Dylann Goes Through the Roof


“You rape our women and you’re taking over our country.” – Dylann Roof

It seems a White man has finally fired back in the decades-long war on Whites. The motive Roof purportedly stated, as relayed in early reports, is quickly being buried beneath a public outpouring of loathing aimed at Whites more broadly. The anti-White hostility is coming largely from non-Whites, of course, but much of it is also coming from deracinated Whites, and some even from racially-aware Whites, who should know better.

That much of this hostility originates from and is amplified by the jewsmedia is really just a consequence of jew rule, one indication that “they” have already taken over “our” country. Yet, in spite of the jewsmedia’s modus operandi, their usual attempt to bury what they can and distort what they can’t, a more or less fuzzy awareness of the harm caused by non-Whites still somehow seeps into some White heads.

Some of that awareness comes via first-hand experience. Some by word-of-mouth. The majority is undoubtedly spreading via social media and the internet more generally. Likewise what we know about Roof. At this point it’s difficult to know exactly what Roof thought. We should discover more during his trial, assuming he is ever afforded an opportunity to speak. Frankly, I wonder less about why Roof acted as he did than why there aren’t more Whites doing so. I don’t wonder if the jews will let a good crisis go to waste rather than using it as a pretext to ban the “hate” speech and guns they’re always looking to ban anyway.

For the jewsmedia it hardly matters that Roof appears White and is at least somewhat racially conscious. Their anti-Whiteness is ineffable and irrepressible. This was evident, for example, in the anti-White assumptions and speculations that they so freely expressed about the Beltway snipers and the Boston bombers before the perpetrators were identified. In George Zimmerman’s case they maintained their anti-White narrative even after it was visibly demonstrated to be false. With Roof they’ve only finally found the Great White Perp they’ve long been crying about. And even in this case, what Roof is accused of pales in comparison to the mountain of White casualties who have been targeted quite deliberately for rape, beatings, and murder by non-Whites. The jewsmedia derides and minimizes even the most common and blatant portion as “the Knock-out Game” – it’s just a game, goyim, only “racists” care about such things.

It’s also hardly surprising that non-Whites in general, who usually have nothing more to whine about than “micro-aggressions” and “cultural appropriation”, are once again suddenly interested in appropriating the White concept of justice from the “White supremacist” “oppressors” they insist on living amongst. Even when it’s one of their own who stands accused they think, speak, and organize monolithically, along racial lines – so there really is no difference here. As absurd as they may believe race is, they’ve accepted their assigned place in the jew-led anti-White “people of color” coalition. Nobody really cares what they think, especially not in the judaized overclass. And Whites shouldn’t.

What disturbs me most about the shooting is the reaction of Whites. I understand that most Whites are deracinated. They feel leaderless and powerless, able only to witness with a vague foreboding what they see going on around them. They may understand that something has gone horribly wrong in what used to be their country, but they’re too busy or afraid to think too deeply about it. They hear the drumbeat of the anti-White jewsmedia, but don’t consciously associate the animus as coming from the jews. To the extent they even think about jews they imagine them as some exotic kind of “white”. Thus when they hear the jewish narrative blaming all the problems on “racism”, effectively blaming Whites and only Whites, they internalize and adopt that poisonous attitude as their own. The demoralizing, pathological effects of this are visible every day, not only in the jewsmedia headlines, but on the internet, and in our face-to-face interactions with family and friends.

Among the most disturbing reactions are those coming from some race-aware Whites, as if their main concern is to openly condemn Roof or his actions. Perhaps they believe this will help either themselves or Whites generally. It won’t. They know, or should know, about the jewsmedia poison. That non-White anti-White hostility is implacable. That Whites need positive, unapologetic leaders. That White concerns and morality, starting with the very definition of right and wrong, can only be legitimately rooted in what is healthy or unhealthy for Whites, as a group. That the utopian “liberal” (now “conservative”) dream of creating a race-blind society has not only failed, but can never work, no matter how hard Whites try. That non-Whites, led by the hyper-self-interested jews, wouldn’t let it work even if it could, even if Whites foolishly continued to try to include and tolerate everybody. That instead Whites are being destroyed in the attempt.

In fact, the clearer the disastrous outcome, the clearer the complicitly of those who do nothing to reject and oppose it, let alone join in the anti-White chorus.

Dylann Roof didn’t cause any of this to happen. His actions haven’t made any of it worse either, but only concentrated and revealed the anti-White miasma that what was already there. Like a lightning rod. How everyone else reacts when the lightning strikes is their own choice, and their own responsibility.

42 thoughts on “Dylann Goes Through the Roof”

  1. If any aware White cannot relate as to why this White snapped, they aren’t fully awake yet.

    I was talking to a friend saying, I understand why this man was pushed to do this. We probably all feel this way at times. How can one not? We are told from every angle possible how evil we are as Whites etc. etc. etc. Someone had enough.

