Gates of Vienna: Ethnically Cleansing the English, by Paul Weston:
To become an ethnic minority in your own country over just a few decades suggests that government policy, as has recently been revealed, was indeed to ethnically cleanse the English from their homeland, although the multiculturalists who committed this wicked act of treason and betrayal never couched it in quite such plain language, preferring instead to frame mass immigration as a means of achieving social objectives.
These figures are not hysterical, nor are they the obtained from the research of paranoid periodicals. In 2007 The Guardian reported that Britain was heading toward a population of 70 million by 2031, but did not mention that the addition of an extra 10 million people whilst the indigenous population was simultaneously declining and emigrating required the importation of an awful lot more than just an extra 10 million immigrants.
Indeed, the liberals and the leftists are only too aware the indigenous population is being ethnically cleansed. In 2000 The Guardian predicted a white minority Britain by 2100, therefore tacitly admitting acceptance of population replacement, but erring only on the time frame necessary to achieve racial cleanliness.
Fjordman said…
Terms such as “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” should not be used lightly, but Paul Weston is unfortunately entirely correct here: What is happening with the native white population throughout Western Europe is a purposeful, state-sponsored campaign of ethnic cleansing. The only thing that’s unique about Britain is that key members of the ruling party openly admit this, in writing. What Andrew Neather probably didn’t realize when he said this was that he inadvertently laid the basis for a new Nuremberg process where Multiculturalism is listed as an ideology with the stated intention of the physical destruction of whites everywhere. As such it constitutes an organized crime against humanity.
NATO, led by the USA, bombed the Serbs for “ethnic cleansing,” thereby facilitating the Islamic ethnic cleaning of Christians in the Balkans. So, if the Western Multicultural oligarchs are against ethnic cleansing, I guess they must now bomb Britain, where the authorities have publicly admitted that they are deliberately destroying the native population of their country. So why isn’t that happening? Could it be because similar anti-white policies are followed in all white majority Western nations without exception?
It’s time we realize that the humiliation, dispossession and gradual destruction of whites, from Canada to Sweden, is not the accidental result of a failed policy but the deliberate result of an evil policy, the largest campaign of ethnic cleansing in recorded world history. An this is happening in the “free and democratic West.” If “democracy” means the genocide of your people then what the hell is it good for?
Fuchur said…
Terms such as “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” should not be used lightly, but Paul Weston is unfortunately entirely correct here
I cannot take someone serious who uses the words “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” in that context. Just look at the word “genocide”: “Killing” is part of the word. Now when, say, a black woman immigrates to GB and then gives birth to a child there – how is that in ANY way related to KILLING somebody??? I can only shake my head in disbelief at the vile twisted minds that could come up with such a warped comparison. Even Orwell would be baffled at that crazy attempt at Doublespeak: giving birth = killing. Ingenious.
This is racism, in it’s purest and simplest form. Period. Now, you could maybe try and make the point that racism isn’t all that bad and so on… but please don’t insult our intelligence by claiming that this isn’t racisim. Really. It’s just too ridiculous…
Paul Weston said…
@Fuchur
Curious name, curious morals.
You read an article pointing out the territorial and cultural displacement of a race of people, and your response is to make the accusation of racism.
You must hate the white race with a passion!
The UN definition of genocide quoted does not include the word “killing” and nor do I make such an association in my article.
I imagine you have an extremely short attention span, so will repeat the UN definition of genocide for you, and the UN rights of indigenous peoples.
“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part…”
“Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.”
“Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;”
You see, no mention of the word killing…
Perhaps a simple yes or no question might be in order.
Do you think the UN declarations above should be applied to the indigenous English?
Yes or no.
Failure to respond might well lead people to think you a rather silly fuchur.
The genocidal regime in Britain, and indeed in all White countries, agrees with Fuchur.
BNP ‘whites-only’ membership rules outlawed | Politics | guardian.co.uk:
Judge agrees with human rights watchdog that British National party’s rewritten criteria for joining are still racist
In a landmark injunction at the Central London county court, a judge found that the BNP’s membership policy remained discriminatory, even after a direct whites-only clause was removed last month.
The judge, Paul Collins, ordered the BNP to remove two clauses from its constitution as they were indirectly racist towards non-white would-be members.
