jewish morality
To most Whites morality is an entirely universalist notion. This means that, with some exceptions, if something is right or wrong then it is assumed to be right or wrong for everyone, everywhere, all the time. This notion of morality is reflected in Christian ethics as The Golden Rule. Universalist morality is one of the tenets of Western-style liberalism.
Jews have a more particularist notion of morality: Is it good or bad for the jews? If something is good for jews then it is right, otherwise it is wrong. Jews are also well aware that universalist-sounding rhetoric can bamboozle Whites into serving or at least acceding to jewish particularist interests.
It is this particularist morality that enables jews to unselfconsciously assert that Israel is for the jews but White countries are for everybody. Likewise that the jews are a people, but White is just a meaningless skin color or social construct.
Criticism of jews along these lines is often mistaken, sometimes intentionally, as an accusation of dual loyalty. As Joe Sobran once observed, dual loyalty would be an improvement (from either a liberal universalist or White particularist point of view).
the hate narrative
Jews tend to identify people they hate for specifically jewish reasons as jew-haters.
According to jews, anyone who comes into conflict with the jews must be to blame. Entirely. This blame cannot be explained in any way that leaves blame unassigned, because then some portion might be ascribed, even if only implicitly, to the jews. Thus the tendency to characterize anyone who vexes them as simply mentally or morally defective, driven to hate jews solely for the sake of hating.
the jewish version of history
A one-sided version of history entirely sympathetic to jews. This means that for any historic conflict with other groups or individuals, the non-jews are and always have been entirely to blame. In a nutshell: jews have always been the victims of horrible persecution and oppression at the hands of stupid, crazy, evil haters.
A corollary of this is the anti-White version of history: Whites have always been stupid, crazy, evil haters, persecuting and oppressing everyone else, and specifically jews.
the jewish guilt-trip
The use of any portion of the jewish and/or anti-White versions of history as an accusation, assigning collective responsibility and guilt to Whites. This is a form of psychological aggression – an attack on White self-worth and self-confidence, placing Whites on the defensive.
The purpose of such aggression is to gain concessions benefiting their own group – to promote or defend jewish power and interests.
the blood libel narrative
One specific jewish anti-White libel/story in the larger jewish version of history. This is the jewish claim that on multiple occasions Europeans killed jews who were accused of kidnapping and killing European children for their blood. Since the idea that jews could be guilty of anything is unthinkable, the Europeans must be the ones who were, and still are, guilty.
Oddly enough, according to jews themselves these accusations of bloody kidnap-killing recur across time and space, following jews wherever they go.
the holocaust narrative
Another jewish anti-White libel/story, the most prominent of all. This is the jewish claim that Whites killed (or otherwise aided and abetted the killing of) six million jews in gas chambers between 1939 and 1945. Today this narrative almost completely overshadows anything else that occurred before during or after World War II.
Over time the target of jewish accusations and guilt-tripping has broadened from the Nazis, to Germans (for not stopping the Nazis), to Europeans in general (for not more effectively opposing the Germans), to Whites in general (for restricting immigration, not joining the war in Europe against Germany soon enough, not making the bombing or liberating of prison camps a higher priority). Meanwhile, in an increasing number of Western countries, open dispute of the holocaust narrative is considered a violation of the law, punishable by fine or imprisonment.
the nation of immigrants narrative
Jews in diaspora are the archetypical nation of immigrants, thriving for millenia while regularly migrating from one host country to another. Well aware of this history, jews overwhelmingly favor open borders for all countries, except Israel. Virtually every jew has a story to tell about how their own family benefited from immigration, or was harmed because they couldn’t migrate freely.
In common use the term is an oxymoron used to idealize unrelated, hostile alien tribes colonizing countries founded and formerly controlled by Whites.
the jewish narrative
All together, the phenomena and attitudes described above, and more, constitute the jewish narrative, which is now the dominant narrative in Western society. The pervasiveness of the jewish narrative is a consequence of jewish influence in media, culture, and politics. This is in turn a consequence of jewish wealth and activism.
the jewish question
Prior to the Enlightenment Europe and Christendom were seen, by Europeans, as synonymous. Jews were seen primarily as members of an ancient religious sect who hadn’t yet gotten around to converting to Christianity.
In the late 18th century, with the fig leaf of religion shriveling, European intellectuals began to wonder aloud – Who are these rude, uncivilized, aliens who call themselves The Jews? Why do they behave as a nation within a nation? Whatever shall we do with them?
jewish emancipation
The jewish question was eventually answered by fiat, imposed from above by European political leaders who were sympathetic to and already in the process of assimilating with the jews. These leaders declared jews equal citizens and granted them full political equality. This process occurred in fits and starts, at various times and places in Europe, during the first half of the 19th century. In exchange jews were expected to drop their particularist identity, to stop being jews and assimilate.
Debate on the jewish question dragged on however. Europeans did not generally accept jews as social or racial equals, and jews did not generally abandon their jewish identity. As partially assimilated jewish intellectuals joined the debate, they turned it more and more into an indictment of Europeans.
Today this portion of European history is taboo. Only the jewish version and their guilt-tripping remain in the mainstream. Calling the process jewish emancipation is itself a sign of deference to jewish sensibilities. It was, in retrospect, more of a slow-motion jewish putsch. In the end, jews were free to operate as a particularist team inside a larger, universalist society.
the jewish template and the minority narrative
The struggle for dominance over Western society came to a head in the middle of the 20th century. Whites waged a cataclysmic, fratricidal war on each other and lost. Long before that war, even while Whites still dominated the US politically, jews were already helping blacks found the NAACP and pathologizing White racial identity.
Now, in the 21st century, jewish power and influence increase essentially unchecked. For the last six decades the jews have gone into overdrive, generalizing and adapting elements of their narrative to other “minorities”. Slowly but surely this is what has turned European-founded societies inside out and upside down. When jews and other diversities exclaim, “Diversity is our greatest strength”, they are exactly right.
Definition of Anglo-American Main-Stream Media
A Jew or Jews debating with another Jew or other Jews on or in a Jew-produced show or article on or in a Jew-owned-and/or-run network or publication, about something some other Jew or other Jews said about another Jew or other Jews on or in another Jew-produced show or article on or in a Jew-owned-and/or-run network or publication in relation to the activities of another Jew or other Jews.* [Plus the active and/or passive collaboration of those who serve, assist, enable, deny and/or defend Jewish domination of public discourse and non-organic culture.]
* For example: Charles Krauthammer and Jonah Goldberg and David Horowitz debating with Michael Lerner and Naomi Klein and Amy Goodman on ABC or CNN or CBS or NBC about something Bill Kristol and Dennis Prager and Norman Podhoretz wrote about Howard Zinn and Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein in The New York Times or The LA Times or The Boston Globe or The New York Daily News or US News and World Report or Foreign Affairs orForeign Policy or The National Post or The Washington Post in relation to Ruth Bader Ginsburg or Susan Sontag or Karl Marx or Howie Levey / “Anton Szandor LaVey” or Lev Bronstein / “Trostky” or Benjamin Satanyahoo or Honest Abe Foxman or Rosa Luxemburg or Ben Stein or Theodor Herzl or Ike Turner or Joe Lieberman or Bill Maher or David Miliband or Jakob Rosenfel / “General 羅” or Nicholas Sarkozy or Naomi Wolf or Erica Jong or Paul Gottfried or Andrea Dworkin or Gloria Allred or Daniel Ellsberg or Harvey Milk or Yousef “al-Qaeda” al-Khattab or Larry “Pull It” Silverstein or Marianne Faithful or Gloria Steinem or Emma Goldman or William Kunstler or George Soros or Rabbi Meir Kahane or Alisa Rosenbaum / Ayn Rand or Leon Uris or Rabbi Schmuley Boteach or Rahm Israel Emanuel or Benjamin Shalom Bernanke or Alan Greenspan or Betty Friedan or Adam Yahiye “al-Qaeda” Gadahn or Murray Rothstein / Sumner Redstone or Larry Kramer or Fairuza Balk or Jonathan Adhout or Rob Reiner
Ain’t that the truth.
