For more than a year the jewsmedia has been trying to turn the shooting of a black nobody by a mestizo nobody into an indictment of White “racism” and “privilege”. Meanwhile the top two candidates to replace Ben Shalom Bernanke as head of the Federal Reserve are Larry Summers and Janet Yellen. All three are jews, but you won’t hear anything critical of that in the jewsmedia.
The jewish paper of record provides a typical example of how the jewsmedia goes about ignoring the jewish elephant in the room. The Battle for the Fed and In Tug of War Over New Fed Leader, Some Gender Undertones spin the struggle for power between two jew-dominated factions into a story about men versus women. Though “diversity” usually means less White, in this case it means less male.
Knowing how often jews are conflated and confused with Whites, I searched out commentary on Janet Yellen white privilege. Remarkably, I found only one article that put these four words together on the same page. Progressive Reading List at Winning Progressive calls Yellen “the best candidate to chair the Federal Reserve”, and in a separate item links The Privilege of Whiteness, describing it as:
an essay on the privilege that we place on whiteness in our society by treating white people as individuals while people of other races are racially profiled far too often.
The anti-White essay is by Paul Waldman. Another jew. These days just about anything serves as a pretext for anyone in the jewsmedia to decry White “racism” and “privilege” – it has become the new normal. The same critics don’t have anything to say about White “privilege”, much less jewish dominance, at a prominent and preeminent seat of financial and political power.
Empirically, jews are regarded as distinct from Whites. Jews like David Sirota, Tim Wise and Paul Waldman may pretend they are “white” because it helps enable their White bashing, and too many Whites are willing to go along with the charade. But the fact is that in the jew-dominated mainstream media and academia it is Whites who are most consistently criticized as a group. To the extent Whiteness is a “default setting”, as jews like Waldman argue, it is as the target for blame. Beside Sirota, Wise and Waldman, the most vile and blatant examples of anti-White invective come from jews like Susan Sontag (“the White race is the cancer of history”) and Noel Ignatiev (“the key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the White race”). Why? Because jews as a group regard themselves not only as distinct from the White race, but at odds with it. Those who speak most stridently against Whites are not “self-hating” Whites, or even White-hating Whites – they are jews doing what they think is best for jews.
Constant complaints about White “racism” and “privilege” serve to distract attention away from jewish power. There are no complaints about White “privilege” at the Fed because it would call attention to jewish power. Those who hold power in the anti-White regime are either jews, in bed (literally or figuratively) with the jews, and/or are afraid of what will happen to them if they oppose the jews. They may complain about Whites. They may even pretend jews are “white”. But they will not abide complaints about jews. This is an indication not only of the power jews have, but the duplicitous and toxic nature of that power.
Voltaire mentioned the basic principle you describe over 200 years ago:
If you want to know who rules over you, find you who you may not criticize.
That’s why any even halfway public figure would never dare to mention even 1/100th of what you have mentioned in just this article. In many of the EUSSR’s provinces )once known as nations), your article would absolutely land you in prison. That’s well on its way here in the Banksta Banana Republic also, naturally.
Professional (and collegiate) sports share much in common with Big Hollywood, from the social agendas to the little men in charge. I would consider pro sports to be a ‘substitute good’ to movies and television. At first glance, mass media is the province of jews but sports are the black man’s domain. Not at all: the commissioners of all the revenue-generating sports leagues are invariably black save the NFL, where two jews made the final five list of candidates. When Roger Goodell retires, it seemly overly likely that his successor will follow in the mold of MLB’s Bud Selig, NBA’s “internationalist” David Stern/Adam Silver, NHL’s Gary Bettman, the MLS’ Don Garber, and even Major League Lacrosse’s own Don Gross (yes that’s real).
Over in Gaye Olde England, Football Association chairman David Bernstein succeeded Baron David Triesman. Former FA vice chairman David Dien has been busy in retirement:
In March 2009 he addressed the European Parliament in Brussels calling on FIFA to scrap its proposed 6+5 rule arguing that players should be picked by clubs on the grounds of talent and not nationality. He also called on clubs to be allowed to continue to buy young talent from abroad arguing that it would be wrong to deny the most talented young players the ability to develop in the most suitable environment wherever that may be.
These rootless cosmopolitans are most concerned with “kicking out racism” and tolerance for all races, genders, and sexualities. And while they shovel that pile of shit into our mouths, more pipsqueaks pipe up about the persistent evils of White racism. Richard Lapchick, some sort of professor at the University of Central Florida, has staked claim to a big pile of shekels for compiling his annual Race and Gender Report Cards. The NBA, with 7/8 non-white players, earns an “A” grade (and half of those whites are foreigners). All other sports, according to this tiny heeb, have room for improvement, although of course the NBA might consider some women as coaches and general managers.
