Blog

Obama’s “Post-Racial” Anti-White Regime

12 Comments

The former black community organizer of ambiguous origin, touted by a sycophantic, anti-White media as the “post-racial” president, is anti-White. Is anybody other than deracinated Whites surprised?

In Obama team’s panic over losing whites, Pat Buchanan writes:

Panic. The White House fears it is losing white America because of a false perception that it harbors a bias against white America.

Outrageous, rail those journalists who celebrated the NAACP’s accusation that the tea party is harboring racists and is too cowardly to confront them.

Yet, as things perceived as real are real in their consequences, if the White House does not eradicate this perception, its lease may not be renewed. Whence comes that perception? Several incidents.

First was the startling accusation by Attorney General Eric Holder, days after Barack Obama was inaugurated in a gusher of good feeling, that we are all “a nation of cowards” when it comes to facing issues of race.

A real icebreaker for a national conversation.

Second was the instantaneous verdict of the president, when asked about the arrest of Harvard’s Henry Louis Gates by Cambridge cop Sgt. James Crowley. With no knowledge of what happened, Obama blurted out that the cops had “acted stupidly.”

It took a White House beer summit to detoxify that one.

A third was the revelation that Obama’s first Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, the “wise Latina” herself, had gone to extremes to see that the case of Frank Ricci and the New Haven, Conn., firefighters never got to the Supreme Court. Ricci and co-defendants had been denied promotions they had won in competitive exams solely because they were white and no black firemen had done as well.

The fourth was the Justice Department’s dropping of charges against members of the New Black Panther Party, whose intimidation of voters in Philadelphia had been captured on tape.

When a department official resigned in protest and went to the Civil Rights Commission to accuse officials at Justice of ordering staff attorneys not to pursue such cases, that explosive charge, too, was ignored by Justice.

Came then the NAACP smear that the tea party was harboring racists, which Joe Biden explicitly rejected on national television on Sunday, before the Monday firestorm over Sherrod.

The anti-White bias of Obama, his handlers, his media cheerleaders, and his administration is crystal clear. Buchanan neglected to cite a few other major incidents in support of this perception.

Obama’s disdainful remarks about working-class voters in former industrial towns devastated by job losses, i.e. Whites: “They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” An unabashed Obama then explained this is something “everybody knows is true”, i.e everyone in his social and political circles disdains Whites.

Obama’s long-term friendship and association with anti-White Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

Media accusations that as a group White voters in the democratic primary and Obama’s subsequent election were “racist”, despite having the least skewed voting patterns of any major racial/ethnic group.

The Obama adminstration’s DHS report directing fear and loathing at disaffected White citizens.

Obama’s drive to reform healthcare despite widespread, predominantly White protests. The reform represents a massive transfer of wealth from disproportionally White payers of taxes and insurance premiums to disproportionally non-White free-riders.

Obama’s personal appeal to “make sure that the young people, African Americans, Latinos and women, who powered our victory in 2008 stand together once again.”

Obama and his administration’s hostile reaction to Arizona’s stand against illegal immigration and his clear preference to promote the interests of non-White aliens.

All of these incidents were given fairly prominent exposure – at least in the conservative media Whites gravitate toward.

Another incident, which conservatives have been unwilling to openly criticize, is Obama’s more recent nominee for SCOTUS, Elena Kagan, who has been strongly criticized by “people of color” for hiring too many “white” men. The Obama White House response was to crow about Kagan’s efforts to “increase faculty diversity”. Their document provides some idea who these “diverse” “whites” were:

Kagan’s hires were not just conservatives; most were liberal professors, including leading liberal academics like Jody Freeman (environmental law), Sanford Levinson (constitutional law), Mark Tushnet (constitutional law and civil rights), Noah Feldman (church-state), Michael Klarman (civil rights), and Cass Sunstein.

Even conservatives who recognize that the regime is anti-White will not question it’s equally obvious favor for jews.

12 thoughts on “Obama’s “Post-Racial” Anti-White Regime”

  1. I think to get the real story on Obama and race, just type clinton obama caucus intimidation into your favorite search engine.

