I’ll be joining Norvin at 8PM PT tonight, the 29th of April. As he put it in his invitation we’ll, “talk about how jews are ultimately to blame for the problems Our people have and debunk this whole we can’t blame the jews for everything argument, take questions for the chat maybe talk about some of these Alt-jews”.
Archive of the live stream: JQ Debate With Age Of Treason – good comments.
JQ Debate With Age Of Treason by Luke Ford on SoundCloud.
Our main topic was Cofnas’ attack on MacDonald.
My series of podcasts on crypsis starts here: Jewish Crypsis – An Introduction.
Here I discuss jew screeching about intermarriage: Jewish Crypsis – Half-Jews – Part 3.
(((Luke Ford))) (@lukeford) on Twitter.
UPDATE 19 April 2018: JewTube circumcised the video. Ford has preserved some comments and linked a few related videos here: Debating The JQ With Age Of Treason Blogger.
John and I spoke earlier this evening, mainly about the TRS debacle and the issues specifically around jew-mixing. In the course of the discussion we touched on LARPing vs fraud, poz/degeneracy reflecting the jew agenda, gaslighting as a metaphor for the relationship between Whites and jews, the insanity of the “good jew” argument, NRx, “left” vs “right” political theatre, and Trump.
Doxing Only Works Once, Greg Johnson speaking with Henrik Palmgren.
This is How We Jew It (webm), TixGirl = Peinovich’s turbokike wife.
Undeniable evidence that Michael Enoch is Jewish – “amongst other jews” – not sure what TDS episode this was, but it was some time prior to March 2016.
The following three snippets were taken from Rebel Shoah: Fashy Struggle Session, which has since been memory-holed.
The Brown v. Board of Education Scam, by Paul Craig Roberts.
The Grave Dangers and Deep Sadness of ‘America First’, by Max Boot.
Topics included the ongoing jew war on Whites, the meaning of “conspiracy theory”, kikeservatives, Twitter, the jewsmedia, Trump, Bannon, (((the echo meme))), alt-right, Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Jared Taylor, Hitler and national socialist Germany, White racial consciousness.
The second half of my conversation with Henrik, recorded on 21 September 2015. The first half was published in mid October.
In this half, before getting into the invasion and rape of Europe, the rise of Trump, and anti-Nordic hostility, we touched briefly on the discovery of Homo naledi, which was described in a NOVA episode titled Dawn of Humanity.
As I mentioned, The Ugly Nationalist Politics of Human Origins is an example of the legacy of Franz Boas, the jewing of race science, with contemporary Boasian storytellers like Jonathan Marks not only hijacking the objective authority of science to promote a reality-distorting anti-”racist” narrative, but relatively openly describing how and why.
What and who were our ancestors?
It might seem as if the answer to this question is simply a question of biology, but in his new book Tales of the Ex-Apes: How we think about human Evolution anthropologist Jonathan Marks argues that the story we tell about our origins, the study of our evolutionary tree, has cultural roots. Evolution isn’t just a question of biology, he argues, it’s also a question of mythology. Our scientific facts, he says, are the product of bioculture and biopolitics.
The study of who we are and where we came from is inherently political, even as science. Understanding what he means by this is best explained by way of example. Take, say, race. In the U.S. the 19th-century “American school” of physical anthropologists used racial features to hypothesize that there were separate origins for the races. As late as 1962, the evolutionary “fact” that the black race was 200,000 years less evolved than the white race was used to argue in favor of segregation.
Evolutionary biologists often explain the emergence of morality in terms of Darwinian imperatives about survival and breeding.
This is about who gets to partake in, and to tell, the authoritative scientific story of our origins. It’s a lot more than biology.
There is much more to say about the semitically correct migrating/mixing/Out-of-Africa narrative and how it distorts science and morality. A recent, typical demonstration of the effect was provided when Bill Clinton preached his understanding of racial purity and mixing.
