Podcast: Play in new window | Download
I’ll be live with Bill Rhyes this Thursday night, 2 July 2015, at 8pm ET (7pm CT) on his program, The Might is Right Power Hour. You can listen and call-in via TalkShoe. Chat via http://mightisright.net/. The mp3 download will be linked here when it becomes available.
We plan to discuss A Personal Disclosure, my role and focus, the White network, White suicide vs genocide, The 14 Words, Breivik, Roof, and more. Join us.
UPDATE 02 July 2015: Bill and I spoke for a bit over 3 hours. Here’s the mp3.
28 thoughts on “Talking with Bill Rhyes”
WRT The 14 Words, I’d personally be happier with what I take to be the genuinely meaningful 5: “We must secure our existence.” Lane’s original and the reasoning behind it I don’t need. But I can still honour Lane and I think Ron McVan is the most under-appreciated writer we’ve had.
This was a terrific broadcast: intelligent, clear, helpful and insightful. Listening to two individuals discuss ideas without interrupting one another, without offering contemporary cliches, while offering White-oriented views receptively tossed back and forth was a joy to experience.
I really enjoyed the “As a woman. . . ” concept from (Jewish) feminism being exposed. I really liked learning what that black church in Charleston is really all about and why Dylan Roof chose it, and I liked learning how even if you move from California, the most liberal state in the United States, no state is free of the liberal acceptance of multiculturalism (even if North Carolina has some area where a White man might feel more comfortable).
These topics came up towards the end of the discussion:
Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/Immigration.pdf
http://thezog.info/ – Names names and attempts to identify jews and jewish spouses in the power structure
Who Rules America? – 2000, by William Pierce
HRP: The mind-bending power of the masters of the media – 1997, by Nick Griffin (according to https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t715699/, which also refers to a similar summary from National Alliance in 2007, Jewish Control of the British Media)
Don’t listen to the whingers – London needs immigrants – 2009, by Andrew Neather, the op-ed in which he revealed who backed the alien invasion of Britain and why
We Hate Ukip: Turning Britain into a Roche Motel – 2014, a broader examination by Tobias Langdon at TOO
Good interview. Christianity is a poison and it’s a shame it is so entrenched into the White mind, whether you practice or not. I used to go hard on it but in the end, I felt it didn’t really matter at this point. At least to make that topic a main focus. Bill made a great point, that the jewish christian morality is pushed from all angles, you don’t have to go too church to be exposed to it.
To me it’s like this, Whites kick jews out because we know what they do is wrong and destructive, but the Christian mind-set, makes us feel guilty about what is right, which is a final expulsion. So, they are just brushed under the rug in hopes they stay put.
Street activism seems good on its face, but it looks more pathetic when 1-5 people show up with flight jackets and shaved heads. If you go about doing this, dress well, look like the type of people you want to attract. What do you think of NYF (angelo gages outfit)? This political situation we are in cannot be changed with memes, it doesn’t hurt though. Voting or moving will not get us out of this mess either. So, we just wait? Type and talk is that the answer?
I would have liked to chat a bit longer but I knew you guys had been talking for a long time. Anyway, it would be nice if you had an open call once a month or so. Maybe the open mics at Renegade?
I have moved three times myself at great expense, coast to coast, you cannot escape. In the Whitest areas it is safer but more annoying and depressing, the liberal mind-set drives me nuts to listen to. Blacker is not the answer however, I find the people in those areas are more aware because of the proximity of living around negros. But they are infected to the eye-balls with christianity. A balance I have found, which may not be the answer but seems to work, so far. Is not the Whitest area but still the majority, but in a more “conservative” type place, You will have more browns, far less negros if any but more cowboy type Whites.
Really, there is no where to run, Whiter doesn’t mean better in the climate we live in. It is safer, cleaner etc. anyway, good interview.
Kevin Strom’s remarks on Honor, Discipline, and Dylann Roof, specifically concerning the targets and their penalty:
The end-of-tWn post I referenced: Why this Archive.
In the comments on Carolyn’s podcast The Narrow Road vs the Wide Avenue is where I think I first became aware of and started listening to Bill Rhyes. It’s also a harbinger of Carolyn’s hostility toward White nationalism (as a “cozy boy’s club”) and perhaps the earliest open expression of my disagreement with the feminist attitude she was espousing.
I admire and commend their spirit in publicly calling out and confronting anti-Whites.
I’d be willing to bet that almost NOBODY knows that the blacks at that church were actively anti-white and involved in Black Lives Matter.
Do you think all this hatred from jews is simple racial and has nothing to do with historical grudges.They seem like black people when comes to all this 24\7 attacks on us.
