Podcast: Play in new window | Download
An impromptu review of AoTR themes covered over the past few months.
The example of the Parasite Flight trope I cited is Roger Cohen’s Jew York Times op-ed, The Great Jewish Exodus, published on 19 Feb 2015:
LONDON – They were gone, as completely as from Baghdad or Cairo, Damascus or Alexandria. They had vanished from Budapest and Brussels, from Frankfurt and Padua, from Paris and Manchester, from Antwerp and Stockholm.
As in the Arab world, Europe wondered what it had lost. The texture of life was thinned, the richness of exchange diminished, the flowering of ideas curtailed. There was an absence.
They did not say much. They packed and left, wheeling their suitcases, carrying their bags and bundles and babies, a little wave offered here and there. Rich and poor, religious and not, they sold what they had and went on their way. People looked askance, as their forbears once had in crueler circumstances, a little uneasy at the exodus, unsure what it meant but certain it was the end of a very long story.
Was Europe not the Continent of Disraeli and Heine and Marx (all baptized, but still), of Freud and Einstein, of Rothschild and Bleichröder, of Dreyfus and Herzl, of Joseph Roth and Stefan Zweig? Was it not the home of Yiddish, once the first tongue of millions, a language perhaps unique, as Isaac Bashevis Singer noted, because it was never spoken by men in power?
Was it not the scene of a great 19th-century struggle for emancipation beginning in France and stretching across the Continent to the pogrom-stained Pale of Settlement, a battle that in many instances ushered this stubborn people, with their eternal covenant of ethics entered into with a faceless God, to the summit of the professions, only for this progress, threatening to some, to end in the Nazis’ industrialized mass murder?
Was Europe not, against all odds, the place liberalism triumphed over the deathly totalitarianisms? The land of Isaiah Berlin who quoted Kant: “Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made.” The Continent where this people survived after the attempted annihilation (in which the majority of Europeans were complicit), forming new communities, even in Germany; a Continent of crooked timber, of every expression and experiment in their identity, their partial loss of identity, their embrace of merged and multiple identities?
Yes, there was often a sense of otherness, a self-imposed discretion, but there was also reassurance in being part of a great European convergence that over many decades dissolved the borders across which countless wars had been fought and affirmed the right of every European of whatever faith or ethnicity to equal rights, free expression, and the free practice of their beliefs.
Yet now they were gone. Europe, without the Jews, had lost part of itself. It had lost the very right to a conscience. It had been defeated in its essence. It had rebirthed itself after the 20th-century horror only to surrender.
Jewishness had lost one of its constituent elements, the European Jew of the diaspora. As for humanity, it had lost all hope. Humankind had succumbed to the tribal nightmare, to the darkest of tides. Tribal war loomed.
Israel is indeed the home of every Jew, and that is important, a guarantee of sorts. It is equally important, however, that not every Jew choose this home. That is another kind of guarantee, of Europe’s liberal order, of the liberal idea itself. So it was shattering when millions of Jews, every one of them in fact, as if entranced, upped and left their homes in Milan and Berlin and Zurich.
Beside typifying (and in this case literally fantasizing an extension of) the jewish narrative there are two points I neglected to mention in the podcast. First, Cohen undermines his own reality-inverting suggestion that jews have had a positive influence on Europeans by citing poisonously destructive exemplars such as Marx, Freud and Rothschild. Second, Cohen (dis)credits the jews with inciting and maintaining jew-serving “liberalism” amongst Europeans.
Interloping “cosmopolitan” jews like Cohen build whole careers upon loxism, characterized by a truly schizophrenic alternation between snivelling and gloating. Often, as in the case of this op-ed, it is both at the same time. Yet, while jews like Cohen loudly whine and boast that their poisonous tribe is the very essence of European health, “white pathologists” busy themselves searching for some way, any way, that it’s not about the jews.
Greg Johnson’s critique of my recent arguments about “white pathology” starts here.
I have some things to attend to offline and won’t be producing AoTR installments for the next month or so. In the meantime I invite listeners review my archives, subscribe to TFeed (and the various of sources of audio I include there) and follow me on Twitter.
This is what the parasites actually believe: Why the Jews? Caroline Glick explains the roots of genocidal Jew hatred.