or Kivie Kaplan or Stanley Levison or Allen “naked kids have been a staple of delight for centuries … to label pedophilia as criminal is ridiculous” Ginsberg or Barry Levinson or Joseph Levitch / Jerry Lewis or Michael Mann or Elaine May or Dick Wolf or Paul Mazursky or John Milius or Paul Newman or Sandra Bernhard or Steven Spielberg or David Geffen or Jeffrey Katzenberg or Murray Rothbard or Felix Frankfurter or Irving Kristol or John Podhoretz or Abbie Hoffman or Bill Graham or Jerry Rubin or Marty Peretz or Jeff Jacoby or Irv Rubin or Norman Ornstein or Bennet Cerf or Richard Perle or John Stewart Liebowitz or Ken Roth or Jerry Zucker or Christopher Hitchens or Peter Hitchens or Annie Liebowitz orMarcel Mangel/Marceau or David Brooks or Michael King or David Frum or Michael Eisner or Bernard Kouchner or Shimon Persky/Peres or Wolf Blitzer or Ted Koppel or Dennis Ross or Larry King or Andrea Koppel or Mike Wallace or Barbara Walters or Ilana Mercer or Michael Ledeen or Heather Graham or Phil Bronstein or Michael Savage or Michael Medved or David Reznik or Samuel “Sandy” “Burglar” Berger or Allen Konigsberg/”Woody Allen” or Rajmund Liebling/”Roman Polanski” or Richard Cohen or Ariel Cohen or Mortimer Zuckerman or Alan Dershowitz or Jeffrey Goldberg or Henry Kissinger or Robert Reich or John Deutch or Robert Rubin or Mickey Kantor or Madeleine Albright or William S. Cohen or Larry Summers or Ari Fleischer or Elliott Abrams or Paul Wolfowitz or Douglas Feith or Irve Lewis “Scooter” Libby or Sidney Joseph Perelman or Michael Chertoff or Joshua Bolten or Michael Mukasey or Carl Levin or Arlen Specter or Frank Lautenberg or Dianne Feinstein or Barbara Boxer or Russ Feingold or Charles “Chucky” Schumer or Bernie Sanders or Henny Youngman or Teddy Kaufman or Al Franken or Barry Goldwater or Jacob Javits or Paul Wellstone or Norm Coleman or Henry Waxman or Barney Frank or Gary Ackerman or Ileana Ros-Lehtinen or Jane Harman or Jerry Nadler or Steve Rothman or Yehudi Menuin or Robert Wexler or Shelley Berkley or Jan Schakowsky or Brad Sherman or Anthony D. Weiner or Eric Cantor or David Paymer or Susan Davis or Steve Israel or Adam Schiff or Allyson Schwartz or Debbie Wasserman Schultz or Steve Cohen or Gabrielle Giffords or Paul Hodes or Steve Kagen or Moe Berg or Ron Klein or John Yarmuth or Ed Perlmutter or John Adler or Alan Grayson or Jared Poli or Tom Lantos or Ben Cardin or Mark Levin or Ron Lauder or Michael Bloomberg or Laura Schlessinger or Milton Friedman or Alan Shatter or Joseph Stiglitz or James Wolfensohn or Paul Krugman or Lawrence Kaplan or Marvin Hier or Eli Rosenbaum or Elliot Spitzer or Samuel Gompers or Kathy Boudinor Isaac Deutscher or Sir Martin Gilbert or Eric Hobsbawm or Harold Laski or Tony Judt or Bernard Lewis or Simon Schama or Kurt Weill or Simon Sebag Montefiore or Sir Karl Popper or Ludwig “Hitler’s Schoolmate” Wittgenstein or Sigmund Freud or Nathan Mayer Rothschild or Danny Cohen or Sasha Baron Cohen or Nigella Lawson or Aaron Brown or Matt Drudge or Thomas Friedman or Lew Grade or Joseph Moses Levy or Robert Maxwell or Melanie Phillips or Jacob Rothschild or Baron Saatchi or Charles Saatchi or Simon Cowell or Sharon Lévy/”Arden”/Osbourne or Chaim Weizmann or Ian Buruma or Jackie Collins or Arthur Koestler or Will Self or Israel Zangwill or Harold Pinter or Tom Stoppard or Barbra Amiel or Paddy Chayefsky or Samuel Montagu or Melissa “Dexter Twilight” Rosenberg or Herbert Samuel or Vivian (Chaim) Herzog or Dame Shirley Porter or Sir Julius Vogel or Stephen Frears or Henry Jaglom or Wilhelm Weiller or Mike Leigh or Sam Mendes or Alan Yentob or Ben Elton or Edwin Samuel Montagu or Leslie Hore-Belisha or Sir Gerald Kaufman or Sir Clement Freud or Baron Brittan or Baron Lawson or Joel Schumacher or Bryan Singer or Todd Solondz or Barbra Streisand or James Toback or Billy Wilder or Sir Malcolm Rifkind or Manó Kertész Kaminer or Howard Koch or Edwina Currie or Michael Howard orChristopher Cerf or Oona King or Irving Thalberg or Ed Miliband or
The Jewish timeline is good. This is what is taught in class.
Follow the link:
Why Do People Hate The Jews?
The sound file is well worth listening to. “Antisemitism is a phenomenon you see all over the world. Wherever you are it exists.” Etc..
Again, this is exactly what you get in a class, face to face. It’s authentic Jewish teaching, Jewish culture, the Jewish viewpoint, Jewish education, online. I recommend listening to it all the way through, several times. If you want “the party line” not just for gentiles but for the formation of Jewish minds, there it is.
Note that the real and only reason for antisemitism, the genuine underlying motive for all antisemitism and antisemites everywhere, is the same one Hitler had. Hitler was only different in dispensing with the excuses. Under the excuses and self-delusions, all those prone to antisemitism (which is everywhere and perennial) have the same motive as Hitler, which is hating the voice of conscience and what is good and holy because it is good and holy.
The (first) two comments illustrate first from a typically Jewish point of view and second from a typically White / gullible gentile point of view how people respond to the narrative of antisemitism.
By S.E Ford on April 5, 2010 — 7:21am
Christian missionaries show false sympathy to the Jews and false guilt over antisemitism. Those people even sponser Aliyah to Israel with groups like IFCJ and EI. Watch TBN and CTN and find out the sad truth, they want to convert the Jewish people or use us to reserect there false god.
By Camille Summons on February 16, 2011 — 5:23pm
Why Do People Hate The Jews?
I am not Jewish, but I have wondered about the problem of anti-semitism since I was a teenager. This teaching is very helpful. The reason for anti-semitism is the very fact that the Jews actually have been the conscience of the world. It is a spiritual reason. I am very grateful for the opportunity to hear the video. It really answers my questions about the issue. Thank you.
This is the perspective that a sympathetic, trusting gentile student of Judaism winds up with. The Jewish narrative of perpetual and one-sided accusation and critique (and of mockery and scorn) is framed as the voice of conscience. Thus, as the true voice of conscience, it’s like G_d’s voice. The Jewish people appear as the physical embodiment, the flesh, of this truthful voice of conscience.
The natural first response to this is gratitude. Now you know what’s going on, so you’re grateful that you’ve been plugged in to the true voice of conscience and you know right from wrong.
The second response is that you want to take your proper place in the scheme of things. That’s with the righteous, as exemplified by the righteous of the Holocaust. If the Jewish people appear as a corporate Jesus in this viewpoint, the flesh and blood divinely created voice of conscience, the saints are the righteous, certified at Yad Vashem. These are the people who went against their evil White societies (not just in Germany itself but in other lands where there was still antisemitism and where there was collaboration with the Nazis or with lesser forms of antisemitism), who did what they could for G_d’s people.