    Given the financial crisis that struck during the election campaign and that John McCain would rather have lost his shot at the Presidency than call Barack Obama on his issues, such as Jeremiah Wright and the Trinity United Church of Christ, the decisive political fight for Barack Obama was against Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination. Once he had that, he had a smooth path to the Presidency and the advantages of overwhelming legislative and media support.

    How did he win that nomination? By taking the caucus states. Where small numbers of activists confronted each other to decide who got the state, Barack Obama’s supporters seem to have had it all over Hillary Clinton’s girls, who said they would not be intimidated, but actually were.

    (I never read about Barack’s brothas saying nervously they were not going to be intimidated by White girls for Hillary Clinton.)

    This is the right context for us to understand the Obama Justice Department’s policy of allowing anti-white voter intimidation and giving members of the New Black Panther Party a free pass on charges they had already been convicted of with no contest.

    When the President owes his office, in important part, to intimidation and the convenient fact that Black zealots for their race can easily push around angry old ladies, how serious should anyone expect him to be about “post-racial” politics?

    – Daybreaker

  4. NPR’s USDA Flap Shows ‘Post-Racial’ Future Has Not Arrived quotes Jared Taylor without portraying him as morally or mentally defective.

    This link comes via a comment to Auster’s The unbelievable has happened, where he mistakes an interview with Taylor at Examiner.com for The Washington Examiner, a “mainstream conservative publication”.

    The interview is here: Race realist Jared Taylor declares the “civil rights struggle was won long ago”.

    The irony is that NPR and a “civil rights” blogger treat Taylor with more dignity and respect than Lawrence “The cause of the white race will not go away” Auster can usually muster for him. Auster alludes to his long history of attacking Taylor as, “I have strongly criticized Taylor for some things, mainly certain associations of his.” Auster has in fact done more than his share to help make any mainstream airing of Taylor and his opinions “unbelievable”.

    Here are a few links, going backward in time, to various episodes of Taylor-bashing at Auster’s blog:

    The connections between Richard Hoste and Richard Spencer, and between Richard Hoste and Peter Brimelow
    “Let the David Dukes and the Don Blacks worry about Mr. Taylor’s rights.”
    Another eagle-eyed white nationalist finds me out
    Jared Taylor’s refusal to condemn anti-Semitism

    Auster’s judeo-liberal guilt-by-association is all about how Taylor, who generally suppresses any discussion of jewish influence at AmRen, does not disassociate himself from “anti-semitism” and “anti-semites” vigorously enough to please Auster. So the question naturally arises: how long before Auster or one of his sycophants contacts NPR and Examiner.com to let them know what kind of “unbelievable” person they’re associating with?

  7. In Jim Webb and the New Southern Strategy, Matt Parrot at OD hypothesizes:

    And what will a panicked attempt by the DNC to recoup blue-collar White voters look like? Two words: Jim Webb. Webb was in the news this week for writing an excellent editorial: Diversity and the Myth of White Privilege. In it, he disembowels the logic of the regime’s anti-White policies in its own terms: equality, diversity, and class warfare.

    I think it’s likely the democrats will excommunicate and shun Webb, as they did to Geraldine Ferraro during the 2008 campaign. As Ferraro, a dedicated anti-“racist” and first female VP nominee, said at the time:

    “Every time that campaign is upset about something, they call it racist,” she said. “I will not be discriminated against because I’m white. If they think they’re going to shut up Geraldine Ferraro with that kind of stuff, they don’t know me.”

    That was the last we heard from Ferraro.

  9. On the GM shutdown, closing 2,000 dealerships owned by White men, it is stated that, “As the new report from SIGTARP states (PDF file), dealerships owned by minorities or women were specifically exempted from the shutdowns.

    Thus, dealerships owned by White males were exclusively targeted. How ironic that the closings were the result of Obama’s mandate for “shared sacrifice!”
    White Male Car Dealers Shut Down by TARP
    http://american3p.org/?p=1158

    Flanders

  10. Hi Tan,

    Auster needs to see “the light”. Some posts on him here and here.