It’s racial animus. Their historical grudges are nothing more than a pretext for their aggression, and an inversion of reality at that. The jews have spent the past two millenia infiltrating, manipulating, and exploiting virtually every European nation. They have greatly benefited and Europeans have been gravely harmed – not the other way around.
I mentioned An Unamusing Mischling Meltdown. Ian Jobling: Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish concerns a similar case.
A very honest interview Tan. A lot of food for thought.
“How different it would have been if, say, three major operatives of the banking cartel that is bleeding us to death — and three bought-and-paid-for Jew-fawning war-criminal White politicians of the most corrupt and sickening type — and three tax-sucking academics whose careers are based on teaching White students to hate their own race and work for its death — had all been removed from the ranks of the living instead.”
This would indeed have been better, though as everyone reading this comment surely knows, the dead were active organizers – not innocents, just low-value targets.
“And how different it would have been if — instead of the way of the barbarian, the Mongol, and the Jew, the way of summary execution — these men had been arrested, indicted, tried, convicted, and punished for capital murder, incitement to murder, genocide, war crimes, theft, fraud, and all the rest of their unspeakable crimes, as appropriate.”
That requires control of a political unit. We are at war against various political units, we do not yet have one of our own. I agree, it would be nice if we had a White nation. But we don’t, therefore courts of law are not in our arsenal.
I’d like to put a team together of like minded individuals to stop white genocide. Winchesterjasonrobert@gmail.com
Please hurry up and post some more :)
I just discovered Age of Treason, and it’s NOW the first place I come to for REAL like-minded info.
I was recently turned-off by many of the other truth-sites that condemned recent events… Instead of realistically analyzing it, like this site did.
Great job AOT.
Thanks Anthony. For audio you can tap my radio archive, see also TFeed for like-minded discussions.
Very good wide ranging, plain speaking, discussion. Thanks to both Tan and Bill.
Early on there was some discussion on the use of such terminology as “suicide” and “genocide” with Tan suggesting a possible alternative with, “jewicide”.
This would, following convention, actually mean the “killing of jews”. A more appropriate term to describe the killing/destruction of Whites could be something like, “Whiteocide”.
@Robert – 7 JULY 2015 AT 7:52 PM
I’d like to put a team together of like minded individuals to stop white genocide.
Robert, I think you need to elaborate on what you have in mind.
For my latest blog post, 911 – The Jews Had Me Fooled: A Jewish Engineered Pearl Harbor click here >>> KATANA
Andrew Joyce’s latest, The SS Empire Windrush: The Jewish Origins of Multicultural Britain.
Tanstaafl, A thread commenter gives us a story about who it was who first coined the term, “Islamophobia” [the first answer given below is not correct].
Frank Galton said…
“You’ll be fascinated to know that The word ‘ Islamophobia ‘ was made popular by the Islamic terrorist organisation Hamas…”
UN Said: “Funny, that. I thought it was cooked up by the same people who created the words “homophobe,” “racist” and … let me think … “antisemite”, perhaps?”
University of California
Center for Race & Gender
The term “Islamophobia” was first introduced as a concept in a 1991 RUNNYMEDE TRUST report and defined as “unfounded hostility towards Muslims, and therefore fear or dislike of all or most Muslims.” The term was coined in the context of Muslims in the UK in particular and Europe in general, and formulated based on the more common “xenophobia” framework.
The RUNNYMEDE TRUST is a race equality think tank founded by Jew Lord Lester and former British intelligence officer, Jew Eliot Joseph Benn (“Jim”) Rose.
Lord Lester of Herne Hill QC
• Co-founder and former Chairman, The Runnymede Trust
He was also the ARCHITECT of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and RACE RELATIONS ACT 1976. He campaigned successfully for the Civil Partnership Act and the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act, the Equality Act 2010 and the current Defamation Act 2013.
Jewish Chronicle, 10 July 2008
Aye! To 150 years of Jewish MPs
• LibDem peer Lord Lester, whose two Private Members’ Bills became the models for the HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998…
The Independent, 04 June 1999
[“Jim”] Rose was director and co-ordinator of a massive six-year [1963-1969] survey of race relations in Britain.
Rose was born in 1909 into the Anglo-Jewish elite of Edwardian England…
The man who had the idea he [“Jim” Rose] was looking for was Anthony (now Lord) Lester, who had been musing to friends of the need for a British institute combining the best of the ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE and the Potomac Institute in the United States…
…he [“Jim” Rose] took very nearly as much pride in the success of the RUNNYMEDE TRUST as in the completion of Colour and Citizenship [a monumental 800-page survey of race relations]…
14 July 2015 at 13:10
Another comment which came from that same thread will follow this one.
