A Tale of Two Steves: Decoding the Ongoing Bannonocaust


Last summer the jewsmedia mocked Trump’s economic advisory council with a variation on the usual “Too White” screech – “All of them are white, half of them are named some version of Steve”. Trump’s list, including most of the Steves, was actually chock full of jews, which is all the more remarkable in a country where there are far fewer jews than Whites.

Such incidents are among the most blatant examples of both the how and the why of the jewsmedia’s semitical correctness. By persistently exaggerating and so explicitly condemning the White this or White that of anything relating to Trump they effectively whitewash the gaggle of jews jewing jewishly all around him. And it is precisely this type of jew-serving anti-White “political correctness” that Trump never challenges.

During the past week another rash of this meta-jewing has broken out, the jewsmedia’s anti-White screeching once again rising to crescendo over a couple of Steves.

The Steve the jewsmedia is most fixated on demonizing is Steve Bannon. We’ve already reviewed the jewy nature of the hatred directed at him. Here we’ll dig more into his thinking. You can start with this article, which elaborates on Bannon’s background as “an ex-(((Goldman Sachs))) trader dabbling in (((the movie business)))”.

The other Steve the jewsmedia is screeching about is Stephen Miller, mainly concerning his work with Bannon on Trump’s inauguration speech and the travel ban. Miller is a jew, though the jewsmedia rarely mentions it and never faults him for it. While most of the jewsmedia focuses on demonizing Bannon, Rosie Gray literally portrayed her tribemate as a “scapegoat”.

In these first few weeks of the Trump administration there have been many short articles with titles like this one from Slate: Trump Gives Steve Bannon, Champion of White Nationalism, Key National Security Seat. The articles themselves describe almost nothing about Trump or Bannon’s ideology, much less what Whites have to do with it. In such cases “White” merely serves as a shibboleth.

There have been some jewsmedia articles that actually do try to explore Bannon’s thinking. For example, Steve Bannon’s own words show sharp break on security issues, from USA Today, 31 January 2017:

In dozens of hours of audio recordings reviewed by USA TODAY of his Breitbart News Daily radio show in 2015 and 2016, Bannon told his listeners that the United States and the Western world are engaged in a “global existential war,” and he entertained claims that a “fifth column” of Islamist sympathizers had infiltrated the U.S. government and news media. Those recordings, preserved online, offer an often unfiltered window into the thinking of Trump’s interview-averse senior adviser.

In January 2016, Bannon discussed various threats facing Europe in the late 1930s and evaluated Islam alongside fascism and Nazism.

“This is when Europe’s looking down the barrel of fascism — the rise of Mussolini in Italy, Stalin and the Russians and the communist Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union. And obviously Hitler and the Nazis,” he said. “I mean you’re looking at fascism, you’re looking at communism. And to say that — what so blows me away is the timing of it. You could look in 1938 and say, ‘Look, it’s pretty dark here in Europe right now, but there’s something actually much darker. And that is Islam.’ ”

Concern about brewing conflict, he said, was a fundamental concept behind Bannon’s media enterprise. “Our big belief, one of our central organizing principles at the site, is that we’re at war,” he said.

It’s war. It’s war. Every day, we put up: America’s at war, America’s at war. We’re at war,” he said in December 2015. “Note to self, beloved commander in chief: We’re at war.”

Bannon is concerned about a muslim war on a neoconservative figment called “the Judeo-Christian West”. This is the particular concern of a neoconnish fringe known as counter-jihad. And we might as well just call the true believers jewhadis. They speak of defending (((the West))), but when pressed they always put the interests of jews and the jew-state first. Many of its proponents are in fact jews, part-jews, or crypto-jews. The rest are useful idiots or outright cucks.

The typical jewhadist regards White nationalism as antithetical to their own position. As I’ve previously described it:

Counter-jihadists can be understood as quasi- or even pseudo-nationalist dissimulators. Their opposition to muslims and islamization is ultimately predicated upon support for jews and judaization. Full-throated advocacy for jewish nationalism is de rigueur. White nationalism is regarded with skepticism. White racial identity is regarded with contempt.

Counter-jihadists/jewhadis characteristically equate islamism with fascism. Despite obvious differences they regard them as in essence the same – a mortal threat to (((the West))) they love, as deracinated and degenerate and thoroughly jewed as it is.