This is what’s flipping yid lids today: Bill Nye’s Advice To European Jews Fearful For Their Lives: They Should Get To Know Their Neighbors
Never mind Bill Nye. Notice that before Nye says anything Meathead offers his version of the anti-White jewish narrative.
Tanstaafl, a couple months ago I linked to your article on the death of Larry Auster in an article I wrote on the self-sabotaging behavior of many anti-Semites and used your point specifically about the pro-Jewish shills among the far right crowd who prioritize Jewish interests above whites. The article received mostly positive but also angry feedback but you can read it here:
http://therightstuff.biz/2015/02/04/most-anti-semites-are-social-justice-warriors-2/
I recently heard your youtube commentary about the ‘white pathology’ problem and how whites internalize this destructive mindset and I was wondering if you’d be interested in appearing on our podcast, The Daily Shoah. We’re trying to build a coalition of right wing podcast contributors from different ideologies and websites and have had several guest stars on. If interested just reply to my comment.
Can you cite some specific examples?
I responded to your article here.
I’m not “right-wing”. I’m a White racialist/nationalist. I’m not interested in debating jews.
“They were gone, as completely as from Baghdad or Cairo, Damascus or Alexandria. They had vanished from Budapest and Brussels, from Frankfurt and Padua, from Paris and Manchester, from Antwerp and Stockholm.
As in the Arab world, Europe wondered what it had lost. The texture of life was thinned, the richness of exchange diminished, the flowering of ideas curtailed. There was an absence.”
He’s talking about Whites,right? Please tell me this imbecilic,self-worshiping, delusional jewish fuck is talking about Whites. You know, Spartacus, Leonardo Da Vinci,the guy who wrote Beowulf, those Europeans whose disappearance would curtail the richness of exchange, the flowering of ideas, and thin the texture of life?
“Yet now they were gone. Europe, without the Jews, had lost part of itself.”
WHAT!?
Did Europe lose a part of itself 109 times when we booted the greedy,conniving, traitorous,child-murdering/raping hooknosed parasites out over and over and over and over? Are jews all smoking meth now or something?
“Was Europe not the Continent of Disraeli and Heine and Marx (all baptized, but still), of Freud and Einstein, of Rothschild and Bleichröder, of Dreyfus and Herzl, of Joseph Roth and Stefan Zweig? Was it not the home of Yiddish, once the first tongue of millions, a language perhaps unique, as Isaac Bashevis Singer noted, because it was never spoken by men in power?”
No. It’s where these unwanted parasites with their disgusting gypsy carney-talk were squatting after being repeatedly told to leave by the rightful inhabitants.
“Was it not the scene of a great 19th-century struggle for emancipation beginning in France and stretching across the Continent to the pogrom-stained Pale of Settlement…”
No. It was the scene of several coups staged by bloodthirsty mass-murdering psychopaths against defenseless White peasants and the leaders in whom they had placed their faith and entrusted their civilization to,though.
“…a battle that in many instances ushered this stubborn people, with their eternal covenant of ethics entered into with a faceless God…”
You mean with a dog-faced demon,I’m sure,jew.
“, to the summit of the professions, only for this progress, threatening to some….”
Your “progress” sure was threatening to the millions of Ukrainians you murdered by starvation. Just my White male opinion, but it all hinges on what type of threat with which “some” are threatened. If that threat is “being starved to death by the millions”, I wouldn’t really call it “progress”. Any African dictator can starve millions of people to death. Perhaps a better way to put it would be “this threat, seen by some (the jews) as progress…”
“…to end in the Nazis’ industrialized mass murder?”
Prove it. Supposedly there were 6 million jews killed with either carbon monoxide or cyanide in “gas chambers”. Show me one actual gas chamber used to kill jews,or preferably, a photo of jews being killed in one of these “gas chambers”. The “Holocaust” fairy tale hinges on the testimony of jews. There is no physical evidence that jews were killed in gas chambers as part of a program of industrialized mass murder and I say the jews were/are lying about it, just like they lie about American history,colonialism,and the supposed “complicity” of “the majority of Europeans” in anything having to do with WW2 (except perhaps our mutual complicity in stupidly slaughtering each other for the benefit of these human leeches,for these ugly, hateful,twisted jewish vermin).
I agree that the Jew-as-parasite model explains this conflict better than the concept of White pathology. This is something I’ve been saying for a while now, and so few people seem to listen.