What are the characteristics of the righteous? This has been studied by various people, but particularly by Nechama Tec. (Whose historic work was the basis for the movie Defiance, which is a pack of lies, but that’s another story.) Her key point, why you naturally hit on for yourself even if you never happen to read her work, is that the righteous were people who perceived Jews purely and simply as persecuted people, with no complicating context for their innocence and that persecution. Thus there were no complications (other than simple fear) in the way of immediate, decisive and risky action in their favor. The non-righteous, on the other hand, allowed that simple picture to be sullied, complicated, effaced. They listened to voices which are the opposite of the voice of G_d’s conscience (what corresponds to the voice of the Devil) which say things like: it’s not that simple, there is this context, Jews are ethnic rivals of your people, Jews have national interests that clash with your (for example Polish) national interest, Jews are guilty of various things, and so on.
So not only do you believe accusations (which are as perpetual as the desire to extract concessions) against all your people as if they came directly from G_d, not only are you eager to sacrifice your good and the good of your fellow gentiles for the good of Jews (that is G_d’s cause), but anyone who tells you to wake up, to look out, that you’re being fooled, that no good will come of this, seems to you to have the spirit of evil in them, of Naziism, of Hitler.
It’s an effective line of propaganda which produces an endless line of race traitors and traitors to themselves who have no idea how deluded they are and what harm they are doing to themselves and those who love them and try to wake them up.
The BBC’s ‘serious’ TV news program is Newsnight. The regular debate panelist aligned with each of the 3 main parties is Jewish: Olly Grender, Peter Hyman and Danny Finkelstein.
It’s they who get to frame their parties’ policies for us and nudge the parties in their preferred directions from the BBC bully pulpit.
Amusing comment made it thru at the Newsnight website (not me):
29.At 23:14 6th Dec 2010, DebtJuggler wrote:
On NN discussion tonight…
Olly Grender (Jewish)
Daniel Finkelstein (Jewish)
Peter Hymen (Jewish)
Emily Maitliss (Jewish)
All on NN talking about British politics. What are the chances of that on a maintstream UK political TV programme? It’s the equivalent of four Chinese origin persons talking about the same subject! How odd would that look?
Also, all of them expressively talked ‘with-their-hands’….did anyone elese notice that?…..it was very pronounced. Almost like a group emulation thing.
Bizarre!
***
Emily Maitliss is the NN presenter who bashed that queer historian for talking about Black riot culture. I’m sure her gate-keeping role is a little easier with the three pol-handlers.
It’s no good to think that people, including gullible Whites, couldn’t possibly believe such a one-sided story as “Why Do People Hate The Jews?” and one so damning to non-Jews. They can and do. It’s a very powerful and emotive story, and everything in popular culture, that is everything in the Jewish dominated mass media and every conversation or act of creativity that takes the contents of the Jewish-dominated mass media as its starting point, is harmonious with it. If you accept this story, all the things you’ve been seeing and hearing all your life from trusted sources make more sense than ever.
Only a great counter-narrative can counter this poisonous false story. (Or personal experience, but that’s costly and time-consuming and it doesn’t scale.)
Even after someone writes down some key points of the truth, with ample documentation, as Kevin MacDonald has, it’s hard to get a hearing for it. Certainly you won’t get a hearing for the truth from imported “minorities” feasting at White expense because the Jewish narrative of accusation has paralyzed the capacity of White people to defend what’s their own.
You need the truth, and you need to be talking to White people (who don’t promote the lie for a living), and you need all the social validation (and money) you can get behind you.
The power of a great lie, supported by aggressive, cohesive and wealthy partisans with a near monopoly on mass communications, is hard to overcome.
But either we do it, or we get crushed.
There’s no reward in the long run for not putting up a fight. All those susceptible to the taint of antisemitism, that is non-Jews and especially Whites, are ascribed the same fundamental motive imputed to Hitler: hatred of what is holy and good because it is holy and good, therefore hatred of the Jews. That is what will be written on our collective headstone if we lose and the Jewish narrative becomes the final word on us, whether we put up a fight or not.
The only hope of a better name for us in the long run is to win, and hope that our own descendants (including the descendants of those like us) will choose to remember us more kindly than that.
Simply, it is impossible for White people to survive collectively in the long run with a self-image that they, collectively, are like Adolph Hitler as described by Jews.
And it’s impossible for Jews to have untrammeled control of White culture through the mass media and academia and not have Whites wind up with that sort of collective self-image, because, collectively and institutionally, Jews like this narrative too much to stop promoting it. It flatters them, it exonerates them from everything, it wins them concessions, and it’s institutionalized now in Holocaust culture and Holocaust memorials.
Therefore Jewish influence over Whites and Jewish power to promote the Jewish narrative to Whites must be limited, or Whites will go extinct.
“Therefore Jewish influence over Whites and Jewish power to promote the Jewish narrative to Whites must be limited, or Whites will go extinct.”
It was called Catholicism, and it worked quite well. I’d love to see MacDonald write a book about Catholicism as white evolutionary strategy.
It’s the only thing that works.
Worked, that is. Before the Great Fracturing of the West.
Tan, Abraham Foxy-Man has just notified me that you are spreading “Canards”.
Viva la Canard!
Gregor
The Golden Rule is about reciprocity, not universalism. I.e., treat others as you expect others to treat you. A dual moral code can exist alongside reciprocity. In fact in my case, reciprocity demands a dual moral code.
This stuff tends to break down in real life, which is why I prefer reciprocity to other terms; it keeps the point front and center – when someone’s screwing you, screw him back. When someone’s treating you well, return the favor.
The Golden Rule also has roots in the two old testament edicts, found in Leviticus 19:18 (“Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against one of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself”; see also Great Commandment) and Leviticus 19:34 (“But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God”).
Interestingly, Wikipedia’s page on The Golden Rule inadvertently (I assume) puts the lie to the Jewish pretensions about Judaism’s universalism. For what are the categories “neighbor” and “stranger living among you,” if not “us” and “them”? “Neighbor” clearly does not just mean “the fellow next door,” and “stranger” clearly does not mean “someone of your people who is unknown to you.” These terms and strictures show up in the same book, no less.
And since OT law is still very much law, the supposed universalism of Christianity is a lie, too.
Actually, that version of “stranger” isn’t making my case, my mistake. I’ll have to look up some alternate translations (it’s amazing how different they all are).
The “stranger” I was thinking of was the part in the OT where it’s made clear that they’re not natives, but foreigners passing through, or people living on “guest visas,” and how, being a commercial people living in a diverse land, Hebrews shouldn’t “molest” them.
Newsnight ? Jewsnight :
Emily Maitliss – jew
Gavin Esler – jew
Jon Sopel -jew
Channel 4 news is as bad . Theyve got a “Simon Israel AND a Yosef Islam !!
I once saw a “Jewsnight ” where EVERY guest and presenter was jew : except for Rupert Murdoch ,and he quacks JUST like a duck .
All UK TV and radio is jew . Look at the “controllers ” and owners of every station .
I call radio 4 , “Radio 4skin ” .
Sorry , I didnt intend to be Anonymous , here is my made-up-name :
GTRman .
I came here via Incogman , where DICARLO reprinted Who Dares Wings comment. I believe the mighty AKIRA originally wrote the list .
GTRman
Tanstaafl wrote:
Now, in the 21st century, jewish power and influence increase essentially unchecked. For the last six decades the jews have gone into overdrive, generalizing and adapting elements of their narrative to other “minorities”. Slowly but surely this is what has turned European-founded societies inside out and upside down. When jews and other diversities exclaim, “Diversity is our greatest strength”, they are exactly right.
——————
My awareness of Jews, through their various movements and ‘-isms,’ sabotaging us has been a very recent thing. I previously dismissed anti-Jew points of view as simple bigotry. In other words Jews have suffered enough, so why pick on them.
