Jews Screech, Facebook Jumps

Open Letter to Facebook — Stop Antisemitism (PDF), 7 August 2020:

In accordance with the recommendations outlined in the “The New Antisemites” report, which call on social media platforms to eliminate antisemitic content by adopting the IHRA working definition as the basis for content removal policies, we the undersigned coalition of 128 [as of 11 August, 145 as of 26 August] organizations, urge Facebook to implement a hate speech policy on antisemitism that includes the full IHRA working definition at its core. Nearly 40 countries have already endorsed or adopted the IHRA working definition in some official capacity, either through their membership in the IHRA or independently. In the United States, in addition to the adoption by the State Department, the recent Executive Order on Combatting Anti-Semitism instructs the Department of Education to consider the IHRA definition when evaluating Title VI Civil Rights Act complaints of discrimination.

The overwhelming majority of civil society organizations at the forefront of efforts to combat antisemitism endorse and encourage the use and adoption of the IHRA working definition. Today’s antisemitism undoubtedly includes the delegitimization of Israel’s right to exist. This bigotry is expressed in various ways, such as the rejection of Jewish self-determination, Holocaust revisionism and denial, and the application of double standards toward the Jewish state and people.

. . .

Jews today, like many other minority communities, are being targeted and attacked in record numbers. They experience physical violence, harassment, and discrimination offline and online. Jews overwhelmingly report that online antisemitism is the most acute form of Jew-hatred they experience.

Facebook’s Community Standards Recent Updates (italics denote additions), 11 August 2020:

We define hate speech as a direct attack on people based on what we call protected characteristics — race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, and serious disease or disability. We protect against attacks on the basis of age when age is paired with another protected characteristic, and also provide certain protections for immigration status. We define attack as violent or dehumanizing speech, harmful stereotypes, statements of inferiority, or calls for exclusion or segregation. We separate attacks into three tiers of severity, as described below.

. . .

Tier 1

Content targeting a person or group of people (including all subsets except those described as having carried out violent crimes or sexual offenses) on the basis of their aforementioned protected characteristic(s) or immigration status with:

. . .

Designated dehumanizing comparisons, generalizations, or behavioral statements (in written or visual form)- that include:

. . .

Jewish people and rats

Jewish people running the world or controlling major institutions such as media networks, the economy or the government

Facebook announces new policy combating anti-Jewish stereotypes – Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 12 August 2020:

Facebook announced that it would ban posts about Jews controlling the world among several other efforts to combat hate speech.

The announcement comes following a monthlong boycott of advertising on Facebook spearheaded by a coalition of civil rights groups led by the Anti-Defamation League. More than 1,000 companies participated in the boycott, which was meant to protest Facebook’s lack of action against hate speech.

In an announcement Tuesday issued by Guy Rosen, the social media platform’s vice president of integrity, Facebook said it would ban posts about Jews controlling the world, as well as those containing blackface. Rosen also wrote that Facebook has removed 23 “banned organizations” from the platform since October, half of which were white supremacist.

. . .

Responding to the announcement, an ADL spokesperson called the changes “welcome yet overdue.”

“It’s distressing that it took this long for the platform to crack down on these particular forms of hate, when it’s quite obvious they should not have been allowed to proliferate in the first place,” the ADL statement said. “It’s equally as disturbing that Facebook still doesn’t view Holocaust denial as violative of their terms of service.”

Facebook banned stereotypes of Jewish global domination – The Forward, 13 August 2020:

In May, Peter Stern, Facebook’s director of Content Policy Stakeholder Engagement, said in a conversation with a representative of the AJC they have “mapped” some elements of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of anti-Semitism onto their own policies, but not the parts that relate to Israel, since the site does not want to penalize people for criticizing Israel.

. . .

Greenblatt, of the ADL, criticized Facebook for not taking a stronger stand on Holocaust denial, and called it “disturbing” that the company classifies such posts as “misinformation,” and not a form of hate speech against a protected group.

. . .