    Honestly it’s surprising this doesn’t happen more. Possibly why the White suicide ( actually real White suicide) is at an all time high. Even if this is staged or a hoax type event, the circumstances surrounding the narrative should be relatable to any fully aware White.

    Great article,Tan

  2. “That White concerns and morality, starting with the very definition of right and wrong, can only be legitimately rooted in what is healthy or unhealthy for Whites, as a group.”

    If you define morality in that terms you are no better than a pack of wolves. One can be moral (=universally moral) and ethnocentric at the same time, if one acknowledges that all human groups have some basic rights. The most basic right of course is the possession of a territory of one’s own. Untill that is achieved, the golden rule between groups should be practised. The crime of the other doesn’t “justify” the crime one’s self.

    This disturbed young man was more moved by the fact that his girlfriend had left him for a Black and his use of drugs, than by concern for his race, no matter what he shouted on entering a church full of peaceful, pious Blacks.

  3. A White lashing out and going on a murder spree against his racial enemies is what to be expected given the decades long provocation and slaughtering of Whites that blacks, for example, have carried out. A minuscule form of “irrational” payback.

    Organized jewry have engineered this racial conflict throughout White societies world wide and therefore bear ultimate responsibility for it. But that’s like booking a mass murdering psychopath for a traffic offense, given the vast scale of Organized jewry’s crimes.

    Decent people of the world, of all races, need to work together in exposing and defeating the anti-human nature of Organized jewry.

    For my latest blog post, German Youth in a Changing World – Part 1, click here >>> KATANA


  4. Ryckaert,

    You’re a concern troll. You always have been.

    The crime of the other doesn’t “justify” the crime one’s self.

    The group need not justify itself to or in terms of any other. Universal morality is either a deliberate group-serving fraud, as in the case of what the jews say about it, or a group-abnegating delusion, as in the case you make for it and Whites typically fall for.

    If you have some insight into Roof’s motives that you got from some place other than the other, the enemy, then share it. Otherwise, shut up.

  5. Roof’s purported website http://lastrhodesian.com/ and manifesto http://lastrhodesian.com/data/documents/rtf88.txt

    The event that truly awakened me was the Trayvon Martin case. I kept hearing and seeing his name, and eventually I decided to look him up. I read the Wikipedia article and right away I was unable to understand what the big deal was. It was obvious that Zimmerman was in the right. But more importantly this prompted me to type in the words “black on White crime” into Google, and I have never been the same since that day. The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens. There were pages upon pages of these brutal black on White murders. I was in disbelief. At this moment I realized that something was very wrong. How could the news be blowing up the Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of these black on White murders got ignored?

  6. Syndicated negro columnist Leonard Pitts on the Knoxville Horror:

    “I am … unkindly disposed toward the crackpots, incendiaries and flat-out racists who have chosen this tragedy upon which to take an obscene and ludicrous stand. I have four words for them and any other white Americans who feel themselves similarly victimized. Cry me a river.”

    Just as a reminder, he’s referring to the brutal torture, rape, and murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom.

    Psychopathy and animal-like viciousness are found even in the “smart’ blacks. They cheered when OJ escaped justice. They taunt the family members of murdered Whites during their courtroom trials. When Whites ask for a little sympathy from blacks, blacks mock them. They simply don’t care, not even when it’s White children like Autumn Pasquale who are strangled to death by empty-eyed, empty-headed negro animals.

    Cry me a river. That’s my response to the dead blacks in that church, as well as slavery, Jim Crow, and every other so-called “injustice” on our part.

  7. Universal morality is the only way the world can function in a civilized manner. Otherwise you get a jungle ( the “right” of the strongest). That Jews misuse the idea of universal morality for their own benefit and to the detriment of others doesn’t make universal morality invalid. Besides, their deceit is not so difficult to fathom. For example their advocacy for “open borders” for all White countries, but closed borders for Israel. Real universal morality is beneficial for all human groups.

    Those Blacks were gathered in their church for Bible study. They welcomed that White young man with such friendliness that he initially hesitated to follow through with his nefarious plan. Several of the survivors of the murdered offered him even forgiveness. I do not see how the murder of such people can ever be justified.

    But perhaps you, like Carolyn Yeager, see conscience as a form of “concern trolling”?

  8. this is way off topic however, your T-feed I subscribed to doesn’t play the daily shoah episodes (says this episode is temporarily un-available from t-feed). Also I notice the T-feed on the website has more of the “negromania” episodes than what my subscription has available. Any idea why that is? not a huge deal , maybe you’re un-aware of this.

  9. Real universal morality is beneficial for all human groups.

    What you’re selling is really poison, not conscience.

  10. Chris, I appreciate your TFeed report.

    I’m afraid I can’t do anything about those Shoah links – SoundCloud URLs don’t have an .mp3 extension, and your podcast app probably doesn’t like that. Try PodKicker, it handles them properly.

