war_on_independence

Jewish Influence in White Communities in America (with Carolyn Yeager)

I’ll join Carolyn Yeager once again tonight, live at Voice of Reason on Monday, March 12th at 9PM ET.

I will likely refer to one or more of the following topics: Lawrence Auster (especially Two “Conservative” Jews, Same “Liberal” Dissembling), Faux-White and the suicide meme.

UPDATE 13 March 2012: The Heretics’ Hour: Jewish influence in White Communities in America : Voice of Reason Broadcast Network (mp3)

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

33 thoughts on “Jewish Influence in White Communities in America (with Carolyn Yeager)”

  1. Off topic: hateful truth.

    Some students offended by Louis Farrakhan’s UC Berkeley address

    The 78-year-old minister urged the 600 or so students to depend on themselves for jobs and learn more about black history. He also pushed a controversial book that alleges Jews dominated the slave trade.

    “(He said) that Jews control the government and that you need to be their friends in order to be successful, that Jews control the media. To me, that was just so hateful and horrible,” said Noah Ickowitz, a UC Berkelely ASUC Senator.

    “This is not hate, this is actual facts,” Farrakhan said.

  2. I was able to catch a good chunk of the broadcast … lots of fun, your articulateness in expressing complex ideas is incredible. Good chemistry with CY too. Kudos.

  3. Here’s Gottfried’s Taki Mag article that I referred to. In Search of Anti-Semitism:

    I continue to find some of the cognitive disparities he stresses between Ashkenazi Jews and Euro-Americans to be overstated or at least under-demonstrated. If they were in fact as stark as MacDonald insists they are, I would believe that Jews have a right to treat Euro-Americans as natural inferiors or as people probably unfit to sustain their civilization (or what remains of it) without a Jewish master class. I am also skeptical about the possibility of extrapolating from the way a particular Jewish subculture has behaved in the U.S., Canada, and parts of Europe in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries to how Jews have conducted themselves everywhere at all times.

    . . .

    Unlike MacDonald, I see no compelling reason to blame this lunacy exclusively or even predominantly on the two percent of the population which is Jewish, without noticing that the majority group, including those who describe themselves as “conservatives,” have lost their cotton-picking minds.

    Overall Gottfried expresses a dim, unsympathetic view of Whites and excuses the jews. In his interview with Stark for instance, note the contrast between Gottfried’s regard for Finkelstein versus MacDonald.

    I don’t think Finkelstein’s Holocaust Industry is online, but here are quotes from an interview in 2003 in which he argues in favor of rejiggering the balance of the litany of White sins. “The holocaust is an ideological club, used to hold Germany in a vice like grip”:

    However, Americans have no right to tell the Germans how they should remember crimes that were committed by a German government. Nobody has the right to dictate to the Germans in this matter. Why doesn’t America remember what it did to its Indians and to the Blacks. Why do the Britons not remember what they have done in India, the French what they have done in Algeria. The holocaust is an ideological club, used to hold Germany in a vice like grip. This routine is just a cheap opportunity for us to escape our moral responsibility. And what compensation concerns, well, we should start paying the Blacks, the South-Americans, the Vietnamese …

    Finkelstein does not oppose jews using ideological clubs against Whites, he would just prefer a broader selection of clubs.

  4. offtopic
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/12/arts/television/doomsday-preppers-and-doomsday-bunkers-tv-reality-shows.html
    NEIL GENZLINGER (wild guesses about his ethnicity??) : Watch either show for a short while and, unless you’re a prepper yourself, you might be moderately amused at the absurd excess on display and at what an easy target the prepper worldview is for ridicule. Watch a bit longer, though, and amusement may give way to annoyance at how offensively anti-life these shows are, full of contempt for humankind.

    “Doomsday Preppers” introduces an array of end-of-civilization types who at first seem surprisingly varied. These preppers live all over the country, in rural areas, suburbs and cities. Each has a different reason for turning a perfectly adequate home into a canned-food warehouse or building an escape hideaway (or bug-out location, to use the prepper term) in the mountains. One expects the North and South Poles to swap places, one a global economic collapse, one “an electromagnetic pulse that will disable the transportation system of the United States.”

    But the people on this show and the customers of Deep Earth Bunker are more alike than diverse. Who knows how representative these shows are of the prepper universe, but the people they feature are disproportionately white. They can’t speak for long without employing that cliché involving excrement and a fan. And whatever their religious beliefs might be, something “Preppers” doesn’t generally explore, most of them put their real faith in firearms.

  5. Thanks for the NYT anti-prepper link. No surprise that in his review of Defamation Genzlinger is annoyed by the producer and his production, rather than the pathological jewish behavior it exposes.