Like the Fed’s fiscal policy, sports are an unsustainable Ponzi scheme. The NBA lost the common (white) fan years ago, as ticket prices skyrocketed to pay out negro “stars” whom no one particularly cared for. Teams play in front of empty arenas, but small market franchises stay afloat thanks to a massive TV revenue stream, sponsored by their media peers in greater Los Angeles.
News media mirrors sports media: jews dictate the anti-white narrative, jews own and control the mediums, and jews are exempt from criticism.
“Constant complaints about White “racism” and “privilege” serve to distract attention away from jewish power.”
I think this is its primary function.
The only way you can safely mention Jews as a group these days is as victims. If for some reason Obama chooses a non-Jew as Federal Reserve Chairman I am betting that the Jew media will be questioning if this was because of anti-Semitism.
Even praising Jews can get you in trouble as shown by Vice President Biden speech which got the Jews anti-Semitism radar pinging. Just starting out a sentence with “The Jews” has them on the edge of their seats looking for something to be offended by.
Jews consider themselves to be individuals, like snowflakes, no two the same, never lumped together. Things like cattle and Goyim are lumped together but Jews must be treated as individuals
“”””Phalluster writes
Richard Lapchick, some sort of professor at the University of Central Florida, has staked claim to a big pile of shekels for compiling his annual Race and Gender Report Cards.”’’
Thanks for the link, never saw this before. I guess if the NBA was 100% minority it would get a A++ grade. As long of course if they counted Jews as a minority. Counting them among the Whites would be anti-Semitic.
the commissioners of all the revenue-generating sports leagues are invariably black save the NFL
invariably jewish, not black, obviously
The funny thing about Lapchick is that he would be otherwise so far down on the totem pole. UCF is several tiers removed from the Ivy League acme of the ivory tower, but Lapchick simply thought of something particularly clever. His reports are always mentioned by sports media in a matter-of-fact manner of reporting. (for example, ESPN: owned by Disney, run by Bob Iger) The prole comments under these articles are in turn always full of protests – anything between “stop shoving blacks down our throats” to “race doesn’t matter, meritocracy instead!” I suppose the latter attitude is the endgame, and of course no one ever speaks up to name the puppetmasters.
DJF said…”The only way you can safely mention Jews as a group these days is as victims. If for some reason Obama chooses a non-Jew as Federal Reserve Chairman I am betting that the Jew media will be questioning if this was because of anti-Semitism.“
What if Obama chose the pitchest black nigger for the Fed Chair? Would the Travyon Martin/George Zimmerman paradigm apply here?
D’Won Mocha Messiah on d’downlow (U B w8in 4!) needs to name Carlos Danger to head the Fed. He meets the J-factor qualification for the job, and will provide endless twittering entertainment.
NYT reports, Obama Narrows Field for Fed Chairman to 3.
The third is Donald L. Kohn, another jew.
Steve Sailer’s post on this subject, Yellen v. Summers: What is and what should never be respectable identity politics, only indirectly referred to the jews. His conclusion:
“the dominant tendency of the last generation in both parties … pro-Wall Street economists or operators who tend to see attempts to regulate billionaires as at least subliminally anti-Semitic.
There’s a lot to be said for this dominant standpoint, but let’s also be clear that it has been dominant, and that it might well be time to try somebody, at least for a change, who doesn’t suspect effective regulation of financiers is the first step to Nazism.“
Even this eggshell-walking was too much for his anti-“anti-semitic” commentariat. One concern-troll writes:
“Your open antisemitism is why you’ll always be radioactive.“
That’s the point. Criticism of Whites is the dominant standpoint in what Sailer calls the “prestige media”, but because Sailer ever so mildly critiques jewish power (his apparent goal being to moderate rather than end it) he is regarded as “radioactive” and does not get the media attention (and prestige) he wants and would probably get otherwise.
Another commenter attempts to explain how:
“[The jews] play with the HBD ignorance of much of the population, especially non-whites, ignoring the difference between white gentiles and Jews.“
Not quite. Sailer brings up identity politics, but he and “HBD”ers generally maintain that jews are “white”, just as the jewsmedia does. The increasingly conspicuous jewsmedia hype against “white privilege”, and the conspicuous lack thereof regarding jew-dominated finance (not to mention jew-dominated media, academia or judiciary) clearly indicates a stark difference between Whites and jews. Conflating Whites and jews as “white”, even in the face of evidence otherwise, promotes confusion rather than clarity.
