Blog

Diversity is Divisive

26 Comments

Commenter Flippityflopitty sends this link via email. Let’s Get Real About Racism: Lee Mun Wah:

Before we can truly become a multicultural nation, we must have relationships based on respect and understanding, reflection and compassion; where our differences and our similarities are embraced, valued, useful and integrated into the very fabric of our workplaces, communities, schools and governmental institutions. I come from the belief that awareness and holidays are just the beginning. What is required is an ongoing dialogue and relationship with each other, one that allows for conflict and differences, questions and curiosity. To me, that is what a healthy and intimate relationship possesses. I hope that you will join me in making this not only a better world for our children, but for ourselves – not by starting tomorrow, but beginning today.

Let’s Get Real: What People of Color Can’t Say & Whites Won’t Ask

For People of Color:

1. What’s hard telling whites the truth about racism?
2. What’s the price of telling the truth about race relations in the U.S.?
3. Why do you think it’s so hard for whites to hear the truth about racism?
4. What would you say to whites if you could tell them the truth about racism?
5. In what ways do whites keep people of color from telling the truth about race/racism?
6. How have you learned to “play the game” to appease white folks?
7. What would it take for you to feel safe enough to tell the truth about race/racism to white folks?
8. What is the difference between talking about race and racism?
9. What is the illusion about race relations in the United States?
10. Are race relations getting wors e or better in the U.S? Why or why not?
11. Can you ever envision a world without racism? Why or why not?
12. What was your most profound experience with racism? How old were you? How did it affect you and how does it affect you today?
13. What do you think it will take for whites to truly embrace diversity?
14. In order to unlearn racism, what do you need or want from white folks?
15. What can’t you say about racism? Why or why not?
16. What does assimilation mean to you? Why?
17. When you have told the truth about racism, what has been some of your experiences? How have those outcomes affected you?
18. When talking about racism, what opens you up and what close you down?
19. What do you say to folks that feel that racism is no longer an issue now that we have a black president?
20. Do you think that your children will experience racism when they grow up? Why or why not?
21. How do you think whites can be effective allies to people of color?

For Whites:

1. What’s good and what’s hard talking about racism?
2. How does guilt keep you from dealing with racism?
3. How do you think you benefit from racism?
4. What opens you up and what closes you down to talk about racism? Why?
5. What are some of your fears to bring up the issue of racism with people of color? With other white folks?
6. What do you need from people of color to feel safe to talk about racism?
7. What do you need from other whites to feel safe to talk about racism?
8. If you could say three things to people of color about racism, what would you say?
9. What do you think it will take for people of color and whites to trust each other?
10. Do you believe that racism is a learned behavior and attitude? If yes, why? If not, why not?
11. Where did most of your stereotypes about people of color come from? How did those stereotypes affect your perceptions and attitudes toward them?
12. What part do you think you play in perpetuating racism?
13. How do you think whites can be effective allies to people of color? Why?
14. What do you think it will take to unlearn racism for white folks?
15. What are some of the things that you are afraid to say to people of color?
16. What would be some questions you would like to ask people of color?
17. Why do you think many white folks don’t identify as a group?
18. When did you first experience racism? What happened and how did it affect you?
19. What percentage is your life is impacted by racism? Why or why not?
20. In what ways have you been able to avoid talking or dealing with racism?
21. Are there two Americas? Why or why not?
22. What does assimilation mean to you?
23. What does diversity or multicuturalism mean to you?
24. What do you think keeps people of color and whites apart?
25. What do you think it will take for the United States to heal from racism?

1. Why does anyone mistake this anti-White bigotry for “anti-racism”?
2. Why should Whites respect, embrace, or have any dialogue or relationship with people who blame us for all their problems?
3. How can we make them leave us alone?
4. Where can we go to get away from them?
5. If we somehow succeed in saving ourselves, how do we keep this from happening again?

26 thoughts on “Diversity is Divisive”

  1. Like the punch line for a joke about two Chinese named Wong having a caucasian baby, ‘Two Wongs don’t make a White.”

    This man clearly should be named, ‘Sum Ting Wong’ for assuming that Whites are WRONG in their assessment of the IMPLICIT TAKEOVER OF OUR COUNTRY.

    Never again. Never forgive, never forget.

    – Fr. John

  2. The US is now littered with NFP’s that provide the “training” to eliminate racism. What’s interesting is the difference between the presented goal and what they cite in resources and “working papers”. Another gem (one of hundreds or more):

    “Racism in the United States is a problem of white supremacy that has world-wide manifestations. It involves an unequal distribution of power for people with white skin
    privilege in four main areas: a) the power to make and enforce decisions; b) access to resources; c) the power to set and determine standards for what is considered appropriate behavior; and d) the power to define reality.”
    [from “Working Assumptions”]

    “OPPRESSION: The combination of prejudice and institutional power which creates a system that discriminates against some groups (often called “target groups”) and benefits other groups (often called “dominant or nontarget groups”). Examples of these systems are racism, sexism,
    heterosexism, ableism, classism, ageism, and anti-Semitism. These systems enable dominant grous to exert control over target groups by limiting their rights, freedom, and access to basic resources suchas health care, education, employment, and housing.”
    [From: “Glossary”]

    Now, as much as I criticize for “broad scapegoating” does anyone else see how these two (2) resources apply to you know who?

