12 thoughts on “Rick Perry’s Jewish Problem”

  1. Youtube comments run the gamut:

    Clueless: “ROFL, Rick Perry will do anything for religious votes!!

    Gets it: “Rick Perry knows who his masters are.

    Humorous: “Rick Perry dancing around with a bunch of bearded men who look about 5 feet tall looks like something straight out of a Tolkien fantasy.”

    Intriguing: “Tolkien based the Dwarves off of the Jews. At last I truly see why.” [Who knew?]

    Cynical Racialist(?): “Dont worry guys, Perry is different. Hes not a Zionist puppet. hes going to bring us change just like Obama promised. This guy is a staunch supporter of Israel, supports multiculturalism and mass non-white immigration into USA and thinks white racism is the number one thing that needs to be combated in USA in order to have a good nation.

  2. It would be interesting to see a pol fawn, bow, and scrape for Ashkenazi-Americans in every way possible, only to turn around and announce (in fawning, bowing, and scraping language) that he wanted to lead Whites the way Ashkenazi leaders lead Ashkenazis. You know, pattern American border policy on Israeli border policy, White Zionism, etc.

    He’d probably wind up in the same outer darkness as KMac.

    “Better not to talk about that sort.”

  3. “You know, pattern American border policy on Israeli border policy, White Zionism, etc.”

    In my own face-to-face experience I have found that even ostensibly intelligent people simply do not have the mere working memory to keep even a few recently mentioned propositions strait in their heads to see that their view of the world has been shattered by direct, Socratic-style refutation. The Jewish influence over our racial declension is far too removed, ever too abstracted, from the lives and the ability to understand of all those we need to understand for those indidivuals to be of use in directly opposing Jewry. It is far easier, not difficult in fact in my experience, to bring common Whites to at least temporary expressions on their part of the value of their race’s survial to them. Understanding the Jewish question, and thus being prepared to contront Jewry, is for the few.

  4. Surely anyone can see, jews ARE extremely ethnocentric, misleading, dishonest, canniving, subversive, crooked, cunning, mendacious, deceitful,fraudulent, deceptive, designing, disreputable, double-crossing, double-dealing, and perfidious. But definitely not “cool”.

  5. “In my own face-to-face experience I have found that even ostensibly intelligent people simply do not have the mere working memory to keep even a few recently mentioned propositions strait in their heads to see that their view of the world has been shattered by direct, Socratic-style refutation.”

    Well you know, old boy, elenchus was only just a literary device — those besotted Athenians were never really so objective as to let themselves be led into error and contradiction with such equipoise.

    All the worse with highly emotive, post-Christian kwans, lacking all refinement and the slightest trace of racial nobility …

    It is as you say easier to lay aside the distal and lead them into the proximate view that what they are has value and ought to endure. What another, whom they can’t even begin to understand, is and does, is for them an impossibly abstract thing; whereas looking merely at themeselves, if they find therein any quality worth preserving, they may arrive at an abstract, positive appraisal of whites as a race/group — which is after all where one must begin with a race that’s been trained to think everything but that.

    -uh

  6. Tan – what do you think of this OWS movement? At first I agreed with Dennis Mangan that it was just another ragtag collection of collectivist dummies, but I’ve come to realize (incl by firsthand accounts) that it’s more complex and potentially far more serious than the media is letting on. Also, our jewish canary in the coal mine, whose far-seeing and acute sense of threat to jewish supremacy on the horizon makes him an invaluable leading indicator (I speak of course of Lawrence Auster) has been condemning it with the combined obsessiveness and vitriol he saves only for the far right. He gives himself away today with this entry you may have seen. Is our distaste for the left making us overlook an opportunity here?

  7. To the extent OWS represents White interests in opposing a regime that harms our interests I sympathize with it, just as I sympathize with the Tea Party.

    Auster is a self-described “jewish fifth-columnist”, so naturally he opposes OWS to the extent it shows any potential to harm jewish interests.

Comments are closed.