DHS Hypocrites Direct Fear and Hatred Toward Whites

Are you feeling marginalized, cheated, or otherwise oppressed? Disturbed by abortion? Angry about the current economic and political climate? Upset about millions of illegal immigrants our government won’t arrest or deport? If you said yes to any of these questions and you’re White then be advised that the Department of Homeland Security considers you a potential enemy of the state.

Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment (via Washington Times):

The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing* terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.

Rightwing extremists have capitalized on the election of the first African American president, and are focusing their efforts to recruit new members, mobilize existing supporters, and broaden their scope and appeal through propaganda, but they have not yet turned to attack planning.

Note that “rightwing extremists” are being accused of reacting to actual facts and events, while the writers of this report are the ones “playing on fears”. This report is a perfect example of propaganda. It not only demonizes an opposing cause, it does so by inverting reality.

* Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

This is the footnote many media reports have focused on.

Note that the hate rhetoric is another inversion. The effect of this report, if not its desired purpose, is to fuel ill will towards Whites who are reacting to what we perceive as aggression and dispossession.
The “rightwing extremist” and “white supremacist” smears used to describe the disparate and well-intentioned people who favor state or local authority or oppose abortion or immigration reveals the report writers’ hypocritical hatred of even the weakest and most disjoint expressions of racial/religious self-interest from a particular racial/religious group: White Christians.

The report specifically targets and deliberately pathologizes Whites who are disturbed by anything we consider harmful to our interests.

Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely would attract new members into the ranks of rightwing extremist groups, as well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for violence against the government. The high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by rightwing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law enforcement.

The founders of our country clearly trusted in and recognized the value of a well-armed citizenry and unambiguously expressed these beliefs in the 2nd amendment. Those who propose the imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans without amending the constitution are the extremists.

A recent example of the potential violence associated with a rise in rightwing extremism may be found in the shooting deaths of three police officers in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on 4 April 2009. The alleged gunman’s reaction reportedly was influenced by his racist ideology and belief in antigovernment conspiracy theories related to gun confiscations, citizen detention camps, and a Jewish-controlled “one world government.”

Note that this report is not only specifically antagonistic toward Whites acting in our own defense, it is also specifically sympathetic to jews.

Rightwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures. Anti-Semitic extremists attribute these losses to a deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of Jewish “financial elites.” These “accusatory” tactics are employed to draw new recruits into rightwing extremist groups and further radicalize those already subscribing to extremist beliefs. DHS/I&A assesses this trend is likely to accelerate if the economy is perceived to worsen.

The chain of causation is reversed. The very real foreclosures and loss of jobs fuels the perceived disastrous costs of the globalist, materialist, consumerist pyramid scheme euphemistically referred to as “the economy”.

The writers of this report are so keen to protect “financial elites” (and specifically jews) who have perpetrated fraud that they use the very accusatory tactics they decry to direct blame and hate instead onto what they imagine is deliberate conspiracy conducted by a cabal of admittedly powerless “rightwing extremist groups”.

Rightwing extremists are harnessing this historical election as a recruitment tool. Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use. Rightwing extremists are increasingly galvanized by these concerns and leverage them as drivers for recruitment. From the 2008 election timeframe to the present, rightwing extremists have capitalized on related racial and political prejudices in expanded propaganda campaigns, thereby reaching out to a wider audience of potential sympathizers.

Once again the word “perceived” marks an inversion.

Whites were the most evenly split racial group in the presidential election. The more lopsided votes of every other group are justifiably understood to reflect antagonism toward Whites because the new presidential administration’s support for immigration is in fact reducing Whites to a minority. The new presidential administration has and continues to capitalize on related racial and political prejudices against Whites – this report being a prime example.

Paralleling the current national climate, rightwing extremists during the 1990s exploited a variety of social issues and political themes to increase group visibility and recruit new members. Prominent among these themes were the militia movement’s opposition to gun control efforts, criticism of free trade agreements (particularly those with Mexico), and highlighting perceived government infringement on civil liberties as well as white supremacists’ longstanding exploitation of social issues such as abortion, inter-racial crimes, and same-sex marriage. During the 1990s, these issues contributed to the growth in the number of domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and an increase in violent acts targeting government facilities, law enforcement officers, banks, and infrastructure sectors.

Here’s how “longstanding exploitation” works.

Some Whites recognize and complain about the unrelenting assault on our social and political interests and try to defend them. In this defense we constantly face smooth-talking dishonest aggressors just like the people who wrote this DHS report. This fills some Whites with frustration and despair, and they react violently. Then we’re all smeared as “extremists” and the violent reactions are exploited, even decades later, to justify and continue the assault against us. This report again provides a prime example. In seven pages of text Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing are mentioned three times.