    See the comments of Faux-White for discussion of Kunstler and Orlov, two jew gurus who preach their own visions of collapse, and direct fear and loathing at ordinary White Americans (rather than the judaized elites) while doing so. More on Kunstler here: Who Thinks Thinking is Unthinkable and Why.

    Read, listen, watch a bit longer, though, and amusement may give way to annoyance at how offensively anti-White these jews are, full of contempt for European-kind.

  6. Tanstaafl said…
    More links expanding on issues I raised with Carolyn:



    The First Law of Jewish Influence

    Murdoch, Phillips, and Auster on What’s Best for “The Jews”

    Wikileaks, Israel, and Iran (where I first became aware of Carolyn)

    ————————–

    Listened to your interview with Carolyn and appreciate what you had to say. I’ve also read through your first link above re Auster’s Frirst Law, aka, the worst any minority behaves (i.e., blacks) the more it is perversely protected and rewarded (by liberalism). As you rightly point out, then what about the jews? Auster gags at this heresy.

    I’d say jews are masters in their ‘behind the scenes’ manipulation and destruction of White society. Blacks don’t rate by comparison, and, just like third world immigrants to the West, are merely tools of jewish string pulling.

    What continues to impress me is your frankness and honesty expressed directly in plain language, all the while sticking to you guns. Auster and his supportive ilk come across as manipulators, selling just half the truth.

    As a relative newbie to this vast topic on jews I’d very much like to know your list of books that you would recommend. Actually I think it would make a good topic for another interview with Carolyn. You could discuss the pro and cons of the most influential books or resources.

    BTW, talking of books, I’m half way or more through, ‘The Forgotten Soldier’ by Guy Sajer. It expresses something that I would have been loath to say before my recent awareness, that is, the gigantic heroic sacrifice the youth of Germany made in the eastern front for civilization.
    A book definitely not for bleeding hearts or weak of heart.

    Thanks.

  7. Tanstaafl, I think you’re wise to give a lot of attention to this, as you are doing.

    I’ve been downloading the sound files and listening to them. You’re a good radio guest. You speak well, you have things worth saying and you express them clearly and without much superfluous verbiage.

    Your voice isn’t the great natural instrument that the professional radio hosts have, but it’s good enough to get by. (Many people don’t have a voice that’s really good enough to get by, that is to be heard without any particular irritation.)

    It’s quite likely that you’ll be invited to speak on radio again, since you’re good at this, and if you practice you can get better at it.

  8. Mate, I am loving these interviews. Voice of Reason should offer you a regular show, if you are interested.

    And I do enjoy (if that’s the right word) Carolyn’s reading of The Fire.

    I’d really like to transcribe these interviews, including the one with Robert Stark, as you clearly and with precision state the case for White Nationalism. If anyone else has the time, that would be very much appreciated not only by myself but would be something which would have long lasting value to reach new and searching White people.

    Well done Tan, and well done Carolyn. Got the third part to listen to tomorrow on a long drive. You have no idea how pleasantly relieving and informative, in my interests! of all things, it is to be able to listen to this in the car, instead of stock standard garbage radio.

    Other interviews I recommend is the Greg Johnson one with Kevin MacDonald.

    One more thing, Carolyn comes across as so sweet and nice, like she could be your aunt who only wants the best for you. So harmless yet, so much hard hitting truth. A great face (well, voice) for radio and White Nationalism. Love the sneezes, the coughing fits and the every now and then screaming. Great stuff.

  9. Just realised my comment “A great face (well, voice) for radio” may actually mean not what I meant.

    I meant that her friendly aunt-like demeanour is a great face for White Nationalism.

  10. How about a consistent message? What does Carolyn Yeager think of this ?
    Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will
    be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

    The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

    Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

    What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

    How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

    And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

    But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

    They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

  11. Great talk, Tan and Carolyn. Thank you so much for taking the time and for pointing out those things about Gottfried and Auster. You sound good on radio, too, and I hope we get to hear more of you.

  12. In Close Encounters Jones cites a telling point from Gottfried’s autobiography:

    As some indication of how complicated things can become, Paul treats us to an entire chapter on Herbert Marcuse, the man who joined Freud and Marx at the hip, creating thereby the New Left of the ‘60s, a political movement which Gottfried, as a man of the right, should presumably hate. From the political perspective of a man who voted for Richard Nixon in 1968, Marcuse should have been the villain of the story, but this is not the case, because ethnicity trumps politics in this instance.

    This isn’t complicated. Jones’ understanding is complicated by his determination to see only half a picture. As his piece on Sam Francis makes clear, Jones insists on seeing human relations only through the lens of ideology. He deliberately plays down the role of biology, the DNA. In his mind even ethnicity is more about memes than genes. Thus Jones makes flawed presumptions and then marvels at their failure.