    The Negromania URLs all pointed to the same HTML page, but the 4 mp3 URLs are different. Your podcast app’s dupe detection is maybe too picky. I’ll keep that in mind in the future. For now I just added a digit to each of those URLs, which may break them, but they aren’t the important bit anyway, the audio URLs should still work. Try and refresh now.

  11. “In George Zimmerman’s case they maintained their anti-White narrative even after it was visibly demonstrated to be false”

    Roof mentioned that in his manifesto, but the media will obviously not repeat what he said.

    HSGW: “Syndicated negro columnist Leonard Pitts on the Knoxville Horror”

    A commenter at the Occidental Observer made a similar point:

    Here’s a mirror image of Charleston. In 2010, one of many recently combusting “disgruntled employees” walked into a New Hampshire beer distribution plant and killed nine white co-workers who, of course, he called ‘racist’. It’s true Omar Thornton’s subsequent suicide precluded much soul-searching, 24-hour CNN coverage, interviews with traumatized folk thousands of miles from the tragedy and utterly unconnected to it in any way except their own Sanctimonious Empathy Disorder – but would it have been treated as red-letter moment if he’d stood trial? Comparatively little Internet remnants can be found about this case. If he’d done his deed today and remained vertical through a trial, can we doubt he’d have rabid defenders, in some of this country’s most ‘prestigious’ newspapers and networks, praising his ‘radical action’ against his ‘oppressors’? (CBS news)

    According to the anti-White regime, Black people are persecuted, and that is a mitigating circumstance for any crime committed against White people. Of course, in the real world, White people are the ones who are persecuted in many ways.

    At the same time, ZOG doesn’t see the genocide of White people as a mitigating circumstance. And they won’t acknowledge that the race replacement program they are enforcing amounts to genocide.

    If there is no genocide, and no racial persecution of White people, the conclusion has to be that Dylann Roof is simply deranged. He sees genocides where there are none.

    Apart from that, as everyone else, I wish he had chosen another target.

  12. I posted the following comment elsewhere but it makes sense out of the context of that particular discussion so I’ll repost it here:

    “Wanting your views to be morally consistent is one of the inherent (and most potentially valuable) traits of Anglo-Saxon psychology (which most whites, especially in former colonial countries have adopted regardless of their particular racial origins). I think lazy, feeble attempts to resolve the moral problem Roof embodies are to be deplored, but not the recognition of the existence of a problem. The more ethically consistent our views are, and the more self-evidently so, the faster and more effectively they will awaken those still sleeping, the more eagerly will they greet their awakening.”

  13. Tan: “It’s also hardly surprising that non-Whites in general, who usually have nothing more to whine about than “micro-aggressions” and “cultural appropriation”, are once again suddenly interested in appropriating the White concept of justice from the “White supremacist” “oppressors” they insist on living amongst. Even when it’s one of their own who stands accused they think, speak, and organize monolithically, along racial lines – so there really is no difference here. As absurd as they may believe race is, they’ve accepted their assigned place in the jew-led anti-White “people of color” coalition. Nobody really cares what they think, especially not in the judaized overclass. And Whites shouldn’t.”

    You are so correct. What concerns we have should be with how the jews utilize this for the ends of jewry – which is the ending of Whites, just as they have gained control of what is supposed to be American media and government. After reading DSF’s manifesto, any White person should be capable of empathizing with his stated opinions. As you indicate few whites are sufficiently in touch with their own heritage to be aware about the richness which is the background of Whites living in what was relatively free America, and certainly would be unable to defend it. What matters is how many Whites are aware and how they are capable of responding persistently in the future.

    Without control by Americans of their own press and media, it will remain difficult. The jew control of MSM, and the failure of having our American Free Press is the major event which has placed us in our current positions. Conditions would be reversed quickly with free speech control by real Americans of our press and media.

    “Yes, black killing, raping and robbing white; Mexicans stealing jobs and women of the white working class; the behind the curtain Jews coordinating everything … but hey this is not the problem, the problem are the Islamic”. – commenter at Irish Savant

  14. Greg Johnson links to HSGW’s comment and writes:

    But I also think we need to guard against being and seeming embittered. Bitterness is the tendency of damaged and angry people to basically switch off their moral faculties when confronted with the pain of others until the cosmos acknowledges their pain. Bitterness is basically a kind of neurosis, because bitter people lose contact with reality because their psyches are too scarred by suffering. Here’s an example of embittered, morally imbecilic commentary on this event from Age of Treason

    I think he’s projecting his own pain and embitterment about his embarrassing performance the last time he showed up here.

    Johnson’s pathetic attempt to triangulate, to separate “new right” from “old right”, is both morally and politically lame. It demonstrates his own loss of contact with the reality of who he’s speaking to, for, and about, as well as who he thinks he’s fooling with his phony moral posturing.

  15. “Embittered?” Yes, I suppose I feel a slight resentment when I read about “respected” blacks who use their privileged positions in the media to mock a young White couple who spent their final days being raped, tortured, and murdered by other blacks.