UN, from Irish Savant, has this comment from NTS informing:
Why would the southern states secede from the Union over slavery when President Abraham Lincoln had offered an amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing the PRESERVATION of slavery [BEFORE the first shots were fired at Fort Sumter]?
“From the Northern Truthseeker.
Our American cousins may find it interesting … considering the huge efforts the jews and their handmaidens are making to obliterate all reference to the Confederacy.
Speaking of the 13th Amendment, did you know that Lincoln authored his own 13th Amendment? It is the only amendment to the Constitution ever proposed by a sitting U.S. President. Here is Lincoln’s proposed amendment:
“No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give Congress the power to abolish or interfere within any state with the domestic institutions thereof, including that a person’s held to labor or service by laws of said State.”
You read it right. Lincoln proposed an amendment to the U.S. Constitution PRESERVING the institution of slavery. This proposed amendment was written in March of 1861, a month BEFORE the shots were fired at Fort Sumter, South Carolina.
The State of South Carolina was particularly incensed at the tariffs enacted in 1828 and 1832. The Tariff of 1828 was disdainfully called, “The Tariff of Abominations” by the State of South Carolina. Accordingly, the South Carolina legislature declared that the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 were “unauthorized by the constitution of the United States.”
Think, folks: why would the southern states secede from the Union over slavery when President Abraham Lincoln had offered an amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing the PRESERVATION of slavery? That makes no sense. If the issue was predominantly slavery, all the South needed to do was to go along with Lincoln, and his proposed 13th Amendment would have permanently preserved slavery among the southern (and northern) states. Does that sound like a body of people who were willing to lose hundreds of thousands of men on the battlefield over saving slavery? What nonsense!
The problem was Lincoln wanted the southern states to pay the Union a 40% tariff on their exports. The South considered this outrageous and refused to pay. By the time hostilities broke out in 1861, the South was paying up to, and perhaps exceeding, 70% of the nation’s taxes. Before the war, the South was very prosperous and productive. And Washington, D.C., kept raising the taxes and tariffs on them. You know, the way Washington, D.C., keeps raising the taxes on prosperous American citizens today.” [Thanks to UN at Irish Savant, and to NTS].
Tanstaafl, I’m not so interested in obtaining a reply as I am in seeing whether this site, The Confederate Society of America – Confederate Sentry, will publish this response.
Flanders reply to “Afterthoughts on the Lowering of the Confederate Battle Flag in Columbia”, an article by a jew hasbara.
Truly aware modern Southerners know that various sectors of jewry are involved in many aspects of the movements against Whites. Automatically, that is anti-Southern. We know that various jewish movements finance, support with media and organizational support, and instigate programs which are against not only the South, but against all Whites. We do not readily accept a hasbara type attempt to deflect the attention and blame toward “neoconservative Republicans”, or toward placing blame on only that portion of the jewish controlled media [Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News] which pretend to be supporters of “conservatism”, while it is actually being supportive of jewish agendas in almost all major respects. Nor do we fully place the blame on those blacks and minorities who are stirred toward destructive actions after having been instigated by jewish “rabble rousers”.
Our most important lines of Southern communication have always been held by the stealth, crafty enemy who continue to propagandize, via their controlled MSM, against truth and who continue to persuade other people* against the honor of White lives and the normality of a regular society. The MSM communicate at will to the entire nation and internationally, spreading poisons against the goodness of the South, and it is a goodness which we Southerners all know to be true because we live that goodness, and because our families in the past lived it. Some of our White Southern people remain unaware (or ignorantly unconcerned) about this jewish control over our MSM, and do not realize the significance that it has that a race which is not White (though some of them have white-skins) are in control of the full range of communications for a nation built by White people.
Remember, too, that at least three Supreme Court justices are among the (white-skinned) non-Whites, and there possibly are more.
*Often not even American born, and many of whom actually are imports [unless you invited them – I didn’t], and are simply given the name of being immigrants – whether “legal” or illegal, and eventually are given the name – of Americans – or that which they could never earn or hold – of Southerners.)
This comment is currently being held for moderation awaiting approval. [posted July 17, 2015].
I enjoyed the interview, and would like to add my 2 cents that I think you have completed your obligations regarding disclosing your connections to people with Jewish ancestry, and we can now put that to rest. We continue to need your incisive analysis, no one else is providing this in the same way. I also feel that broadcasts are on a higher plane, more appropriate to the quality of the content, minus the occaisonal low-brow words like “nigger” and such.