    The truth is that ethnic identity is just as much if not more biological than ideological. Ethnic differences are at root racial differences, though at a finer grain than the coarse, black/white terms in which most people, including Jones, tend to think about race.

    Jews are a people, a tribe that is linked both biologically and ideologically. Rightist jew Gottfried regards leftist jew Marcuse favorably for the same reason he regards leftist jew Norman Finkelstein favorably. Because they’re members of his tribe, regardless of their politics. This is, by the way, the same reason Gottfried regards Jones and Kevin MacDonald unfavorably. Because he sees them as enemies of his tribe, regardless of their politics.

  13. Katana, ‘The Forgotten Soldier’ by Guy Sajer is a great book. I particularly liked the part where Sajer’s commander makes the case for NS. It’s only a page or two but very moving.

  14. Taanstafl on White’s including Gottfried into the movement: “..this is one of the good Jews, there’s so many bad Jews, doing so many bad thing’s to my people. Well here’s one that I can find, there’s so much pressure not to be labeled a Jews hater, I can call this guy agood Jew and he’s my budy and that makes me a good person too.”

    Exactly. For anyone tempted by this line of thinking/behaviour just remember the fable of the scorpion and the frog. It’s in their nature.

  15. Hey, what about Brother Nate?

    “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children.”

    How? I am reminded of traditionalists in the 20th century such as Voegelin and Russell Kirk who had grand visions of what needed to be done, but had no detailed plans on how. They failed completely at fighting back liberalism. The troops were awake and worked hard but their efforts were scattered and ineffectual.

  16. To Pat Hannagan,

    Thanks for your nice words. And perceptive too. I really am a sweet person (the word that always comes to my mind to describe my mother is sweet, so there you go: “like mother, like daughter.”) But the basic sweetness is overlaid with a strong-willed person who has always become angry and impatient when I recognize myself in an intolerable situations, and I look for a way out of it. That’s what we Whites are in now, and we better find the way out. There is no excuse for preaching moderation at this late date, as so many still do.

    I recommended that Tan get a show of his own, though I don’t know that he wants one. We need more uncompromising voices such as his. There is too much compromise going on, which we no longer can afford. Read Henry Ford’s “The International Jew” and it becomes crystal clear that we should have acted then. And that was going on 100 years ago!

  17. Hey, what about Brother Nate?

    I turned my response into a separate post: Brother Nathanael Kapner Gives me the Creeps.

    Suffice to say here that Brother Nate advocates securing a future for a polyglot America which includes jews, he just doesn’t want them driving the bus. As far as I can see he doesn’t spell out how to get there.

    For my part I think the how includes harping on self-determination and freedom of association, voting with our feet, and putting our money where our mouths are.

  18. I’ve just realized polyglot was a bad choice of words, since Kapner advocates for a single language. I should have just used the word he himself uses to describe his America: multi-racial.

  19. Nice show.

    I am surprised that this Robert Stark, another radio host on this network?, seems to believe in the Big-H. Carolyn said “he never studied it”. Why not? All it takes is a little reading and an open mind, and the entire ‘narrative’ (back to Tan’s point) begins to fall apart. Mental liberation.

    I would wholeheartedly recommend the book Carolyn spoke about, The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes, as one of the best introductions to Holocaust Revisionism.

  20. You’re right about E. Michael Jones. I recall him saying elsewhere that America’s three major ethnic groups are Jews, Catholics and Protestants both Black and White. Now see what he says about Gottfried’s Jewish ‘ethnicity’ trumping politics.

    According to the divisions previously stated Jones should have Gottfried down as ethnically Catholic – religion trumping ancestry as determinant of ethnicity. So Jones absolutely must know on some level that he’s bullshitting about this ridiculous Black / White single protestant ethnicity.

    In his review of Thomas Fleming’s Everyday Morality Jones fouls all over nationalism insisting it’s something it’s not, so there’s pattern here.

  21. On the upside he often points out that the Israeli military disseminates porn to its local enemies knowing it demoralises societies, while the Israeli military’s most fervent defender in America, the ADL, gives awards to America’s biggest pornographers. I do like that about Jones. He’s also written some good stuff on the HIV/AIDS hoax and presumably a lot of other things given that Linder and wintermute often used to recommend him..

  22. “Whites Declare Independence; Jews Declare War.” A similar real-life headline appeared in 1933:Judea declares war on Germany. Millions were killed because of this Jewish instigated declaration.

  23. I’m advised Gottfried isn’t a Catholic. More than once I’ve seen it said on Whitosphere blogs that he was and cos we tend to be right about most things I assumed so in this case.

    I don’t think my point about Jones is much harmed: clearly if you say that Black and White American protestants make up a single ethnic group and that imperialism is what nationalism is all about you’re less about truth than about shaping your perceptions to suit your ideology.

Comments are closed.