The current regime is anti-White and pro-jew exactly because jews dominate it and don’t identify with Whites (or even as “white”) in any meaningful, positive sense. On this point “HBD”ers like Sailer adopt willful ignorance. Sailer often mocks others for using “Occam’s butterknife”, saying “PC makes you stupid”, yet here he demonstrates these flaws himself. It doesn’t confuse the jews, and I doubt he’s confused about any of this either.
I’m sorry, but what’s HBD?
I invite the gallery to indulge (if they have the stomach for this sickening demonstration of Jewish anti-Euro and anti-*human* pathologies) in rhetorical combat at these Stanford professors’ ethno-culture and linguistics blog.
The piece is entitled “Explaining the Rapid Rise of the Xenophobic Right in Contemporary Europe” and its author is one James Mayfield (race unstated) but who appears to be more a deluded and (within the framework of his pathogenic outgroup-imposed notions and effete treasonous decadence) an honest Anglo-American goy than a born enemy by extraction.
The true witch in this foul brew however is the professor Asya Pereltsvaig, a certifiable K*kess of venomous persuasion, whose vomit-inducing sophistries deny the moral *and* cognitive ability of Europeans to distinguish kinsman and friend from foreigner and foe, and (how so typical) denounces commenters who point out the racist apartheid and ethnocentric policies of the Jewish race-state Israel.
HBD = human biodiversity, a term Sailer coined. “HBD”ers are akin to “race realists” who likewise regard jews as “white” – meaning that while they may occasionally regard jews as special and distinct from Whites, they will not distinguish Whites (or any White ethny/nationality) as special and distinct from jews.
Larry “The-architect-of-kleptocracy” Summers in charge of the Fed?
Oy vey!
We will remember, with regret, the benevolent reign of Ben Shalom.
The true witch in this foul brew however is the professor Asya Pereltsvaig, a certifiable K*kess of venomous persuasion, whose vomit-inducing sophistries deny the moral *and* cognitive ability of Europeans to distinguish kinsman and friend from foreigner and foe, and (how so typical) denounces commenters who point out the racist apartheid and ethnocentric policies of the Jewish race-state Israel.
Reading it was staggered, she sounds brain dead. I assumed she was Scandinavian in origin given her second name sounded like that. Not at all, she’s tribe:
http://www.pereltsvaig.com/personal.html
Generally in these threads few whites have the insanity needed to maintain the double, triple, quadruple thinking necessary to really believe the PC, cultural marxist bullshit.
Jews otoh arent required to actually believe it at all and say black is white, up is down etc all day long.
I trust everyone is going to pitch in and comment/vote there. Come on guys.
Professional (and collegiate) sports share much in common with Big Hollywood, from the social agendas to the little men in charge. I would consider pro sports to be a ‘substitute good’ to movies and television. At first glance, mass media is the province of jews but sports are the black man’s domain. Not at all: the commissioners of all the revenue-generating sports leagues are invariably black save the NFL, where two jews made the final five list of candidates. When Roger Goodell retires, it seemly overly likely that his successor will follow in the mold of MLB’s Bud Selig, NBA’s “internationalist” David Stern/Adam Silver, NHL’s Gary Bettman, the MLS’ Don Garber, and even Major League Lacrosse’s own Don Gross (yes that’s real).
I’ve noticed this as well. Lots of pro team franchise owners are Jewish as well.
Jews seem to gravitate towards “bread and circus” type industries and “flesh market” type industries where bodies and their images are bought and sold – from the slave trade historically to contemporary Hollywood, fashion, porn, sports businesses where young women and athletes are bought and sold.
Also pro sports, like Hollywood, tends to promote the image of black males as being dominant, paragons of masculinity, moral authorities, etc. This seems to reflect Jewish attitudes and insecurities, which they then project and promote onto the rest of the populace. Here’s an article about Donald Sterling (born Donald Tokowitz), the owner of the LA Clippers, and his peculiar post-game activities:
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/23649/legal-filings-show-frustration-of-clipper-gms
“”During this same period, players Sam Cassell, Elton Brand and Corey Maggette complained to me that DONALD STERLING would bring women into the locker room after games, while the players were showering, and make comments such as, ‘Look at those beautiful black bodies.’ I brought this to Sterling’s attention, but he continued to bring women into the locker room.””