A few jewsmedia articles go beyond Bannon’s jewhadist thinking and name some of the more prominent jewhadis he has associated with. Steve Bannon in 2010: ‘Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a religion of submission’, CNN, 31 January 2017:

President Trump’s chief strategist, former Breitbart executive Steve Bannon, once dismissed the notion that Islam is a religion of peace, describing it in a 2010 radio interview as “a religion of submission.”

Bannon made the comments on “Western Word Radio with Avi Davis,” an online right-wing radio station.

In the segment, Bannon, who at the time served on the board of Breitbart, criticized former President George W. Bush for what he and fellow guest conservative columnist Diana West described as injecting political correctness into the federal government.

Avi Davis was a jewhadi jew, Diana West still is.

Here’s another article naming more names. The Dark History of the White House Aides Who Crafted Trump’s “Muslim Ban”, Mother Jones, 30 January:

The Trump administration has insisted since Sunday that the president’s executive order banning travel to the United States from seven predominately Islamic countries “is not a Muslim ban.” But as Mother Jones first reported in a series of investigations starting last summer, the two top Trump advisers who reportedly crafted the immigration crackdown—Stephen Bannon and Stephen Miller—have a long history of promoting Islamophobia, courting anti-Muslim extremists, and boosting white nationalists.

Ambiguous jew Roger Stone and obnoxious jewhadi jewess Pamela Geller are specifically named. There’s also some more detail on Stephen Miller’s jewhadist views:

Miller has long been an advocate of framing the fight against terrorism in religious terms. In 2007, while an undergraduate at Duke University, he started the Terrorism Awareness Project, an effort to make “students aware of the Islamic jihad and the terrorist threat, and to mobilize support for the defense of America and the civilization of the West.” The group promoted “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week” on college campuses and took out ads in college newspapers titled, “What Americans Need to Know About Jihad.”

What’s missing from this article is any evidence that Trump or Bannon are “boosting white nationalists”. By its own account Miller has done the opposite.

The most sober and informative article about of the jewhadist worldview pervading Trump’s inner circle was published by The Jew York Times. Trump Pushes Dark View of Islam to Center of U.S. Policy-Making:

Mr. Trump was echoing a strain of anti-Islamic theorizing familiar to anyone who has been immersed in security and counterterrorism debates over the last 20 years. He has embraced a deeply suspicious view of Islam that several of his aides have promoted, notably retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, now his national security adviser, and Stephen K. Bannon, the president’s top strategist.

This worldview borrows from the “clash of civilizations” thesis of the political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, and combines straightforward warnings about extremist violence with broad-brush critiques of Islam. It sometimes conflates terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State with largely nonviolent groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and its offshoots and, at times, with the 1.7 billion Muslims around the world. In its more extreme forms, this view promotes conspiracies about government infiltration and the danger that Shariah, the legal code of Islam, may take over in the United States.

Those espousing such views present Islam as an inherently hostile ideology whose adherents are enemies of Christianity and Judaism and seek to conquer nonbelievers either by violence or through a sort of stealthy brainwashing.

As I’ve already alluded, the “clash of civilizations” thesis is a neoconservative theme. It was promoted by the jew Bernard Lewis as well as Huntington. It is at odds with the jew golden age narrative, which jewhadis mostly ignore. It’s also difficult to square with the jew holocaust narrative, which jewhadis actually espouse (and seek to silence nonbelievers) just as fervently as the jewsmedia. These contradictions are a feature, not a bug. The general idea: clash you goyim. The common theme: jews lie, goyim die.

Among the most outspoken of those warning about Islam are Pamela Geller, of Stop Islamization of America, Robert Spencer, of Jihad Watch, and Frank Gaffney Jr., of the Center for Security Policy.

In an interview, [Gaffney] explained his view of Islam, which focuses less on the violent jihad of Al Qaeda and the Islamic State than on the quieter one he sees everywhere. By his account, potential enemies are hidden in plain sight — praying in mosques, recruiting at Muslim student associations and organizing through mainstream Muslim rights groups — and are engaged in “this stealthy, subversive kind of jihad.”

“They essentially, like termites, hollow out the structure of the civil society and other institutions,” Mr. Gaffney said, “for the purpose of creating conditions under which the jihad will succeed.”

