Game Targets Whites

TEA PARTY ZOMBIES MUST DIE! (TPZMD can be accessed for free using any Flash-enabled browser.)

In online video game, Tea Partiers make “zombie” targets, CBS News:

A new online video game company has come up with a controversial new twist on the traditional zombie-killing gaming concept: The zombies targeted for kill are prominent figures in the Tea Party movement.

The game, “Tea Party Zombies Must Die,” features a handful of Tea Party members – including Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, and a blood-spattered, bra-clad Michele Bachmann – who the gamer is instructed to kill with either a “melee weapon” (in the first level, at least, it’s a crowbar) or a gun.

Other featured Tea Party targets include: “Generic pissed off old white guy zombie,” “Pissed off stupid white trash redneck birther zombie,” “Factory made blonde Fox News Barbie who has never had a problem in her life zombie,” and “Glenn Beck Zombie (Back from the dead!).”

Upon the player’s death, one is told, “You got Teabagged! P.S. You didn’t have health insurance, so you died. P.P.S. There’s no such thing as God, so you died for eternity.”

Video Game Targets ‘Tea Party Zombies,’ Fox News Personalities, Fox News:

Notable politicians depicted in the game include current and previous presidential hopefuls like Palin, Bachmann, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum. Several Fox News personalities are also featured, including Huckabee, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and Brit Hume.

Lesser-known targets include “factory made blonde Fox News Barbie who has never had a problem in her life zombie” or the “Koch industries Koch Whore lobbyist pig zombie.” Fox News logos and a recreation of its studios can be seen in blood-spattered screengrabs posted on the company’s website.

Attention to the game’s release has heightened after violent rhetoric from Teamsters President James P. Hoffa, who in a speech over the weekend told President Obama that his supporters would “take out the son-of-a-bitches” in the Tea Party who were waging “war” against unions.

“The liberal media have been preaching for years that conservatives are the ones who invoke violent imagery and rhetoric. Yet in the space of two days, the radical, pro-Obama left calls us ‘son-of-a-bitches’ and says they want to ‘take us out.’ And they follow that with a hideously violent game where they do just that — depicting ways of shooting prominent conservatives, presidential candidates and journalists,” said Brent Bozell, president of the Media Research Center. “The news media would be in an uproar if violence had been incited against liberals. Their silence disgusts me.”

To describe TPZMD as targeting “prominent figures in the Tea Party movement” is to miss the point. All the targets are White. White media figures, White politicians, and most tellingly, poor, powerless, ordinary Whites. Indeed, the Tea Party haters feel righteous about venting their fear and loathing exactly because they see the Tea Party as White. Beside that, their animus is not at all confined to the Tea Party or to prominent media or political figures.

Here’s how TPZMD characterizes who it targets for death:


These are the bugbears of the contemporary anti-White narrative. These are the people the anti-White elite delights in slurring, scapegoating and demonizing. These are the hard-working tax-paying law-abiding citizens they regularly malign as stupid and evil. TPZMD is just one product of their relentless dehumanizing anti-White propaganda.

To describe their propaganda in terms of partisan politics, as media reports do, or as class warfare, as their narrative does, is to be willfully blind to the key point these anti-Whites themselves continually hammer on: The nature of the conflict, as well as their animus, is racial. They distrust and dislike Whites, rich or poor. To top it off they’re dishonest about it. They justify their animus by offering a variety of lame excuses that they wouldn’t consider valid reasons to hate anyone but Whites. They imagine that painting Whites as stupid, religious, or duped makes it OK not only to hate us, but to fantasize about bludgeoning, hacking, and shooting us dead.

22 thoughts on “Game Targets Whites”

  1. This is not new.

    Back in 1995, there was a video game called “Redneck Rampage”.

    The idea was to go around shoooting stereotypical White Southerners.

    There wasn’t even a figleaf such as zombies, or the Tea Party to hide behind. It was explicit, rather not implicit, anti-White hate.

    I remember asking a Liberal (Jewish) acquaintance, who was completely unphased by the spectacle of that video game, what would she think of a video game named “Nigger Hunter” that featured stereotypical gansta rappers being gunned down. She went pale, more shocked than if I had slapped her in the face. When she regained her composure, she stammered “Its not the same”, but she never satisfactorily explained WHY its not the same.

  2. “There’s no such thing as God so you died for eternity”.

    If there is no such thing, why is the writer using the word eternity? For if there is no God, neither is there an “eternity”.

    Feh…much ado about nothing.

  3. The Joo wants there to be a Race War fought through their proxy Slaves of course. The n*gger and the sp*c are trained to HATE the Whites in the indoctrination centers of public schools and the Media.

    The Joo hopes that the demographic changes favor their side and wish that Whites be demoralized to the point of not fighting back!