In Noblesse oblige in the 21st Century Sailer points to a 2008 article of his which indicates his recognition of the judaized nature of the elite and that this judaization is the source of their hostility. The hostility is directed at Whites, of course, but as usual Sailer downplays that aspect of it. Sailer as usual also comes across as actually sympathizing more with the elite, as a kind of wrongfully exiled wanna-be advisor keen for them to moderate their hostility so as to better continue their rule. And maybe let him get a job advising them or something.
Sailer is like many people who finally notice jews, because at some level they realize that what jews are doing is harmful to whatever they personally regard as important, and then go through a stage where they attempt to argue/bargain with jews in terms of “what’s best for the jews”, because they see that’s how jews argue with each other about everything.
Sailer has been stuck in that stage for years. He believes he is part jew, which is likely why he’s stuck at that stage, and likely why he will never go beyond it.
Has Occidental Observer, via Tobias Langdon, become the de facto Lawrence Auster Society?
In Praise of Austerity: Remembering A Patriot and Prophet
First they came for the comments section, and it was shut down. Then they wrote the articles, and none were there to oppose them.
Tan – While you are essentially correct I think Sailer does a pretty good job though. Pushing the envelope pretty far while just about maintaining a more neutral tone.
He certainly woke me up. I was a pretty standard race-blind liberal type (UK version) when I started reading his stuff. But he really led me off into other stuff, ‘noticing things’.
Pat,
The comments at TOO had to go because too many trolls, saboteurs and provacateurs were creating a madhouse atmosphere in the comments section.
MacDonald has always been willing to praise Auster’s strong points, and criticize his shortcomings.
Tobias Langdon’s piece links to MacDonald’s articles critical of Auster – no vile sycophant he!
Phalluster: sorry for no contact lately but my PC blew up.
Rest assured I havent lost my commitment to the revolution nor have I turned into a Hannaganesque dilitentate.
Your Kommrade,
Cameron.
Cheers, Cam. Sorry to hear about your machine; sounds like a typical Mossad thermite operation. That apostate cunt Mangan won’t approve my comments, so this blog is now the go-to depot for cool handsome WNs to howl at the moon.
AROOOOOO!
Notice the name of the guy that is undermining the UKIP from inside. Must be a plant. No anti-immigration organisation acan allow jewish members.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2386488/Godfrey-Bloom-Sending-aid-Africa-treason-says-unrepentant-UKIP-man-Bongo-Bongo-land-storm.html
Larry Summers had to resign from presidentship of Harvard for making a politically incorrect speech.
What role will that play in this selection?
Or he might be known as woman-hating White-Fed-Head who will compensate for his sins by going even more all out to favor Jews.
“Surprise new UK trade minister is committed Jew, thinks Israel’s ‘amazing’
Ian Livingston, who revived telecom giant BT, handpicked by Cameron for unpaid ministerial position, seat in House of Lords”
http://www.timesofisrael.com/surprise-new-uk-trade-minister-is-committed-jew-thinks-israels-amazing/
“LONDON — There are so many Jews at the top of Britain’s Conservative party, Prime Minister David Cameron once quipped, that it should be known as the Torah party rather than the Tory party.
With the announcement last Wednesday that Ian Livingston was selected as trade and investment minister and elevated to the House of Lords, Cameron has appointed to the government possibly its most committed Jew yet, and certainly its most outspoken supporter of Israel — which Livingston has called “the most amazing state in the world.”
I think that the royal family are crypto -jews. That is why they have co-operated with the destruction of Britain.
Kate Middleton’s mother is jewish. She is a Goldsmith so Prince George is jewish according to jewish laws of inheritance.
Forgot the reference;http://www.otbrit.com/circumcision/the-mohel/
What about all the jews at the top of the Labour party? Milliband Mendelsohn, Jack Straw, Bercow,Margaret Hodge etc.Britain is well and truly a crypto-jewish state.
“Goldsmith” isn’t necessarily a Jewish name.
Kate Middleton’s jewish ancestry seems to be pretty well documented here:-http://endzog.wordpress.com/2012/04/16/the-great-kate-middleton-scam-shes-a-jew/
Why have the British royal family had their sons circomcised for 150 years and the operation has been carried out by a rabbi and not a physician?
I’ve read that there are 2 Goldsmith families. One is Jewish and the other isn’t. If Kate is Jewish, then if she’s from the Judeo Goldsmiths, was it from a grandmother or grandfather? And if the Judeo Goldsmith family is well known Jewish why is there any trouble proving she’s a part of the Tribe?