Like Geller, Spencer and Gaffney are full-time professional jewhadis, all as hostile to White nationalism as they are to islamism.

Nearly any critique aimed at muslims and jihadis can be turned into a “conspiracy theory” which fits jews and jewhadis even better. Gaffney’s termite analogy is a good example. It is for this reason so many jews regard muslims as proxies for jews. They see a defense of muslims as serving the interests of jews. Thus they try to psychopathologize and make “islamophobia” taboo in much the same way they have already done with “racism” and “anti-semitism”. Jewhadi jews differ mainly in that they reject these semitically correct taboos around criticizing islam and muslims because that’s what they think is best for (((the West))).

As the Times article hints, this entirely jewy divide on islam and muslims isn’t entirely new. It confounded generals during the Bush and Obama “war on terror”. It will only cause more confusion during Trump’s “war on radical islamic terror”. All the while jewhadis like Andrew Bostom will only complain about symptoms, never the cause.

Prior to Trump’s selection the jewsmedia was content to ignore jewhadis. Now that Trump has thrust the jewhadist worldview into the limelight, and they’re compelled to explain it, it’s no surprise they’re trying to blame it on Whites. After all, that’s what jews usually do when their jewing get exposed.

28 thoughts on “A Tale of Two Steves: Decoding the Ongoing Bannonocaust”

  1. OT

    In this new book, by a well-known “Holocaust” Revisionist, Jurgen Graf, the planned extermination of the White race by the globalists (aka, Organized jewry) using the socially engineered below replacement birth rates, mass Third World immigration and various other methods is described. In the introduction Graf talks about how he became involved in “Holocaust” revisionism and how the “Holocaust” is used to demoralize and guilt Whites into passively accepting their racial and cultural displacement — KATANA.

    Book: White World Awake! — Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk

    From the Publisher

    White World Awake! Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk.

    Western civilization is in desperate peril. White people — our volk — are in trouble. The question of the day — and very likely the question of the millennium — is whether Europe will survive—and with it its American, Canadian, Australian and South African cousins — and, if so, how?

    Seeking to answer those questions is a very important new book, White World Awake! Stopping the Planned Extermination of Our Volk. Those who seek the truth will find the truth in the pages of this book, and those looking for a practical plan of action will find that as well.

    For too long, observes the author, White people have fought among themselves. The European Union and NATO are failed efforts to correct that situation. Europe faces an existential threat with tsunamis of unassimilable Africans, Middle Easterners and Asians swarming in. Russians, Britons, Frenchmen, Germans and Poles, Serbs and Croats, Romanians, Finns and Greeks, Spaniards and Hungarians are all in the same rickety boat.

    The time has come for Europe to speak with one nationalist voice on military and foreign policy matters, while it is equally necessary for each nation and ethnic group to preserve its distinctive language and culture, and for historical injustices to be discussed openly.

    A Eurasian Federation is proposed, which, like Old America, will not interfere in other parts of the world except to provide humanitarian aid and ensure the safety of such places as Armenia and Georgia against any immigration threat.

    Traitor politicians who see no problem in allowing Europe and other White nations to be transformed into mixed-race caliphates — a dream of the mysterious Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi — will be voted out of office.

    Many of the solutions apply equally to the rest of the White World. “Close the borders! Stop the flood!” is key not only for Europe, but America and all other White areas of the world. Thus Graf lays out a practical 10-step program to stop the genocide of the West starting with Europe, the cradle of White Western civilization.

    This is a book that needs and deserves to be in the hands of every concerned person who cares about the future of the Western world.

  2. Portraying Bannon as the unacceptable face of whiteness may be seen as necessary to mass-market counter jihad to the base. He may however take up new interests as his power level rises.

  3. This Is How Steve Bannon Sees The Entire World – BuzzFeed News:

    Donald Trump’s newly named chief strategist and senior counselor Steve Bannon laid out his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a conference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014.

    . . .

    Here is what he said, unedited:

    tl;dr He’s a good goy.

    Harnwell: The first question was, you’d reference the Front National and UKIP as having elements that are tinged with the racial aspect amidst their voter profile, and the questioner was asking how you intend to deal with that aspect.

    Bannon: I don’t believe I said UKIP in that. I was really talking about the parties on the continent, Front National and other European parties.