While one offending clause is largely an administrative matter – a requirement that all new members agree to a vetting visit from BNP officials, something the judge found could intimidate non-white applicants – the other spells out core beliefs.
This is a requirement for members to believe in the “continued creation, fostering, maintenance and existence” of an indigenous British race and action towards “stemming and reversing” migration.
Our enemies see concern for the interests of indigenous Whites as “racist”, and not being “racist” against alien interlopers takes precedence over the desire of native Whites to ensure our very existence. That they have the power to legalize their crimes does not absolve them of responsibility.
Are the people at GOV becoming more open to white advocacy, or are they still fixated solely on Muslims?
I cannot take someone serious who uses the words “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” in that context. Just look at the word “genocide”: “Killing” is part of the word. Now when, say, a black woman immigrates to GB and then gives birth to a child there – how is that in ANY way related to KILLING somebody???
What a retard! Yes, “killing” is part of the word, but what about the other part? It’s the killing of a genus, not any person or persons.
Are the people at GOV becoming more open to white advocacy, or are they still fixated solely on Muslims?
The focus has definitely shifted since I last visited regularly. Fjordman at least is beginning to realize that the regime isn’t so much pro-muslim as it is anti-White. AFAIK he hasn’t yet wondered aloud why the anti-White regime is pro-jew.
The regime’s reaction to the minaret vote in Switzerland apparently opened some eyes. See Fjordman’s first comment in Mohawk the Model. More than a few counter-jihad Whites must have noticed that organized jewry sided with the muslims.
In A Day That Will Live in Infamy for American Conservatives they noticed neocon jews Kristol and Krauthammer had criticized Dutch nationalist Geert “support for israel is my litmus test” Wilders.
I honestly think that the BNP is the last chance for the UK.
Jessica
http://jesscon.wordpress.com
Weston’s essay got picked up by Mangan’s. There’s plenty of confusion and misdirection in the comments, but here’s a good response to that:
Lugo said…
“Probably none of this can be stopped though. You cannot go back, only forward. It strikes me that instead of trying to restore old ideas and principles, a strategy which has going against it the idea that you are against progress, and progress is an emotionally powerful idea embraced by most average people, we should work on developing new philosophies and value systems that repackage the best elements of the old.”
The basic logical error here is that you accept the liberal claim that what has happened in the last 50 to 100 years represents “progress”. What has actually happened to the West since 1914 has been an unmitigated disaster; chaos, destruction, and death on a grand scale, the erosion of social, cultural, and political institutions, demographic suicide, the collapse of western will, etc etc. Once you destroy the idea that we have had “progress” in the past century, and get the truth across, then you remove the supposed obstacle that turning the clock back is “against progress”.
Your idea that all we can do is sit back and accept the inevitable, in the hope that future centuries will be better, is craven, defeatist, and contemptible. To quote Bill Whittle: “Civilizations do not fall because of the barbarians at the gates. Nor does a great city fall from the death wish of bored and morally bankrupt stewards presumably sworn to its defense. Civilizations fall only because each citizen of the city comes to accept that nothing can be done to rally and rebuild broken walls; that ground lost may never be recovered; and that greatness lived in our grandparents but not our grandchildren.” In other words, civilizations fall because cowards like you have given up. Now go away and quit demoralizing everyone who hasn’t given up!
Now that GoV and Mangan’s (the proprietors and their commentariat) have begun to realize and accept what is happening, the next step is to start thinking through who is doing it and why.
From BBC News – Growing fears over Muslim prison ‘gangs’:
MUSLIM PRISONER POPULATION
2008: 9,795 (12% of total prison population in England and Wales)
2007: 8,864 (11%)
2006: 8,243 (11%)
2005: 7,246 (10%)
2004: 6,571 (9%)
2003: 6,136 (8%)
. . .
In some high security prisons, the figures are well above average.
In 2008, Muslim prisoners accounted for a third (34%) of prisoners in HMP Whitemoor, in March, Cambridgeshire, and about a quarter (24%) of inmates in HMP Long Lartin, in Evesham, Worcestershire.
“This is racism, in it’s purest and simplest form.”
Until people like Weston get past this buggaboo progress will continue to be difficult.