But, I have always harbored a nagging question as to why the Nazis would persecute the Jews for no good reason. It didn’t make sense, especially the claim that they ‘gassed’ six million of them, just for being Jews. Germans are smart people, so what were they thinking?
Due to web sites such as your own I have finally woken up to what is largely going on.
Whites have been brainwashed into racial suicide by the multiple Jewish ‘-isms.’ Whites are being subject to massive psychological attack to get them to hate themselves so that they commit racial suicide through Third world immigration and so on. The Jewish ‘narratives’ are just wordy lies.
‘Diversity’ is one of the Jews greatest weapons and our death knell. Jews promote, ‘Invade the world, invite the world,’ and all the suffering it causes.
The vast majority of courageous and intelligent whites simply don’t know the score. Somehow wake those people up and it will lead to a mighty roar!
Keep up the good work, it’s appreciated.
LandShark: “I’d love to see MacDonald write a book about Catholicism as white evolutionary strategy.”
Separation and its Discontents has two sections on Catholic antisemitism. He’s done the theory there. I think that’s a decent level of coverage for an evolutionary psychologist who wants to stick to his own department (evolved psychology and group selection).
For a more detailed and comprehensive historical treatment, we’d need a professional historian to take an interest in the clashes of interests involved in Jewish migrations and ascendancies, in the benefits to non-Jews in Catholic Europe of limiting Jewish influence, and more importantly in the long term and pervasive costs to large numbers of relatively lover-class Whites of not limiting Jewish influence. (As opposed to the immediate and specific benefits to members of elites, particularly newly conquering, exploitative, less legitmate elites, in cooperating with Jews.)
He or she would have to be willing to take the serial expulsion of the Jews from European states seriously as evidence of clashes of interest that couldn’t be controlled normally, not merely as evidence of White Christian bigotry and stupidity. This would involve thinking and researching along lines that a near-monolithically left-wing academia forbids. And he or she would have to be willing to take the punishment, the ostracism and the career death that would follow. Which is why I’m not holding my breath while waiting for such books to be written.
Svigor, if the word for the stranger you are looking for is ger (plural gerim), that’s the word for convert.
As in: if you are a convert to Judaism you are a stranger because not born Jewish; if not a convert then not as near as a stranger (and the nice stuff about strangers does not necessarily apply to you).
The commandment to love the stranger is in effect a command not to drive out the converts, who (not being Jewish by birth) would not have the tribal connections to defend their interests.
Like that famous statement in the Koran about there being no compulsion in religion, the commandment to love the stranger doesn’t quite commit the relevant religion to all the things a naive outsider might assume. Rather, the heart-warming phrase is an opportunity to wallow in good feelings over (for Jews) not being ethnocentric or (for Muslims) not having any susceptibility to religious violence, but without any practical implication that the old hostility to the goyim (the nations) or for Muslims the spirit of jihad would be lessened.
Svigor,
“when someone’s screwing you, screw him back. When someone’s treating you well, return the favor“
This is tit-for-tat. Though tit-for-tat is often equated with The Golden Rule, I think many Whites/Christians actually adhere to a looser interpretation of TGR. They tend to “turn the other cheek” when someone screws them. This makes their lives more of a one-sided tat-tat-tat-tat-…
What I was getting at in the OP is that Christianity and liberalism are more universalist than particularist – in that they are open to all.
John Hartung at http://www.strugglesforexistence.com has some very good work on the Jewish understanding of ‘love thy neighbor as yourself’ etc.
Awesome post.
Yes, excellent post. You summed it up. This should be distributed on laminated cards in every public transit system.
In the interim, here’s some further flakiness from Daybreaker, who holds Whites to the fire while he gives Jews a free pass: http://ozconservative.blogspot.com.au/2012/02/folly-of-whiteness-studies-and-those.html
That thread will be gone when Richo, the Austerian arse munching ebook posting, theorising on liberalism, ad per in perpetuam, cock head wakes up and deletes it all.
I think the Jewish version of the golden rule was meant to be particularist i.e. designed to regulate behavior between Jews. The Hellenized version of the golden rule was meant to be universalist although in pracise it is only as universalist as the underlying population.
.
“It was called Catholicism, and it worked quite well….It’s the only thing that works.”
In what way did it work?
For over a thousand years Jews were given a monopoly on banking and money-lending in Europe and institutional assistance in preventing assimilation. This is exactly what they wanted.
Jews are an extremely inbred and extremely ethno-centric tribe. The problem is physical. The solution can only be physical i.e. physical exclusion or physical assimilation.
Daybreaker I applaud you.
(not that I read a word of it but nobody reads me either)
Catholicism was the foundation upon which expulsion could be leveraged. We no longer have that moral framework.
How many times have Jews been successfully expelled since the end of Catholic unity?
Exactly.
Believe me, we don’t want Jews assimilated. 90% of the time you get marranos. And how do you even know what a marrano is unless you know what it isn’t? Worse than the brown mass the genetic multicult is supposed to create, the spiritual multicult has left us without a means of seeing anything clearly enough to act.
Who the hell is a Jew anymore anyway? I’d say a Christian Zionist is almost a worst kind of Jew than a Jew.
But I view Jews from a spiritual viewpoint, not a genetic viewpoint. The genetic view is false, and Jewish in itself. So the only way to know the difference is to know what a Jew is not. Which is Catholic. (Or used to be, anyway.)
A very post indeed. Someone needs to write a simple, non-academic primer on the Jewish Question aimed not at us but at otherwise intelligent people who don’t understand Jews. You might be the one for the job.
I take that back. According to the linked document, I guess they’ve been expelled plenty.
Sure as hell doesn’t feel like it, though.
Here in Eretz Yizrael, Jewmerica.
(bit off-topic, but possibly still relevant)
I do not frequent GOV that often anymore, but as I live in Europe I do appreciate the stories they print on the latest event concerning Muslim mayhem, as the papers here print next to nothing about them that isn’t some kind of “uplifting” story. Point is, I still check the headlines, etc @ GOV.
Today, I noticed a grand essay by ‘The Baron’ entitled: Losing Our Religion. It is not the worst thing I have ever read, I did like it in parts, but of course, he HAD to slide this piece of treachery in:
Yet the overwhelming evidence that human intelligence has a significant genetic component is disregarded. We are required to ignore the fact that variation in IQ strongly correlates with the distribution of physical characteristics that are generally associated with “race”. Anyone who wishes to discuss these facts — and their implications for public policy — is shunned. This is true even in “conservative” venues, as our friend discovered. Unless one is willing to keep company with dedicated Jew-haters, it’s virtually impossible to write of these matters and expect to be read by a significant audience.
yeah yeah yeah, those evil “jew haters” again, huh…poor baron!
So when I read the comments on the story, it struck me as fairly hilarious that someone wrote this:
How many other websites out there would allow us to even engage in the debating of these ideas? What a breath of freedom and sanity is our beloved GoV!(con’t)…. the administrators there (another website) knocked out all of my replies that explained the point of view that Germany may be heading to Weimar 2.0. The administrators responded like the soviet comissars that they are and deleted my posts without warning, advice or any feedback.
To that I just said:
How ironic! For was it not Gates of Vienna and their darling Fjordmann who deleted and censored perfectly legitimate criticism of this sites refusal to allow ANY talk about what is commonly referred to as the “Jewish Question”? Instead such people are mischaracterized and smeared as “jew haters”.
Despite agreeing and appreciating with a lot of what gets posted on GOV, it is clear that hypocrites live here, of that I am sure.