    I’m not an expert in this, but it seems that they have had some aspects that may be anti-Semitic or racial. By the way, even in the tea party, we have a broad movement like this, and we’ve been criticized, and they try to make the tea party as being racist, etc., which it’s not. But there’s always elements who turn up at these things, whether it’s militia guys or whatever. Some that are fringe organizations. My point is that over time it all gets kind of washed out, right? People understand what pulls them together, and the people on the margins I think get marginalized more and more.

  4. Whether they like it or not, Trump and his people are aiding in the rise of racial consciousness. The more Trump pushes, the more the Left makes its attacks explicitly anti-White. If Trump doesn’t lose his nerve, the absolute polarization of public discourse into, at first anti-White on one side, and whatever else on the other, is inevitable.

    I am firmly convinced White people must feel they are under attack AS Whites before a group consciousness will dawn on them. This dialectic must work itself out before a counter-offensive can be mustered. Right now, Trump is the prime mover in this process.

  5. Drawing attention to the Trump Admin “as white” allows them to promote a counter position “as jews”.

    I can’t tell you how many times Ive heard the phrase “As jews,…” to open some self-conceived position of moral high ground countering the administration’s position(s).

    All the while dealing marked cards and and playing loaded dice.

    Nice to play the position whatever’s good for jews.

  6. I’ve been using the term Counterjewhadists to refer to the people you call jewhadis.

    I think you’re being a bit unfair to Bannon. There are indications he is aware of the Jewish problem.

    See here, for example:


    The Jew Nick Cohen also recently complained that “Bannon believes western culture is inseparable from European ethnicity”.


  7. There is indeed a difference between neocohenism/jewhadism and the kind of alien restrictionism Bannon and Trump are proposing. The typical neocon/jewhadi will screech about those mooselimbs all the live long day, but whenever some naive goy suggests that maybe keeping them (and maybe even other aliens) out of the country in the first place might be a good idea, the neocon/jewhadi will screech even louder to silence “the nazi”.

    Bannon and Trump are fairly typical of the useful idiot goyim sucked in by jewhadist rhetoric. They imagine that if they only think good thoughts about the holy jews hard enough then they will be permitted to emulate their greatest ally’s behavior (build walls, maintain at least a civic nationalist state).

    Nobody does a better job of informing them of their error than the jews do. And yet still they persist in their kikeservativism. To sympathize with such mindlessness is to be dippier dipshits than they are.

  8. In his written proposal for a documentary “The Islamic States of America”, Bannon described the “American Jewish Community” as among the enablers of islamisation. That’s a curious form of “kikeservatism”.

    The Counterjewhad can act as a gateway drug to a real awakening as it did for me and several others I know. Regardless of what Jews think about it, the threat from Islam is real.

  9. I couldn’t find Bannon’s draft for “Great Satan”. Here are the best jewsmedia accounts I could find:

    REVEALED: Steve Bannon’s proposed documentary warning of the ‘Islamic States of America’:

    An eight-page draft of a documentary-style film written in 2007 by Steve Bannon envisions a world where Muslim extremists have co-opted the United States and transformed it into the “Islamic State of America,” the Washington Post reports.

    The outline, written by Bannon when he was a Hollywood filmmaker, was entitled, “Destroying the Great Satan: The Rise of Islamic Facism [sic] in America,” and proposed a three-part series that would explore the threat posed by Muslims and their “enablers among us.”

    Among the “enablers” listed by Bannon: The New York Times, NPR, universities, the “American Jewish Community,” the FBI, the State Department and the CIA.

    “The road to the establishment of an Islamic Republic in the United States starts slowly and subtly with the loss of the will to win,” Bannon wrote in the outline. “The road to this unique hell on earth is paved with the best intentions from our major institutions.”

    According to the outline, “Great Satan” also planned to explore “the rise of a global holy war” that would “attach and destroy western civilization.”

    Julia Jones, who’s listed as a co-author on the document, told the Post the draft was the brainchild of Donald Trump’s top advisor.

    “It was all [Bannon’s] words,” Jones said.

    Bannon film outline warned U.S. could turn into ‘Islamic States of America’ – The Washington Post:

    The outline shows how Bannon — years before he became a strategist for President Trump and helped draft last week’s order restricting travel from seven mostly Muslim countries — sought to issue a warning about the threat posed by radical Muslims and their “enablers among us.” Although driven by the “best intentions,” the outline says, institutions such as the media, the Jewish community and government agencies were appeasing jihadists aiming to create an Islamic republic.