    Your assistance might bring him closer to revelation.

    Keep up the great work. You’re an inspiration.

    Cheers,

    Pat Hannagan

  11. STARTS EVERY SUNDAY NIGHT AT 11PM EASTERN, 10PM CENTRAL,  9PM MOUNTAIN, 8 PM PACIFIC

    http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/75473

    Hosted by: PastorLindstedt

    Title: TMT –Episode #28 – Whiggers & Mamzers & jews, Oh My!!!Time: 07/25/2010 11:00 PM EDT

    Episode Notes: TMT –Episode #28 – Whiggers & Mamzers & jews, Oh My!!! Jesus Christ predicted that the poor we will have amongst us always. He should have warned us about something far more common — and dangerous — especially those turds within our White Nationalist [bowel] Movement. Now that means critters like Alex Linder, TraitorGlenn Miller, sundry anglo-mestizo CreaTards — all the hue-mamzer debris that infests the ZOGland, and adheres to our Movement. Much of it is frentic and idiotic and packs itz tents in the night — like the Roid Rage Retard Jim Giles who got a shitty new v-bulletin license and hid the turds in his crown of all the radio shows. But that also means that Christian Identity has an overflowing toilet bowel chock full of whigger nuts and mamzers and jews, which need to be periodically flushed. Just as in the daze of Ezra and Nehemiah, you get all manner of ‘Sored-Mamzers’ and Delaneys and Kaplan/Quests infesting Christian Identity like jew-flies and fleas on whigger dogs. Tune in tonight for a Zyklon-B flea-bath upon Genesis 3:15 detection

  12. Panic. The White House fears it is losing white America because of a false perception that it harbors a bias against white America.

    (This in no way is racists, it’s a political strategy)

    Outrageous, rail those journalists who celebrated the NAACP’s accusation that the tea party is harboring racists and is too cowardly to confront them.

    (The Tea Party does have racists in it, but they weren’t saying the Tea Part itself is racist)

    First was the startling accusation by Attorney General Eric Holder, days after Barack Obama was inaugurated in a gusher of good feeling, that we are all “a nation of cowards” when it comes to facing issues of race.

    (Your post is evidence of the cowardice in facing racial issues. Holder may just have well been talking about Obama and the NAACP as well. The out of context unverified statement holds no weight)

    Second was the instantaneous verdict of the president, when asked about the arrest of Harvard’s Henry Louis Gates by Cambridge cop Sgt. James Crowley. With no knowledge of what happened, Obama blurted out that the cops had “acted stupidly.”

(Saying someone “acted stupidly has nothing to do with race)

    A third was the revelation that Obama’s first Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, the “wise Latina” herself, had gone to extremes to see that the case of Frank Ricci and the New Haven, Conn., firefighters never got to the Supreme Court. Ricci and co-defendants had been denied promotions they had won in competitive exams solely because they were white and no black firemen had done as well.

(I guess facts of racial bias don’t sway you)

    The fourth was the Justice Department’s dropping of charges against members of the New Black Panther Party, whose intimidation of voters in Philadelphia had been captured on tape.

    (The evidence was crap and wouldn’t hold up in court. http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/justice_dept_ethics_office_no_evidence_that_politics_race_influenced_new_black_panther_party_case.php And no, The New Black Panthers are NOT my friends. They stink and their strategies stink, for the most part)

    When a department official resigned in protest and went to the Civil Rights Commission to accuse officials at Justice of ordering staff attorneys not to pursue such cases, that explosive charge, too, was ignored by Justice. (Where’s the racism?)

    Came then the NAACP smear that the tea party was harboring racists, which Joe Biden explicitly rejected on national television on Sunday, before the Monday firestorm over Sherrod. (They are, and so what. They didn’t say the whole group was racist). 

(Is that all you got? Wow, that’s weak, no links, no supporting evidence. Obama’s not a great president, but painting him as anti-white is a joke. You’re punking us, right? ) PTxS

Comments are closed.