    I admit I feel further bitterness when the media then defends the negro instead of condemns him, the same media that would immediately fire a White columnist who mocked the death of a black criminal, let alone an innocent black.

    But I guess that’s just a part of my “neurosis.” Maybe I should just let it go and watch one of the Batman movies his website always raved about. Yeah, real incisive commentary, Mr. Johnson. You’re doing a wonderful job.

  16. Here’s a telling indication of what makes Johnson tick:

    I know I could do a lot more if I had the capital to hire another full-time person. Contributing to a hypothetical Dylann Roof defense fund is basically pissing away money on a kid with NO FUTURE — a kid who THREW AWAY his future — when that money that could be better spent capitalizing our cause and making it more effective.

    I don’t think he’s lying when he says you sending him money will make “our” cause more effective – he’s just using the royal we.

  17. We don’t even know how genuine Roof is. Some have said the flags on his jacket were photoshopped.


    Someone else pointed out that Roof’s “manifesto” only went online after he shot up the church.

    Whether this was the deed of an actual WN or some sort of false flag is beside the point, though. The main issue here is Jewish media dishonesty, non-Whites’ lack of empathy, and mass violence against Whites.

  18. Tan, attributing base financial motives to Greg Johnson is entirely uncalled-for & beneath you. Greg was levelheaded in his analysis & entirely correct in what he said.

  19. I’m getting disgusted by the denunciations of Roof and his actions, but Greg Johnson’s was probably the least offensive and most objective while the actions of many others who claim to be pro-white spokesman are reminiscent of something out of the Soviet Union. Dylan Roof is just a symptom of a virulently anti-white system that continues to spiral further out of control and therefore his actions cannot be condemned or condoned when viewed in this light.

    And the “this will set us back” choir is almost as insufferable as the “pro-white” fulminators and denunciators. The Jewish led anti-white left and radical congoids have done far worse to whites and it doesn’t set them back, but then, they aren’t sentimental morons like white people, pro-white or otherwise. It’s time people man up, stop the apologizing and moralizing and go on the offensive.

    There are those that say black people sitting in a church are not the enemies of white people, but according to the website, theconservativetreehouse.com, the church where the shooting took place is known as a hotbed of black radicalism with extensive involvement with rallies and organizing for thug Trayvon Martin and other rallies for black racial causes the past couple of years. It would appear that this church was in the mold of the radical Trinity United church in Chicago attended by Obama and which preached black moral supremacy over the white devil and was on friendly terms with Louis Farrakhan.

  20. attributing base financial motives to Greg Johnson is entirely uncalled-for & beneath you

    Not at all. I’m not speculating. I quoted him directly, and did so only in response to his criticism of what’s been said here.

  21. Johnson has a chip on his shoulder about Age of Treason.

    Out of the blue he brings up a reasonable comment here by HSGW, expressing a lack of sympathy towards the black victims, given that blacks show zero sympathy towards White victims of horrific black criminality, and labels it “embittered” and “morally imbecilic”!

    In fact, showing sympathy towards these victims, victims that belong to race that commits massively disproportionate violent crime against Whites on a daily basis, is more likely to be “morally imbecilic”, as Johnson puts it.

    BTW, here’s a sample of some blacks’ “moral sense”, taken from How Africans May Differ from Westerners



    During the apartheid era, black activists used to kill traitors and enemies by “necklacing” them. An old tire was put around the victim’s neck, filled with gasoline, and—but it is best to let an eye-witness describe what happened next:

    “The petrol-filled tyre is jammed on your shoulders and a lighter is placed within reach . … Your fingers are broken, needles are pushed up your nose and you are tortured until you put the lighter to the petrol yourself.” (Citizen; “SA’s New Nazis,” August 10, 1993, p.18.)

    The author of an article in the Chicago Tribune, describing the equally gruesome way the Hutu killed Tutsi in the Burundi massacres, marveled at;

    “the ecstasy of killing, the lust for blood; this is the most horrible thought. It’s beyond my reach.” (“Hutu Killers Danced In Blood Of Victims, Videotapes Show,” Chicago Tribune, September 14, 1995, p.8.)

    The lack of any moral sense is further evidenced by their having videotaped their crimes;

    “apparently want[ing] to record … [them] for posterity.”

    These people apparently took pride in their work.

    In 1993, Amy Biehl, a 26-year-old American on a Fulbright scholarship, was living in South Africa, where she spent most of her time in black townships helping blacks. One day when she was driving three African friends home, young blacks stopped the car, dragged her out, and killed her because she was white. A retired senior South African judge, Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough, quotes from a newspaper report on the trial of her killers *:

    “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.”

    This behavior, Van Schalkwyk wrote, “is impossible to explain in terms accessible to rational minds.”