Historically, domestic rightwing extremists have feared, predicted, and anticipated a cataclysmic economic collapse in the United States. Prominent antigovernment conspiracy theorists have incorporated aspects of an impending economic collapse to intensify fear and paranoia among like-minded individuals and to attract recruits during times of economic uncertainty. Conspiracy theories involving declarations of martial law, impending civil strife or racial conflict, suspension of the U.S. Constitution, and the creation of citizen detention camps often incorporate aspects of a failed economy. Antigovernment conspiracy theories and “end times” prophecies could motivate extremist individuals and groups to stockpile food, ammunition, and weapons. These teachings also have been linked with the radicalization of domestic extremist individuals and groups in the past, such as violent Christian Identity organizations and extremist members of the militia movement.

Over the past five years, various rightwing extremists, including militias and white supremacists, have adopted the immigration issue as a call to action, rallying point, and recruiting tool. Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.

The constitution describes the political structure of a government. The fear that this structure has been subverted and illegitimately replaced with what amounts to a new kind of government is based on the very real evidence (the report we’re examining here for example) that the current government and its defense is based primarily on economics. In addition, the writers of this report are clearly antipathetic to the constitutional principles codified in the 1st and 2nd amendments. Their strident fervor is directed specifically against Whites who would defend and uphold the constitution.

Rightwing extremist paranoia of foreign regimes could escalate or be magnified in the event of an economic crisis or military confrontation, harkening back to the “New World Order” conspiracy theories of the 1990s.

The report writers seem to resent that theories with predictive value are naturally magnified. They present no evidence to substantiate their paranoid theories concerning “rightwing extremist paranoia of foreign regimes”. The bulk of their report makes the case that “rightwing extremists” are most concerned about the domestic regime.

— (U//LES) DHS/I&A has concluded that white supremacist lone wolves pose the most significant domestic terrorist threat because of their low profile and autonomy—separate from any formalized group—which hampers warning efforts.

— (U//FOUO) Similarly, recent state and municipal law enforcement reporting has warned of the dangers of rightwing extremists embracing the tactics of “leaderless resistance” and of lone wolves carrying out acts of violence.

Note that the biggest threat they perceive to the deliberately organized and government-supported demonization, disarming, and dispossession of Whites is the disorganized resistance of individual Whites acting independently. The moral: native Whites who conclude that our current government is acting against our interests are by this very act justifying the government to work that much harder against us. Regardless of what they might think or do however, immigrants and financial elites can rest assured that the government is actively defending their interests.

A prominent civil rights organization reported in 2006 that “large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the [U.S.] armed forces.”

The “prominent civil rights organization” is not specified, but the source of the quote indicates that it is actually an anti-White-rights group.

Racist Extremists Active in U.S. Military – SPLC urges Rumsfeld to adopt zero-tolerance policy:

Southern Poverty Law Center President Richard Cohen urged Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to adopt a zero-tolerance policy regarding racist extremism among members of the U.S. military.

“Because hate group membership and extremist activity are antithetical to the values and mission of our armed forces, we urge you to adopt a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to white supremacy in the military and to take all necessary steps to ensure that the policy is rigorously enforced,” Cohen wrote in a letter to Rumsfeld.

Military extremists present an elevated threat both to their fellow soldiers and the general public. Today’s white supremacists become tomorrow’s domestic terrorists.

Zero tolerance for Whites pretty much sums up the hate-oriented nature of the domestic terrorists who have insinuated themselves and their anti-White ideas into the very highest levels of our government.

17 thoughts on “DHS Hypocrites Direct Fear and Hatred Toward Whites”

  1. Great post. If there’s ever to be a “white think tank”, its origin is right here.

  2. One thing, Tan: do emphasize their reliance on the notion of perception — this is an appeal to psychiatry and relativism at once: our perception is “skewed”, nothing we perceive is real, and we’re “pathological” for “perceiving” matters in such a way. You can pathologize anyone by appealing to perception. To whatever extent we on the right exercise a selective perception in “outting” the Jews, they’re past-masters at the same game, do it much more completely and systematically and, according to the foucauldian rhetoric of New Leftism, are ipso facto worse for being those objectively in power and thus enabled to abuse their selective perception and “metanarrative”.

  3. A prominent civil rights organization reported in 2006 that “large numbers of potentially violent neo-Nazis, skinheads, and other white supremacists are now learning the art of warfare in the [U.S.] armed forces.”

