16 thoughts on “Ocean of Whiteness”

  1. “It’s amazing how the anti-White narrative works, isn’t it? Blacks are polling at 0 percent for the White candidate, but Whites are the ones who are supposed to feel guilty about it.”

    I think that’s exactly the point – misdirection. They disguise black / mexican / jewish ethnic bloc voting by shouting and pointing the finger at white people so white people are so busy judging themselves they don’t notice their accusers are total hypocrites.

    It’s exactly the same with the primary jewish role in atlantic slavery, the bolshevik holocaust and total jewish media domination.

    By jumping up and down, making a lot of noise and pointing the finger of blame at white people over the nazis or the secondary white role in slavery or disparate impact that works in favor of white people they deflect attention from things they did or are doing.

    I think this will be a general rule. When jews are shouting and screaming and accusing and pointing the finger then step back for a moment, ignore them and look back in the exact opposite direction to where they’re pointing and you’ll find something they want to hide.

  2. Notice that subline: “Diversity nowhere in sight.”

    It’s heartening to see our Fourth Estate herald such a positive turn. I haven’t read the article, but in the spirit of its lead I expect mentions of other things that (like diversity) were nowhere in sight: EBT ticks, rapists of nonagenarians, face-devourers, visible buttocks, warring bangers, obese STD petri-dishes, and jaundiced crack-connoisseurs.

    As the boys as MPC might aver…Coincidence Status: Denied.

  3. Actually it’s an ocean of non-whites. According to the 2000 census America had 100 million non-whites. That is undoubtedly enough to insure fewer and fewer white kids. The headline is pro-GENOCIDE. They want Genocide.

  4. yes, the gop should feel guilty… romney is polling 0%, not because blacks are racist, but because his platform doesn’t represent blacks and is actively out to harm them… that is like blaming the victim of rape for wearing a short dress.

  5. “his platform doesn’t represent blacks and is actively out to harm them”

    Both the gop and democrats support mass immigration. Mass immigration harms blacks through the supply and demand for labor.

    So the democrats are economically both anti-white and anti-black but being explicitly culturally anti-white disguises it.

    The gop are economically both anti-white and anti-black but by being less obviously culturally anti-white than the democrats it disguises it.

    Both parties are funded by the people who benefit from increasing the supply of labor and the whole pupper show is designed to keep people distracted while their economic future is being destroyed.

  6. Both parties are funded by the people who benefit from increasing the supply of labor and the whole pupper show is designed to keep people distracted while their economic future is being destroyed.

    The key is group identity, not economics. Who benefits from keeping whom distracted?

    To a first approximation party funding comes from jews, who spend even more on media. Their show keeps Whites distracted while our future – economically, politically, genetically – is being destroyed. Jews (and blacks, latinos, asians, …) are well aware of their group interests and organize politically to pursue them. Jews pathologize and demonize Whites for attempting to do the same.

  7. “The key is group identity, not economics.”

    Well said.
    1. What’s really bad for White people is the race-replacement, not the impoverishment.
    2. Jews do not promote our race-replacement to get richer.

    Anyway, I don’t believe that capital owners reap financial benefits from third-world immigration. Some of them do. But I think most of them are getting poorer as white people’s money is redistributed to non-whites, and as the country becomes more third-worldish, less wealthy and less productive. Productivity depends a lot on people. Mexicans are less productive than White people. The less productive the people, the less profitable the capital investments.

  8. “The key is group identity, not economics.”

    The underlying driving force is tribal warfare but economics is one of the battlegrounds on which it is taking place.

    “Jews (and blacks, latinos, asians, …) are well aware of their group interests and organize politically to pursue them”

    They don’t though. Jews do yes and currently latinos and asians maybe but non-immigrant blacks, which is the group the first poster used as an example, don’t benefit from mass immigration. They get thrown anti-white cultural bones and AA for now to keep them onside but they’re in the process of being thrown under the bus in favor of latinos.

    Everyone is being played here except the Jews. The white elites who are going along with it for money are being played, the white majority obviously are being played, blacks are being played etc.

    Even latinos, although on the surface they are being given America by the Jews they’re not being given the same America. They’re being given the future Brazil version of America with a billion people living in slums. At the moment they may be getting a taste of the old prosperous America but their future in America is exactly the same as their past in Mexico – poverty and slums – simply because of numbers. The borders won’t suddenly close when white people are a minority. They’ll stay open until the new Americans are as poor as the Jews want them to be.

    Like i say. Everyone is being played.

    (This isn’t generally relevant to the position of this blog. It’s a specific response to Mr Weisel’s point about the gop/democrat puppet show.)

  9. Anonymous: “Even latinos, although on the surface they are being given America by the Jews they’re not being given the same America.”

    Latino immigrants come to the US for the money. Even so, they would rather collectively replace White people than strike a deal with them so as to stop immigration and ensure a better economic future for the children of Latinos who already live in the United States. They tend to favor their collective racial interest over their narrow economic interest.

    [non-immigrant blacks] “get thrown anti-white cultural bones and AA for now”

    And that’s why they vote for anti-White, pro-affirmative-action politicians. They think they are defending their collective interests, even though that is a miscalculation. Most Blacks are probably against immigration, but they are even more anti-White and pro-AA.

  10. Anyone who bases their vote on color or ethnicity, does not belong in our country!!!

    Then I guess you better go tell niggers to leave America as they are voting 100% for Black Obama and 0% for White Romney.

  11. “They think they are defending their collective interests, even though that is a miscalculation.”

    Yes, my point is simply the miscalculation part.

Comments are closed.