  22. I appreciate the article and I agree with it completely. I enjoy TAAN’s site because it is “hard” White Nationalism, while being very intelligent and timely. I have profited in my understanding of our racial predicament from the concept of the “goyishe kopf”, the nature of continuous infusions of Jewish poison into every aspect of Western life, and the realization that (I am paraphrasing), “this is an existential struggle, not a f-ing debating club”.

    I read counter-currents and age of treason regularly now, and reading Mr. Johnson’s essay on the shooting, I see where I was in my understanding of our predicament a year ago. I read this as a plea for reason, decency and restraint, and fear that such incidents could harm the (already heavily assailed) image of the WN movement. “Let’s be kinder and gentler”.

    “Frankly, I wonder less about why Roof acted as he did than why there aren’t more Whites doing so.”

    Absolutely. Europeans are being discriminated against, oppressed, demonized and dispossessed. They are the targets of the undying hatred of a hostile elite with the endgame of genocide. Yes, genocide, the crime of the greatest magnitude. And it is expected that Europeans will not act against it? I don’t necessarily condone Mr. Roof’s actions, but I would certainly regard an act that took down Lindsay Graham or any of the other traitors and true enemies as a heroic act. This is an existential struggle, it is a war of survival, and Europeans, like all peoples, have a natural God-given right to survive. Survival is not pretty. The Old Testament testifies to the brutality of group vs. group, where numerous cities and tribes of non-Jews were massacred pitilessly. That was essential for the Jews to survive in that harsh land. The quest for European survival has likewise required the death of numerous other peoples, all through the pre-history of Europe, through the conquest of the New World and so forth. The great majority of Europeans in America owe their very existence to the labors and conquests of our ancestors. Our lives would not be possible today but for the death of the natives who previously held these lands, and lost the battle for survival against a mighty foe.

    I believe that, to emphasize my point, that it is Almighty God’s will that the existence of Europeans is secured on this planet. Therefore, our survival is the highest level of morality, and therefore, morality, “starting with the very definition of right and wrong, can only be legitimately rooted in what is healthy or unhealthy for Whites, as a group.”

    Rykaert writes, “If you define morality in that terms you are no better than a pack of wolves. One can be moral (=universally moral) and ethnocentric at the same time, if one acknowledges that all human groups have some basic rights. The most basic right of course is the possession of a territory of one’s own. Untill that is achieved, the golden rule between groups should be practised. The crime of the other doesn’t “justify” the crime one’s self.”

    This is an existential struggle, not a f-ing debating club. Imagine the medieval Germans obsessing about morality before they faced the mongol hordes in battle, to determine the future owners of that territory. That would have been insane, just as it is insane for Whites to endlessly concern themselves with the well-being of alien others. A pack of wolves does what is good for the pack, and that is moral. Wolves have a lot to teach Europeans, in fact. We need to re-learn to do what is good for our people, to pursue our interests. The commandment of love one another and the Golden Rule only apply in-group, not to outsiders. To do otherwise will result in our eventual destruction. This has already happened in Rhodesia, and is well-advanced in South Africa and elsewhere.

    “Universal morality is the only way the world can function in a civilized manner. Otherwise you get a jungle ( the “right” of the strongest). That Jews misuse the idea of universal morality for their own benefit and to the detriment of others doesn’t make universal morality invalid.”

    These concepts of being “civilized”, “fair play” and being nice have no place in an existential struggle. “Universal morality” is a concept that is attractive only to a European brain, a genetic trait that enhanced Ice Age fitness as Dr. MacDonald has discussed. It was great back then, but now, in a completely new environment, that propensity is completely dysfunctional. The morality that we must adopt now is that which is practiced by the Chinese, Arabs, Jews, Mestizos and every other group, struggling to survive amidst the deadly competition of racial conflict: “what is moral is what is best for our people”.

    I don’t know if Mr. Roof’s actions advanced our interests or not. Certainly by imposing costs on a grossly immoral system, they might in the long term. (This next part is going to sound very harsh, so brace yourself). And if ultimately they do, then although ugly and horrifying, they are acceptable. To not pursue our interests, and condemn our children to dispossession and our race to extinction, is the greatest crime and act of immorality that humans are capable of.

  23. Flanders, your site uses Cloudflare. Cloudflare delegates security to Google jews. To even read it you need to fill out one of those impossible to read Google captchas. That gives Google jews a complete database of your visitors’ IP addresses. So does running any other Google feature – Googleanalytics, Googleapis or embedded Youtube videos. All WN sites should stop using jew controlled or affiliated “security services.”

  24. I don’t understand why so many of us worry about our image. I seriously doubt most of us are drug-addicted skinheads living in trailer parks. White leftist golems hate us no matter how we look, what we say, or how reasonable we are. They even consider kosher conservatives like Mitt Romney (who’s for all intents and purposes a liberal) to be fascists. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t look presentable or speak well, but it does mean that it’s pointless trying to be “nice” to people who have a violent hatred towards us.