I didn’t think they would post that actually, but I then saw why they did: it was an opportunity for Takun to emerge from the shadows and use my vague term “ANY TALK” (rather than nailing them specifically on the gross censoring of Tan and Chechar’s posts,which in retrospect I wish i had done) ) and use it as a way to promote their supposed (not) openness to discussing the JQ in an in depth way. Here is what he spewed:
@Mary
Re: JQ
You are 100% wrong. GoV published two essays of mine severely critical of the outsize Jewish contributions to the utopian ideologies that are grinding us down. You will find them just to the left of this column, one about McDonald and the other called F Street. It has also reprinted some of my pieces from The Brussels Journal that contain critical Jewish-related references within wider relevant topics. In doing so, GoV showed considerable courage that no other anti-jihad or conservative website I can think of would be capable of. So it’s not ANY talk that GoV has proscribed, but unhinged talk by madmen. To share with you my own experience, trying to discuss the JQ with the Duke-MacDonald-Sunic acolyte crowd is like trying to discuss Islam with a Muslim. It’s like trying to empty with one’s fingers a basin full of water.
I have never even met the owners of this blog and am not privy to their editorial considerations. But if I were the editor of a mag (Web or DTO) focusing truthfully on the important issues of the day, I would have to ban crazed Judenrein cryptos too though I have some personal interest in the issue. To publish the truthful statements about the JQ that the more intelligent among this crowd can make entails refuting the lying and libelous statements that outweigh the true ones by about 3 to 1.
To leave the lies and libel standing means that the publication and the editor endorse them. No person of conscience can bear that. But to refute them sucks the time and energy of the conscientious publisher to such an extent that all other goals of the platform must be sacrificed. Life is too short, and the work to be done is very long.
The cryptos have many places to go to: all things called “Occidental,” “Alternative,” “Third way” etc. No one here has advocated that such venues of opinion be shut down.
Lastly, you’ll ask why JQ critical references have to be embedded in an article critical of MacDonald. It’s because you, the very group for which you speak, are the main obstacle to the possibility of discussing JQ in an open, rational forum and influencing public perceptions accordingly.
Takuan Seiyo
And then Dymhna:
@ Mary (and thanks for giving us a name)…
I started to respond to you since I didn’t think anyone else would, but I see Takuan Seiyo has just explained why we refuse to get sucked into the quagmire of this so-called “Jewish Question”.
Your opinion is that our refusal to consider the subject anymore makes us hypocrites? So be it.
My opinion is that we gave it too much space to begin with. It’s a trigger subject and not worth the trouble it causes. There are several other trigger subjects and those don’t get any room either.
IMHO, we’re not hypocrites, we’re survivors of that particular experience is purported dialogue. We’ve decided not to permit new battles here because they’re repetitious and eventually tedious to those of us who have no interest in participating. The wide, wide wonderful web gives you an infinite amount of room in which to have that discussion.
But not here. Not anymore. You believe this demonstrates our hypocrisy. I believe it shows our firm resolution to be good stewards of our limited time.
There is a great quote somewhere about paranoids being recognizable because they have a theory about the Jews, and a theory about money…but i can’t remember the rest of the quote. Perhaps is was merely when you combine those two, the paranoid can’t change the subject.
Anyway, the whole thing is OT. Just wanted to reiterate our reasons…not to have you agree with them, but to explain to newer readers the context of your accusation.
One thing’s fer sure: we ain’t ever gonna suit everyone.
So, that’s it so far. Just an interesting sideline on how the whole jew-run counterjihad is keeping its motors humming along, safe from the throngs of evil, “paranoid”, “OT”, “madmen” like us who dare and try challenge their positions on the “supposed” (according to Dyhmna) “jewish question”.
Oops, I wrote a three part message but only the 2nd and 3rd parts have posted :(
Basically I was just sharing an interesting piece “The Baron” wrote on GOV called “Losing our Religion”. In it, he includes this line:
Anyone who wishes to discuss these facts — and their implications for public policy — is shunned. This is true even in “conservative” venues, as our friend discovered. Unless one is willing to keep company with dedicated Jew-haters,, it’s virtually impossible to write of these matters and expect to be read by a significant audience.
I put a comment on his story calling them hypocrites as it is THEM who do not allow honest talk about the JQ and it is THEM who have engaged in deleting and censoring in order to enforce their stance.
So the previous two posts were follow ons to that scenario. I think my message might have been halted due to my trying to make it a link, lol. (fail)
So here it is in case anyone is interested in taking on the creepy Takuan Seiyo yet again ;)
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2012/02/losing-our-religion.html
I have no idea what’s going on at that site, never have, and don’t care to. And after reading that link, I care even less.
But nice effort anyway, Mary.
It was called Catholicism, and it worked quite well. I’d love to see MacDonald write a book about Catholicism as white evolutionary strategy.
He devoted two chapters of Separation and Its Discontents to this topic.
“Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against one of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself”
See below for an explanation of who one’s neighbor is:
http://strugglesforexistence.com/pdf/LTN.pdf
I see I was beaten to the punch on both points.
Apologies Mary, your 1st comment was stuck in the spam filter. Thanks for the heads up on GoV.
For those who haven’t heard of Takuan Seiyo before, he appears in the comments here:
A lightning in the middle of the night!
Tanstaafl on Auster
Tan, thanks for retrieving that, but frankly, after seeing how much space this little sideline has eaten up in the comments on your truly excellent post, I wish now I had kept it much shorter!
“Catholicism was the foundation upon which expulsion could be leveraged. We no longer have that moral framework.”
Btw i’m not saying it was worse than now and it may have been better and it may play a useful role in turning things around in the future but i personally don’t think it’s enough on its own – at least as it currently stands.
Agree. It’s not enough now. It’s nearly meaningless now. Just like everything else.
Except for the Jews of course, who won the 20th Century and are now on the cusp of sealing the deal for their Brand New Age.
But that’s because we let our Faith fail. The Jews sold us their world and leveraged our souls in the deal.
I find it hard to believe there was ever a time so hopeless for the future of White culture. Of course that’s said every age with the same conviction. But this sucks. And who is there to help us? We don’t even agree on our Faith anymore. Without that, there is nothing.
The “Christian” “Patriot” movement where I live is completely spiritually involved with Israel and the Jews. Taking trips to Israel, learning Yiddish, etc. I’m not talking mainstream neocons here, either. I’m talking prepper style, sovereign citizen, gun-carrying, bilbe thumping “patriots”. Chuck Baldwin style. Intimately tied up with Jewish folkways, worshipping Jews.
As the early Church Fathers said, “like dogs returning to their own vomit.” Hell, at this point we are our own vomit.
Read the early history of the Church and how hard they fought to keep this from happening. It’s why they changed the Mass to Sunday — to keep people from thinking they were Jews. It’s why you don’t hand out Bibles. Because people always start thinking they are Jews, or start worshipping the Jews as sacred. It’s the easy way out. Because then you don’t have to deal with so much we should otherwise be dealing with. The hard stuff.
Anyway, this is a mess beyond comprehension. The worse it gets, the more the Ancient Church makes sense. They were real. And they tried to save us.
Landshark, Surely we can still agree that we are White. That we have a right to stay White. There is NO right to Genocide. As someone said “just because the nazi’s wanted a world without Jews does not justify pushing for a world without Whites.” Stick the Mantra is their faces.
Most everyone who has destroyed us has had white skin color.
How about the anti-white narrative that supports the ongoing genocide of white people: massiveimmigration of non-whites, force integration, transfer of wealth to non-whites from whites, transfer of opportunity from whites to non-whites, forced assimilation leading to increased interracial dating ending in the extinction or complete genocide of white people. How about that. That is white genocide don’t you agree?
Excellent post, Tan, and equally-excellent comments by who+dares+wings.
Of course white genocide is the goal of the NWO.
I like the narrative, believe me. But the narrative presumes the listener is rational. The listener is already irrational if they are genocidal.
A genocidal person of any color or ethnicity doesn’t care if their position isn’t logical. They just want us gone.
You never know who may be listening. So many are simply demoralized, but know something is wrong. It also helps when some Anti-White really starts spewing,when provoked.
