Quick Links, 10 Dec 2009

‘White Male Privilege: A Social Construct for Political Oppression.’ by Hugh Murray, 1999, discusses how:

Liberals seek to camouflage the overrepresentation of Jews by pointing the finger at alleged “white male privilege.”

Via Invisible Victims: White Males and Affirmative Action.

– – –

Another piece from fellist’s excellent Songlight for Dawn, ‘Why Work?’ by Dorothy L. Sayers, circa 1940:

Do you realize how we have had to alter our whole scale of values, now that we are no longer being urged to consume but to conserve?

– – –

Elizabeth Warren: America Without a Middle Class:

Can you imagine an America without a strong middle class? If you can, would it still be America as we know it?

– – –

Tiger Woods alienates black community with white lovers. A window into blackness.

“Had Barack had a white wife, I would have thought twice about voting for him,” Johnson Cooper said.

Contrast with the media’s regard for Whites holding comparable views on race-mixing. Via Occidental Dissent.

– – –

El Centro holds position for highest jobless rate

El Centro, Calif., held its position of having the highest unemployment rate among the nation’s metropolitan areas, with the jobless rate at 30%, according to government figures released Wednesday.

While the figure fell from a revised 32.2% in September, it climbed from 26.8% a year ago and it is staggering even against the nation’s 10.2% unemployment rate, which is at a 26-year high.

But the jobless picture has always been inferior in southern California’s Imperial Valley.

Look at the ethnic makeup of the Schools in El Centro, CA. Don’t avert your eyes. This is where “diversity” leads. As Felipe Calderon put it: Where there are mexicans there is mexico.

– – –

The “cool jew” trend causes jews to complain about jews complaining about jews complaining about jews. Seriously.

24 thoughts on “Quick Links, 10 Dec 2009”

  1. The jews camouflage that it is they who are the intended beneficiaries of any imaginary attacks (purported to be made) against any minority group. They realize that if they made their demands in their names only that the Whites would soon realize that the constantly repeated charges do not have a factual basis.

    Their purpose in making insinuations of racial violence (attributable only to Whites)is to enable themselves to continue to justify their further attacks against Whites and against America. They are not content with liberty to the fullest extent which jews have ever had it, on a basis of true equality as has, without exception, been afforded them by the American system. They choose instead to use that liberty, not to advance America and themselves, but as their license to attack America and traditional Americans, in an attempt to impose their control. Their cohesive minority (both from within the USA and from wherever else jews reside) attack and demean our political system, overhaul the entire social fabric of our nation into an alien philosophy of bureaucratic socialism, and act destructively and demeaningly against the White race – at every opportunity.

    They strive to make natural and justifiable resentment against their audacious grasp of power appear to be an antiracial movement. The question is, why are so many Whites so ignorant as to not understand that is what the facts are, and that the usurpation of power thus gained by this loud and obnoxious minority is intended to subject Whites to a silence which is not traditional for Americans, and to transform White Americans into slaves for a system which is alien to all free men and personally destructive to all individual Whites.

    There are so-called whites who are subscribers to the philosophies against American freedom who willingly assist in the camouflage. Whether they are called masonic, communist or dumb, they are traitors to their country and to the White race.

    There should no longer be academic debates carried on at childish levels, as if on a college debating team. It is clear that there is a movement to marginalize, if not to injure or kill, and it is being conducted on a massive scale against Whites and our traditional liberties.

    If White Americans have become so meek that they cower at the slightest hint of being accused of a racial or religious prejudice – at the expense of losing their constitutional and God-given rights, then they are not free, and so far as I’m concerned – they are not White.


  2. Re: Elizabeth Warren
    I wonder why she doesn’t give her take on why this is happening. She is satisfied just documenting the destruction of the middle class. She says many people have become victims of “creative banking”. She says the rich have become richer at the expense of the middle class. But she doesn’t say a word about immigration, which is obviously the main reason why the middle class is going down. This is very frustrating. I wonder if the word “immigration” ever appears in her books.

  3. Tiger Woods’s Wife, Elin: An Angry White Woman | Newsweek Life | Newsweek.com

    A national media outlet publishes an angry black woman who has a problem with black men who “choose to marry outside the race”, and thinks one blonde counter-example erases the “[c]onstant images of black females with their hands on their hips, eyes rolling and tongues lashing out”:

    It’s been far too easy for these men to use the emotional excuse to dismiss black women as potential partners, and it’s time for it to stop. We live in a society where beauty is narrowly defined by European features—meaning long flowing hair, fair skin, and a lean figure. Black men, like everyone else, are constantly showered with those images and no doubt grow to believe that beauty is in essence the opposite of what they themselves look like.

    Yes. I’m glad Newsweek agrees that the media’s constant shower of race-mixing propaganda must stop, and that we should instead seek out partners who look like us. Wouldn’t it be great if we had our own countries, with our own governments and our own media? I’m certain Newsweek will soon publish an angry White man disapproving of race-mixing, and blaming Nordegren for setting a bad example. Any day now…

  4. We live in a society where beauty is narrowly defined by European features—meaning long flowing hair, fair skin, and a lean figure. Black men, like everyone else, are constantly showered with those images and no doubt grow to believe that beauty is in essence the opposite of what they themselves look like.


    I trust we are aware of Steve Sailer’s law of female journalism, I paraphrase:

    Each opinion piece is actually a demand that accepted standards of beauty be alterd so that the author is considered hotter looking.

  5. On December 11, Judge Gershon issued a preliminary injunction against the United States Government preventing the implementation of a law stripping ACORN of federal funding.