    They hate us because we are Whites who don’t accept the status quo. We don’t tolerate hatred or violence aimed at us, and we want to change things. White leftists think we’re evil, whether we’re part of Jared Taylor’s Amren or actual fascists. They don’t recognize differences between us; to them, our whole movement is evil, regardless of the details like whether we are peaceful or violent, libertarian or authoritarian, atheist or religious, or race realist or White supremacist.

    It’s all evil to them simply because we’re not them. We’re not self-hating Whites. That’s why they hate us. They’ve been trained their entire lives to see our very perspective as the most evil thing possible. They’re so convinced of their own moral goodness, and the obviousness of their moral goodness, since it’s the one they’ve been indoctrinated to believe in their entire lives by the system, that they totally short circuit when they come across a White person who hasn’t been hypnotized into racial self-abasement.

    This is why we shouldn’t worry about how we look to them. We can’t look any worse to them. It’s like that essay, “Sorry for being hated, hated for being sorry;” there’s nothing we can do to appease them but become them, and we obviously can’t do that if we want to protect our people. Instead of trying to ingratiate ourselves with the people who want our genocide we should be defiant, steadfast, and unapologetic. We have nothing to apologize for.

    Dylann Roof did what he did because he’s part of a race that is hated and attacked 24/7. His actions were understandable. If the system doesn’t want more Dylan Roofs it needs to stop encouraging hatred of us as well as violence toward us. If we apologize or express sympathy, we lose ground to our enemies and submit to their frame. We need to frame the argument, not them. When things like this happen it’s not the time to retreat, it’s time to advance.

  25. Greg Johnson will be on live at renegade broadcasting tonight with the TRS Death Panel. Maybe call in Tan, Would be great to hear your posts debate type exchange live.

  26. Daniel,

    Shooting up a church makes no sense whatsoever.

    The conclusion of Roof’s purported manifesto outlines a perfectly sensible reason:

    I am not in the position to, alone, go into the ghetto and fight. I chose Charleston because it is most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country.

    That church has great anti-White significance, or as the jewsmedia puts it, a “rich history”:

    Civil rights luminaries spoke from its pulpit and led marches from its steps. For nearly 200 years it had been the site of struggle, resistance and change.


    The Wednesday evening shooting occurred a day after the June, 16, 1822 slave rebellion, organized by Denmark Vesey, who was revered as one of the founders of the Emanuel AME Church. The house of worship is the oldest AME church in the southern part of the country.

  27. If nothing else, some of the comments above prove the point Dominique Venner made when he made his farewell statement at Notre Dame.

    Whites, to express any political will, have no structure. Recent daydreams in that direction have produced the same frustration people had 50 years ago with G.L Rockwell. Blowing off steam is not the same as having a party, program and organization regular people can trust. Nothing like that is in the offing.

    Everybody remembers that America’s old labor unions were racist but only a handful look under the rug and see that the AFL-CIO was one of the first oganizations subverted by the CIA under Lyndon Johnson. And there were paperbacks available about this at the time; none of this was ever a secret.

    The only real racial regime that made a difference was from 1933-45 in Germany and it was made possible by tough, hard, white union guys getting together and comparing notes. Okay, it’s not as dramatic as mass killings and immolation, but consider:

    As the corporate “train your H1B replacement” goes into high gear, now MIGHT be a good time to remember what brough Adolf to power in the first place, and what activity unites white guys when they’ve actually had enough. I think we’re reaching a real potent moment, odd as it is to say it.

  28. Katana;

    Thanks for the link to “How Africans may differ from Westerners”. That is excellent material.

  29. “That White concerns and morality, starting with the very definition of right and wrong, can only be legitimately rooted in what is healthy or unhealthy for Whites, as a group.”

    That really is the whole point , isn’t it? Is there any time in history where all Whites or even a large portion of them stood together to do “what is best for White people”? Has there ever been an organization that raises money for “the advancement of White people”? Whites have always clung to nationalism which is a form of tribalism, as opposed to ethnocentric behavior such as the Jews exhibit. As we all know, a Jew is a Jew first, an Israeli (perhaps only at heart if not in fact) second, and whatever nationality he happens to be according to his geographic location; last. Not so with us Whites. For example, the European union is a union in name only with nationalistic squabbles taking place all the time. I recall with frustration trying to reason with “Hunter” at Occidental Dissent that Whites lack racial cohesiveness and that this is the crux of our problem. He simply ignores this argument and clings to kinism as an answer to local problems in the South, with Southern independence as his goal for “The White People of the South”. And so it goes.
    This idea of White solidarity is more urgent than it might seem. It is apparent that disarming Whites (under the guise of “gun control”) is a priority for the present administration and for every administration that preceded it back to 1968. And looking at South Africa today we can surmise what is in store for us once that goal is achieved.

  30. I couldn’t agree more Tan – really good piece of writing from you here. The reaction to this event has been shocking to say the least for many of us.