Jews have achieved dominance in many civilizations over the course of many centuries, including non-White ones. These civilizations have invariably perished. There is nothing inherently wrong with Whites.
The concept of White pathology is merely a secularized Original Sin for Whites. We have no Original Sin. “Sin” is a moral concept, and this is not a moral war, it’s a biological war.
A priceless example of the suicide meme in a recent comment from AntiDem, a part-jew NRx blogger, https://disqus.com/home/discussion/therightstuffbiz/another_ovenside_chat_with_mike/#comment-1865011199
Meow Blitz adds his own jewy twist, https://disqus.com/home/discussion/therightstuffbiz/another_ovenside_chat_with_mike/#comment-1884613769
“We shouldn’t blame the jews, stupid goyim. We should blame ourselves, stupid goyim. Trust us, stupid goyim, we’re on our side.”
“the self-sabotaging behavior of many anti-Semites”
Nothing sabotages White racial action like making out it’s a right vs left struggle. Whites are the only people who think politics is about right vs. left. Right vs. left just divides Whites against ourselves over issues that don’t matter at this time.
I’m more familiar with the paleoconservatives around Brimelow and Taylor, the alt-rightists around Spencer and the new-rightists around Johnson than these nrxers, but there’s little between em. If it doesn’t begin with White interests at the centre and an understanding that non-Whites especially Jews must be excluded, it inevitably becomes about ‘what’s good for Jews’. Linder is right about this and right to call these people cowards.
We’ve see how Taylor eventually sides with Hart and other uncivil Jews over gentleman Duke; Spencer sides with Gottfried over White Nationalists when Gottfried comes out for the Jewish ethnostate but against White ethnostates; and Johnson promotes writers who think race-consciousness is zoological buffoonery or embrace a tribal identity that is necessarily multi-racial. All this is inevitable if they’re Right not White, when the game of right vs. left is so thoroughly controlled by Jews.
***
Taylor was labelled ‘controlled opposition’ over at TOO recently and MacDonald intervened to insist that commenters be more respectful to other pro-White bloggers, but isn’t the Hart/Duke incident and aftermath enough to prove the claim, if we’re talking about false opposition to the Jewish promoted anti-White status-quo?
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/03/the-justice-departments-bogus-report/
Taylor, Spencer, and all the rest are ultimately democrats. They think they can win by compromising, hedging their bets, playing nice, and speaking softly. Meanwhile they’re up against uncompromising Jewish fanatics and their equally fanatical and uncompromising goyim slaves.
A lot of these alt rightists/New Rightists also have a disturbingly Judaic contempt for Hitler and the National Socialists even though they have not a single victory to their name while Hitler became a world leader. They think they have better strategies than Hitler even when these strategies (not naming the Jew, playing the democrat, not defending NS when attacked, etc.) have failed every single time for the past 70 years.
Linder had it right: it’s the clown show.
holocaust survivors gone wild: “A lot of these alt rightists/New Rightists also have a disturbingly Judaic contempt for Hitler”
Greg Johnson writes favorably about Hitler. But for some unknown absurd reason, he won’t say that the jewish holocaust story is an obvious lie. He is remarkably straightforward about the jewish problem, but he may direct snide remarks at those who simply say: it’s the jews, stupid!
Jared Taylor won’t mention the Jews, but I think his work about racial differences is still very useful. I don’t see him as false opposition. Personally, I have always been race-conscious and pro-White. I didn’t need to realize that non-White immigrants usually have low IQs. But I think it is especially useful today for young White people who are not racially aware to learn about racial differences. American Renaissance has provided many people with essential information about IQ, crime statistics, the importance of birth rates, eugenics and dysgenics, the effect of racial diversity on social capital, and so on. After that, people can still learn about the Jewish problem from other sources.
“Linder had it right: it’s the clown show.”
Linder is a clown too when he says that exterminating the Jews would solve the problem. Saying that isn’t helpful.
Colin Liddell and Ramzpaul are clowns too, when they attack Robert Ransdall for using the slogan “with jews, you lose!”.
So, there’s a lot of clowning around by smart WNs who should know better. I hope WN circles will eventually develop a more serious culture. But the people mentioned here are still doing useful work. Some criticism is all right, but I think too much criticism would be counterproductive.