Sirota and Wise Define The New Normal – “White Privilege” as a Jewish Construct

David Sirota writes Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American:

As we now move into the official Political Aftermath period of the Boston bombing — the period that will determine the long-term legislative fallout of the atrocity — the dynamics of privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks. That’s because privilege tends to determine: 1) which groups are — and are not — collectively denigrated or targeted for the unlawful actions of individuals; and 2) how big and politically game-changing the overall reaction ends up being.

This has been most obvious in the context of recent mass shootings. In those awful episodes, a religious or ethnic minority group lacking such privilege would likely be collectively slandered and/or targeted with surveillance or profiling (or worse) if some of its individuals comprised most of the mass shooters. However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes.

If recent history is any guide, if the bomber ends up being a white anti-government extremist, white privilege will likely mean the attack is portrayed as just an isolated incident — one that has no bearing on any larger policy debates. Put another way, white privilege will work to not only insulate whites from collective blame, but also to insulate the political debate from any fallout from the attack.

Tim Wise writes Terrorism and Privilege: Understanding the Power of Whiteness:

White privilege is knowing that even if the Boston Marathon bomber turns out to be white, his or her identity will not result in white folks generally being singled out for suspicion by law enforcement, or the TSA, or the FBI.

White privilege is knowing that even if the bomber turns out to be white, no one will call for whites to be profiled as terrorists as a result, subjected to special screening, or threatened with deportation.

White privilege is knowing that if the bomber turns out to be white, he or she will be viewed as an exception to an otherwise non-white rule, an aberration, an anomaly, and that he or she will be able to join the ranks of Tim McVeigh

among the pantheon of white people who engage in (or have plotted) politically motivated violence meant to terrorize and kill, but whose actions result in the assumption of absolutely nothing about white people generally, or white Christians in particular.

And white privilege is being able to know nothing about the crimes committed by most of the terrorists listed above — indeed, never to have so much as heard most of their names — let alone to make assumptions about the role that their racial or ethnic identity may have played in their crimes.

In short, white privilege is the thing that allows you (if you’re white) — and me — to view tragic events like this as merely horrific, and from the perspective of pure and innocent victims, rather than having to wonder, and to look over one’s shoulder, and to ask even if only in hushed tones, whether those we pass on the street might think that somehow we were involved.

It is the source of our unearned innocence and the cause of others’ unjustified oppression.

That is all. And it matters.

David Sirota is a jew. Tim Wise is a jew. It matters.

The narrative of oppression is, after all, the jewish narrative. This is a narrative in which Whites and jews are polar opposites – where jews and other people of non-Whiteness are innocent victims of unjustified oppression by Whites.

Wise and Sirota, as hypersensitive as they are about race and identity, are well aware of this. The hypocrisy of their anti-“racist” screeds against Whites and the dishonesty of their “White like me” anti-White guilt-trip schtick can only spring from an unfathomable hatred for Whites.

To describe what’s going on in their own terms, it is jewish privilege that allows them to vent venom against Whites based on nothing more than literal fantasy – “if the bomber turns out to be White” or even “hoping the bomber turns out to be White”. Their shrill denunciations of illusory “White privilege”, echoed ever more often and loudly across the media, are an indication of just how deeply dishonest and malevolent jewish rule is.

27 thoughts on “Sirota and Wise Define The New Normal – “White Privilege” as a Jewish Construct”

  1. David Sirota will be debating Ben Shapiro this afternoon (ostensibly on the gun vote in the senate, but after this Salon piece I don’t think the gun vote will enter into the picture much).

    It will be interesting to see if Shapiro will bother to note the irony of two jewish brahmins discussing the “white problem”.

  2. This is the same guy who called for the profiling of white males over mass shootings a few months ago. No mention of Omar Thornton in the CNN interview.

    Profile white men

    Some good comments there.

  3. Shapiro responds to Sirota on Boston suspect article –

    David Sirota: You likely don’t believe America is as nasty or xenophobic because you are white and you don’t have to face it everyday. That’s the definition of white privilege. But talk to people of color living in New York City about stop and frisk, or talk to Muslims about surveillance, or talk to Latinos here in Denver about police brutality, and you might see things a bit differently.