    What is that supposed to mean? She doesn’t have jurisdiction over the “United States Government”. She can enjoin a particular official in her district from doing something, though even that may be meaningless because of the separation of powers. But enjoining the entire government from defunding? How is she planning to enforce her ruling? Is her marshal supposed to go to the floor of the House and the Senate and pull a gun on the members until they vote, at gunpoint, to repeal their previous enactment? Is she a complete lunatic?

  6. They strive to make natural and justifiable resentment against their audacious grasp of power appear to be an antiracial movement.

    Yep, can’t criticise the financial system – cos it’s fundamentally Jewish – but their control of the financial system is what’s destroying us culturally and biologically.

    They know it all fits together, even if not consciously; note how the ADL looks into anti-government and anti-Fed initiatives. Jean Paul Sartre once linked sound economic programs with anti-semitism / funny money with Jews — is there a difference?:

    “The anti-Semite has a fundamental incomprehension of the various forms of modern property: money, securities, etc. They are abstractions . . . a sign of wealth, not a concrete possession. The anti-Semite can conceive only of a type of primitive ownership of land based on a veritable magical rapport, in which the thing possessed and its possessor are united by a bond of mystical participation; he is the poet of real property. . . .”

  7. Larry Auster has a post up today about Hunter Wallace of Occidental Dissent and his “reversal.”

    I don’t believe Auster has ever even mentioned Hunter Wallace and Occidental Dissent. But now with something like this he immediately jumps on it and is ready to wage intellectual battle, promote his influence, and push for his agenda and interests.

    The important point here is that not being extreme like Linder and Giles DOES NOT mean that one has to capitulate to the noxious influence of Auster and other Jews and allow them to gain increasing control and prestige. They must be shut out.

  8. Meanwhile amidst all this…you can’t go to a freaking racialist website today without that ubiquitous piece of ADL-Mossad trasch Friedrich Braun and his lapdog Mark lecturing you that an alliance with the yudkos is really the answer to all your racist cracker whitey problems.

    OY VEY — don’t these stupid racialist retards realize that anyone who criticizes the shylocks in anyway is a low-IQ, drunken, drug-addicted, sociopath, mental defective, genocidal, evil, gutter-dwelling, knuckle-dragging, loser, scum, dreg, moron, unattractive to women, underachieving, welfare-collecting, bum, retard, psychopath, … ANTI-SEMITIC disgrace to humanity!!!

    After all all that matters is our ethnic genetic interest which are absolutely not, in-no-way, not-in-a-thousand-lifetimes, unquestionably by the word of the Lord God himself without a doubt impossibly being adversely influenced by God’s Chosen People. Stupid goyim.


  9. What happend to FB, was he ‘turned’ somehow, was his old site a false flag all along, is it even the same person? Or is his story real, that he underwenat a paradigm shift?

  10. I honestly cannot think of a less interesting question than “What happened to Frederich Braun?”. He was utterly mediocre when he was an anti-semite, though at least he had the virtue of being generally on the right side of the issue. Now he’s a dullard that’s completely wrong. He has no arguments, which is why he repeatedly engages in gratuitous ad hominem attacks on anyone that disagrees with him.

    The question of “why” Braun believes what he does is about as interesting as hearing from an IQ-110, 19 year old female on why she voted for Obama. Forgive me if I yawn repeatedly and loudly.

  11. Well, I’ll be damned. I submitted a comment at AmRen that used a J word three times, and it was published.


    “Judge Steven Salant is president of the Simon E. Sobeloff Law Society, which was created to provide a social vehicle to network, encourage civility and build camaraderie among attorneys while celebrating their Jewish heritage and Jewish values in the law. The Society serves as a forum for advocating and educating on those matters of mutual interest to Jewish attorneys.”




  12. Snow knocked me offline. It’s taken me hours today to catch up.

    In Mea Culpa, HW writes:

    Here is the major issue that we need to address: does blogging about the Jewish Question, that is, drawing attention to the issue, is that aiding and abetting the exterminationist anti-Semites? Are we making their job easier? Are we making people more receptive to the idea of killing Jews and non-Whites? What are the moral implications of that?

    To which ben tillman responds:

    I don’t think that’s the right question. The question is “does failing to blog about the Jewish Question, that is, failing to draw attention to the issue, is that aiding and abetting the genocide of our people?”

    The question as you frame it puts Jewish interests ahead of our own. If we don’t put our interests first, who will? How can we hope to survive?

    I agree with ben.

    In My Answer, at HW’s other blog, Antisemitica, he gets the order right.

    The highest priority for Auster and his new mini-me friedrich braun is what’s best for jews.

  13. It seems all these people are grabbing for Hunter Wallace to side with them. On one side you have Linder and his ilk and on the other you have Auster and Braun.

    Notice though that with these people (Linder and Braun) it is their way or the highway. No dissent is allowed in either of these positions.

    I’m glad to see that Hunter Wallace has used his critical thinking skills and decided to stay on the right path.

    Braun and Linder are both cancer imo.

  14. Yes. A regular tug of war.

    There is a similar epic struggle wherever and whenever any “jewish question” comes up. It puts the lie to the idea that the subject isn’t important, or alternatively, that it should be avoided because it turns people off.

    The truth is quite the opposite. Such discussions generate all sorts of interest exactly because they are important and are more often suppressed than not.

    If anything turns me off it’s having every discussion commandeered and rerouted into what is or isn’t good for jews.

Comments are closed.