  3. I had to throw in another personal peeve -cherry-picking history. [There are too many nuggets from the link below so I will stick to the one point]

    Another good will organization provides their personal perspective on history in their working papers section:

    “Through a deep analysis of the colonial project, the foundations of the systemic economic, cultural, and racist oppression that we have inherited today are made visible. To do this honestly and authentically we must rely heavily on the insights and experiences of those for whom colonialism is an ongoing reality. At one time we might have referred to them as indigenous peoples and recognized them by their true names, but today, because their homelands have been invaded, with
    many people forcibly removed and traditional societies destroyed, they have become part of US
    society with names imposed on them; Afro-Caribbeans, Central and South American Indians or Indios, Native Hawaiians, Puerto Ricans, Samoans, Filipinos, African Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, Mexican-Americans, Native Americans, Latinos, and Chicanos. The key to understanding the historic experience and current realities of these groups, is to understand that the way they came to be present and their roles in US society differs significantly from that of Europeans Americans.
    [From “Historic Development…]

    That (and most of the assertions in the “working paper”] are examples of what the racists we are dealing think in terms of history. I dont know what reference in this one paragraph is more ridiculous (aside from “To do this honestly and authentically…”) “At one time we might have referred to them as indigenous peoples” or “they have become part of US society with names imposed on them”.

    Tan – I cant find the original email, can you reply? The second part of it had a citation I lost and I wanted to dig around.

  4. 3. How can we make them leave us alone?
    4. Where can we go to get away from them?
    5. If we somehow succeed in saving ourselves, how do we keep this from happening again?

    Read: The Northwest Quartet novels.

  6. 1. Why does anyone mistake this anti-White bigotry for “anti-racism”?

    Good question! I think we need to explain to people that anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white.

    Deeper explanation:

    Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for Everybody

    Genocide by Assimilation

    It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    2. Why should Whites respect, embrace, or have any dialogue or relationship with people who blame us for all their problems?

    We should not… The reason they demonize us white people is because they want us to feel guilty for being white and then they hope that we will accept white genocide…

  7. I agree with Brad. Sites like Occidental Dissent say many interesting things. Then sometimes they say they must do what WORKS. But then, something like the Mantra is considered “pissy” only for the ordinary.

  9. Google “Ice Age Columbus” for proof that the White man was the first to the Americas.

    Now it is time for you to take your OWN advice and GO BACK TO ASIA.

  10. Asians are a very serious threat to the long-term White demographics of the Americans.

    The Asiatic menace is nearly as important to solve as the Jewish problem.

    Asians have already colonized large portions of the West coast of the USA and Canada, and they continue expand. If Whites do not check Asiatic expansion their soon, parts of the Americas will be lost forever to Whites.

    “The Yellow Peril” – http://karws.gso.uri.edu/JFK/the_critics/oliver/The_yellow_peril.html

  11. “6. Who pays these people to produce this b*llsh*t?”

    The Jews who control the Federal Reserve, most of the U.S. Federal Government bureaucracy, and anti-White American academia.

  12. The mantra should be posted on our sites. The more of us on a consistent message, the better.

  13. “The Asiatic menace is nearly as important to solve as the Jewish problem.”

    Amen. White nationalists need to discuss this topic more often. We should not let the HBD/Race realists gain the upper hand on this topic. We must lead them away from their destructive libertarian ideas that Asians are an “elite” that we should welcome into our nations.

  15. Another one, Tan:

    “Racist” — A Word Invented by USSR’s
    Leon Trotsky
    by Dustin Stanley

    “The word “racist” has for a long time been the single most effective fear-word in the leftist and neoconservative arsenal. For decades, they have successfully used it in the political arena to slander traditionalists, shut down debate, and leave opponents running for cover. In the social arena, they have caused even more damage by using it to brainwash impressionable children and young college students, and to teach people to hate their nation, their cultural traditions, and worst of all, themselves.

    What surprisingly remains almost totally undiscussed, even on the hard core traditionalist Right, is the word’s origin. Did it come from a liberal sociologist? A 60’s Marxist college professor? Perhaps a politician in the Democratic Party? No. It turns out that the word was invented by none other than one of the principal architects of the 74-year Soviet nightmare, the founder and first leader of the infamous Red Army, Leon Trotsky.