    Ben Shapiro: Racism exists. But it is not the dominant force in American life.Speaking of which, I do find it odd that Jews are considered members of the white privileged class when less than two generations ago, whites wouldn’t let us into their country clubs.

    David Sirota: Re: Jews – as one, I agree on that point.

    Shapiro: Jews aren’t White or privileged.

    Sirota: I agree.

  4. Sirota is only doing this for “us”.

    I still hope the bomber is a white American –

    The reason, then, to hope that the bomber ends up being a white American is because the double standard may prevent an overreaction to the heinous attacks in Boston.

    . . .

    The reason to hope that the bomber is a white American is because in a country where white privilege and double standards so obviously affect our national security reactions, that outcome will better guarantee that the reaction to Boston is a bit more measured.

    So why not hope the bomber is a jew? Heck, an Israeli passport would suffice. Then the jewsmedia would immediately and completely lose interest.

  5. Meanwhile, Greg Cochran has banned the Jew Ron Unz from commenting at his site after a dispute over the gay germ v gay gene theories:

    Of course I banned him, and good riddance. He’s a waste of time. As a friend with a fair amount of experience said, Ron is impervious to reason.

    I mean, he comes with up wrong ideas about everything, and then he goes on and on forever, arguing like a possessed lawyer.

    Maybe Unz is aiming to become the new Lawrence Auster!

    There’s a funny comment at 6.25pm April 16 by someone called Not Ron Unz:

    I, Not Ron Unz, would like to reply by ignoring/misunderstanding everything that you’ve just written.

    Further, I’d like to draw your attention to “cherry-picked quote,” from the textbook of Authority Figure #1. What sort of cruel man would disagree with Authority Figure #1?

    And what about these statistics from weak sources? Do you disagree with the gospel of Authority Figure #2′s data-gathering ability?

    In sincerest pomposity,
    N. R. U.

    I don’t think there can be any doubt that Unz is mostly responsible for turning The American Conservative into the leftist joke that it’s become.

  6. The bombing of the Liberty, then by this logic, must be Israeli/Jewish privilege. Or the Omagh bombing that killed 29 and mutilated 220 others in NI must be an example of Irish Catholic privilege because it did not stop GWB from meeting the murderer Gerry Adams at the White House on St Paddy’s day.

    “Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.”


    secular humynist, pro-Israel, feminist, and fiscally conservative Arianna Pattek
    My first week of work
    Posted on June 8, 2012 by feministconservative

    Like I said in my last post, I’m working in my school’s admissions office for the time being. This is a great opportunity for me, and I’m so glad to have the ability to decide who will come in and who won’t. We are here to make future leaders of America and the world, and as such we have the responsibility do keep those who would make the world a worse place far away, while admitting those who have potential to use their abilities to improve the world.

    For instance I can’t tell you how many applications I saw that were just dripping with white male privelege. Any of those that I saw basically went straight to the garbage can regardless of how good their qualifactions were. If I saw an application from a white male that basically was just good test scores, and activities like chess club or math club or what not then it shows me this person is not interested in a diverse environment. Obviously he made no effort in integrating with minorities or to sympathize with them and is counting on male privelege to get in. So that kind of application should get ignored. In their place I admitted a female student. This goes double especially for math/science majors.

    Another time this I had an application for what sounded like an arab male who wanted to study computer science. On paper he looked good enough, decent above average scores, and such. But I checked facebook and sure enough on his wall I came came upon a particularly hateful post about Israel supposedly not having a right to exist. I promptly trashed the application and sent out a rejection letter.

    The lesson here is that people are multi-dimensional. We can’t boil people down to numbers or statistics, or reject people based on the color of their skin. I’m happy to say that I approved nearly 90% of all female minority and 80% of all (white female applicants especially if the girls want to study math or science) while rejecting over 50% of white males this week and hope this trend holds out.

