The Jew Menace


The big news this week is that the jews have very openly and collectively, as jews, called upon governments everywhere, but especially in Europe, to provide them special treatment, to protect and serve the jews specifically by suppressing and punishing any expression of whatever the jews decide to define as “anti-semitism”.

Effectively the jews and their worshippers are calling for a ban on blasphemy against the jews. They’re seeking to criminalize any expression of irreverence, disrespect, distaste, disagreement, or even mere disregard for the complaints and demands that jews are constantly making. Complaints and demands such as the ones they’re making this week – which we’re going to critique in some detail. This is precisely the sort of critique that the jews are demanding goverments illegalize. Everywhere.

Let’s start by noting that there are two very specific kinds of blasphemy that the jews are most keen to stop. The first they call “holocaust denial”, by which they mean any form of challenge to or rejection of their version of history, their narrative about the period of European history which used to be known as World War II. The second kind of blasphemy they want governments to stop is any and all forms of criticism of their ethnostate, Israel.

This is actually old news in that the jews have been making these same complaints and demands for decades – especially since the war ended. It is a difficult fact for White people to face – and even 70 years after that war most still will not think about it in such terms – but the White race, all European peoples whatever their nationality and wherever they may live today, lost that war. The jews won.

There is no clearer indication of this than the unrivalled position of power from which the jews have been able to dictate to Whites everywhere what can and can’t be said about jews or virtually anything jews feel impinges on their interests. Most especially having to do with that war. Thus it is less and less even referred to as World War II, and more and more “The Holocaust”, or “Shoah”. Because that is how the jews see it. And, as everyone can see now, if only because the jews’ media and political power compels it, that war was all about the jews.

The most elementary point I’d like to make here is that these three things – the jews, Israel, and their holocaust narrative – are connected. They come in a package. And it is this way because the jews themselves insist upon it. Yet they also insist that if anyone else makes this connection it is “anti-semitism”. As I mentioned the last time, when describing jew-worship and blasphemy, the double-standards jews promote seem surreal, almost magical in nature. But I think it’s really just a reflection of their dominance.

Speaking of dominance, and old news, I’m recording this the night before, but tomorrow is a special day for jews and jew-worshippers. When this special day was first declared by the UN in 2005, Robert Faurisson wrote a short article about it titled The UN Decides a Universal Ban on Revisionism:

On November 1st, unanimously and without a vote, the representatives of the 191 nations making up the UN adopted — or let be adopted — an Israeli-drafted resolution proclaiming January 27th “International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust”.

Moreover, the resolution “Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part”.

Faurisson’s conclusion:

This extraordinary UN resolution also constitutes proof that historical revisionism is a reality that can no longer be bypassed, denied or played down. Its notoriety has become global. Still, let us take care to recognise that the revisionist researchers who remain active are now but a handful and, with each passing year, their future grows darker.

Faurisson was being optimistic. Here we are in that dark future. The jews are still at it. More aggressively pushing for more banning. More directly connecting it to themselves, their Holocaust narrative, and their ethnostate. Let’s take a closer look at three jewsmedia reports on the menace jews have been making of themselves this week.

Prosor calls on European leaders: Take a stand against anti-Semitism, quotes Israel’s Ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor:

“Let the message echo from the halls of the UN to the streets of Europe to the capital of every nation – stand for human rights and human dignity by taking a stand against anti-Semitism,” Prosor said.

This rhetorical fraud – jews cloaking their concern for their own particularist interests in disingenuous universalist language – can be found throughout their pronouncements this week. It’s a constant feature of what jews do and how they do it.

To see just how transparently brazen this statement is you simply have to substitute one word: Let the message echo from the halls of the UN to the streets of Europe to the capital of every nation – stand for human rights and human dignity by taking a stand against anti-Europeanism.

Is there even one European politician, in power, who would claim he himself is taking a stand against anti-Europeanism, much less lecture the rest of the world that they should do so?

Prosor asserted that “The struggle against anti-Semitism must be a priority for every nation because the hatred that begins with the Jews never ends with the Jews. History has shown us time and again that when a nation’s Jews are not safe, the entire society is at risk.”