Mr Weston’s response should be…”Yes, it is racism in its purest and simplest form and it is morally good. It recognizes that it is normal for an ethnic group or race to want to survive and to avoid displacement by others. It recognizes that mass immigration is ethnic competition over territory and that it negatively impacts reproductive fitness. It realizes that territory ensures survival, and human history is largely a record of groups expanding and contracting, conquering or being conquered, migrating or being displaced by migrants. The loss of territory, whether by military defeat or displacement by aliens, brings ethnic diminishment or destruction – precisely what is happening in the “multicultural” West today.”
“What has actually happened to the West since 1914 has been an unmitigated disaster; chaos, destruction, and death on a grand scale, the erosion of social, cultural, and political institutions, demographic suicide, the collapse of western will, etc etc. Once you destroy the idea that we have had “progress” in the past century, and get the truth across, then you remove the supposed obstacle that turning the clock back is “against progress”.”
—
Isn’t it funny how the decline of The West during the 20th Century parallels the rise of Jewish power at the exact same time? Could there possibly be a correlation there?
Fjordman at least is beginning to realize that the regime isn’t so much pro-muslim as it is anti-White.
This is true. Fjordman used to be nearly an anti-racist, he banned people from his site for stuff like that in the old days. Not anymore, it seems. But it’s not so hard to believe. Many people including myself started out more as anti-liberals and the explicitly racial part of the equation became clear later.
Now that GoV and Mangan’s (the proprietors and their commentariat) have begun to realize and accept what is happening, the next step is to start thinking through who is doing it and why.
This is also true. However, it is irksome that people like this are so eager with the ‘anti-semite’ smear when people like you and I were, from the beginning, decrying the obvious Jewish hand in all of this. The Jews are massively overrepresented in pro-immigration groups, pushing for thought crime legislation, advocacy for affirmative action and the denial of freedom of association for Whites, fomenting intolerance toward anyone who disagrees with their utopian communistic agenda, indoctrination of the larger populace into their malicious agenda, and so forth. And all the while they indignantly deny their hand in it in an immense display of nerve.
To deny these goings-on, now that they are so clear, is to be brazenly mendacious.
Tan,
Your latest retort to Taksei at GoV is right to the point. I don’t want to post in that site anymore (except perhaps an e-mail follow-up note when I finish to translate my book for my blog). But it is very reassuring to see that, after I changed sides, at least one of my new friends is giving Taksei such a good battle. I mean: this is the second time that, from my POV, you have scored a T.K.O. against pro-Jew heavyweights such as Auster and Taksei.
Please continue posting at GoV when you feel it.
Here is some White advocacy.
“As they once said in the American Old West: Get out, while the getting’s good. You know it’s only a matter of time for you people, don’t you? What? Are you anxiously waiting for the final implementation of the Stalinist Police State and Marxism on America to save your Commie asses? Well, I guess that just proves things, now doesn’t it?”
http://incogman.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/knock-knock-%e2%80%94-telegram-for-the-gd-jews/comment-page-1/#comment-51370
Flanders
In the same GoV thread Chechar pointed to, EV tells BBodissey he should not be surprised that Charles Krauthammer, as a Jew, took sides against anti-islamist European nationalists.
Parts of BBodissey’s replies :
“It’s all out in the open. Bin Talal brags about what he does: he influences editorial policy at our news organizations. That is one factor that helps persuade people like Krauthammer to avert their eyes from some of the nasty facts about Islam in Europe.”
“This is not a conspiracy theory, but a case of using many billions of petrodollars to buy influence and subvert our government through the use of Muslim Brotherhood front groups. I am in the process of editing a lengthy and thoroughly-sourced book on this subject, so I have some of the facts at my fingertips.”
“Much of what happens is quiet, even if it isn’t secret. It’s the stealth jihad, and it’s about the gradual imposition of sharia law in the United States.”
” Also look at IIIT. Then you’ll discover what is being inserted in to our schools’ textbooks. Check out the guidelines for the Society of Professional Journalists. Look at who endows schools at Harvard and Georgetown. Follow the law cases where de facto sharia is used. And above all, follow the money.”
“Read up on it. It’s not a secret conspiracy, but it’s a massive case of illegal foreign influence”
“I do not assert that Krauthammer is bought by Saudi petrodollars. Not at all.”
“I assert that Fox News itself is demonstrably influenced in its editorial policies by the voting rights and influence bought by bin Talal along with his 5.46% share of NewsCorp.”
