself Jewish, noted that at his alma mater, “Asians comprise between 2% and 3% of the U.S. population, but nearly 20% of Harvard undergraduates. Then too, between a quarter and a third of Harvard students identify themselves as Jewish, while Jews also represent just 2% to 3% of the overall population.” Not only was he so blunt about this, he took the step — rare in the mainstream media — of drawing the logical conclusion: “Thus, it appears that Jews and Asians constitute approximately half of Harvard’s student body, leaving the other half for the remaining 95% of America.”

    Unz understood this, too, demonstrating how education levels play out over one’s career. What he found at Harvard about white Christian underrepresentation “is present to a greater or lesser degree at most of our other elite educational institutions: Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Berkeley and so on. And partly because these universities act as a natural springboard to elite careers in law, medicine, finance and technology, many of these commanding heights of American society seem to exhibit a similar skew in demographic composition.””

    Desmond Jones

  6. If there is an economic value in educating whites in colleges, the college business will accommodate all qualified people, jewish, asian, or white. It’s not a zero-sum game, more colleges can be built. In fact, Murray has already shown in the bell curve that basically everyone with a high IQ gets into college and eventually, gets a high paying job. So I fail to see how competition from abroad undermines white ability to make a living. Wealth and IQ of nations showed wealth was half IQ, half economic freedom. The presence or absence of high-IQ foreigners in no way lowered the wealth of other people of merit and ability who had the freedom to do as they pleased.

    China-town is probably far richer than the $5,000 per capita lifestyle of China, with a far different political viewpoint that values freedom more highly — I haven’t heard of Chinatown agitating for communism recently, have you? I would suspect Chinatown is more like Hong Kong or Taiwan than China.

    As for overpopulation being a problem per se — high IQ immigrants are much rarer than low IQ immigrants and would not in the least cause a Zanzibarian lifestyle for those nations that accepted them into the country. You just seem to be lumping two different issues together and claiming they’re the same: “Import mexicans you get mexio, import Chinese you get China.” One’s true, the other’s false! Maybe if you said: “import chinese you get Hong Kong.” But then, what’s wrong with Hong Kong? According to Clavell books at least, it’s a romantic, exciting place to live, that westerners felt completely at home with.

  7. Diamed, why the hell are you arguing for foreigners?

    The touchstone is ‘are they stupid impoverished criminal civilization wreckers?’

    No it isn’t. The touchstone is: does they advance the genetic interests of our people? This is about the survival of the European race of Man, and very little else. Not employment and prosperity, not “tolerance”, not anything that can be construed from Asian or Jewish cognitive elitism.

    We want to live sovereign and free in our own lands, as our forefathers did. Is there something about that noble goal with which you are predisposed to disagree? If so, why?

  8. It’s not a zero-sum game, more colleges can be built.


    Politically Correct Racism (especially Why ‘The Bell Curve’ is so Dangerous, Erocide)


    There are many chinatowns, not one. Every city above a certain size has one. It is not a uniquely chinese phenomena either – there are koreatowns, little italys, MLK and Cesar Chavez Boulevards… The wealth of such enclaves relative to their motherlands or the many other ways in which they differ is not as important to any of us who aren’t a member of the dominant group there as the fact that those enclaves are filled with people who don’t look like us, don’t think like us, and don’t like us. The enclave operates for the benefit of their own kind. You neglect to consider that personality traits are just as heritable as IQ. These personality traits determine the nature of the societies people construct, thus people who are alien to me construct societies that by their nature are alien to me. These feelings of alienation are mutual and universal.

    You just seem to be lumping two different issues together and claiming they’re the same: “Import mexicans you get mexio, import Chinese you get China.” One’s true, the other’s false!

    They are the same. Neither mexicans or chinese are me. I don’t want to live in Tijuana or Hong Kong. I don’t want to live in Mexindiachinafornia either. In any of those places I’d feel like an alien.

    I second what GW wrote:

    We want to live sovereign and free in our own lands, as our forefathers did.

  9. “Wealth and IQ of nations showed wealth was half IQ, half economic freedom. The presence or absence of high-IQ foreigners in no way lowered the wealth of other people of merit and ability who had the freedom to do as they pleased.”

    LaGriffe further refined the data in his ‘Why Asians lag’ posting.

    “In market economies, per capita GDP is directly proportional to the population fraction with verbal IQ equal to or greater than 106.”

    Thus LaGriffe shows that Asians lag not because of a lack of freedom but because of a bifurcated IQ.

    The presence of high IQ ethnocentric foreigners will exclude high IQ natives from elite schools (see Harvard data) which in turn excludes them from governance. It is impossible to ‘to live sovereign and free in our own lands,’ if the native people are excluded from governance. Import China or India or the Punjab and you will get China, India or the Punjab.

    Desmond Jones

Comments are closed.