    I would have been willing to go along with some small amount of denunciation because I understand the pressure people are under who use their real name but this has been way over the top to the point of ridiculousness.

    We should have been hammering away for our ideas and the truth from the moment this story started instead of article after article full of loud cries of denunciations and scorn and attempts to psychoanalyze the man when he explained his motives in his manifesto very clearly without their analysis..

  31. Gov’t statistics show 100 white women are raped every day by blacks, virtually no black women raped by white men. Every white woman, perhaps every woman, should be given a firearm, expert training, and ammo at gov’t expense- MagSafe or Glaser Safety Slugs- to carry at all times and in all locations- and be taught to COMPLETELY shoot off the genitals of their attackers- no innocent people will be hurt, and the problem will be solved rather quickly. I’d pay my taxes with a smile for programs like THAT.

  32. Edward, Thanks for your warning, but I’m not aware why anyone would need to fill a captcha to get to my link at The Forbidden Truth dot net. It should be a direct link to my post there, and the site itself is directly accessible. I will check with the site to see if they are aware about the issue you mention. For myself, I have zero technical abilities on computers.

  33. Tan, If this is too long or doesn’t fit with what you want posted feel free to remove it, and leave me a note. Storm is being used as a strawman in order to forcibly change American opinion.

    Today, the American people are being subjected to mass judgment by stand-ins for the Frankfurt School. The entire Media, and the full range of MSM communicators are, in fact, acting in the stead of the Frankfurt School.

    The lineup of celebrity images and cultish types of personality figures which are paraded in front of the public’s eyes by the primary controllers within “American” MSM are used for the purpose of using them as substitute controllers of public opinion. The purpose of such charades as we see placed on television screens daily, and the full MSM range of publications in the longer term, is to convince people that – a person’s actions are not important [the deed of alleged killings]; rather, the issue is the psychological attitude of the public—as determined by the lineup of those voices and faces metioned earlier, who stand in the stead of the social scientists like those of the Frankfurt School.

    They are intended to change attitudes of the American people – by force exerted through easily influenced masses.

    The media controllers demonize all people who hold certain beliefs by placing representative strawvictims (or perpetrators) in their faces. The main purpose is to demonize whole groups of people who hold valid beliefs, beliefs which the controllers want to change in the minds of the mass public, and to compel conformity by swaying the masses. It is classic Marxism applied primarily by jewish controllers behind the scenes.

    It worked for the jewish controllers in the earlier days in the Soviet Union – so, now their ideological replacements are doing the same in the US.

    The purpose behind the public parading of Dylaan Storm Roof is, not so much about his individual actions (which will be determined in a courtroom). The public spectacle parading is done more to change mass public opinion by holding whole groups of American people who hold legitimate ideas and opinions (opinions which are not only legal and traditional to hold, but rationally necessary in order to maintain a secure American society) into being demons scorned by the rest of the world.

    Consider and contrast with this description for instance:

    The Theory of the Authoritarian Personality

    “The Frankfurt School devised the “authoritarian personality” profile as a weapon to be used against its political enemies. The fraud rests on the assumption that a person’s actions are not important; rather, the issue is the psychological attitude of the actor—as determined by social scientists like those of the Frankfurt School. The concept is diametrically opposed to the idea of natural law and to the republican legal principles upon which the U.S. was founded; it is, in fact, fascistic, and identical to the idea of “thought crime,” as described by George Orwell in his 1984, and to the theory of “volitional crime” developed by Nazi judge Roland Freisler in the early 1930’s.

    When the Frankfurt School was in its openly pro-Bolshevik phase, its authoritarian personality work was designed to identify people who were not sufficiently revolutionary, so that these people could be “re-educated.” When the Frankfurt School expanded its research after World War II at the behest of the American Jewish Committee and the Rockefeller Foundation, its purpose was not to identify anti-Semitism; that was merely a cover story. Its goal was to measure adherence to the core beliefs of Western Judeo-Christian civilization, so that these beliefs could be characterized as “authoritarian,” and discredited.

    For the Frankfurt School conspirators, the worst crime was the belief that each individual was gifted with sovereign reason, which could enable him to determine what is right and wrong for the whole society; thus, to tell people that you have a reasonable idea to which they should conform, is authoritarian, paternalistic extremism.

    By these standards, the judges of Socrates and Jesus were correct in condemning these two individuals (as, for example, I.F. Stone asserts in one case in his “Trial of Socrates.”) It is the measure of our own cultural collapse, that this definition of authoritarianism is acceptable to most citizens, and is freely used by political operations like the Anti-Defamation League and the Cult Awareness Network to “demonize” their political enemies.”

    [Excerpt is from the bottom of the page]

  34. White people have nothing for which they should be ashamed. When burglars sneak into your house and steal your belongings, it is not your fault. Even when they are invited in by pretense on their part, and steal, your only mistake is that of having been a bad judge of “character”. Failing to react when the crime is known is stupidity, but so is blindly confronting governments which have been coopted by traitors while you were asleep.