Facebook still permits inaccurate and false statements about the Holocaust, but takes down posts that in any way celebrate or defend the Holocaust, or mock the Holocaust or survivors, Cutler said. When asked if there is content on Facebook that denies the Holocaust but is not otherwise anti-Semitic, Cutler said the site moderates such pieces of content on a case by case basis.

Here we see jews, obsessively organized and acting collectively as jews, setting themselves apart from and above non-jews, shamelessly proclaiming themselves the arbiters of what non-jews can say, instructing the world’s most powerful corporations how to better serve their tribe, bragging that governments of 40-odd countries have already codified special privileges for jews, as spelled out by jews.

Note how they screech as if anyone else’s bigotry or “application of double standards” could ever be more obnoxious than their own, and how they respond to any concession with more demands. Note too how their usual identity fraud, their outrageous “fellow white” shtick, is conspicuously absent here. Instead they present themselves like “other minority communities”, as a “protected group” per civil rights law, as non-White.

Indeed, with jews so openly dictating who can speak and what they can say, and doing so under color of a jew-defined and jew-driven moral imperative to combat “White supremacism”, jews could hardly make it more obvious that they see themselves as the utter opposite of Whites – morally, politically, socially, legally.

17 thoughts on “Jews Screech, Facebook Jumps”

  1. “Facebook announced that it would ban posts about Jews controlling the world among several other efforts to combat hate speech.”

    “…essay, which was originally published in the Times Of Israel in 2012, is worth revisiting because it frankly admits that almost everything ‘antisemites’ claim about Jewish power and control is true, and the only reason Jews don’t like to admit just how powerful they are is that they don’t want the responsibility that comes with that power, especially when bad things happen — and when Jews are in control, bad things are the rule, not the exception — just ask the 60 million dead Russian Christians under Jewish Bolshevism.”

    https://christiansfortruth.com/jews-openly-brag-about-taking-over-america-we-own-the-whole-freaking-country/

  2. No matter how thoroughly and overwhelmingly Jewish assertions, claims, and narratives can be and have been proved to be lies of the most extreme and outrageous kind, for instance, the WHOLE WWI and especially WWII “Allied” narratives, the utterly disgusting “holocaust” hoax, the 19 Arab hijackers…fraud, they all thus far are “in the books” as bed-rock truth. And all of these monstrous lies have paved the way for Jewish destruction of all of Western civilization. Hard to wrap one’s mind around how such history can unfold. And only when (IF!) there come to be White racial (ethno-) states/nations will the full and faithful truth finally be revealed to one and all. It is remarkable how the most outrageous lies can rule over the lives of all those within the White world while the truth is thrown to the ground.

  3. Facebook Hires an Israeli Censor, by Philip Giraldi – The Unz Review:

    As it is an election year and both parties are seeking tens of millions of dollars from Israel-tied Jewish donors like Sheldon Adelson and Haim Saban, the effort to make any criticism of Israel hate speech is intensifying. Two weeks ago “…more than 120 organizations sent a letter to the social media giant [Facebook], urging it to ‘fully adopt’ the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism as the ‘cornerstone of Facebook’s hate speech policy regarding antisemitism.’ This definition, which was adopted by the IHRA in 2016 and has been promoted to governments worldwide, includes several examples of what it describes as ‘contemporary’ antisemitism—including ‘denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” and “applying double standards’ to Israel—that can be interpreted to define much criticism of Israel, Israeli policies, or Zionism as antisemitism.”

    Facebook for its part has hired Emi Palmor, former director-general of Israel’s justice ministry, as a member of its new oversight board which will censor content on the site. The company’s chief operations officer Sheryl Sandberg has also declared that FB is using “…the IHRA definition ‘in informing [its] own approach and definitions,’ that its new policy ‘draws on the spirit—and the text—of the IHRA,’ and that under Facebook’s policy, ‘Jews and Israelis are treated as “protected characteristics.’”

    Protected characteristics has meant in practice that criticism of the activities of either Israelis or Jewish groups will not be acceptable on the site.

    While soft-headed White men bitterly cling to abstractions like “liberty” and “equality” as their ideals, jews openly organize as jews to relentlessly and ruthlessly construct political and legal systems which explicitly privilege jews and punish their enemies.

