Jew-Firsters vs Israel-Firsters

In Why I am using ‘Israel firster’ again M.J. Rosenberg writes:

Short definition: you are an Israel Firster if you believe it is acceptable to criticize US Presidents (whether Obama, Bush or any other) but believe that you must stand behind any and all Israeli policies and prime ministers. Call it “my country, right or wrong” but with a significant twist.

The reason Israel Firster became so explosive in 2012 is because (1) this is the year the lobby wants the United States to either attack Iran or allow Israel to do it and (2) this is the year in which tens of millions of dollars of unregulated campaign contributions are flowing to the Republican candidate for president simply because the single-issue crowd believes that Mitt Romney is the candidate most likely to fit comfortably in Netanyahu’s pocket.

The lobby’s biggest fear is that the American people will figure this out and that the blow back will harm the US-Israel relationship.

Frankly, I share part of that worry. But my fear is that if the American people do figure out what AIPAC and its friends are up to, it could harm us here. After all, the lobby has done a great job convincing Congress and opinion leaders that they represent all Jews not just 4%.

I don’t want my kids or theirs tainted with any association with those who are pushing for war with Iran, as they did with Iraq, or who blackmail presidents into supporting policies that harm the United States.

How to prevent that?

Frankly, I think I’m more than entitled to call this spade a spade. I have supported Israel (not, however, its more horrific policies) my whole life. I believe that Israel should survive and live in security, in some kind of arrangement with the Palestinian people who deserve peace, security and sovereignty just as much as Israelis do. Also, I speak as someone whose own kids are first generation. Their mom, my wife, was born in a Displaced Persons camp in Germany to two Polish Jews who survived the Holocaust.

I simply cannot be intimidated by those who business is intimidation. The way I see it, both my country, America, and a country I deeply care about, Israel,and the Jewish people are all being placed at risk by a small bunch of multi-millionaires and billionaires whose only interests are self-aggrandizement, hob-nobbing with those in power, and crushing anyone who gets in their way.

One day, everyone will understand that. It should be our mission to make sure that before they do, we break the back of an unrepresentative, dishonest and corrupt lobby that jeopardizes us all.

Rosenberg insinuates that he speaks for 96% of jews. According to him the problem with Israel-firsters is that what they’re doing isn’t good for the jews. What’s more, as an entitled, morally self-righteous, holocaust-invoking jew he won’t be intimidated into silence by the entitled, morally self-righteous, holocaust-invoking jews in the other 4%.

Mitt Romney, the Republican candidate for president, is at this moment in Israel performing his humiliating donning-of-the-skullcap ceremony, pledging fealty and obeisance to the interests of an alien nation.

This bizarre pilgrimage and rite of misdirected loyalty has become de rigueur for all aspirants to political “leadership” today, no matter their religious, political or state affiliation. Obama too, First Jewish President, “leader” of the free world, has already performed, and today is blasted for not renewing his vows.

Such is the thoroughly judaized state of the current regime. After decades of purges the only open opponents to the Israel-firsters who remain are jew-firsters. Where the Israeli-firsters wear their loyalty more or less on their sleeves, their jew-firster critics, like Rosenberg, are just as corrupt and dishonest in that they misrepresent the nature of the whole dispute as political or economic when it is in fact purely jewish. The primary concern, on all sides, is what’s best for jews. They simply disagree about what’s best for which jews.

The image above comes from the jew-firsters at Breitbart, who cite and join a broad swath of organized jewry denouncing Rosenberg, explaining:

While the term [Israel-firster] might not immediately be considered derogatory, in context, it’s usually apparent that it’s not meant in a positive way.

It all depends on the point of view. Whites are regularly subjected to intentionally derogatory terms such as “racist”, “nazi”, and “White supremacist”. None of this is meant in a positive way either, except again in the sense that it comes from people whose main obsession is what’s best for the jews.

13 thoughts on “Jew-Firsters vs Israel-Firsters”

  1. Tan, once again you pick apart the jewish narrative wih precision and clarity. Thank-you for all your excellent work.

  2. Whites are as intelligent as Jews and way outnumber them. If we would regularly do things like we did for Chik-fil-A day, applied to societal and political projects, then we could take our country back in a week.

  3. “Whites are as intelligent as Jews and way outnumber them. If we would regularly do things like we did for Chik-fil-A day, applied to societal and political projects, then we could take our country back in a week.”