The main struggle of the jews is to ensure that the harm the jews cause others is never attributed to the jews. To do this jews shift the blame elsewhere, in this case, as usual, to “anti-semitism”.

The argument Prosor is making here is that everybody else must make it their priority to stop somebody else from even complaining about what the jews do.

History has shown us time and again that jews are parasites who infiltrate, manipulate, and ruthlessly exploit other nations, that they have cared only for their own interests as they have undermined and ultimately brought to ruin and fled every other nation they have ever lived amongst.

History has shown us time and again that jews pose a special menace to hosts which attempt to look after their own safety and defend themselves against the depredations of the jews. Even those who succeed in reclaiming control over their nation as the national socialists did in Germany find that the jews never forgive and never forget. In Germany’s case, world jewry declared war in 1933, began agitating Britain, France, the Soviet Union and the United States to war, to teach them all the lesson Prosor alludes to: “when a nation’s Jews are not safe, the entire society is at risk”.

The jews blame their hosts for resisting them. That they bribe and lobby and propagandize and even succeed in taking control of the host’s leaders and crucial organs and makes them more culpable and harm they cause more insidious, not less.

“Europe is being tested,” he said. “We don’t need any more monuments commemorating the Jews who were murdered in Europe, we need a strong and enduring commitment to the living Jews in Europe. If the governments of Europe succeed in defending their Jewish communities, then they will succeed in defending liberty and democracy.”

Prosor cites the jewish victim narrative even as he denies it.

Jews actually want, and get, both – worship and defense. They get monuments and holidays commemorating them, and special security. It is sponsored by governments, funded by taxing others.

It is jews telling Europeans what to think and what to do – in this case Prosor literally defines “liberty” and “democracy” and even success as the defense of jews.

And vowed that “The days when Jews were the world’s victims are over. We will never again be helpless and we will never again remain silent. Today we have the State of Israel standing guard.

Victimhood again, this time couched in menace: “We don’t need to incite others to war against you, we have weapons of our own now”.

The article explicitly mentions the attack on the “kosher supermarket” in Paris a few weeks ago, giving the impression that this is what triggered the jews to action this week. It isn’t. The bombing of Gaza this summer was not explicitly mentioned, though that was the actual impetus for the UN meeting. It is hinted at indirectly in this paragraph toward the end:

The meeting was requested by 37 countries who sent a letter to assembly President Sam Kutesa on October 1 calling for a meeting in response to “an alarming outbreak of anti-Semitism worldwide.” They said they wanted a meeting because “a clear message from the General Assembly is a critical component of combatting the sudden rise of violence and hatred directed at Jews.”

This simple statement, in both what it says and doesn’t say, reflects the incredible power and influence jews have over dozens of other governments outside the single government they officially control. Jews have enough control over the govts of 37 countries (most crucially the US) to manipulate them in this fashion.

That they could orchestrate such a show of force in response to the murder of four jews in Paris would be amazing enough. But in fact it was actually orchestrated in defense of Israelis who murdered thousands of non-jews in Gaza. The Israeli military bombs Gaza and then jews worldwide join with Israels to organize a UN meeting to literally shift the blame to “anti-semitism worldwide”.

UN meeting challenges world to stand up to anti-Semitism, describes the result:

But 40 mainly Western countries issued a joint statement afterward urging all nations to “declare their categorical rejection of anti-Semitism,” strengthen laws to combat discrimination, and prosecute those responsible for anti-Semitic crimes.

“The determination to eradicate the conditions that gave rise to the Holocaust was a guiding principle among the founders of this organization over six decades ago,” their statement said. “Let us rededicate ourselves to that principle and endeavor to eliminate anti-Semitism in all forms.”

I could find no UN source for this UN declaration. All the pages containing “declare their categorical rejection of anti-Semitism” are variations on this AP story.

Note the unequivocal, uncompromising language used to compel others to serve jews.

In the keynote speech, French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy said blaming Jews “is once again becoming the rallying cry of a new order of assassins.”

Levy, who is Jewish, called for new arguments to counter anti-Semites who say “Jews are detestable.”

These anti-Semites call Israel an “illegitimate state,” deny the Holocaust, and believe Jews give far too much attention to Holocaust victims and stifle other people’s martyrs, including the Palestinians, he said.

Dozens of speakers echoed his call to address the root causes of anti-Semitism as well as wider religious intolerance, hatred and extremism.

The jews try to dictate what others are permitted to find detestable. That’s detestable.

Levy offers no arguments, and his call for arguments is disingenuous anyway. The whole point of the UN meeting was for jews to make public their demands, which amount to telling everyone else they must “reject” and “prosecute” and “eliminate” blasphemy against the jews.

Levy is one of the many jews who unambiguously connects jews to Israel and to their holocaust narrative.

France’s minister of state for Europe Harlem Desire urged the world to act “with the utmost firmness, wherever anti-Semitism rears its head in the world.”

“Without the Jews of Europe, Europe would no longer be Europe,” he warned.

Harlem Desire, which is his real name, is a semitic-looking mulatto.

The premise of Desire’s argument is that “the world”, and especially European govts, should be more worried about what’s best for the jews than what’s best for Europeans; that “the world”, and especially European govts, should see a Europe without jews as unthinkable, and literally not think at all about what Europe will be like without Europeans.

A host can survive without a parasite. A parasite cannot survive without a host. Thus the jews equate expulsion to extermination. Jews, without the wealth and security wheedled out of Europeans, would cease to exist. Europe, without the parasitic load of the jews, would thrive – as Spain did after expelling its jews in 1492, and as Germany did as well in 1933.

Roth and Desire called for a new legal framework at the European Union and internationally to address the diffusion of racist and anti-Semitic speeches and material.

This is needed today, Desire said, “to put the responsibility on those passing the message” such as Google and Twitter.

This the closest thing to a “new argument”, though it’s just the old methods applied to new technology, new forms of communication. The tactic suggested here is to leverage the influence and power jews already have over some governments in some places and couple it with the influence they have over certain internet corporations in order to impose the priorities and interests of jews over and above everyone else, everywhere else, all at once.

Jewish leaders call for Europe-wide legislation outlawing antisemitism, describes a separate but related push:

European Jewish leaders, backed by a host of former EU heads of state and government, are to call for pan-European legislation outlawing antisemitism amid a sense of siege and emergency feeding talk of a mass exodus of Europe’s oldest ethnic minority.

Let’s decode “Europe’s oldest ethnic minority”.

“Ethnic” is a euphemism for race – an ethnic group is a genetically and culturally (in other words racially) distinctive group.

The oldest ethnic groups in Europe are the Europeans, not the jews.

Jewish roots, genetically and culturally, are in the Levant, not Europe. Jews have quite consciously preserved their distinctiveness from Europeans for more than two millenia while living amongst Europeans.

The words “minority” and “exodus” allude to the jews’ victim narrative, and a reminder that it stretches back to Egypt, far more than 70 years ago and outside Europe.

The fact is that the jews, whomever the host among whom they live happens to be at any point in time, see themselves, organize and operate as a collective. This international lobbying, using their influence over some governments to influence other governments to “combat anti-semitism” is a perfect example.

The fact is that the jews have collectively imposed themselves upon virtually every European nation at one time or another. They have infiltrated, manipulated and exploited Europeans, moving and concentrating physically in each and every place Europeans have ever been or have ever gone. Today they manipulate Europeans collectively, via the EU.

“Europe’s oldest ethnic minority”? No. The jews are the oldest and most hostile alien interlopers in Europe. The jews have parasitized Europeans, who have for millenia served as their primary hosts.

A panel of four prestigious international experts on constitutional law backed by the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR) have spent three years consulting widely and drafting a 12-page document on “tolerance”. They are lobbying to have it converted into law in the 28 countries of the EU.

The proposal would outlaw antisemitism as well as criminalising a host of other activities deemed to be violating fundamental rights on specious religious, cultural, ethnic and gender grounds.

This is essentially an echo of the demands the jews put forth at the UN, but aimed more specifically at the EU. It is also more fleshed out with ready-made answers to those demands – an indication of the long-term, premeditated nature of the effort.

These would include banning the burqa, female genital mutilation, forced marriage, polygamy, denial of the Holocaust and genocide generally, criminalising xenophobia, and creating a new crime of “group libel” – public defamation of ethnic, cultural or religious groups. Women’s and gay rights would also be covered.

This is the traditional approach jews have taken, disguising their concern for their interests by wrapping them up and conflating them with others. It’s not clear whether they want to ban burqas, or ban the banning of burqas. It hardly matters because whatever it is it’s subject to change depending on what the jews running the show demand tomorrow.

The proposed legislation would also curb, in the wake of the Paris attacks, freedom of expression on grounds of tolerance and in the interests of security.

“Tolerance is a two-way street. Members of a group who wish to benefit from tolerance must show it to society at large, as well as to members of other groups and to dissidents or other members of their own group,” says the document.

“There is no need to be tolerant to the intolerant. This is especially important as far as freedom of expression is concerned: that freedom must not be abused to defame other groups.”

“Tolerance” and “freedom of expression” as defined by the jews, in the interests of security of the jews.

Amid acute European angst over multiculturalism, fundamentalist violence perpetrated on alleged religious grounds and the response of the state, the call for uniform rules across Europe is to be initiated this week in Prague at events commemorating the Holocaust and the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.

Yet another reminder, amidst all the disposable universalist platitudes, that it is the holocaust narrative, the jews-as-victims-of-Europeans narrative, that the jews themselves provide as justification for the contempt and hostility they so constantly and freely express toward Europeans.

20 thoughts on “The Jew Menace”

  1. The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
    The Economic Boycott of 1933

    Toben’s Arrest: A New Assault Against Free Speech
    Why ‘Holocaust Denial’ Laws are Dangerous

    “The barbaric World Jewish Congress, only a few generations out of the shtetl, have decided that wherever possible, freedom of speech for gentiles should be outlawed. Because Jews are a dominant minority, erecting “hate speech” laws to make sure the goyim cannot criticise the “master race of holy people” and their agendas is essential. This is usually done through a buffer, pretending to be concerned about “racial hatred” or “Homophobia”, but sometimes mention “Holocaust denial” (gentiles may not question their account of WWII history). Many people have been fined and put in jail directly as a result of the Orwellian thought crime laws erected by WJC proxies”.

  2. I suggest that anyone who doubts jewish intent once power is obtained – or in order to obtain that power – to watch the powerful video at B’Man.

    “You will hear the words “fascist” and “Nazi” thrown around, but I must point out for you to pay very close attention to the 15:44 mark to see who this guy calls out. I suspect he is correct. There is a Jewish instigated genocide taking place in that country. Don’t think the same thing can’t happen here.”

  3. “But 40 mainly Western countries issued a joint statement afterward urging all nations to “declare their categorical rejection of anti-Semitism,” strengthen laws to combat discrimination, and prosecute those responsible for anti-Semitic crimes.”

    There are several goals that their strategy here would serve: to squelch all dissent, to control all social media and the internet, and in the end – to make themselves untouchable. They have been working on another of their prime concerns for at least the past 70 years; to ban private ownership of guns. Initially their argument with regard to gun ownership was that it supposedly increases crime (nonsense, of course). Lately at least one Jew, Alan Dershowitz has come out with the idea that self-defense should be illegal:
    ““Look,” said Dershowitz, “I support abolishing self-defense. I’ve said so in the past. I think that what the passengers of flight 93 did is unconscionable. No one has the right to take the law into their own hands. Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ” Unfortunately, though I copied that article in which he made that statement, I never made note of the original source.
    All of this is probably a manifestation of Jewish paranoia (which I personally believe to be a genetic predisposition they have), and their paranoia with regard to recent events which they help perpetrate is justified. They can see that the internet is spreading awareness of their influence and their hand at work in false flag events and they are worried. They sense a growing dissatisfaction among the populace with lack of employment, health care, and the endless wars (8 in the middle east in the past 15 or so years) which they expect us to fight in their behalf.
    But do the Jews really have anything to worry about with regard to losing control? IMHO they do not. There has never been any lack of stupid goyim that can be bought or blackmailed into doing their bidding. They own the “education” system. Our children are indoctrinated from Kindergarten to College and for the rest of their lives thanks to continued indoctrination on TV (that we pay for!). They have prepared for possible social unrest by militarizing the “police” and providing them with weapons of war and hiring men and women of substandard IQ and sociopath personality as police officers. They live in gated communities. They own your local, state and national politicians. They run the Empire.
    But are the goyim as a whole really that stupid? It would seem that they are. The “Greatest Generation” was responsible for fighting a fratricidal war that eliminated a great portion of the best, brightest and healthiest men and women from the White gene pool. And their descendants elected George Bush Jr. Twice. And then elected Obama. Again; twice.
    So is it really surprising that the Jew can manipulate most of the White populace with Newspeak and Doublethink”? ( Orwell was something of a prophet, in a sense). Even if it were possible to “wake up” (I have come to detest that overused phrase) most or even all Whites, what then? A population of slaves aware of their enslavement are slaves nonetheless. The problem we have always faced is threefold; we get no help from those of our race who are monied, we are not unified as a race of people and the Jew thinks and plans in terms of centuries whereas we live for and in the present moment.

  4. France wants to make Google and Facebook accountable for hate speech:

    In an announcement today, Hollande said, “We must act at the European and international level to define a legal framework so that internet platforms which manage social media be considered responsible, and that sanctions can be taken.”

    French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve plans to travel to the US to discuss this proposal with the heads of Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and Twitter. The president will present a draft law next month.

  5. George,

    Even if it were possible to “wake up” (I have come to detest that overused phrase) most or even all Whites, what then?

    Consciousness, or “waking up”, is what the White race must do in order to survive. The jews are able to do what they do to Whites because they are conscious and Whites are not. Jews spend a great deal of effort on both halves of that formula, trying to keep it that way.

    Anyway, you alluded to the answer:

    The “Greatest Generation” was responsible for fighting a fratricidal war

    If Whites can be ideologically/psychologically manipulated into such bloodlust, it’s not difficult to imagine what Whites could do if we ever developed enough racial consciousness to see it as fratricidal, and see the jews instigating it.

  6. Every Jewish organization I know of supports mass invasion of European lands, including the mass invasion of Muslims. They support genocide through colonialism against Europeans and when that invasion has the side effect of a minor up-tick in violence against Jews, they use the violence they’ve helped cause to increase the genocidal pressure against whites. Neat. Most Muslim violence is directed at the local European natives, not at Jews. Jews silently support it. So do the governments and press in Europe. Parasites may need a host, but the scorpion will always revert to its true nature. They’ll murder Europe even if it means they’ll be chased out and even at the risk of eventually destroying Israel. Their hatred overrides all, a trait they’ve passed on to their white liberal friends.

  7. ““Look,” said Dershowitz, “I support abolishing self-defense. I’ve said so in the past. I think that what the passengers of flight 93 did is unconscionable. No one has the right to take the law into their own hands. Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ”

    I had to find the source for this since it was so absurd. I couldnt but found this for further context:

    “I support abolishing self-defense. I’ve said so in the past. I think that what the passengers of flight 93 did is unconscionable. No one has the right to take the law into their own hands. Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. Everyone who is arming themselves for self-defense are just as wrong as those misguided passengers. I’m in favor of broad controls on guns. But it is clear, in the wake of the September 11 box-cutter attacks, that if people don’t defend themselves, somebody else has to, because a victim who lets an attacker free may be condemning thousands to die. If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”

    Based on the followup litany, Dershowitz was combining facts, opinions and sarcasm so we have no idea what he really believes. Makes a nice sound bite though.

  8. “French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve plans to travel to the US to discuss this proposal with the heads of Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and Twitter. The president will present a draft law next month. ”

    – It was just a matter of time before they turned their attention to the problem that the Net poses for them. There was some talk (can’t remember the source) concerning requiring that blogs be written only by “qualified journalists”. And I wonder what “sanctions” Cazeneuve has in mind?
    On the matter of Jews and Jewish interests, I thought I might solicit your opinion on this guy: . He seems to be really out of step with the rest of the Tribe and I can’t decide whether he is genuine or has found a new twist (and blasphemous for a Jew) for soliciting donations for his website and personal financial support. It is odd in any case that he is tolerated by the rest of the Jewish community. While constantly begging for donations for his “work”, and stating that he can barely meet his monthly expenses, he appears to be living in one of the more affluent areas of the US; Frisco, Colorado. In any case, you might enjoy watching the video since it is very comical.

  9. @ flippityfloppity;

    Yes, the link that you show was the original source that I quoted, so you did find the original source. What Dershowitz said here makes no sense to anyone but him. Maybe he believes it is only right to defend yourself against an attacker every other Wednesday when the moon is full. This is the kind of logic you can expect from a man who advocates torturing people by sticking needles under their fingernails…what can I say?

  10. Looks like the jews are trying to make it illegal to resolve these issues peacefully. I guess they think,what, after we can no longer attempt a peaceful resolution we’re just going to go along with whatever they say and accept our Talmudic role as their slaves? lol. I don’t think they can tell their ass from a gefilte fish salad anymore. It’s a pretty stupid idea to try this now/ Maybe it would have worked out for them 50 years ago,when more people would have opposed them but had less means to fight back with. Today, although less people will resist, the quality of resistance will be much higher,the caliber of that resistance will be much more ferocious,and the targets chosen will do far more damage to the jewish power structure then back when we had a bunch of grabass retards running around who might have just beaten up a jeweler or pawn shop owner or something.

    If this law is adopted, then I guess our people have nothing more to say to these jews. I have strenuously stressed anti-violence up until this point. I don’t know how I could possibly talk people out of it when no peaceful or diplomatic resolution is possible any longer. I don’t even know how I could condemn people for engaging in it. I don’t know how anyone could.

  11. First, thanks for the link.

    “Though Kapner is critical of jewish rule he still wishes to secure a future for America that includes them. His America is an oxymoronic multi-racial nation, which he imagines can somehow rally around a single religion and language regardless of underlying racial differences.”

    Well yes, he is not going to want to exclude himself or his tribal members from a (theoretical) all White nation , or would even be interested in the concept of a racially exclusive nation. He does make some interesting political points in his videos from time to time, however. And my reaction to him differs from yours a little- he does not give me the creeps, but instead makes me laugh just looking at him. His style of presentation in the videos is classic “used car salesman”. And have you ever seen a more Jewish looking Jew than him? Thanks for your observations.

    “People like this may seem to serve White interests by criticizing jews, but ultimately they are inimical to White identity and separation from jews. They aren’t us.”

    Agreed, they aren’t us.

  12. Kapner is just another liar kike. He claims jews are just a religion. He cannot possibly really believe this. I for one would never refer someone to his site because he looks like and is a whackjob. He just wants money that could be better spent waking up white people.

    If we ever kick out the jews he should be one of the first to go.

  13. @ James Scott:

    ” He just wants money that could be better spent waking up white people.”

    Well, if you read my first post you would see that this is what I was implying, and the reason that I posted a link to his website was that I was asking Tan for his opinion of the man, not because I am a Brother Nathaniel fan:

    “… I can’t decide whether he is genuine or has found a new twist (and blasphemous for a Jew) for soliciting donations for his website and personal financial support.”

    While I am certainly not trying to start a flame war over this, I am not so sure that he believes that Jews are just a religion and not a race. Besides having pointed out the “Jewish looks” of various media persona in several of his articles, he had this to say in one of those articles entitled “My Jewish Bloodlines”:

    “…Once after Sabbath services the news of a Gentile convert came up.
    My uncle kept on calling her a “shiksa,” a disparaging word for Gentile women which in Yiddish means an unclean animal derived from the Hebrew word “sheketz.
    She didn’t have the right blood…FOR JEWS SEE THEMSELVES AS A RACE, NOT A RELIGION”. I included the caps for emphasis, not for “shouting” because I know of no way to convert to italics on my PC. Sorry about that.

  14. Ask jew Kapner if jews are a race. He is high level dissent. Many truths he gives but has you believe jews are not a race and do not conspire. It’s the “zionists” or its about money. See how fast he censors you asking if jews are a race.

    If you are White and believe in the 14 words. The last person on Earth you should seek truth from, is a jew. He must give truths that is how they suck you in.

    This is how they control dissent. Now you are following your known enemy who claims to be christian into another rabbit hole of jewish lies.

  15. I see the bottom where you say he says jews are a race. Link please. He censored many comments of mine calling this out and others I know as well. Either way, a jew is a jew is a jew. Don’t look for a jew to lead you to truth especially ones who claims not to be a jew anymore. That is impossible to do. Can you no longer be Asian, African, European just by saying so?

  16. Wow, I hardly know where to begin!

    ” Don’t look for a Jew to lead you to truth ”
    – I never said I was.

    “I see the bottom where you say he says Jews are a race. Link please.”

    What is said was ” I am not so sure that he believes that Jews are just a religion and not a race.” . Please read my posts with a view to reading comprehension.Your request for a link proves that you didn’t even read my comments before seeing red with (irrational, I might add) anger. Since you need a link to the article, here it is; (“My Jewish Bloodlines” in case the link doesn’t work).
    You said;
    ” Many truths he gives but has you believe Jews are not a race and do not conspire.”

    Kapner tells you in the article I quoted that OTHER Jews see themselves as a race. How can Kapner quote his bloodlines and still deny that a Jewish race does exist? Consider these two lines from the article “My Jewish Bloodlines” (that I linked to above):

    “It doesn’t matter what you do as long as you’re a Jew—by blood.
    Is it a matter of racial supremacy that Jews in the spotlight enjoy special celebrity?”

    He obviously knows that Jews are a race unto themselves.
    Here again, Kapner says that Jews consider themselves to be a separate race:

    “Thus the state of Israel defines itself as a “Jewish state” — not religiously, but racially. Any Jew who can prove his birth from a Jewish mother regardless of whether he goes to synagogue or not can instantly become a citizen of Israel.” -from his article “Jewish Eugenics and the Master Race”

    As to your statement that he has you believe that “Jews do not conspire”, I can only respond by saying that there is an entire list of articles on his website that blame Jews for conspiring.(as a matter of fact, that is what his website is mostly about)
    Here: (“Jewrys Victory over America) (How Jews Control America) (How the Jews destroyed America) (Jewry’s war on White America)
    – And many more.I am not going to link more of them. This is Tan’s website and not mine, and as I said in a previous post; I was asking Tan for his observations on Kapner, not trying to get into an argument with anyone over Kapner’s views on Jewry. I won’t respond further to any comment on Kapner or his beliefs.

  17. Well, if you dont want to engage in Bro Kapner the shill, dont bring him up publicly. Tan has an email. My irrational anger as you claim is non existent. You stated many things with no proof, asking for proof of your claims is not irrational. Good day.

  18. First of all, what makes you think the enemy can not hack into your site and gather names of their opposition to target? Mossad is certainly capable of this, and also the ADL which is known to spy on Americans.
    I am not “anti semetic”. Was Helen Thomas a semite? Was Hanaha Ashwari a semite? I do not know what a semite is. I am counter hebraic. I know what a hebrew is. I oppose it because it is a racist, nationalistic, terrorist, hate criminal against humanity. It is also a lying, cheating, cunning, manipulative, perverted, predatory, parasite and a master of hipocracy. It is the greatest enemy democracy has.
    How can certain groups claim to oppose Jews and be Christian? The spread of this branch of the Jewish faith was the preparation for Jews to infect northern Europe, teaching that Jews are God’s “Chosen People” in other words a Master Race. Jesus was a meglomaniacal, charismatic rabbi who built a pedophile cult on the “Rock” of his deciple, Peter.
    They are guilty of all the crimes they accuse others of. Facts are not defamation, lies are.

Comments are closed.