So ultimately color isn’t really the issue, it’s irrationality.
Jewish irrationality and hatred, to be precise. And the narrative doesn’t address that. The Church did.
Agree though. The narrative is useful. It’s also about all we have.
Color is the issue in so much that it is ONLY Whites who are targeted for Genocide.
Not to beat a dead horse, but the narrative is only defensive and only attempts to stop our enemy on a specific front, when they are attacking us ceaselessly and on all fronts. I want the whole world, not a tiny white-colored slice of it, and that only by allowance.
THEY need to be ghettoized, not us.
But I’m just splitting hairs.
Landshark writes:
“So ultimately color isn’t really the issue, it’s irrationality.
Jewish irrationality and hatred, to be precise. And the narrative doesn’t address that. The Church did.“
Ultimately, the issue is that we’re not jews and the jews aren’t us – that’s the source of the “irrationality” and “hate”.
“Not to beat a dead horse, but the narrative is only defensive and only attempts to stop our enemy on a specific front, when they are attacking us ceaselessly and on all fronts. I want the whole world, not a tiny white-colored slice of it, and that only by allowance.
THEY need to be ghettoized, not us.”
As soon as White people get it straight in their heads that jews aren’t us, then they can see the various fronts and select one or more to get to work on.
Speaking of fronts, it sounds like you’ve got alot of work to do. You should maybe start by rehabilitating your Church – and you won’t get that done by wasting time preaching to the good White folk here.
Takuan Seiyo wrote:
“You are 100% wrong. GoV published two essays of mine severely critical of the outsize Jewish contributions to the utopian ideologies that are grinding us down. You will find them just to the left of this column, one about McDonald and the other called F Street. It has also reprinted some of my pieces from The Brussels Journal that contain critical Jewish-related references within wider relevant topics.”
In other words, ONLY Jews or half-Jews (like “Seiyo”) can criticize Jews, or as Fjordman put it: “It appears that the only people who can denounce genuine anti-Semitism yet at the same time criticize liberal Jews are people who are part-Jewish themselves, such as Larry Auster or Takuan Seiyo” (Fjordie wrote this when he made all of us believe that he was a true Viking, not another half-Jew). And nope: no Gentile will be allowed to criticize non-Gentiles at GoV. Seiyo wrote:
“…if I were the editor of a mag (Web or DTO) focusing truthfully on the important issues of the day, I would have to ban crazed Judenrein cryptos too though I have some personal interest in the issue. To publish the truthful statements about the JQ that the more intelligent among this crowd can make entails refuting the lying and libelous statements that outweigh the true ones by about 3 to 1.”
Always respond to counter-jihadists by means of re-contextualizing their hypocrisies!:
If I were the editor of a magazine focusing truthfully on the important issues of the day, I would have to ban crazed Islamophobic cryptos too though I have some personal interest in the issue. To publish the truthful statements about the Muslim Question that the more intelligent among this crowd can make entails refuting the lying and libelous statements that appear at GoV, Brussels Journal, Jihad Watch and other dedicated Muslim-hater [paraphrasing the “Baron”] sites.
Sheila, great comment on OneSTDV’s Are Jews to Blame for Vegetarianism?:
“One, re your mention of how this sort of “Jew-hater alert! Jew-hater alert!” seems to go out to all and sundry whenever you have a post even mentioning Jews — it occurs to me that the Jewish response to any sort of discussion of Jewish behavior or responsibility for anything is similar to the black manner of physically attacking Whites. It’s a group beatdown. It’s almost like there’s a conspiracy (gasp! Yes, I went there!) so that commenters start coming out of the wood work to deny and argue and insist that they, alone, are allowed to set the parameters of the debate. For example – Rose – your comment is fairly innocuous and moderate on the surface. However, who are you to say that my points may be discussed “without fear” but that, at the same time, we need to be “careful” not to unjustly accuse the Jews? Same with Dana, here. Valid points, but I would argue they don’t go far enough. And why must we all “agree” with your statements if some of us feel that they are incorrect? Blacks do the same thing, of course – demanding that they set the parameters of the debate and they choose which words we are allowed to use. I reject all of these limits by any protected group. I’m seeing more and more Jewish censorship at heretofore relatively open sites, which will discuss race differences without limit, will discuss Muslim beliefs and social pathologies endlessly, but heaven forfend anyone mention the damned Jews.“
Well said.
The hate narrative, the jewish version of history, and the jewish guilt-trip is how jews chimp-out.
By filling every forum and everyone’s heads with one aspect or another of the jewish narrative, they leave no space for our own.
P.S.
And even if Fjordie and Taksei are right that only Jews can criticize Jews (which is nonsense anyway), neither of them nor the Baron actually said anything about my excerpts of Jew Albert Lindemann’s criticism of Jews, his heavy treatise Esau’s Tears. I typed the long excerpts precisely in my (vain) attempt to communicate with counter-jihadists. But they never said a peep about the heavy academic treatise.
Dymphna wrote “We’ve decided not to permit new battles here because they’re repetitious and eventually tedious…” But if we take into consideration the dozen times that I had mentioned Esau’s Tears at GoV, this is a lie. Lindemann’s criticism of Jews was never discussed at GoV. Zero discussion. Zilch. Zippo. Nothing! In fact, it was precisely after I mentioned Lindemann’s study for the Nth time that Fjorman labeled Tan and me as “spammers”.
Re the invective from Seiyo, Fjordman, BB, Auster, etc.
Intellectuals have such clever ways of calling people “stupid”, “crazy”, or “evil”, but in the end it is just ad hominem. When they play that card, what they’re saying is, “I have no other argument to make, so I’ll explain my lack of response by acting as if there’s nothing to respond to.” It’s a gambit. It works only on observers with whom they have some credibility. When they use that tactic on people who obviously aren’t stupid, crazy, or evil then they lose their credibility. Slowly but surely. That’s good enough for me.
“You should maybe start by rehabilitating your Church – and you won’t get that done by wasting time preaching to the good White folk here.”
Can’t do it alone.
And we’re all preaching something.
Nevertheless, point taken.
@ “When they use that tactic on people who obviously aren’t stupid, crazy, or evil then they lose their credibility. Slowly but surely. That’s good enough for me.”
Mary, I have not followed GoV as you do. But since a few weeks ago I’ve noticed in Conservative Swede’s site Recent Comments at Gates of Vienna that most of the commentariat I knew in the golden years of GoV is gone. Could it be possible that because “they used that tactic on people who aren’t stupid, crazy, or evil” then they are starting “lose their credibility”?
And what happened to Fjordie? Is he publishing his stuff elsewhere? How come no Norwegian Jew-wise man has investigated Peder Jensen’s affiliations to the Jewish community so that a reliable article on Fjordman’s ties with the tribe is exposed? I mean, if I lived in Oslo I’d have surely tried to interview his parents or retrieve info from their acquaintances…
Tans,
In regard to your 6:18 comment…The jews themselves were the industrious little elves who helped to cultivate my own mindset. When my interest in the JQ was one of mere curiosity, I would periodically pose questions to jewish commenters or acquaintances when the given forum lent itself to the subject. Their responses were always quite varied:
Silence
Hysteria
Insults
Diversion
Assertions of intellectual superiority
Demands for unattainable white moral purity
Lachrymose appeals for sympathy
Contradictions within the same sentence (we are white; and you whites have much to answer for)
Base vengeance and desire for eternal redress (Shoah me the money!)
I have found your old chum Takuan Seiyo in particular to be an almost pristine specimen of this rhetorical breed. I do hope that if we survive this great tumult, that our children will build museums with narratives all of our own. And one of the exhibits should feature an animatronic “Seiyo” regurgitating an endless litany of his turgid, ostentatious bullshit. And with it will be a moderator who continually reminds: “Always remember how this sounds, because you will never hear it coming from a friend.”