“Those editorial policies trickle down and influence most of the staff and talking heads, sometimes in subtle ways that they may not even realize.”
—
I think he’s making fun of us. He can’t see a Jewish problem, but he worries over bin Talal having a 5.46% share of NewsCorp. And he believes there is a kind of Muslim conspiracy to impose the sharia law in the USA! The whole counterjihad thing is a joke.
@ “The whole counterjihad thing is a joke.”
The whole counter-jihad community lives in the tiny tip of a massive iceberg that counter-jihadists are determined not to see.
Why is it that so many of the more “enlightened” articles fail to mention anything about the underlying cause of ALL that is happening to the Whites of the world? I’m a fan of Weston, but doesn’t he have the guts to tell what he thinks on everything, or is he deluding himself as Fjordman is doing {presuming Fjordman is actually White and not a jew pretend to be}? Whites are undergoing the same onslaught as Christians, caused by the same tormentors. Any White ignoring that factor assists in their own persecution, and that of us all.
Flanders
The Crucifixion of Bishop Williamson
“As I observe the vilification of Bishop Williamson occurring in the Catholic blogosphere, I can’t help but recall the gospel account of the crucifixion of Christ Himself. For with the exception of the Blessed Mother and St. John, the rest of His apostles had abandoned Him, quaking in their boots “for fear of the Jews” (John 19:38).
Fast forward 20 centuries and something eerily similar seems to be happening again. Only this time, the person being abandoned and crucified is Bishop Richard Williamson of the Society of St. Pius X. And what was his crime, pray tell? It seems His Excellency has a penchant for speaking the truth to power, something Our Lord Himself was not afraid to do, including the following flamer – right to the Pharisees’ faces (John 8:44):
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it.
Now that is politically incorrect! Good thing Jesus isn’t around in human form these days or He just might find himself in a German prison, like Ernst Zundel or Germar Rudolf, or anyone else who dares to question the Holocaust™. Because I am convinced that if Jesus were still alive on this earth in human form, there would be no shortage of Christians dutifully denouncing Him as a threat to Jewish-Christian relations! It really has become that pathetic.” [Continues, including:
“I don’t know definitively how many Jews died in concentration camps during World War II. But I do find it awfully suspicious that people are thrown in jail for questioning an historical event. (And even more disturbing that so many Americans don’t seem to have a problem with that, as we brag about our freedom of speech.)].
http://www.catholicactionresourcecenter.com/defendingbpwilliamson.htm
@ Why is it that so many of the more “enlightened” articles fail to mention anything about the underlying cause of ALL that is happening to the Whites of the world?
I would say that MacDonald explains a substantial part of it, but not the whole thing: as I have just said in my latest blog entry.
@ I’m a fan of Weston, but doesn’t he have the guts to tell what he thinks on everything, or is he deluding himself as Fjordman is doing {presuming Fjordman is actually White and not a jew pretend to be}?
Despite of his rather high IQ Fjordman is, indeed, deluding himself. Takuan Seiyo says (I don’t know if it’s true) that he is pure Norwegian.
@ “I don’t know definitively how many Jews died in concentration camps during World War II. But I do find it awfully suspicious that people are thrown in jail for questioning an historical event. (And even more disturbing that so many Americans don’t seem to have a problem with that, as we brag about our freedom of speech.)
Ditto. Counter-jihadists have an obvious double-standard here. If these are our friends, our times are as dark as the LOTR epic…
Engaging the “anti-Jihad” people is important.
On a related note, some American Jewish groups recently held a meeting with Hispanic groups where the Jews pledged to help pass amnesty for illegal aliens in return for Hispanic support for Israel in Congress. This was widely reported in all major media.
I submitted a news article about this meeting to Amren.com, but they never published it. Just this past week, Hispanic groups held a similar meeting with Muslims where both groups agreed to work for amnesty. Amren published it, but then censored several attempts by myself to bring up the earlier meeting in the comments. I wanted to point out that Jewish groups have been at the forefront of the open borders lobby for a century, where as Muslims have had essentially no influence on America’s immigration policy.
Who moderates the comments on Amren.com? It’s almost like they outsource it to the ADL. I also notice that my comments that are critical of the GOP, conservatives and especially capitalism and large corporations are often censored.