  4. You’re right, Tan. These jews are organized behind the scenes. You know they are getting desperate when they ban people like Richie From Boston and Vince James off Jewtube. I mean, RFB even shills for Isreal and they still banned him lmao. Banning someone like Vince, who almost never says anything edgy or unoptical, just goes to show you how desperate they are.

    Have been wanting to get your thoughts on Kyle Rittenhouse. Do you think the jews will give him the James Fields treatment or do you think they’ll drop the charges?

  5. We need the cops to keep killing niggers and antifa to keep rioting so that we can get this race war started. These events are the perfect accelerant. Kyle Rittenhouse would have made an at least functional political soldier deployed in the Harold Covington strategy.

    The Covington strategy is this: in the territory that will constitute the White ethnostate an insurgency will fight ZOG using the core tactic of the targeted assassination of ZOG’s functionaries. With no ZOG functionaries left alive, or with no reasonable hope of remaining alive, the territory will become ungovernable by ZOG. ZOG will either formally cut it loose or at least retreat and slack off on attempting to control the territory. There you have the ethnostate.

  6. Kudos Tan, on your assessment of Faceberg and the subject of Jewish stridency & effrontery.
    Interestingly enough, yesterday Strike & Mike did a show about current events as well as “anti semitism”. They did a dive into Lindeman’s book Essau’s Tears, which was quite interesting, to say the least.

  7. @Aryan Diablo

    James Fields isn’t the most similar precedent.

    Kyle Rittenhouse killed a couple of jewy anti-“racist” goons. So far the jewsmedia has given him the Nikolas Cruz treatment, trying to spin him as a “white supremacist terrorist” who killed deliberately with racial malice aforethought. The prosecution will be compelled to spin it differently, because all he apparently did was shoot “fellow whites” who were attacking him, but the jewed anti-White regime will not let his act go unpunished no matter how un-“racist” or anti-“racist” Rittenhouse proves to be.

    I generally agree with Matt Parrot’s assessment vis-a-vis Fields:

    They’re trying to pin “white supremacism” on Kyle, because they know that he’ll only be found guilty and sentenced if the judge and jury are trying him for “racism.”

    The Rittenhouse case hinges on “racism”. But even if they can’t find any “racism”, Rittenhouse may just get the George Zimmerman, ie. “white hispanic”, treatment – a long drawn out courtroom ordeal meant to discourage Whites from defending ourselves.

    The regime won’t relent simply because the evidence favors Rittenhouse, and certainly not because Trump and Trump supporters rally behind him. Ironically, these people only feel safe rallying behind him because according to the evidence so far they think there isn’t any “racism” to be found. But then, in light of the current zeitgeist, the prosecution could very well cite their support itself as its evidence of “racism”. The jewsmedia certainly will.

  8. STRIKE & MIKE Episode 127: Esau’s Narrative Collapse

    Too bad it’s paywalled.

    Albert Lindemann’s critique of Jewish historiography in Esau’s Tears, how Jewish inability for self-criticism creates problems for them

    I’d like to hear how Whites misunderstanding and underestimating the jews creates problems for jews. Their two jews, three opinions about what’s best for the jews shtick doesn’t create problems for them, it creates problems for Whites.

  9. I continue to be surprised at the accelerating full spectrum – economic, political, cultural – attack that the Jews are now mounting against Whites and their civilization. Had not expected this sort of thing until c. 2030 when, due to Jew instigated open borders shitskin insourcing, the Kosher Culture of Death attack on White family formation and birthrate, and the boomer die-off, Whites will become an actual minority in ‘Murka. It may be (((they))) are, in other words, getting a bit ahead of themselves….and when the Jewbuck dies, i.e., when the ZOG can no longer hold the rest of the world on the dollar at gunpoint, the Self Chosen may find themselves in hot water well before Whites have been fatally reduced in numbers. Even now the stresses and strains in the Jew-constructed anti-White amalgam – Zionist Jews, hardLeft anti-Israel tikkun ola Jews, self-liquidating urban Whites, Blacks, spics, Muslims, and slants – are intensifying. In short, acceleration is our friend. And it’s happening.