    The Joo is as Stupid as it is Weak. All they will do is Inflame Whites and Start a War that will end with All of them dead or fleeing…

  4. This is why our side really should stop using the word “liberalism.” It has become a catch-all to include too many disparate and even opposing ideas (as in the case here … I thought liberals were pacifists? Why would they want to play a shooting game?). Organic European liberalism is something very different than what we should call judaeo-liberalism, which (among other things of course) promoted coalitions to replace the less jew-friendly premises with jew-supremacizing ones. Where it wasn’t original (e.g. bolshevism, the cancer of the 20th century), judaeo-liberalism has been what staitsticians would call an effect modifier on organic European leftism e.g. by strengthening the tail end of the “resentfulness distribution” that ordinarily would have been held in check.

  5. I agree completely about so-called “liberalism”.

    The First Law of Jewish Influence

    The most insidious feature of the so-called “liberal”, “non-discriminatory” regime is that it is simultaneously anti-White and pro-jew. If there was a game based on shooting Wall Street bankers, freedom riders, Fortune 400 listees, Journolist participants – or more to the point – prominent neocons, it would almost certainly be greeted by very public bipartisan condemnation exactly because it would be perceived as anti-jewish. People and organizations associated with it would be blackballed, boycotted and sued. Excuses based on the notion that not all targets are jews or that the targets are morally or mentally flawed in some way would be regarded as confirmation and further aggravation of the crime.

    Neocon is broadly regarded as a codeword for jews. Likewise Tea Party serves as a codeword for Whites.

    The difference is that under the current regime Whites are regarded as legitimate targets for discrimination/demonizing/scapegoating/violence while jews anywhere in the world are regarded as a special protected class.

  6. The game, “Tea Party Zombies Must Die,” features a handful of Tea Party members – including Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, and a blood-spattered, bra-clad Michele Bachmann – who the gamer is instructed to kill with either a “melee weapon” (in the first level, at least, it’s a crowbar) or a gun.

    If they’d stopped there, this would have actually made a pretty good game.

  7. New Statesman – Tea Party zombies: the game

    Thanks to Nick Dean for leaving a comment there linking here. I wonder how long it will stand.

    Another comment there extends the big-joke attitude in the article, and I think typifies the broader “liberal” double standard:

    08 September 2011 at 16:19

    Hilarious. I enjoyed the game very much, it killed 10 minutes.

    I also find the Republican response hilarious, trying to claim it is racist. Typical Conservative response to be honest – missing the point entirely and going on the offensive with wild unfounded accusations: Because that swastika on the poster is a replica of Tea Party posters found all across billboards in the US.


    Pete is the sort of wanker who would likely flip his lid over “racism” if the game was set in London and involved shooting it’s largely non-White inhabitants. Under judeo-liberalism a game whose targets are 100% White is not only not “racism”, it’s enjoyable and hilarious.

    The fact that “nazi” is applied so promiscuously in social and political discourse is yet another measure of jewish influence. Many of the posters in the game are indeed taken from reality. I doubt the one in the trailer park that says “MORE TAX KUTS 4 RICH FOKE!” is.

    For their part the flaccid “conservative” response avoids race, other than seeing it in a swastika. Heaven forfend they defend Whites as Whites. That would be unthinkably “racist”.

  8. Games Elevate Hate to Next Level, Wired, 20 Feb 2002:

    Hate groups are increasingly using racist and anti-Semitic computer games to recruit young people, the Anti-Defamation League charged in a report released Tuesday.

    Ethnic Cleansing, Shoot the Blacks and Concentration Camp Rat Hunt were some of the titles studied by the group. The objective of these first-person shooters are predictably similar — to kill as many non-whites, Jews and everyone else they hate as possible.

    The proliferation of so-called “white power games,” which can be bought or downloaded online, is part of a larger strategy by extremists to recruit younger members, said Abraham Foxman, the national director of the ADL.

    “These games use modern technology to seduce young people who are attracted and addicted to games, into bigotry, prejudice and anti-Semitism,” Foxman said. “They piggyback on the popularity of games and are a perversion of a well-meaning entertainment vehicle.”

    The most sophisticated of these new games is Ethnic Cleansing, which was produced by National Alliance and sold on a CD-ROM for $14.88 a pop. It is promoted by the group as the “most politically incorrect video game ever made.”

    The game — which is based on the Genesis 3D open-source software –- takes place in an urban setting where the protagonist kills Blacks and Latinos on city streets before descending into a subway to slay Jews, and ultimately Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. When a dark-skinned player is killed, a monkey sound is played; Jewish characters shout “oy vey” when they are shot.

    Racist rock music, with hate-filled lyrics, blares on the soundtrack and National Alliance posters with the group’s URL are plastered on the virtual walls. The game was released on Jan. 21, Martin Luther King Day.

    “This is the first game I’ve seen using such sophisticated technology that’s geared specifically toward spreading a message of hate,” said ADL Internet researcher Brian Marcus.

    Ethnic Cleansing at least had some diversity.