I spoke with William Scott on the 8th of January to discuss the significance of fairy tales to White identity, and how this relates to the age-old struggle between Europeans and jews. Our focus was on one particular tale from the Brothers Grimm. William uploaded his reading of Snow White and Rose Red to YouTube, and I’ve taken the liberty of transcoding to mp3 in order to put it on TFeed. It’s only 16 minutes long, well worth a listen even if you aren’t interested in what William or I have to say about it.
If you have time, see also his Interview with Ayla – an intelligent and insightful exchange about the same tale which stayed more directly on topic.
William also posted a monologue, Trailer for Tanstaafl, as an introduction to our conversation and to lay out his thoughts on racial differences. William’s website is FOLKWAYS/Teleolojic. His introductory post, Intention: Deep racial identity explains where he’s coming from and what he’s trying to do.
Anti-Semitic Legends contains a short collection of European tales, including several published by the Grimm brothers, in which the jews are more explicitly identified. The following bit of impudent spin appears at the top of the page:
These legends reflect an anti-Jewish sentiment long exhibited by European Christians. These tales, like their witchcraft analogs, illustrate a tragic and lengthy chapter in ecclesiastical history. Archives, like microscopes, often reveal root causes of sickness and evil. Our best hope of correcting the errors of the past lies in exposing their root causes to the light of day.
In fact the deep wisdom and values reflected in European fairy tales long predates Christianity. Recent analysis suggests that the tradition and themes trace back to the Aryans, just as the Grimm brothers and their contemporaries surmised.
The wisdom in these tales is as valid with regard to the jews as anything else, and that’s so whether they are represented directly or via stereotypically jewy characterizations (like the dwarf in Snow White and Rose Red). The hostility and arrogance of jews is no fiction. It is clearly visible in the reality-inverting spin quoted above. Fairy tales indicate that the origin of “anti-jewish sentiments” lies in the jews and their behavior. Their attempts to excuse themselves by literally pathologizing and demonizing Europeans only confirms this.
UPDATE 28 Jan 2016: William’s final cut ended up in three parts, and parts B and C have been on YouTube for a few days. I’ve transcoded them to mp3 and they can be downloaded here and here (they’ll appear on TFeed soon). In these two parts our conversation meanders a bit farther from fairy tales and into White identity, the invasion and rape of Europe, Jonathan Bowden, Appalachia and mountain folk, Christianity, the racial roots of Europeans, and more. Apologies for my Skype dropouts.
A week and a half ago I spoke with John Friend concerning various aspects of the jewish problem. His post on our conversation is here. Below are some additional links for context and reference.
The Jews – Who, What, Why and How sums up a comprehensive series of podcasts I did on the jewish problem. The Jewish Problem and “Anti-Semitism” addresses the importance of identity and point of view.
My criticism of “White pathology” traces back to “White Pathology” on Saturday Afternoon with Carolyn, recorded in November 2013. My criticism of “pathological altruism” started with Pathology and Pathogen, Fear and Genocide, and Gaslighting, recorded in February of this year. The comments on those posts contain further clarification and some debate. Solipsism and Narcissism, recorded in June, summed up the argument and added a couple of new points.
Regarding Jared Taylor: Pathological Altruism | American Renaissance, Jews and American Renaissance | American Renaissance, Tan Staafl on Twitter: “This is why Taylor’s “race realist” idea that jews are White is so pernicious. Whites are not extincting themselves. http://t.co/AueJUSyx6J”, “The Jewish Question” – Jared Taylor Vs. Brit.
My criticism of Wilmot Robertson’s majority/minority terminology – pussyfooting around the jews, to put it in his own terms – is laid out in the comments here.
As John pointed out, the upshot of Pew Polls Jews is that the #1 “essential part of what being jewish means” to jews is “remembering the holocaust”. In How Anti-Whiteness is at the Heart of Jewish Identity I point out that the jews have been “remembering” (and advertising to anyone who will listen) their woe-is-us self-image as blameless victims. What’s so important about their “holocaust” narrative is that it explicitly paints Whites/Europeans as the collective victimizer/enemy.