Porter,
Your list is all too true. But I’d boil it down to the late Scott Peck’s definition of Evil: To self-deceive you constantly in order to maintain an image of self-perfection.
My background is not politics, history or white interests, but child abuse studies. Although Speck discovered this scientific definition of the age-old (and often religious) concept of Evil in the context of abusive parents, I believe it’s pretty handy when we apply it to the Jews. They always self-deceive themselves in order to maintain an image of self-perfection!
Landshark
“So ultimately color isn’t really the issue, it’s irrationality.”
Ethnicity is the issue. Color is one aspect of ethnicity. Behavior based on ethnicity is rational.
Reading Tan’s link to Chechar’s site above, I have to conclude that Takuan Seiyo’s flailing kitchen sink assault on the “jew obsessives” makes for an even better study in cajewistry than Auster’s sputtering offerings, because Seiyo is smarter, more clever, and more self-aware.
Scott,
And there is still another long entry in the former incarnation of my blog about our old friend Taksei.
Perhaps Taksei is older than Auster; surely he’s decades older than Fjordie. He’s a real intellectual in the European sense of very wide knowledge in the humanities (always beware of intellectuals).
At least, like Auster Taksei never hid his J background, something that Peder Jensen/Fjordie did. But what I find most infuriating is not Fjordie’s takiya, but the self-delusion of informed gentiles, like the Catholic “Barons”. The half-Jews prioritize their tribe’s interests, yes, but gentile counter-jihadists prioritize the interests of an alien ethnic group. And they practice typical altruistic punishment on those co-ethnics who dare to criticize them!
Always be more concerned with informed race traitors than with non-gentiles posing as gentiles.
Thanks for the link, Chechar – a great recapitulation. Seiyo is truly something to behold – he goes from good cop (offering free advice on how not to harm our cause) to bad cop (spitting ad hominems) at the flick of a switch. One moment he’ll leave in a huff after firmly concluding that “jew obsessives” are self-marginalizing psychopaths not worthy of anyone’s time, only to belie his verdict by returning again and again with yet another newly-found piece of the kitchen sink to sling. It’s all so stupid, because the philo-semitic argument in these “debates” always boils down to Auster’s simple-minded formulation: there is a real jewish problem (good cop), but ( … bad cop) we have to shun the mentally sick jew haters because “the real Jewish problem consists in the fact that Jews are a distinct people who because of their energy and talents tend to become dominant in culturally influential areas of society.” Of course, if the Amish came to dominate every corridor of global power and conveniently made barn-raising the criterion for dominance, those opposed to their dominance wouldn’t care if they got there via “merit.” But even beyond that obvious flaw, such an argument, by acknowledging that they’re a “distinct people” already concedes (before proceeding to ignore) the main problem: conflicting group interests. Seriously, how pathological is it to pathologize those who aren’t pleased that their culture and mores have been taken over by those who have a deep-rooted, almost instinctual animus against them? That’s why they never win these debates and have to resort to silencing, ad hominems, and psy-ops.
“That’s why they never win these debates and have to resort to silencing, ad hominems, and psy-ops.“
Exactly. They will not acknowledge that Whites are distinct from jews, and that we have conflicts of interest, because it undermines their usual shtick that jews are us, on our side. The simple act of asserting a distinction incites jew-firsters to a venomous response which confirms it.
Noticing their distinctiveness would undermine their main source of taqiyya. Remember how upset Abe Foxman was when someone remarked that Hollywood is Jewish? Try to remark who controls the banks or write an essay about the Jewish lobby and see what happens. Gentiles a supposed not to notice these things.
Noticing their distinctiveness would undermine their main source of taqiyya. Remember how upset Abe Foxman was when someone remarked that Hollywood is Jewish? Try to remark who controls the banks or write an essay about the Jewish lobby and see what happens. Gentiles a supposed not to notice these things.
@ “Gentiles a[re] supposed not to notice these things.”
According to Taksei, Fjordie et al, we are supposed to behave like the frugivorous Eloi, walking straight ahead, in a trance-like state, to the now open doors of the Morlocks’ building and their dinner table.
Takuan’s latest at GoV.
It’s not worth reading.
Seiyo writes to confuse rather than clarify. He examines symptoms and neglects causes. His ultimate purpose is to excuse jews and blame nazis.
Taksei has brilliant sentences criticizing Christianity’s wrong turn such as:
Quote:
We are rich in the Judeo Christian values of Compassion, Faith, Hope and Love. We are extremely poor in the Greek values of courage, prudence, temperance and justice — and that’s not the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals justice. We are broke and empty of the Roman values of Constantia (endurance), Fides (good faith), Firmitas (firmness of mind), Frugalitas (love of simplicity), Nobilitas (nobility), Pietas (civic dutifulness), Prudentia (foresight, wisdom), Pudicita (chaste modesty), Severitas (sternness, self-control), Veritas ( truthfulness), and Virtus (manly courage)…
The current answer for “progressives” and Christians alike is “a life of loving service to others”…
One may feel compassion for Somali refugees, but resettling them in Minnesota as several Protestant organizations do is a willful offense against Reality, devoid of compassion for Minnesota.
/ end quote
On the other hand, in addition to sparing the Jews for their pro-immigration lobbying, he also wrote absolute abominations in that piece such as:
Quote:
Race in a country that was multiracial at its founding cannot be an obstacle. I believe that Thomas Sowell and AyaanHirsi Ali would be in the top of the discriminative ruling elite: the nobility and the brains are chiseled in their faces and CVs.
/ end quote
The West is the white race. And the white race is the West. With defenders of the “West” such as Taksei, with all his awesome dominion on the English language and global culture, who needs enemies? His Jedi tricks may deceive the GoV-ers and conservatives alike. But not us…
I wish I had more time to read all the comments. My full matrix exiting awakening has been recent. I’d discovered different tentacles of the octopus over the years but only recently come to the full truth of the.jewish question and their treachery.
Fuck me runnin.
This article summed up what took me a year or three to learn.
I’ve been listening to David Dukes audio version of My Awakening.
No wonder they hate him so much. He reveals what they want to hide.
Here’s a twist on the jewish narrative. The Greeks are the new jews! (According to the Greeks.)
Greeks direct cries of pain at Germany:
“Most shockingly, a rightwing Greek newspaper depicts Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor, in a Nazi uniform above the headline “Memorandum macht frei” – an allusion to the memorandum in which Greece’s foreign creditors demand more austerity measures and to the Auschwitz slogan.“
Shocking only in that it supposedly comes from rightwingers. Invocations of the holocaust narrative can be found in the headlines every day. It would be shocking if the general public didn’t adopt this as the standard for all moralizing rhetoric.
And yet the premise of jewish morality is that the tactics jews use against others are immoral to use against jews. Thus it’s SHOCKING!!! when non-jews turn the jewish propagandizing on its head. Just look how they sputter over the memorializing of Dresden.
Why do people hate Jews?
Often the Jewish excuse ranges from “Because people need a scapegoat to blame the world’s problems on” to “Do people need a reason to hate?” (a rhetorical question, notice that Jews ask lots of rhetorical questions, a persuasive trick) to religious reasons and to xenophobia.
It’s amazing to me that “Hate Crime” and “Xenophobia/Racism” are often cited along with “Antisemitism” despite the fact that the Jews aren’t a race.
People need a reason to hate. I don’t like Jews, I am irreligious, and am white but not a white nationalist, I am not a racist or a bigot. So why do I hate Jews? I’m in my 30s and up until this point, never had anything against Jews.
If you google “hate Jews” you get a bunch of Muslim-related links. The Jews want people to believe that Muslims religiously want to kill all Jews. Muslims and Jews lived together and migrated together (across North Africa to Spain). Jews were safer than in Christdom. Elite Jews were treated like royalty, especially by Ottoman Sultans. Iran has a population of likely over 100k Jews which is deliberately diminished to 30k to make it look like there is less. But we are to believe Iran wants to holocaust Jews.