Amren also frequently posts articles from anti-white capitalist sources like the Wall Street Journal and the Economist with misleading bylines suggesting a greater sympathy for our cause on the part of the writers than the actual article bears out. Whoever writes the bylines seems to really want to believe that the capitalists are just around the corner from coming out in favor of White Nationalism.
the capitalists are just around the corner from coming out in favor of White Nationalism.
Wheras I suspect quite the opposite, they conceive of short term gain through mass immigration and anti-nationalism and use deluded left/liberals to do their dirty work for them on this front.
At Mangan’s…
“At 3/21/2010 09:40:00 AM, Blogger Fjordman said…
I correspond with a person in Norway sometimes, a Leftist actually, but about as intelligent and sensible as you can get and still be left-of-the-center. He predicts that there will be a serious eruption of Jew hatred in the United States in the near future when the economy tanks for real. Unfortunately, few people will have done more to fuel this than Thomas Friedman, an enthusiastic supporter of the ridiculous policy of exporting democracy to Iraq and of the continued mass immigration of Third World peoples, policies that are now crippling the US economy.
If we take a friendly approach we can perhaps say that Ashkenazi Jews support ethnocentrism for themselves but obstruct it for European Gentiles because they fear a Nazi-like society. The problem with this is that if you seriously believe that the white majority are a bunch of crypto-Nazis in the waiting then perhaps you should go and live somewhere else. If I lived in a country where I thought that most people were just waiting for an excuse to massacre me then I would leave.
Besides, the truth is that while Jews have sometimes been mistreated in some European countries they have been generally well treated in the United States. This means that the mass immigration supported by people like Mr. Friedman is starting to look like a form of ethnic aggression to dispossess the white majority population. This is a dangerous policy that will fuel resentment. Moreover, it doesn’t make sense for Jews themselves to undermine one of the most pro-Jewish countries on the planet.
As I stated in one of my previous essays, the main reason for California’s rapid decline is a decline in IQ among those who inhabit that region. This is again caused by mass immigration. The underlying structural problem for the USA now is that US national debt is rising even faster than US national IQ is declining. As long as this trend remains unchanged, continued US decline is all but assured. Mr. Friedman is an Ashkenazi Jew, which means that he comes from the one ethnic group on the planet with the highest average IQ.
Yet while he personally benefits from high IQ he does not want to talk about it. The same is the case for author Jared Diamond, another Ashkenazi Jew who thinks it is immoral and “loathsome” to mention IQ.As I concluded in my in-depth investigation of human evolution and culture, Why Did Europeans Create the Modern World?, while Jared Diamond’s book Guns, Germs, and Steel contains some worthwhile parts, the overall conclusion is almost certainly wrong. You can just look at the state of California to disprove it.
California was by the 1960s and 70s the economic engine of the USA and by the extension the world. By 2010 it is close to bankruptcy. The reason for this is not that the geography of California changed, nor its plants or animals to any significant degree. What changed was the demographic make-up of California. As long as it was predominantly inhabited by whites it was a dynamic region. As soon as it become inhabited by Mexicans and other lower-IQ Third World peoples it came increasingly to resemble a Third World region.
Diamond is currently a Professor at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), which means that he can see clearly that his theories are flawed just by looking out the window.”
“I would say that MacDonald explains a substantial part of it, but not the whole thing:”
“Nonetheless, it was precisely during those years when the Christian morality rebelled against slavery…”
It’s not an entirely accurate statement.
Fjordman’s next comment on the same thread, responding to a mild suggestion that he’s in danger of being punished for anti-semitism:
Fjordman said…
Maciano: I don’t have any problem with publishing at those websites. If you read what Pamela Geller or Robert Spencer write about the ADL whenever they say some nonsense about Geert Wilders you will see that they are right on the money. I also don’t have any problems with supporting Israel, which any sensible person should do, anyway.
Anonymous: I have never said that Jews created the main problems of the West. The most essential underlying issues can be traced back to the American and French Revolutions of the eighteenth century, including the excessive egalitarianism of the American Declaration of Independence. As I have pointed out before, one could debate whether the USA was founded on a lie.