    Meanwhile, at tea party zombies – Google Search, it’s nothing but crickets.

  9. The goal of the right should be to escalate the conflict whenever possible. Things like this should be welcomed and reciprocated. It’s only crook Republicans and conservatives who are only interested in feeding off the system who want to deescalate, because conflict threatens their sinecures and profits. Thus they are always ready to respond to the dominant left’s call to keep debate “civil” no matter how much spit the left deposits in their faces and the faces of their supporters. They’re in it for the money and they work for the system against the nation, their civilization, and their predominantly white supporters.

  10. Back in 1995, there was a video game called “Redneck Rampage”.

    The idea was to go around shoooting stereotypical White Southerners.

    As a matter of fact, it was 1997 and the idea was that a couple of White Southerners go around doing the shooting. Sure, their targets were often White Southerners but it gives the lie to your contention that there wasn’t even a figleaf to hide behind.

    The parallel, therefore, would have been a game featuring black hoodlums shooting up other blacks, which is not something conveyed by the title “Nigger Hunter.”

    Yours, I’m afraid, was a typical overreaction; exactly the sort of thing that keeps people thinking “racists” are a pack of shallow kooks blinded by their hatred. In reality, “racists” have a far better grasp of the important issues than non-racists, but “racist” overreactions have a way of completely obscuring this.

  11. I’m having trouble understanding how “racists” can be fairly described as overreacting to the current zeitgeist, considering that “racists” hold zero political power and are in fact explicitly targeted for extermination not just in games but across the entire spectrum of society.

    If we were to take at face value the pervasive judeo-liberal rhetoric about “tolerance” and protection for powerless “minorities” then trailer park Whites should be among the most protected of all classes in America. Instead they’re openly designated as trash. Also according to judeo-rhetoric, such terminology implies they are slated for genocide.

    There really is only one way to explain the chasm between judeo-rhetoric and the way poor, powerless Whites are actually treated.

    Anti-White racial animus.

    To find fault with how “racists” face this animus is to blame the victim.

  12. “Yours, I’m afraid, was a typical overreaction; exactly the sort of thing that keeps people thinking “racists” are a pack of shallow kooks blinded by their hatred.”

    Is that you, Silverfish?

    I thought Silver got banned from posting here after he claimed credit for the “shell of a man”/”seeing Jews in cloud formations” comment.

  13. Interesting list. The Tea Party is regularly attacked for being “racist” (code for “too white.”). But it’s not “racist” to make a video game where the bad guys are “too white.” That’s perfectly okay.

    Got it.

    (Funny how similar our tastes are, Tan. I have a post written up on this that I never uploaded)

  14. Here is the police chief of Rapid City, SD, following a shootout that killed 2 cops and the Indian shooter. He captures the essence of Liberalism perfectly. Note also the comments section that is completely quiet over this extraordinary statement from a police official. The hate has become completely institutionalized.(via Western Voices World News):

    “My preference is that we would never have another shooting, ever, involving a Native American,” he said.

    Saying it was “probably very unprofessional to say,” Allender said that “as a white police chief, I wish we would only use force against white people, because it would erase that issue that’s so hard to deal with and is so troubling for so many people.”

  15. @ “I thought Silver got banned from posting here”

    I remember a “Silver” at Mangan’s. IIRC he had a Tel Aviv IP (do you have StatCounter, Tan to check up IPs?). And now a “Silver” is posting at MR. I suspect he is also LL in a very long thread (besides the Captain, all of the buddies have commented there: Greg, Trains, HW, Linder, Armor, Parrott, Wandrin and many more). I believe it will be the last MR thread in which I comment.

  16. GW at Majority Rights has a large indulgent streak for eccentrics. This is meet as I don’t see how someone can love the White race and not have a soft spot for its plethora of characters. Silver and Richards obviously derive emotional gratification from pressing peoples’ buttons. They are narcissistic kooks. Anyone who lets the likes of them get under their skin takes themselves too seriously.

  17. But that was not my point.

    My point is that once Silver seemed to enter my blog from Mangan’s, and I traced his IP as Rishon le Zion in Israel, which means that he’s been lying to us by presuming a gentile background, and that Linder was right at MR:“I’m not going to make a big thing of this, Silver, but I don’t believe you’re who you say you are. I don’t believe your tale about your own background.”

  18. Silver’s comments have a consistent character. They implicitly demoralize and denigrate under the explicit pretense that he’s offering objective, constructive criticism.

    Yours, I’m afraid, was a typical overreaction; exactly the sort of thing that keeps people thinking “racists” are a pack of shallow kooks blinded by their hatred. In reality, “racists” have a far better grasp of the important issues than non-racists, but “racist” overreactions have a way of completely obscuring this.

    In other words, “I think you racists are great, but everybody else including me thinks you suck.”

    Whether that comment was from Silver or not, and whether Silver’s an Israeli or not, double-think like this typically comes from anti-White jews.

Comments are closed.