So what changed? Zionism. And I’ve done my homework, those Jewish ‘pogroms’ and ‘expulsions’ during the 20th century were both exaggerated and instigated by Zionist influence to promote ‘aliyah’ to Israel. Israel’s brutal behavior to their neighbors did the rest. If Muslims hate Jews it’s because they hate Israel. The fact that they hold up Jew-hating signs in English at these protests in the ME is suspicious IMO.
Why do I hate Jews? First of all there is Israel and the fact that they’ve lied about their entire history, have committed ethnic cleansing and genocide, making excuses, commit false flag terrorism and kill Americans, the flotilla, cast lead, Netanyahu, state-sponsored terror, their stranglehold on our Congress, their lobbies, etc.
In recent years, the no gas chamber debate caught my interest. I extensively re-visited it after the whole Israel awakening thing and I just cannot believe I bought it for so many years. I feel violated. All the shills on the internet spouting nonsense and lies just make me angry.
Then there is things like collective Jewry calling on us to free criminal Pollard, Tikkun Olam aka globalization/nwo, neoconservative hawks dictating foreign policy and sending our kids to die for Israel, helping out the tribe above all else, Wall Street, the central banking criminal cartel, corporations, lobbies, over-representation, etc. And Jews get mad when you point this out or point out that they dominate the media and Hollywood.
And BTW, I used to say “Zionist” but I have since stopped. The problem is Jews, They are the problem. Most Jews are Zionist. The Jews who actually speak out against this are labeled as self-haters. Jews are the problem, no sense in putting them into subgroups or being PC. There are hardly any Jews on this planet anyways, .2% of the population. 99.8% of the world is not Jewish.
And the problem is not religious because half of the Jews are atheist. They discourage breeding with non-Jews so they have a small inbreeding pool. It’s genetic. They have high rates of mental illness and psychopathy. Some gullible idiots mistake this for intelligence. The ability to use persuasive rhetoric and manipulate the gullible without remorse or empathy is not a sign of intelligence. It is a sign of a predator that should be avoided.
Jews dominate our everyday lives in Western Society. People who realize this might not like Jews. It’s not irrational and it’s not a sickness.
Even things like Khazaria are suspicious because Jews promoted them. There was an Anatolian providence called Lydia which in Greek was no different than Judea. Jews were in criminal justice and banking positions throughout Europe. They were just there, they didn’t move there. Powerful elite Jews are hiding something massive and criminal about our history.
I have not had time to read all the comments, so this might be repeating what someone else has said – but it is either moral or it is not. There is no such thing as “Jewish morality.” They just do not HAVE any morals – at all, so far as I can tell. They literally do not know what is right, what is wrong, what is good or what is bad – or how to be happy, in other words.
They are so insensitive to decency and morality that they seem to be actually not like us but are simply subhuman.
I do not mean that unkindly and it seems like a horrible thing to say, but how else can one understand the behavior of Jews?
I cannot!
I do think it is a matter of education – but HOW? How does one rescue them all from their horrible indoctrination which they go through from birth – even before. Imagine being a baby continually bathed in all the stress hormones. Jewish women are usually very aggressive, and I believe that comes from generations of being told they must hate and fear all of Humanity. How can anyone be relaxed when they are told that from birth – and subjected to the stress hormones even prenatally?
Anonymous: “There is no such thing as “Jewish morality.” They just do not HAVE any morals – at all, so far as I can tell.”
Also, it isn’t clear if the Jews have double standards or no standards at all. I think the problem isn’t that their standards become looser when they deal with non-Jews. The problem is that they are anti-White. It is real hostility, not a lack of fairness. When we accuse them of having double standards, we assume that they are people like us, just a tad dishonest. In fact, it is worse than that.
Many also complain about Jewish hypocrisy, when the real problem is Jewish hostility against White people.
Jews say that the race-replacement of White people is good for humanity. Of course, they lie about their motivations. They don’t think the world will be better off without the Whites. They just want to get rid of us. I think it’s natural they would lie about their genocidal intent. What’s wrong is their genocidal hostility, not their hypocrisy about it.
Usually, someone who is described as a hypocrite is driven by self-interest, not by hostility. But Jews who crusade for race-replacement are driven by anti-White animus.
Hey, hey, who+dares+wings,
What matters most is getting the message out.
Still, a little credit to Akira 耀「アキラ」 for his “Definition of Anglo-American Main-Stream Media” would be nice….
http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2010/02/17/definition-of-anglo-american-main-stream-media/
The Jew is very racially aware and loyal to collective Jewry. This does not stop the Jew from being greedy to fellow tribe members, it’s a different type of greed than the hostility displayed to gentiles.
Our problem is, for the most part, a lack of racial awareness. When it comes to whites of European origin, we are discouraged and brainwashed against being a cohesive and loyal group. This is the Jew’s doing. We are a people divided on too many things. Unfortunately it is not easy for the brainwashed majority to become Jew aware for various reasons. There are ways around this.
I think nationalism is a start. This won’t work in the US, Canada, or Australia, but it will work in Europe. Nationalism should be encouraged as a start, based on ethnic identity. A Nigerian living in Ireland is not Irish for example.
In the US I think people need to be aware of Jewish Marxism. So many conservative Americans think that Jews are conservative when the majority are Marxist and liberal. Some are aware of Marxist subversion, but the Jews are the ones who told them and they blame Muslims instead of Jews. On purpose. Once the Americans realize the Jews are mostly Marxist liberals, Zionism and Zionist crimes can be exposed without falling on deaf ears.
Exploit their Christian faith against them. Point out how Israel is not Jewish in the bible and the kingdom of Israel became the non-Judah lost tribes. Explain that the Jews are mostly atheist and the religious Jews are following Pharisee traditions by their own admission. Pharisees, the enemy of Christ. Show them how Zionists treat Christians. Explain that Jesus was a Judean, not a nation wrecking modern Jew. He was part of the Nazarene sect. Explain that the covenant moved to Jesus and his followers and Jews are not chosen people. I’m not asking anybody to believe this at all, but this is all spelled out in their bibles that they don’t read.
Eventually you can explain that the OT was replaced by the NT, the 10 commandments are crap and replaced by 2 from Jesus, and hopefully tear out all the Judiac dogma including revelation and the entire OT. Explain how Darby and Scofield manipulated revelation to serve the Jew and that the rapture is a 19th century hoax. Explain that Judeo-Christianity is a meaningless oxymoron. This way Christians can sort of remain Christians while shedding the Jewish aspect.
A more Jew aware public should understand that the holocaust is a horrible crime – against the white race. Against Germans and Germanic people. A massive hoax which is not founded on a single piece of physical evidence. Then all the crimes of Jewry can be exposed and understood. Their overrepresentation in politics and the unelected financial class of Jews who control it. Media Jews, Hollywood Jews, and of course financial bankster Jews dominating our lives and our thoughts with the money they print out of nothing but our faith (at interest).
Show them how the Jew wants to destroy the white race, how the Jew encourages other races and cultures to maintain a group identity, how they have flooded white nations with immigrants on purpose.
I think people can be eased into this if done the right way. The end result will be an anti-Marxist pro white nationalist group that is racially aware and hopefully over their superficial differences. Aware of the Jew as an enemy and aware that our group is much larger and much stronger in numbers alone. I would say intelligence too, but the Jew is intelligent in a different way – in the cunning and manipulative variety.
The Jew fears only the white race, they don’t fear any of the other races as much of a threat. They know they cannot compete. The one thing they fear is all of us being awake and aware. And once we’re there we can get the other races there too and single out the Jew. As for the solution to the problem of the Jew, I’ll leave that up to others.
Very good article. Couldn’t agree more.
Do you believe it is possible that the Jews made such a big deal about their 2 or so million (if that) lost in the Holohoax to divert attention from the fact that they killed 100 times that,200 million, with their communism during more or less the same period?