  8. How about all those white victims everywhere? Why don’t they put up their white privilege shields?!

  9. David Sirota’s latest is on the front page of Salon under the title, “OUR POST-BOSTON NATIONAL SHAME – Between a Saudi student’s profiling and irresponsible CNN and NY Post reports, our nation’s bigotry is on display”. Boston aftermath brings out America’s worst prejudices:

    For a country that so often purports to be color blind, that insists too many people of color are overly obsessed with race, and that claims to live up to Dr. King’s dream of not judging people “by the color of their skin but by the content of their character,” the last two days have revealed a much uglier reality. They have revealed that — “doth protest too much” claims to the contrary — America is anything but color blind, that too many white folk are the ones obsessed with race, and that Dr. King’s dream is still just that: a distant dream. And that’s not just a general truism that is irrelevant to this moment of national emergency — it is, on the contrary, a very specific point that must be made, right now, precisely because of that national emergency.

    The standard retort by the “I’m colorblind!” crowd to any mention of these inconvenient facts, of course, is to claim that “now is not the time” to discuss bigotry. But that’s the thing: its only “not the time” if you happen to be a member of the group (read: white people) that is never collectively demonized. For people of color, whether in Boston or anywhere else, now must be the time, because — unlike white folk — at a moment’s notice people of color personally could end up like the Saudi student or the guys on the front cover of the New York Post. And just as bad, their entire communities could easily end up with more draconian measures unduly aimed at them.

    This is absolutely classic – jews with megaphones pointing fingers at some other jews with megaphones, casting blame on anybody and everybody else.

    Sirota’s use of terms like “our nation’s bigotry” and “America’s worst prejudices” are disingenuous, and deliberately so. He recognizes the deep racial divisions of this American non-nation. He’s clearly siding with the non-Whites, against the Whites, who he unashamedly targets for collective shaming, profiling and demonizing.

    Sirota knows his opponents on the other side of the jewsmedia are gelded – as jewblind as they are colorblind. He continues a pattern established decades ago, accelerating after WWII and again after the 1960s, whereby leftwing jews make a scene about bigotry and “racism”, and the rightwing jews sheepishly give ground, protesting that they’re not “racist”.

    Here too we see another classic jewish tactic – attack, attack, attack. Criticized? Attack, attack, attack some more. The jew cries out in pain as he attacks.

  10. “But talk to people of color living in New York City about stop and frisk”

    The hypocrisy is stunning.

    Stop and frisk (like zero tolerance before it) is/was a Jewish policy to ethnically cleanse black people from what Jews want to be *their* towns: NewYork, LA, Washington DC and in theory Chicago (but that may turn out to be a bridge too far), after black crime successfully cleared out all the white people.

    In particular it’s about Jews wanting to get all the black people off Manhattan.

  11. Quote:
    his or her identity will not result in white folks generally being singled out for suspicion by law enforcement, or the TSA, or the FBI.

    White privilege is knowing that even if the bomber turns out to be white, no one will call for whites to be profiled as terrorists as a result, subjected to special screening, or threatened with deportation.

    Whites already are singled out specifically for profiling. Every single picture and story of some young toddler or child being held and searched by the TSA has been a white. Every elderly infirm person suffering the indignity of body searches has been white. Every one. The targets TSA practices shooting only has white males, females and children. Not a single minority. The FBI profiles commonly insist on a white suspect. The list goes on. And the jews know the truth of it they are the driving force behind it.

  12. Thankfully the FBI doesnt believe in any of this white privilege bullshit:
    In profiling mass murderers, FBI behaviorists follow a formula that hasn’t changed much over the past decade – even after Sept. 11.

    It’s called “RWG,” or regular white guys.

    I.C. Smith, an FBI counterintelligence veteran, explains how it was applied in the sniper case.

    “First you start with the statistic that 80 to 90 percent of all (serial) shooters are white guys. Then you back out the guys happily married. That leaves the introspective loner types,” he said in a WorldNetDaily interview. “So you end up with a pretty small part of the population.”

    Of course, that residual excludes Muslims – who tend to be black or foreign, not white.

    Remember john Allen Muhammad? How about Joel Rifkin, David Berkowitz, Israel Keyes, Andre Chikatilo?