While he didn’t create the problem I think it’s quite fair to say that Thomas Friedman is at least contributing to it. I take issue with the most rabid anti-Semites who say that “Jews only care about Jews.” If you look at people like Friedman here they don’t even do that. These Third World immigrants may include a few decent engineers etc. from high-IQ Asian populations, but the vast majority of them will be low-IQ individuals.
What should worry Mr. Friedman in particular is that a substantial proportion of them will be Muslims. Muslims hate basically everybody on the entire planet, but they hate Jews the most. Muslim immigration has triggered the greatest wave of violence against Jews in Western Europe since the Nazis. Continued Muslim immigration to the USA will rapidly end the golden age of American Jewry and undermine Israel’s security. This basically means that Thomas Friedman wants to import future pogroms.
Scandinavians manage to be suicidal quite on our own, as do the Germans, the Dutch etc. I seriously wonder sometimes whether there is something suicidal about high-IQ populations in general, but the Japanese and the Koreans don’t seem to act in the same way as we do, so maybe it’s just a European and a Jewish thing.
Fjordman is finally coming around to the truth. It’s painful to watch him cling so tenaciously to thinking in terms of what’s good for jews, downplaying their role while eagerly scapegoating Whites, even to the point of misidentifying genocide as suicide. Still, he’s getting closer, and if he keeps pushing he’ll find himself denounced as a “rabid anti-semite” either by some self-interested jew or by some holier-than-thou know-it-all counter-jihadi who knows jack squat about jews. Then of course he’ll finally begin to understand just how blind he’s been.
Fjordman: “Muslims hate basically everybody on the entire planet, but they hate Jews the most.”
I would expect more subtlety from someone who thinks that you are a rabid anti-Semite if you think that “Jews only care about Jews”. I don’t think Muslims by and large hate everybody on the entire planet.
@ “Nonetheless, it was precisely during those years when the Christian morality rebelled against slavery…”
It’s not an entirely accurate statement. –Anonymous
You are quoting my paraphrasing of Paul Johnson in my blog. You may be right. I don’t know…
Changing subjects, how fascinating are these Fjordman posts. I have been told that he’s still in his thirties. Since he seems to be a smart guy, sooner or later a powerful lightening might stuck him…
Oh yes: Watch out for my forthcoming entry in my blog: the JQ again.
“Fjordman is finally coming around to the truth. It’s painful to watch him cling so tenaciously to thinking in terms of what’s good for jews, downplaying their role while eagerly scapegoating Whites, even to the point of misidentifying genocide as suicide. Still, he’s getting closer, and if he keeps pushing he’ll find himself denounced as a “rabid anti-semite” either by some self-interested jew or by some holier-than-thou know-it-all counter-jihadi who knows jack squat about jews. Then of course he’ll finally begin to understand just how blind he’s been.”
Tan, Fjordman’s evolution seems similar to mine. Maybe it’s the norm?
Yeah, it’s painful to watch, but seems to me it would be useful to use him as a case study. We need to fully understand, what does the most common process of a philosemite “coming around” look like, so that we can encourage them effectively, support them when they get their first slam as a “rabid antisemite” so they don’t just shut back down, and speed the process.
Fjordman’s evolution seems similar to mine.
Mine too. Which is why watching it grates.
Likewise Mangan, who is making his own slow evolution. They seem to be feeding on each other’s progress.
In response to Paul Krugman, Hater, Fjordman writes:
Of course this is a huge wealth transfer by the ruling Multicultural oligarchs from us to non-whites, that’s the whole point, just like with climate quotas: To create a form of transnational Socialism and rob whites of their possessions and their lands. This is the official policy of all white majority Western nations without exception.
Our countries should be deliberate flooded with Third World masses in order to destroy our societies so that the West can be put under global governance by a permanently entrenched ruling caste of anti-white Globalists. Whites need to be broken because we are too unruly, too interested in self-rule and just too plain “different.” By merely existing we constitute an obstacle to global governance that must be crushed.
Fjordman is one short step away. He has in fact already said enough to alert the anti-“anti-semites” that he’s on to the most critical piece. The ruling caste is anti-White. Can he acknowledge now that it is pro-jew? At any rate he’s speaking out as a White man, against the anti-White regime. The hammer will fall on him soon.
It’s infuriating the Fjordman puts jews in the same boat as whites. Jews are NOT flooding Israel with non-Jewish immigrants. They are NOT committing suicide, they are killing us.