    This is why even “conservative” jews pushed hard for 3rd-World immigration… Nothing freaks them out more as White acting like unit on their racial interests.

  4. “If we would regularly do things like we did for Chik-fil-A day, applied to societal and political projects, then we could take our country back in a week.”

    How long is a week on your planet?

  5. Tan, you sounded great on The White Network last night: very passionate!!

    And here I am posting kinda off-topic observations again (sorry) but it’s somewhat related in that it is largely down to you that I was able to break this debilitating belief in the first place: the “jews are White” delusion.

    So today I got an email from Sam Harris (I have been on his mailing list for years), a fairly well known jewish atheist known best for his book ‘The End of Faith’. The topic was ‘Internet trolls’ and he was responding to his many critics. Anyways, halfway down the page, I see this:

    What is the “controversy” that my correspondent finds so gratifying? A couple of months ago, I wrote an article on profiling at airport security checkpoints. Given that I suggested (twice) that white men like myself also fit the profile of a possible terrorist, I would have thought that charges of “racism” would be off the table. Not so. In fact, people like PZ Myers continue to malign me as an advocate of “racial profiling.” I have written to Myers personally about this and answered his charges publicly. His only response has been to attack me further and to endorse the false charges of others.

    Grrrr: I think this is still such a massive problem, this ‘jews are White’ thinking that so many Whites have, but I can see how insidious it is as there are so many of them (jews) who keep inserting this lie about the place.

    Just a thought: thanks for your work:)

  6. Pleased to be of service to you Mary, and to others too, I hope.

    Tonight on AoTR I begin a series of podcasts concerning identity, a critical part of which will be comparing and contrasting White identity with jewish identity.

  7. Christians and Europeans are being wiped out by a very dangerous alliance: the Jews and the Saudi Salafi. The united Semites are expanding throughout the Middle East and Europe.
    Do not fall for the popular misconception that there is animosity between the Jews and the Salafi. They are allies.

  8. Israel was founded as a Marxist nation.

    Mapai (Hebrew: מפא”י‎, an acronym for Mifleget Poalei Eretz Yisrael (Hebrew: מפלגת פועלי ארץ ישראל‎), lit. Workers’ Party of Eretz Yisrael) was a left-wing political party in Israel, and was the dominant force in Israeli politics until its merger into the Israeli Labor Party in 1968.

    Mapai (Acronym for Mifleget Poalei Eretz Israel-the Party of Eretz Israel Workers) — Socialist Zionist party. Founded upon the merger of Achdut Ha’Avoda and Hapoel Hatzair in 1930, it constituted the the central and dominant political force in the Labor movement, in the Yishuv of Palestine, in the Zionist movement and later in the State of Israel. In 1965 joined with the reconstituted Achdut Ha’Avoda-Poalei Zion to form the first Alignment, which in 1968 merged with Rafi to form the Israel Labor party. As long as Mapai existed, all the Prime Ministers, all Presidents but one, all Knesset Speakers but one, all Secetaries General of the Histadrut belonged to that party.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapai.

    Mapai was a Marxist party. It defines Israel’s identity.

    Marxist Gulags:

    GULAG videos
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hA9drjCX6U

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqfV0XCySZU

  9. “Christians and Europeans are being wiped out by a very dangerous alliance: the Jews and the Saudi Salafi. The united Semites are expanding throughout the Middle East and Europe.”

    *yawn*

    Jews will make alliance with all those they think can aid them in eventually destroying racially pure Northern Europeans for if Northern Europeans are destroyed there will be essentially no credible rival to the Jewish millenarian claim of their being a Master Race (“G_d’s Chosen people”).

    The choice is ultimately this, Who would you rather be ruled by, at whatever degrees of separation one cares to name, Jews or racially pure Northern Europeans?

    I’m sure Tan already knows and has decided upon his personal answer to this most decisive of questions.

  10. Yeah, the hatred Saudis feel for Europeans is special and very fierce. That is why Iran and Turkey, and even Pakistan could become useful. Sadly, the US does not only support Israel, but also Saudi-Arabia directly. This is outlined by Alexander de Valle.
    I have developed a special counter strategy. I point out Saudi-Arabia and Iran will destroy each other, unless they convert to my religion.

  11. Apparently, many people like my solutions. Always remind Saudis that God exists and hell is eternal. Saudi women are never raped by their drivers or lingerie salesmen, so isn’t the separation of the sexes completely overdone?

Comments are closed.