In their own ways Bill O’Reilly and Bill Clinton have just highlighted the defining character of the political zeitgeist – a clash of establishment narratives.
Referring to Trump’s selection, Clinton said, “He doesn’t know much. One thing he does know is how to get angry White men to vote for him.”
Referring to the jewed establishment’s response to Trump’s selection, O’Reilly said, “The left wants power taken away from the White establishment and they want a profound change in the way America is run.”
Trump and his campaign manager responded to Clinton. Trump, as usual, refused to even say the word White. Conway, rather than noting Clinton’s invective was anti-White, simply accepted his premise and responded in kind.
The jewed establishment’s response to O’Reilly has been to shit on O’Reilly for having the temerity to defend the establishment, specifically because he imagines it is White. Bill O’Reilly rose to the defense of white privilege in America’s presidential voting process, from The Washington Post, and Bill O’Reilly, in Defending “the White Establishment,” Nails a Liberal Vision of America, from Salon, capture the gist of this response.
Both little Bill scandals are merely reverberations of the recently completed hyper-racialized selection process. To recap, the Clinton team went with an anti-White strategy. Meanwhile, the Trump team wanted White votes, but wouldn’t even speak to Whites as such.
The jewsmedia, which in effect served as part of the Clinton team, has been pushing two conflicting narratives before, during, and now after the campaign.
The first narrative – decrying “White supremacism”, “White privilege”, “institutional racism”, and even lowly working-class White voters – is based on the premise that the current establishment is White. The second narrative decries the same thing – Whites, specifically because they are White – but is based on the premise that Whites have been emboldened by Hitler 2.0 to rebel against the current establishment, which alarms organized jewry and the jewsmedia precisely because they perceive this as a threat to jews.
There is some truth in both narratives. The apparent contradiction is resolved by putting them together.
The Clintons and the Trumps and many other individual members of the establishment may look White but their words and behavior aren’t pro-White. They all recognize the difference White votes can make, but none will so much as speak explicitly in favor of Whites. And even when the Conways or O’Reillys do use the word White, it’s only because they have internalized and are regurgitating the anti-White premise they are responding to, not to defend Whites as Whites.
The larger truth is that jews aren’t White, they’re anti-White. The establishment is anti-White because it is so thoroughly jewed. That’s why members of the current establishment, whether they look White or not, won’t say anything positive about Whites or negative about jews. Those who do dare are denounced and excluded.
Jews currently rule and are pushing a genocidal anti-White agenda. This is what’s making Whites angry. The jewsmedia reports every aspect of this situation, they simply report it from a point of view entirely sympathetic to jews and other non-Whites, and antipathetic to Whites.
Some jew at The Federalist claims Jews Fixate On The Alt-Right So They Don’t Have To Confront Themselves.
Left-posing jews hype “White privilege” to shift blame away from jews. Right-posing jews hype “anti-semitism” to shift blame away from jews. These jew poseurs usually work in tandem, but even when they confront each other the argument is all about what’s best for the jews.
Spokesman for jewsmedia jews Erik Wemple screeches, Bill O’Reilly becomes spokesman for white America, at the Washington Post.
O’Reilly’s full statement is here. When O’Reilly speaks of “the White establishment” he’s referring to White Americans generally, not only those in positions of power. O’Reilly claims the whole thing is about race, and he can explain it, but then doesn’t, falling back instead on the usual semitically correct terms, offering no explanation why “the left” and “liberal media” favor “minorities” over Whites.
More from (((The Federalist))): 2016: The Year The ‘Alt-Right’ Breached The Moral Quarantine On Racism.
“Moral quarantine on racism” is code for anti-White jew taboos.
Its really easy. Simple Simon don’t know complex. Its (((them))) or US. Coexistence is IMPOSSIBLE. Hitler was too kind. You can’t let them go. Parasites cannot feed themselves. ((They))) will say we can have America back over (((their))) dead bodies.
GOOD. I wouldn’t have it any other way.
Bill O’Reilly: ‘The Left Wants Power Taken Away From The White Establishment’:
O’Reilly is describing the jew narrative, what jews say about “liberalism”.
Damn. This is so true and it’s so creepy cuz I never noticed it even though jews are so in your face about it. They tag team us into believing we’re bad cuz we’re White but White really doesn’t exist anyway and politics has nothing to do with race, it’s just “left” and “right” Goy.
Right-posing jews scoff at White privilege but their real motive in dismissing it is their fear of White identity. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/439150/white-identity-politics-wrong-and-immoral
Goldberg knows that “whatever that is” is gonna put him in the oven. He explains in the article that it’s okay for us Goy to have Irish pride or Italian pride (he doesn’t use German pride as an example for some odd reason). But he shakes his finger at us and cries Jim Crowe and slavery if we identify collectively as White.
I used to watch O’Reilly and he would do exactly this all the time. My ears would perk up cuz I thought something of substance was about to be said. But no. Never. He would just start down that road but never go all the way, and Whites are so needy for *some* acknowledgement and *some* explanation for what’s happening that this technique would get him high ratings which he never got tired of bragging about.
“Left-posing jews hype “White privilege” to shift blame away from jews. Right-posing jews hype “anti-semitism” to shift blame away from jews. These jew poseurs usually work in tandem, but even when they confront each other the argument is all about what’s best for the jews.”
This sums it up really well. I always had this feeling but you worded it well and cleared my head of this ringing, trying to articulate it. I am really tired of these lying jews and their bs.
It’s really draining in many ways,physically, emotionally etc. as I’m sure it’s meant to be. Along with the actual killing of us. It’s truly amazing there is not a Roof or Breivic every day. Instead Whites are drowning in addictions.
Maybe the lack of Roof and Breivics are a testament to the depth of Whites bible poison tolerance, jew induced guilt-coma or the amount of jewing going on? So much jewing that Whites are literally like a child doing the forehead spinning on a baseball bat and trying to run.
Hitler was far too nice and Linder is always right.
Team White or team jew, pick a side.
“Its really easy. Simple Simon don’t know complex. Its (((them))) or US. Coexistence is IMPOSSIBLE. Hitler was too kind. You can’t let them go. Parasites cannot feed themselves. ((They))) will say we can have America back over (((their))) dead bodies.
GOOD. I wouldn’t have it any other way.”
My favorite comment. I absolutely agree, 110%!