  10. Had not expected this sort of thing until c. 2030

    Trump’s election threw them into an hysterical overreaction. It’s actually uncharacteristic of jews, who tend to be very cold-blooded and analytical, and good at long-term planning. Maybe they just lost their edge after 70 years of unchallenged supremacy, or maybe they over-estimated the usefulness of their black golems, who’ve turned out to be more than they can handle. Anyway, the sooner a collapse happens, the better it is for us.

  11. Im complete agreeance with Servenet.

    The Kikes have only won…
    Because of comfortable, compliant , consumptive White conformity and abject gullibilty….which of course, these Rodents orchestrated.

  12. “Maybe [the Jews] just lost their edge after 70 years of unchallenged supremacy”

    Their power has made them decadent. As such, they have lost the ability to delay gratification. All they have to do is keep the immigration floodgates open and run out the demographic clock. But that is no longer good enough. Now they demand the satisfaction of enacting a full on Bolshevik bloodletting.

  13. Opposite of Whites!

    A millennial understatement if there ever was one.

    What are these “things” really?

  14. Mark Zuckerberg:

    Today we’re updating our hate speech policy to ban Holocaust denial.

    . . .

    I’ve struggled with the tension between standing for free expression and the harm caused by minimizing or denying the horror of the Holocaust. My own thinking has evolved as I’ve seen data showing an increase in anti-Semitic violence

    Confirming that jews define “hate speech”, shamelessly dictating what others can say while constantly screeching as if they are victims.

    The response from jews? More screeching.

    Facebook Banned Holocaust Denial. What Took Them So Long? | Time:

    Civil rights groups welcomed the news, but questioned Facebook’s timing. “As Facebook finally decides to take a stance against Holocaust denial and distortion, they claim it is because of their work with the Jewish community over the past year,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, the CEO of the Anti Defamation League (ADL), in a statement. “We question this claim because if they had wanted to support the Jewish community, this change could have been implemented at any point in the last nine years.”

    Zuckerberg specifically cited “rising anti-Semitism”, which jews at the ADL have been screeching about non-stop for 107 years, and jews more generally have been screeching about forever.

  15. Jonathan Cook:

    A typically provocative, and compelling, read from Norman Finkelstein on why Facebook and Twitter are wrong to ban Holocaust denial – and how the decision will prepare the ground for extending the ban to weaponised ‘antisemitism’ (ie criticism of Israel)

    Same old boring pilpul. The jewing is getting so jewy that a few jews are worried that all this jewy jewing might somehow harm the jews.

    http://normanfinkelstein.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Finkelstein-HDeny.pdf

    WHY WE SHOULD REJOICE AT HOLOCAUST DENIERS, NOT SUPPRESS THEM
    A Reply to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey
    By Norman G. Finkelstein

    Blah blah John Stuart Mill blah blah. The conclusion sums up the “argument”:

    If, for argument’s sake, it is set aside that, first, Holocaust denial can’t be suppressed if “The Holocaust” doesn’t denote a stable, discrete object, and, second, that Holocaust denial largely comprises discrete factual assertions that can be disposed of with discrete factual rebuttals, then, the bottom line is this. If Holocaust denial is a marginal phenomenon, then, in light of a faculty’s responsibility to familiarize students, not with every last word on a subject, but only with “the best published expressions of…the questions at issue,” it arguably shouldn’t be taught in a college classroom because it doesn’t figure in current academic debates on the genesis and contours of the Nazi holocaust, although deniers do perform, albeit inadvertently, a valuable function in society at large, such that it would hamper the pursuit of truth to suppress them altogether. If, however, Holocaust denial does constitute an actual or potential contagion then it should be taught, ideally by Holocaust deniers, if only to inoculate students. To profess both that Holocaust denial shouldn’t be taught and that it poses a clear and present danger defies logic. The claim by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey that an alleged global rise in anti-Semitism and ignorance of the Nazi holocaust justify suppression of Holocaust denial no less lacks in logic.

    Just jews arguing with jews about the best way to educate/control the goyim.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *