A Brief History of the Bagel Republic

bagel_republic

Emma Lazarus, 1903: Fill the bagel republic with huddled masses of wretched refuse.

Israel Zangwill, 1908: Abracadabra, the bagel republic is now officially a melting pot.

George Orwell, 1949: Lol, by 1984 they’ll be saying “Diversity is Strength”.

The ADL, 1958: Diversity is our greatest strength. Shazam, the bagel republic is now a nation of immigrants.

Susan Sontag, 1966: By the way, the White race is the cancer of human history.

Studs Terkel, 1984: Good thing (((we))) won The Good War. Good goys! Greatest generation!

Stephen Miller, 2017: To preserve the bagel republic we must shut it down just a bit.

The jewsmedia, 2017: English is racist.

Stephen Miller, 2017: You’re the real racist. I’m shocked, shocked by your cosmopolitan bias.

The jewsmedia, 2017: OY VEY THERE’S A RACIST NEO-NAZI WHITE NATIONALIST ANTI-SEMITE IN OUR WHITE HOUSE!

37 thoughts on “A Brief History of the Bagel Republic”

  1. I’ve always thought the whole “America is a land of immigrants (from around the entire world), the Statue of Liberty says so” is one of the biggest coups the Jews pulled on immigration. I doubt 1 in 100 Americans could define “republicanism” (since, after all, it tends to include limited suffrage and is therefore inconvenient), but everyone could tell you about how the whole point of our country is to be the dumping ground of global subhuman garbage.

    What Lazarus was really talking about, of course, was the ability of Litvaks and other Jews to disperse from the “oppression” of the Pale of Settlement, where they had been recently emancipated from their lowly status as rich arendator rent-collectors and tavern-swindlers to even greater heights of parasitism. “Pogroms” like the one at Kishinev were the fake news of their day, the result of Jewish usury and not at all the one-sided “oppression” nor the “mass murder” that Joseph Pulitzer and other yellow (star) journalism Jews contended. Schiff financed the Japanese in 1905, Bronshtein set up a St. Petersburg soviet, we know all the “crying out in pain as they strike you” that happened after that. The average American’s understanding extends to the notion that Emma’s poem, one of many added later until the Jews pushed it to the forefront, somehow constitutes official Anglo-Saxon policy from the country’s beginning.

    It’s easy to see that the Jews were really making their move around the turn of the 20th century, with Boas and Zangwell, Lazarus and Kishinev, Herzl and Jabotinsky all coming to the fore. They wanted out of the Pale of Settlement, they wanted Israel, they wanted Russia, and they got all of them and more. The financialization and centralization of the American economy ensued, Allenby invading the Levant to set up the British Mandate of Palestine and Israel followed, internationalism and communism emerged, all while the American gentiles fell for the war propaganda against “the Hun” and the need to give easily manipulated women the vote.

    The Jews proceeded with such a specious and persuasive agenda that one almost wonders whether it was inevitable, after 1900 or so, that they would get their way. It seems like this highly concentrated population of indolent yet cunning ethnocentrics had an insurmountable advantage against a nobler but more naive populace of Whites, cemented by the world wars and growth of mass media. Whether it was or not, I refuse to believe that it’s inevitable that Whites in the present age will quietly submit to being miscegenated out of existence, no matter how frustrating the ongoing cluelessness of so much of our population is.

  2. In order to make Lazarus’ poem predominant, they had to (make up the field of, as though it’s a field and not an instinct, and then) take over pedagogy. To some later extent, whites handing over their children to the minutely-, then completely-controlled Jewish government to raise was caused by the leveraging of financial power to prevent single-earner households and paternal control over child upbringing, but this was not initially the case; like the decision to contract the government out to the Federal Reserve Bank, and to invade Germany and Russia in the 1910s, handing children to the state predated the female vote and permissible Hispanic invasion. Certainly those latter occurrences complemented central child-rearing, but the decision in the 1800s to not execute kidnappers (masquerading as helpful lesbian schoolmistresses and/or truant officers) seems to have enabled the system that would ultimately result in now, where children are taught to inform Big Brother if their parents don’t enjoy Lazarus’ poem. Considering when it began, it took so very few Jews, proportionately speaking, to buy the souls of the relevant policymakers.

    The model for the system of mandatory child-theft imposed in America and Europe was the parochial school, revealing again how incredibly useful Christianity has been in breaking ground for institutions that even the dumber gentiles later could see were harmful. The dumbest are still worshiping the rabbi, but even some of them have realized that some components of rabbi worship, e.g. Mormons or the RCMBLA, are problematic.

    Again to Rabbi Jesus, the spade in the soil…by all means, eliminate pathogens if possible, but I find it difficult to see how someone so desperate to kill his kin on behalf of zombie stories would not be a problem in any potential civilization. Without detracting from more pressing steps at present, it might someday be wise to adopt prophylactic measures toward the adaptation of future organisms designed specifically to feast upon our vulnerabilities. Leave open food on the picnic tables and the bears will come. Obviously the bears need to be removed right now for survival’s sake, but it’s not at all foolish to consider ejecting the sloppy eaters from all future trips to Yellowstone.

  3. The model for the system of mandatory child-theft imposed in America and Europe was the parochial school, revealing again how incredibly useful Christianity has been in breaking ground for institutions that even the dumber gentiles later could see were harmful.

    Tan, you never wrote anything anti-Christian until late 2016. You opened the door to blaming Whites and now the comment section has degraded into people who express their jew worship by blaming Christians.

    You’ve put a lot of effort into debunking the White suicide meme but blaming our White Christian ancestors who built Western Civ is the same jew ploy from a different angle.

  4. I’ve put this definition of Emma Lazarus together:

    “A Jew York jewess, whose “poetry” defaces the base of the Statue of Liberty, continues to jew White Americans into accepting the tired, poor, huddled masses of wretched refuse of the Third World, into America. The bronze plaque was installed in 1903 by (((friends))) of the late Lazarus.”

    White Glossary

    A Glossary of Terms and Expressions from a White Perspective

    The purpose of “White Glossary” is to provide a list of terms, expressions and their definitions from a White perspective, that will be useful in our battle against our enemy and the enemy of humanity, namely organized jewry, and its genocidal plans against Whites.

    Please assist by contributing. Entries may range from the academic to the humorous, just make sure it is pro-White and useful!

  5. Tan, you never wrote anything anti-Christian until late 2016. You opened the door to blaming Whites and now the comment section has degraded into people who express their jew worship by blaming Christians.

    You’ve put a lot of effort into debunking the White suicide meme but blaming our White Christian ancestors who built Western Civ is the same jew ploy from a different angle.

    Understanding the jews and their jewing helped me to understand Christianity.

    Christianity is cultural thalidomide – an alien concoction which has crippled the White race and disfigured our civilization. The tenets of Christianity have always enabled jew parasitism. There is no more toxic or longer-running example of the harm jewing has caused.

    Conflating and equating the White race with Christians and White civilization with Christianity is THE jew ploy. When jew apologists do this (whether they are “left”-poseurs like Beinart and Sontag, or “right”-poseurs like Auster) it is usually only to subtly and temporarily distinguish jews from Whites racially, specifically to excuse jews and condemn Whites. Otherwise they go about the usual pretense that jews are “white”, or at least might someday transubstantiate into “white” via the magic healing powers of thalidomide.

  6. Perelandra by C.S. Lewis, chapter 2
    Then he remembers – as one remembers an island of consciousness preceded and followed by long anaesthesia – going forward to meet the Un-man for what seemed the thousandth time and knowing clearly that he could not fight much more. He remembers seeing the Enemy for a moment looking not like Weston but like a mandrill, and realising almost at once that this was delirium. He wavered. Then an experience that perhaps no good man can ever have in our world came over him – a torrent of perfectly unmixed and lawful hatred. The energy of hating, never before felt without some guilt, without some dim knowledge that he was failing fully to distinguish the sinner from the sin, rose into his arms and legs till he felt that they were pillars of burning blood.

    What was before him appeared no longer a creature of corrupted will. It was corruption itself to which will was attached only as an instrument. Ages ago it had been a Person: but the ruins of personality now survived in it only as weapons at the disposal of a furious self-exiled negation. It is perhaps difficult to understand why this filled Ransom not with horror but with a kind of joy. The joy came from finding at last what hatred was made for. As a boy with an axe rejoices on finding a tree, or a boy with a box of coloured chalks rejoices on finding a pile of perfectly white paper, so he rejoiced in the perfect congruity between his emotion and its object. Bleeding and trembling with weariness as he was, he felt that nothing was beyond his power, and when he flung himself upon the living Death, the eternal Surd in the universal mathematic, he was astonished, and yet (on a deeper level) not astonished at all, at his own strength. His arms seemed to move quicker than his thought. His hands taught him terrible things. He felt its rib break, he heard its jaw-bone crack. The whole creature seemed to be crackling and splitting under his blows. His own pains, where it tore him, somehow failed to matter. He felt that he could so fight, so hate with a perfect hatred, for a whole year.

    Perfect hatred is spiritual hatred.

    If Christianity was cultural thalidomide Hollywood would make Christian movies, TV would have Christian shows, Christian books would be on the NY Times Best Sellers list, our government would say Merry Christmas instead of Happy Holidays, Google would have Christian doodles. Christianity has been scrubbed from our culture by the jews. If Christianity benefited jews then jews would push Christianity. Jews push atheism, agnosticism, paganism, Buddhism, Hinduism. Anything that doesn’t have Christ gets the jew seal of approval. Christianity is so threatening to jews that even judeo-Christianity, which is not Christianity, is treated with derision by these jews.

    Gen Z is being indoctrinated to spurn Christianity that puts White men at the top of the hierarchy, and teaches them to instead worship women and niggers. Gen Z is rejecting the Zog curriculum. Gen Z will be Christian. They will fight in a race war and win because they will fight with the same Christian spirit as Ransom. They’ll fight with the same Christian spirit as their Crusader ancestors.

    “The joy came from finding at last what hatred was made for.”

  7. Did CS Lewis have anything to say about jew parasitism?

    If Christianity was cultural thalidomide Hollywood would make Christian movies, TV would have Christian shows, Christian books would be on the NY Times Best Sellers list, our government would say Merry Christmas instead of Happy Holidays,

    So they did, until the 1960s or so. More to my point, in the centuries before movies, television, radio, and prior even to the printing press Christianity and its bible were the vehicle for the jew narrative, the device by which the moral authority of jews was promoted.

    Google would have Christian doodles. Christianity has been scrubbed from our culture by the jews. If Christianity benefited jews then jews would push Christianity. Jews push atheism, agnosticism, paganism, Buddhism, Hinduism.

    Technology changed the environment. Christianity devolved into liberalism, then the multicult. As you’ve noticed the jews have shifted to new vehicles.

    Anything that doesn’t have Christ gets the jew seal of approval. Christianity is so threatening to jews that even judeo-Christianity, which is not Christianity, is treated with derision by these jews.

    Loxism is biological, not ideological. The crucial difference is race, not religion.

  8. In dealing with Christians, I’ve found that literalism is never a good approach. Christianity is, even in its most heavily European-marketed form, the literal worship of a Jewish rabbi, who was created by and is himself an all powerful Jewish man, who created the first Jew (Adam) in his own image. In order to even begin contemplating such a Jewish supremacist religion as European, let alone anti-Jewish, one has to (besides forgetting how Christianity took Europe in the first place, but we’re dealing with a high modern bias here, so that level of history isn’t useful) develop massive internal dissonance management systems that, like a chem lab, keep conflicting components with interacting with each other.

    What I’ve found to be more helpful is–and Cora, I truly hope you’ll try this–looking at some of the more European-derived work about Christ. The Jews and Turks who took Rome did their best to destroy many early forms of Christianity, and to standardize “the Bible” in much the same way that they standardized “WW2” and “Civil Right” curriculum. Many of the so-called “Gnostic” gospels describe Christ not as a Jewish rabbi, but as a paler-skinned person who refers to the Jewish god as a liar who didn’t really create the cosmos, only this particular world. The “Gnostic” Christ accuses Yahweh of lying to people about being the sole god, and of having spawned a race of soulless demons who will try to end the worship of all other gods and make everyone servants to Yahweh. Those gospels actually connect with many of the works that the Jews and the Turks ultimately settled on in Nicea, making them interesting reading as part of a study in perception management, if nothing else.

    Dear Cora, if your loyalty is indeed to Christ, rather than to the Chosen people of the Pentateuch, give some of the Gnostic works a try. Like many earlier European religions, the Gnostic gospels don’t embarrass themselves by making claims that the goyim later disproved with their damned rockets before they could be made to spend their money educating African javascript programmers instead. I’m not saying that’s my way, but there is a way to keep a faith in Christ without having to concede to a Jewish creation and a Jewish god.

  9. Media Matters’ Cristina López explains how the White House uses dog whistles to appeal to the “alt-right”

    MARCO WERMAN (HOST): It may sound a little like it falls into the category of the word “elitist,” but “cosmopolitan” also has an ugly history of anti-Semitism. Nazis in Germany and Joseph Stalin both weaponized the word. Cristina López is a senior researcher at Media Matters. She’s been following trends in language used by white supremacists and the “alt-right.” So, what does a word like “cosmopolitan” actually signal to white supremacists, Cristina?

    CRISTINA LÓPEZ: Well, like you very well said — antisemitism has a long, ugly tradition of using cosmopolitanism as a dog whistle. And the thing about dog whistles is that they work kind of like easter eggs — you have to know what you’re looking for to find them. So, therefore, they kind of, like, land with a very specific kind of audience, but fly over the heads of everybody else. So, on a sort of speech that was meant for public consumption, like yesterday’s press briefing, Stephen Miller was able to just throw in the word “cosmopolitan” and make it sound like he meant “elitist.” And, when confronted by anyone, he would be able to say, you kno, “Well, no. Of course you’re making this up, I am myself Jewish” or be able to get away with it.

    Two crypto-jews jewsplain how tricksy White supremacists like Miller are…so tricksy.

  10. In America ambitious pols of such obvious lowly moral character as Clinton, GWB, and Obama have to pretend to be Christian because Christianity is so essential to the media-created culture.

    That can be the fact even as the culture is otherwise shut-off to Christianity. Gibson’s PASSION having to go independent and despite massive financial success, no studio deigning to make surefire pro-Christianity follow-ups.

    It isn’t really that this or that idea is intrinsically good or bad for Whites, and is therefore censored. All ideas can be manipulated and will be. The Jews gave Hagee a Lear Jet to help him promote Christianity in ways beneficial to them, they give Dawkins a second career post-dementia for attacking religion generally.

    Just remember that these ideas are only thoughts that someone else usually gave to you, while Whites are real, and White nationalism that excludes non-Whites especially Jews, is not so easily an idea re-written.

  11. All this Christ-talk is much ado about nothing. Why? Because it is a rare bird indeed that will act out of genuine spiritual and ideological convictions.

    What in the main motivates men to act? Usually it is the quite quotidian pursuit of money, power, pussy and glory. Get rid of Christianity and I can promise you it would not one wit of a difference so long as the Jews could go on bribing the right people.

  12. Hey Tanstaafl, sorry to interrupt the modernity of all this, but comments were closed in the past, and something rather hilarious and telling just happened while I was going through your archives. I was reading this post of yours from late 2014:

    http://age-of-treason.com/2014/12/09/a-genetics-primer-biosynthesis/

    …and I watched the “DNA transcription to RNA” video from the link you provided. My first non-text/image event since starting my review, since records and videos are so slow, but I was having a sandwich, so it worked out. Anyway, I watched that video, and assumed it would roll over to the next one you had linked, which makes perfect narrative sense for the material you were covering.

    Lo and behold, Youtube didn’t send me from “DNA to RNA” to “RNA to protein.” Rather (after the obligatory ad), it linked me to a helpful Science! video starring this friendly goblin with the proverbial weepy eyes and peevish expression:

    https://www.patreon.com/professordaveexplains

    It’s telling how refined they’ve gotten at taking the mildest opportunities to steer people from objective to subjective. It’s such comprehensive work that I’d guess most of them are not directly conscious that they’re doing it. Some of them surely are, as we’ve proven recently with stuff like search engine results, but rather than them consciously rigging and constantly updating a preferred occurrence system in each and every field–government and entertainment and finance and newspapers and laboratories for at least a thousand years, with very few, if any, mistakes–it seems almost like they have some way to communicate, like a plasmasensory web that can cause them to promote within the group without actively thinking, “I am giving this priority points because it is my duty as a Jew.”

    People like Emma Lazarus or Barbara Spectre are relatively trackable in their motivations. And again, in whatever field, there are surely many, “You should hire Stevie there, he’s a good friend of ours,” moments with plausible deniability, where neither nepotizing partner ever actually said anything that could be evidence. But their coordination seems too good and too minute to account for what we’re seeing. Solving this rather imperative puzzle of ours may be less about raising our consciousness, and more about interfering with or turning off the invisible teleprompter that they can all see but that we can’t.

  13. so long as the Jews could go on bribing the right people

    Yes. Christianity isn’t the problem, it is a prominent outgrowth of the jew problem. The jews have planted and cultivated many other ideologies which have been good for the jews and toxic for their hosts.

    My assessment of the jew-Christian relationship in Why the Jews Hate Those Who Love Them hasn’t changed. It also gets at High Arka’s invisible teleprompter. The jews are guided and animated by an inner screech, which on regular occasion blurts out as a collective screech.

    The jew impulse to impose themselves and their will upon others, telling everyone else what to think and do while they shamelessly cry out in pain, is the invisible teleprompter of the jew conspiracy. Their so-called revolutionary spirit is in biological terms a suite of inborn racial personality traits. Exposing jewing or even jamming its overt expression may be a step toward reducing jew virulence, but it is no cure.

  14. Paul Fromm: “Ernst Zundel, publishing giant and holocaust skeptic, died of a heart attack, August 5 at home, aged 78, at Bad Wildbad, Germany”
    Paul Fromm: “Zundel trial humiliated religion of holocaust, Crown expert witness said he could tell ethnicity of those being cremated by color of smoke.!”
    Paul Fromm: “The predator and Canadian deep state never forgave Zundel. Kept him for 2 years in solitary & deported him to 5 years in jail in Germany.”
    Paul Fromm: “The fate of a heretic who questioned the new religion of our time,”

  15. @Cora

    Very good Cora. It’s tempting to “let oneself go and hate Christ, Christians, Church,” but it’s a dead-end and worse. True enough, the “Church” has been badly corrupted by Jewish malice and cunning as has every single institution in the West. But, two things – when the West was pervasively Christian it conquered the world and was saner than all other people groups, and now that is thoroughly de-Christianized (only the buildings now enclose the “Faith”) it is inexpressibly ugly and deranged. Where’s the reasonableness, thought, balance, historical perspective of the Christian haters – it’s completely absent…and it’s ugly to behold. Not only so (and here’s the “worse” part) but it’s just plain dumb, and we can’t afford “dumb.” And btw, isn’t it still true that evangelicals are far to the right of any other white sub-group? That would be, yes. Think about it. I said…think about it, yea?

  16. Harry, Christianity did not forget the parasite, it put them front and center – granting them moral superiority, granting them authority over history, and creating a big beautiful door through which they could pass if and when it suited them. The corruption you decry is a feature, not a bug.

  17. Spencer Klavan jewsplains, Why It’s Impossible For Western Civilization To Be White.

    Gesticulating intensifies here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7PGJ54cR1Q&feature=youtu.be&t=4m50s

    Klavan *defines* Western civilization/identity as an idea – “a nationhood whose citizenship doesn’t depend on ethnic or geographic determiners”. He traces the origin of this race-abnegating idea (and destruction of the White race) to Greek stoics, logos, Paul, Jesus, and Abraham – i.e. Christianity. Or, as his discolored foil laughs, “you trace the West to jews and gay guys”.

  18. Paul Ryan: “In our country, the condition of your birth does not determine the outcome of your life. This is what makes America so great. https://t.co/RG3xNaGkXn ” (note jew state military jet in background)
    Michael Cohen: “White privilege is a helluva drug”

    In bagel republic, jews call the anti-White bagel republic narrative “White privilege”.

  19. From Rex Warner, THE GREEK PHILOSOPHERS, 1958:

    [Stoicism] ‘put forward the genuinely inspiring idea – by no means a natural one to the Greeks – of mankind as a single family, of each man as fundamentally a “citizen of the world,” and only secondarily and by convention a member of this or that restricted community. Alexander, according to Plutarch, put this idea into practice in the government of his vast and heterogeneous empire; but it was formulated in philosophy by Zeno. It is relevant, no doubt, that Zeno himself was not Greek; he was apparently, of Semitic extraction.’

    In some older books Jewish writers like to claim Zeno as one of their own. More often he’s said to have been a Phoenician. But then making clear distinctions between Jews and Phoenicians isn’t easy.

  20. “Spencer Klavan jewsplains, Why It’s Impossible For Western Civilization To Be White.”

    I’m ashamed I even read half of that jibberish. Ppl have real nerve to publish such trash, contaminate our clear concepts with a mud of lies.

    “White privilege”, as you say ‘Jews invert reality’, it becomes “Jew priviledge” and “White restriction”.

  21. “In some older books Jewish writers like to claim Zeno as one of their own.”

    Jews always claim to innovate everything.
    The first to give the world an alphabet, the first to give the world civilization, the first to have monotheism etc.
    A stupid public will believe anything, even 6 million.

  22. Klavan the Elder doing his shtick.

    Alba Gu Brath: “Warning…this is not satire. Jew suggests the entire Middle East be owned by Jews as a solution to lasting peace. Wait for the ending… https://t.co/OUs4J34T6e
    Alba Gu Brath: “Well done america. You give billions to Israel in aid and they are laughing that you are in debt and can’t build your own wall.”
    Alba Gu Brath: “Jews literally started all the social programs that got you into massive debt and then they laugh at you.”

    Like jewing generally, jew jokes are literally at the expense of the goyim.

  23. “Well done america. You give billions to Israel in aid and they are laughing that you are in debt and can’t build your own wall.”

    Many ppl calculate that we have spent 25 trillion on slum scum, since about 1965.
    Imagine if we had spent those funds on educating bright whites, giving them free education and incentives, incentives for families, medical R&D etc. We could have made so many great leaps in innovation.

    Concerning the wall, right now we could put up a fence of electric netting (just like we use on the poultry yard) that would keep out 99.99% of illegals. That would serve till the wall is built. Additionally, Vietnam has offered to take our prisoners for 2$ a day. Ship all illegals in federal, state and local jails to Vietnam, the net savings would pay for the wall in less than 2 years.

  24. Immigrants Shouldn’t Have to Be ‘Talented’ to Be Welcome – The New York Times:

    Refugees don’t fall into the economic logic of immigration. The argument for accepting refugees is not that they are good — for the economy, or for the country’s ability to meet its international obligations, or even because they are good people — but that America is good. This is where the sleight of hand of turning stories of immigrant success into the story of America becomes dangerous. It’s not immigrants’ economic contribution that makes America proud; it’s its adherence to the words inscribed inside the base of the Statue of Liberty: “Give me your tired, your poor/your huddled masses yearning to breathe free” — from the Emma Lazarus poem that the White House adviser Stephen Miller waved away last month during a news conference on immigration reform.

    The controversy following Mr. Miller’s comments focused on the poem. But the argument for refugees is less poetic than it is pragmatic. As Arendt wrote in that essay, “the outlawing of the Jewish people in Europe has been followed closely by the outlawing of most European nations.” This was just a first step, Arendt wrote: “The comity of European peoples went to pieces when, and because, it allowed its weakest member to be excluded and persecuted.”

    If immigration is debated only in terms of whether it benefits the economy, politicians begin to divide people into two categories: “valuable” and “illegal.” When countries make people illegal, the world comes apart. When we agree to talk about people as cogs, we lose our humanity.

    “You goyim have to do what I say because I’m a jew, and I say you can’t defend yourselves because muh holocaust.”

  25. What a Just Immigration Policy Doesn’t Look Like | Foreign Policy:

    Immigration doesn’t have to be a partisan issue. We’ve allowed the rhetoric to become so polarized that many believe that there is a dichotomy between the working American in the Rust Belt trying to afford rising health insurance premiums and the immigrant trying to come over to seek a better opportunity, to contribute to America, or to flee persecution.

    What they want is essentially identical: to work hard and achieve happiness, safety, and security for themselves and their families. A founding premise of America is that this is a place for immigrants to come and start over.

    In bagel republic, you goyim are all the same.

  26. It almost looks as though Jews are trying to take credit for building the Statue of Liberty. They’ve already changed the very meaning of it all. From a declaration of Freedom, Liberty, and the Constitution, The Statue of Liberty has become an anthem for Jewish globalism. oddly though, the only place in USA immigrants are not welcome is…. Jewish communities. Jews welcome migrants, just so long as they settle in White neighborhoods, Black neighborhoods, and crowded Hispanic cities. BUT, if you wanna settle into a Jewish town, that’s off-limits.

Comments are closed.