    It seems that the $PLC is up to some dirty tricks with its claims of “white supremacists” and neo-Nazis in the military. The $PLC bases its claim on a gang investigator’s report that 320 soldiers at a base in Colorado belonged to gangs. The $PLC turned around and wrote that 320 “extremists” had been found at one base. Of course, only a portion (and probably a very small portion) of military gang members are actually neo-nazis. In fact, the majority of gang members in the military are actually non-white. So the $PLC is using negro and mestizo gang members to inflate its numbers of “white supremacists”!



    And these shysters are still quoted with a straight face by every MSM outlet in existence. What a world we live in.

  4. At foxnews.com Andrew Napilatano writes Six Things You Should Know About the Homeland Security Report on ‘Rightwing Extremism’. Like other deracinated defensive responses this one neglects the most important thing you should know: that the report specifically targets Whites. It doesn’t target veterans or critics of abortion, immigration, finance, or the government in general. It speaks in explicitly racial terms, targeting Whites who are upset about a specificially black president and specificially jewish financial elites.

    In neglecting to address this point Napilatano either consciously or not demonstrates the validity of his own point #5 – that the report chills free speech, making Whites fear to object to demonization of themselves lest they be branded “white supremacists” and thereby enemies of the state with all the consequences that implies. Napilatano surmises that this report represents the tip of an iceberg. Actually, it’s more like the tip of the elephant in the room.

    There is a similar dynamic swirling around the tea parties.

    In Liberal actress says tea parties were racist we hear Janeane Garafolo specifically recognize the White nature of the tea parties and express her fear and hatred of that:

    “Let’s be very honest about what this is about. This is not about bashing Democrats. It’s not about taxes. They have no idea what the Boston Tea party was about. They don’t know their history at all. It’s about hating a black man in the White House,” she said on MSNBC’s “The Countdown” with Keith Olbermann Thursday evening. “This is racism straight up and is nothing but a bunch of teabagging rednecks. There is no way around that.”

    Olbermann did not once try to challenge her on those assertions.

    The actress went on to describe the brain size of typical “right-winger, Republican or conservative or your average white power activist.”

    “Their synapses are misfiring. … It is a neurological problem we are dealing with,” she said. This isn’t the first time she’s offered this analysis, either. Ms. Garofalo said similar things about Alaskan GOP Governor Sarah Palin’s brain last February in an interview with an environmental blog.

    The actress went on to bash the GOP on MSNBC Thursday because it had “crystallized into the white power movement” as well as Fox News, which she said has captured the “Klan demo[graphic].

    Let’s be very honest about what this is about. Garafolo hates Whites. I heard crowds cheering speakers who bashed the GOP as well as the current administration. I think what Garafolo and her friends really fear is that Whites might escape the one-party Democrat/Republican cage we’ve too long been divided and confined to against own own interests.

    The responses I’ve heard from tea partiers have so far been to either ignore the race-based attacks, or to explicitly distance themselves from their own Whiteness by denying that their protests, or the hostile responses to them, have anything to do with race. The malice and power of the government and media are such that most Whites fear to even notice the anti-White hate directed at us.

  5. Axelrod suggests ‘Tea Party’ movement is ‘unhealthy’:

    Senior White House adviser David Axelrod on Sunday suggested the “Tea Party” movement is an “unhealthy” reaction to the tough economic climate facing the country.

    Axelrod was asked on CBS’s “Face the Nation” about the “spreading and very public disaffection” with the president’s fiscal policies seen at the “Tea Party” rallies around the country last week.

    “I think any time you have severe economic conditions there is always an element of disaffection that can mutate into something that’s unhealthy,” Axelrod said.

    Axelrod appeared to backtrack when pressed on whether the movement is unhealthy.

    “Well, this is a country where we value our liberties and our ability to express ourselves, and so far these are expressions,” he said.

    “The thing that bewilders me is that this president just cut taxes for 95 percent of the American people,” Axelrod argued. “I think the tea bags should be directed elsewhere because he certainly understands the burden that people face.”Axelrod is not at all bewildered. He’s scared. But allow me to unbewilder anyone who might be truly bewildered.

    Axelrod and friends know that the “severe economic conditions” are but a hiccup in the upper class’ use of the lower class to soak the middle. The distinction between classes being that the middle generally works and pays taxes and the others generally don’t, and that the upper and lower are disproportionately “people of color”. The plutocrats and their selectees are scared that the disproportionately White middle masses may pick up our pitchforks and revolt if we ever figure out how thoroughly and intentionally we and our posterity have been dispossessed. They’re so scared they’re willing to use fear-mongering against the very golden-egg-layers who built, fuel, and fight for this country.