Regarding Christianity, I think it appropriate to analyze this for whether it is good for Whites. I also believe that this requires a comprehensive examination. On the surface, there are numerous unhealthy ideas being preached by many churches, such as universal morality, and opposing ethnic defensive organizing by Whites, as you mentioned in the interview. But there is more to the issue than that. Science suggests that humans are designed for spirituality, with a “God” part of the brain and so forth. If you take away something that humans need, you will get dysfunction. The spiritually deprived people that I see around me have a strong tendency to be doing worse in every way than the spiritually fulfilled people: with fewer good and fertile marriages, less stability, etc. Christianity fulfills important roles in our society in enforcing morals, meeting powerful emotional needs, creating community, encouraging child-rearing and family stability and more. Atheists are certainly worse off in resilience to multiculturalism than Christians are. The ideal Christianity would be fully racially aware (like that of the South during the days of slavery) and would be more masculine and warlike (like that of the early settlers who believed in manifest destiny), except more so than any earlier iterations. My point is that there is a lot of good there, and it would be unwise to throw the baby out with the bathwater. There is a need for intensive reform, for sure, but too often Europeans raised without religion end up screwed up: angry at the world covered with tattoos, or lost, always searching for something intangible that is missing, or dedicating their life to hedonism or something else that does not look like a happily married family person bringing new White children into this world. In Europe I understand that increasing numbers of Whites are being drawn to Islam, an alternative system of spirituality that is probably another road to destruction for Whites. I also do not think the neo-pagan religions are any real alternative. They don’t have “it”, a spiritual system that is rich and fulfilling, and satisfies human needs.
anxiously awaiting your next podcast lol. 14/5
Andrew, I wanted to let you know that I appreciated your comments “Regarding Christianity”. It’s a good explanation for some of the reasons to not discard all religious basis. Just to let you know, since I’m older than you, I remember when the churches had that(racial without any racist aspect) – racial knowledge you speak about. It was not until universalist teachings began being introduced during the 1950’s and 60’s that that inherent type of knowledge began being removed. One of the first indications was the introduction of children’s music like, Jesus loves All the little children of the world – yellow, brown, red and black and white”, that the universalist doctrines were stealthily inserted and became more prevalent. I had quit going to any church by the time I finished school, and the so-called “Christian-Zionism” teachings hit the scene some time after that. I’m now aware that the historical basis was laid by a Freemason, C.I. Scofield, acting under the influence and pay of a Rothschild agent, and had laid the plan for that teaching long before [early 1900’s], with his Scofield Reference Bible. I wasn’t aware about that in my earlier years attending the Methodist church.
Andrew & Fleming — “Regarding Christianity”
You’re both right.
I had an aunt who was a high-ranking nun in the early 60s who was invited to Rome to give a nuns-eye-view report to Vatican II, the council that effectively obliterated the Roman Church as an agent of “racial stability” (to modify Hitler’s comment slightly). She told me at the time (I was 12) that the deck was rigged. She was a Traditionalist and to her, it was as if Rome was selling out to the mob. And as Rome went in 1962, the rest of Christianity seems to have followed at quick-step.
But just as predicted by people back then, the catacombs are back up and running. A pamphlet on Gurdjief, “Digging up the Dog” has exposed his oldest gag as real (His gag was: “Everything good in Christianity they took from the Greeks, then they spoil”.)
As if picking up on this, Dennis MacDonald’s recent book, “Mythologizing Jesus” picks up the same idea and runs with it so well that even the thickest evangelical can grasp what most pastors used to know: Christianity IS European Paganism for anyone who wants to unpack it only slightly. So “Esoteric Christianity” is making a comeback right when we need it.
And MacDonald at no point argues against orthodox Christianity, proving that you can make the case without offending anyone. On page 50 of his book, wonderfully, MacDonald includes the 500 B.C. depiction of Hermes walking on water. A total delight for me because I heard about it decades ago but never expected to see it.
Tan’s MIA?? Waiting to drop the epic podcast bomb?
Not really. The Christian scriptures, i.e. the New Testament, are chock full of references and allusions to the Jewish scriptures, i.e. the Old Testament. The gospel stories of Jesus, in particular, are just rewrites (sometimes verbatim) of various stories of Jewish heroes and prophets in the Old Testament, particularly Moses, Elijah, and Elisha. Dennis MacDonald and all critical New Testament scholars are well aware of this fact, but they generally try to conceal it from the Christian public for obvious reasons.
Without the Jewish scriptures/Old Testament, the Christian scriptures/New Testament would make no sense and could not have been written in the first place.
Universalist teachings and doctrines were present at the founding of Christianity. In fact, universalism is one of the central ideas of Christian theology. The other one is egalitarianism.
Read the New Testament epistles.
Who Controls Donald Trump?
Comments are closed.