    Take a look at this document if you would, dear reader.” [Continues].

    http://newrightamerica.blogspot.com/2010/01/racist-word-invented-by-ussrs-leon.html

  18. Here is another posting of the numbers after pdx/
    1442403975.html

    I have a copy in my files if that doesn’t work and I know of another posting with the commentary.

  19. Tan, an excellent article from our British neighbor, Green Arrow. [I’ll check to see if the link copied].

    http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/index.php/writers/arrow-straight/1444-nothing-british-and-conspiracy-theorists

    “So let us recreate the path I travelled as I travelled it. I first started digging into David Cameron’s origins and I discover that Boy David may or may not be a direct descendant of Moses. I wonder what Moses would say about Boy David deciding to switch his loyalties over to Islam? Then again David is just following orders from an higher authority – The New World Order who chose him to lead the conservatives to destruction.

    So it turns out that Cameron’s great grandfather was the Polish Jew Arthur Francis Levita who made the family fortune in Banking under the directions of the Rothchilds. David of course is married into the elite and wealthy Jewish Astor family and both families are still heavily involved in finance.
    —Skip–
    But the facts are this. The Rothchilds and “friends”, either own or control most of the banks in the world and have been responsible for almost every war ever fought. Sounds incredible but it is true. They also own most of the worlds media(including REUTERS) and so can control the flow of information and propagate propaganda at will.

    Their sole goal and their allied families is complete control of the worlds wealth and power. Elected politicians of The Establishment parties are just the puppets of the real rulers of the world.

    Now we must take a trip to Serbia to show an example of how the World Bank/International Monetary Fund that is also owned and controlled by the Rothchilds and “Friends” operates. The IMF requires that nations that it “supports” with “loans” do the following.

    1. to sign secret agreements of 111 items

    2. in which they agreed to sell off their key assets – water, electric, gas, etc.

    3. in which they agreed to take economic steps which are really devastating to the nations involved

    4. in which they pay off the politicians billions of dollars to Swiss bank accounts to do this transfer of a countries fixed assets
    —-Skip–

    The government has missed deadlines for cutting state jobs and pledged to start them in April. The government needs to adopt a fiscal responsibility law next month, said IMF mission chief Albert Jaeger, also present at the interview.

    Sound familiar? Who owns our utility companies now. Who will own the major assets of Serbia? Not the people but private corporations and who owns those?

    And what happens to those brave individuals who try to let the people know the evil that is being carried out by these “Bankers”.

    Well what happened to Ashley Mote the former MEP who asked the following of the European Union President in 2007. Mote finished up in jail on what he says were trumped up charges and is fighting to clear his name.” [Continues at the link].
    ——————–

    What is happening to Mote is just an example on a global scale of what is happening to each of us individually. The roots for our oppression and for the limitations on our freedoms, whether of speech, press or the pursuit of happiness is within the policies devised by these corruptors. RACISTS! Damn right they are! Against Whites, against freedoms, and against YOU.

    Flanders

  20. Some of our diversity suppliers are not happy that the Tea Party movement is becoming less diverse in thought.

    “SPLC’s report, “Rage on the Right,” is not as extensive or derisive of the Tea Party movement as ADL’s earlier “Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies.” But it is a cannonball across the bow of the explosively growing Tea Party movement. It warns leaders not to let the whole truth about international Zionist control and conspiracy take root, or these super powerful Jewish muscle groups will use their influence to inflame Jewish media, the Congress and law enforcement against them.”

    http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/jewishattackgroupsteaparty.htm

  21. OK, seen the craigslist thing. Should have realised it was just a matter of tacking on a .html, thanks!

  23. It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The thing is, though, who actually ever says that? I don’t think I’ve ever heard it put that way by any anti-racist or immigration booster.

    The mantra itself is good, but it’ll lose its effect on your target if there’s someone around to make the point I just did above.

  24. • “They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

    • “The thing is, though, who actually ever says that? “

    They won’t say so explicitly, but that’s what it boils down to. What they say is that white countries should keep taking in more non-whites. There’s no mention of setting limits. And what they never say is that non-white countries should take in any whites at all.

    Diversity is also a code word for fewer whites :
    100% white = 0% diverse
    100% non-white = 100% diverse

    Hate crime laws are also anti-white laws :
    Judges do not brag that they only apply those laws against whites, but that’s what they do.

    It’s the same for “ethnic slurs” :
    We are told that nigger and kike are terribly offensive words, but for some reason, no one can think of an equivalent that would be equally offensive to whites.

    It’s all right to start a specifically Black or Jewish association, but not an association for Whites, because that would be racist.

    And so on. It’s easy to show that most “anti-racism” is really anti-whitism.

  25. The purpose of the mantra is to keep us focused on what’s important. It puts anti-White double-standards in terms any person of ordinary intelligence operating in good faith can understand. Quibbles about its phrasing and even challenges to its veracity only invite further exposition and discussion. That’s a good thing.

    Thanks for demonstrating how it works Armor.

Comments are closed.