    It is when the thieves are taking your stuff in broad daylight while your eyes are opened is when white people who should know better should feel very much ashamed.

    When the white (lower-case) people continue to listen to and react favorably to slick perpetrators who are directing thieving accomplices (because those whites are being “entertained”), while the perpetrators are telling the whites that it is them who are at fault – even as the ruffians whom the perpetrators instigate are raping their white children, cutting the throats of their white wife and grandmother, and moving into their homes, freely or at reduced charge – That is when those whites should be more than ashamed – and shunned by all good White people.

  35. Edward, What I said earlier is true, that no Captcha forms should be required, but the site does use Cloud Flare. Your note and my inquiry, I’m informed, will be discussed at a coming staff meeting. Until an answer or resolution is given me, I will no longer link there. Thank You.

  36. It’s the Jews. Katana is right. Jews do not observe a universal morality. They observe a particularist morality, which really isn’t morality at all. And since they are currently at the top of the pyramid, the wall of separation, the ingroup/outgroup behavior they observe, is not only toxic to the entire planet, but forces every other group to use the same kind of cohesive strategies or lose in the game of survival.
    Nazism was the mirror image of Judaism. Hitler was fighting fire with fire.
    Yes, whites MUST become tribal and defend their interests and fight back. I’m all for that. But it must be done intelligently.
    Kevin MacDonald isn’t shooting up churches, and he would NEVER promote such a thing, despite the fact that the Jews see KM as evil incarnate.
    My hope is that sites like this one will awaken the sleeping white nincompoops before it’s too late. No doubt there are times when violence can be justified. There are hundreds of books that deal with just war theory. However, shooting elderly women in a church would not pass muster in just war theory, even if the women WERE engaging in marxist politics.

  37. Here’s what I really meant to say. The Big Jews are rotten, and they are rotten BECAUSE they do not observe a universal morality. The Jew’s doing what is good for the Jews creates a domino effect of strife that reverberates throughout all of humanity.
    So, we have to ask ourselves….do we have to become equally as rotten to fight back? We’re talking about the destruction of the soul.
    I hope I’m making sense. It relates to ego inflation and taking on the role of God.
    If we ONLY care about our OWN, then we are no BETTER than the Jews. And if we target elderly church ladies, we are no better than the lowlife negroes that rob and rape our old people.
    Yes, I know, if we’re being slaughtered, our high minded morality isn’t doing us any good.
    It’s a conundrum.

  38. Tan offers the counsel, “…say, ‘I have nothing to say,'” to racially aware whites who are conflicted over this event. Who feel themselves to be on the horns of a moral dilemma. Whites are being savaged as a people politically, socially, as well as physically. The notion of defending the action of someone’s entering a “church” and randomly killing those within is, in isolation, a great moral horror, but within the context of white destruction on the part these same people undoes such isolation and compels a far more thoughtful consideration. It was fascinating to learn here that this fraud, said to be a church, was in truth a fortress of black anti-white aggression and belligerancy. So we have context within context. As a serious traditional Christian I feel the force of the above mentioned counsel. However, I posted a comment on a “kinist” Christian blog I frequent in response to what I thought was some expected and required (for whites) handwringing.

    When are whites allowed to return the fight in the war that is being waged against them? When are they justified in physically defending themselves (and that, in their – once – own country). How many cities, towns must be robbed from them and turned into killing fields before they act to defend (or take back) those cities? How many millions of whites must perish at the hands of non-whites in this ersatz “country” before they “do something”…about it? I see predictable white hand-wringing here but that is all I see (other than the also predictable, feckless, “the left did this to us”). How long are we to sit haplessly by while the “nation” (no thinking person can use these designations seriously) is invaded by ever more hostile non-whites to “step-up” the genocide? How long should we bow-the-head before a government that is so monstrously wicked that it openly carries on a policy of dispossession and violence against the founding peoples? What should that actual, physical response consist in?Just…asking.

  39. Thank you for the thoughtful and intelligent post. I totally agree with you. In fact, I’m reminded of the fact that Obama sat in “Reverend” Wright’s church and listened to anti-white propaganda for over 20 years. No doubt many of the black churches are simply covers for marxist anti-white operations. This is a sad truth that had slipped my mind momentarily. WN’s often prod me ask me when we are going to fight back….when we are 50%? 40%? 30%? ……when we are GONE?
    Such questions can only be answered by each individual, but there is no doubt that if we don’t start fighting back, and soon, we will have passed the tipping point and Rhodesia here we come.
    Solzenitzen says that maybe something could have been done in Russia if people had fought back when the Cheka Jews would come in the middle of the night to make people “disappear.” But people went on about their lives as if nothing had happened, as if they didn’t see a thing, but with the knowledge that anyone could be taken away and murdered for the slightest transgression and trumped up bullshit charge.
    You’re right that our government is evil, because our government is owned and operated by Zionist Jews.

Comments are closed.