    Obama’s tax cuts aren’t made out of compassion. They are a calculated attempt to skim support away from the middle and shift it into the lower class, just as the bailouts and stimulus ripoffs have skimmed support from the middle and into the upper class.

    Next up: crack some deracinated-supremacist egg-layer heads.

  6. I think it’s safe to assume the club (tea partier guilt-by-association with “white supremacist” “haters”) will be fashioned by the SPLC, but it could just as easily come from the ADL, NAACP, or La Raza. It would actually be perfectly and consistently hypocritical for them to unite to oppose Whites who want a better life for ourselves, painting even these peaceful and unselfconsious tea parties as racist hate.

  7. Another obvious point is that Axelrod, in expressing these couched anti-White views from his position of power inside the White House, confirms that the animus in the anti-White DHS report is not rogue – it goes/comes straight to/from the top.

  8. “The thing that bewilders me is that this president just cut taxes for 95 percent of the American people,” Axelrod argued.What is he talking about? I can’t find any evidence of any tax cuts.

  9. Obama Highlights Tax Measures in Recovery Act:

    One of the critical provisions of the Recovery Act is the “Making Work Pay” tax credit, designed to offer tax relief to 95% of working families. The plan, which provides a refundable tax credit of up to $400 for working individuals and $800 for working households, is expected to put more than $100 billion into Americans’ pockets, the White House said.

    Putting that ‘Making Work Pay’ rebate to work:

    The tax rebate is part of the stimulus bill that became law in February. The total for 2009 is $400 per individual or $800 a couple, though those amounts start to phase out if pay is more than $75,000 a year for individuals or $150,000 a year for couples.

    You don’t have to do anything to get your money. Employers must start using adjusted tax-withholding tables no later than April 1, according to Internal Revenue Service spokesman Michael Dobzinski. The money should start showing up in your paycheck as soon as they comply, he said.

    During the campaign, before the crash, the amounts promised were actually higher.

    Obama Tax Plan Aimed To Help Homeowners and Seniors: Who Else?:

    Obama’s tax plan began with a “Making Work Pay” credit that would offset payroll taxes on the first $8,100 of earnings, generating up to $500 per person or $1,000 per family. The campaign said that would eliminate income taxes for 10 million low-income Americans.

  10. Yes, and the big city slickers making that obscene $75k/$150K per year (how dare they) like me shouldn’t dare expect a handout from the government.

    For god’s sake, we use Ben Franklin’s for toilet paper; we couldn’t possibly be considered part of the 95% in need.

    Every April 15th, I’m just another fool that’s WWW – working while white. Here’s my gallon of milk… moo … where’s the pasture?

  11. Around 50% of Americans don’t fall within the purview of the IRS code. This means they pay no taxes and the IRS has no claim on their labor.

    Guess who those people voted for? Guess what color their skins are?

    Therefore, Obama did not “cut” anything for 95% of anything.

    As someone who was dangerously close to the 33% bracket and shares the mindset of the people that attended the Tea Parties I can say that my anger is probably a very healthy psychological response to my dispossession.

    Newsflash to all you in the corridors of power that are fans of “progressive” taxation: I don’t have any “disposable” income.Yes, it is good for us crackers to remember that if we’re white, and hard-working, we can expect to be the piggy bank for jewish plots and pushy, demanding non-whites. What a lovely future. But at the same time, a lot of whites are slowly coming to the realization that they’re getting f’ed. I don’t know how it’ll all shape up, but I don’t think the ultimate scheme of the jews will come to fruition.

  12. Okay, so we all agree — there have been no tax cuts under Obama, since tax cuts are prospective. There’s been a small (0.5%) tax rebate, but that’s not a tax cut.

    The mainstream are flat-out lying. What a shock!

  13. The tea partiers are well aware of their tax slavitude. Their next step is for them to start thinking about who they’re enslaved to and why.

    So how about:

    Overtaxed Undervalued Boiling Mad
    Indentured Servant to Wall Street
    Fatcat Fodder
    Forced to Fund My Own Destruction
    Refugee From Refugees
    Kulak 2009

  14. Backdoor taxes to hit middle class – Yahoo! News, Feb 1:

    The Obama administration’s plan to cut more than $1 trillion from the deficit over the next decade relies heavily on so-called backdoor tax increases that will result in a bigger tax bill for middle-class families.

    In the 2010 budget tabled by President Barack Obama on Monday, the White House wants to let billions of dollars in tax breaks expire by the end of the year — effectively a tax hike by stealth.

Comments are closed.