    What do they all have in common? They were all profiled by FBI as white males…

    go figure.

  13. It never fails. These lying anti-whites love to frame a conversation in a manner that forces their lies to seem like truth. In this example the trick is to say that

    “However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated / targeted for those shootings — even though most come at the hands of white dudes.”

    This is like saying that since the largest numbers of mass deaths, while traveling, occurs on airplanes, that airplanes are “privileged”. Notice that Wise, a Jew, does not say that Jews or Israelis are guilty of mass killings, or privileged, even though they kill more people in mass than anyone on the planet.

    Let’s consider the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting. How many died, 26, okay. Now ask this question, how many people have been murdered in this town? Expand this question to include any of the mass shootings by whites. How many people die because of mass shootings (or any shootings) by whites?

    Now what about Detroit? Gary, IN? South Central, LA? Chicago? Not so many mass shootings but all people are a LOT safer around those “privileged” white men than in the presents of blacks & Mexicans. By the way, Wise and other anti-whites just LOVE to over look all of those MASS GRAVES down Mexico way, don’t they?

    They start by pretending that THEIR assumption is correct and then add in a large number of so-called facts in support of their defective logic. Please don’t fall for this false logic they are ONLY expounding on their reasons to support white GENOCIDE.
    C. C. Conrad
    Jack’s War

  14. secular humynist, pro-Israel, feminist, and fiscally conservative

    Oh, that kind of “conservative” [lol]. She’s “fiscally”, you see.
    Seriously, reading her other posts, she can’t be for real. Then again, she probably is. I think I need to puke.

  15. So, Jews that control (monopolize) the banking systems, universities, entertainment industries, financial centers and major cities of countries that they have invaded…. Jews, that are offended when the people of the host country want to celebrate their religion or control their immigration policy… Jews that overthrew christian eastern Europe, rebuilt it under a Talmudic theocracy and murdered tens of millions of people but, accept no blame for their crimes…. Jews that poison countries with drugs, pornography, engage in human organ trafficking… incite wars then fund both sides, but are never held accountable… That move freely between nation as if it’s their right, but prevent white people from moving out of dangerous places like Africa. Is there a limit to this tribe’s hypocrisy! White privilege is a term to delegitimize white control of any institution and diversity is a tactic to dispossess us. This is a genocidal war being waged against white people by Jews.

  16. Current TV Hosts “Hope” Boston Marathon Bombers Are White, RealClearPolitics, 18 Apr 2013:

    Cenk Uygur, Brown University Professor Tricia Rose, Mediaite editor Noah Rothman, and “The War Room” host Michael Shure debate whether or not it’s okay Americans to hope the people who committed the Boston Marathon attacks are of a certain race, ethnicity or religious background.

    Uygur and Shure agree with Sirota. All these jews in the jewsmedia and not one has pointed out how completely different these discussions would be if “White” were replaced by “jew”. Weird, isn’t it?

  17. According to wiki:

    Wise was born in Nashville, Tennessee, to Michael Julius Wise and LuCinda Anne (née McLean) Wise. His paternal grandfather was Jewish (of Russian origin), while the rest of his ancestry includes Scottish.

    Wise isn’t 100% jew.

  18. In a contortion of logic unbeknownst to European kind, Wise blames Zionism on white supremacy.

    “These Jews, unlike the European Jews who sought to displace said Arabs from their land, lived there peacefully and sought no grand designs for “Greater Israel.” They did not create Zionism, nor lead the charge for the development of a Jewish state. For that, it took a decidedly Western, European and frankly white Jewish community. The Jews who were most indigenous to the land of Israel, or those of Africa, or the rest of Asia Minor — in short those who were most directly Semitic peoples — were never the problem. Nor indeed was their faith. A decidedly colonial mentality, itself an outgrowth of European thought and culture from the late 1800’s forward, was the fuel for the Zionist fire. Zionism’s problem is that it is a form of white supremacy and Western domination.”

  19. Don’t forget Michael Skolnik, another Jew who is at the forefront of the white privilege race baiting movement.

Comments are closed.