    The eight-page draft, written in 2007 during Bannon’s stint as a Hollywood filmmaker, proposes a three-part movie that would trace “the culture of intolerance” behind sharia law, examine the “Fifth Column” made up of “Islamic front groups” and identify the American enablers paving “the road to this unique hell on earth.”

    The outline offers an early glimpse of Bannon’s belief that the West and “supremacist” Islam are headed for a “fundamental clash of civilizations,” as the outline says. Bannon later expressed this view publicly as chief of Breitbart News, a site that often features articles about radical Islamists and has provided a platform for the alt-right, a small, far-right movement that seeks a whites-only state.

    The article linked in the text above says:

    Friends, family and even now-critical former colleagues said the image of Bannon as a bigot is wrong, and miss what really drives the 62-year-old, who was infuriated when people like his father, a longtime phone company worker, saw their retirement funds shrink because of the 2008 financial crisis. Bannon’s longtime personal assistant is an African American woman, and he has extended family members who are Jewish, they note.

    For Bannon, the mission is to ignite a broader populist movement — even if that means tolerating extremist viewpoints, associates say.

    “He is not a racist,” said Julia Jones, a self-described “Bernie Sanders liberal” who was Bannon’s screenwriting partner for 16 years. “I think he is using the alt-right for political purposes.”

    In an interview with the Hollywood Reporter published Friday, Bannon said: “I’m not a white nationalist, I’m a nationalist. I’m an economic nationalist.” He predicted Trump could create a new populist political movement that would win significant black and Hispanic support and “govern for 50 years.”

  10. Bannon’s worldview circa 2007 was very much like what self-described fifth-columnist jew Lawrence Auster was encouraging the useful idiot goyim congregating around him to believe at that time. And from more recent quotes Bannon has not progressed much beyond this point.

    Bannon’s concern is to preserve “the Judeo-Christian West”, i.e. a civilization in which jews are not only integral but define good and evil. Thus Bannon regards jihad and sharia, “racists” and “nazis”, and maybe even those renegade “cultural marxist” not-all-jews who threaten his ideal as evil, as enemies.

    Even by jewsmedia accounts Bannon is a good goy who just wants to ensure that the world remains safe for righteous race-less Westerners like himself – black, jew, or otherwise. My point is that he is a useful idiot for the jews, all of whom ultimately only care about the best interests of their collective. The “left”-posing jews demonize him for promoting a pro-White agenda. Meanwhile all he is really doing is parroting and serving an agenda defined by a subset of “right”-posing jews. The jews on all sides are deliberately downplaying the role of jews in driving all of it.

    The unfortunate reality is that neither Trump nor Bannon are pro-White. I think the most likely eventuality, as jews screech ever louder, is that they will only try harder to prove that they are not “racist” or “anti-semitic”. This is the historic pattern of kikeservativism. Being publicly flayed by jews does not generally turn the target pro-White, it makes them more pliable and obsequious to jews.

  11. Steve Bannon Wanted Mel Gibson for His Movie About Nazis, Abortion, ‘Mutants’ – The Daily Beast:

    “[The] most radical ideology in history—Man as the driver of evolution, the creator of the new Adam,” Bannon’s draft reads.

    Later, Segment 8 covers in four minutes “subjugation of race and class throughout time,” including Native Americans, “Jews and gypsies,” “Suni’s and Shiites” (sic), and also the genocides in Rwanda and Bosnia.

    The next four minutes cover Darwin, Nietzsche, Wagner, “the survival of the fittest,” “the Ubermensch,” and “the Aryan Elite.”

    And things keep getting darker. Segment 12 opens Section III, “The Commercial Eugenics Civilization,” with two minutes covering Nazi theories and practices of racial purity, and “the perfectibility of life through a human-controlled elite race that will bring about a better world.”

    Jewsmedia accounts keep trying to spin (((Hollywood))) Bannon as a “racist” “anti-semite”. But reading between the lines of their own accounts you can see he was actually trying to push an anti-“racist” anti-“nazi” narrative.

    The irony is that at root Bannon’s moral mechanics work the same way the jewsmedia’s does – “nazis” are the ultimate evil, so X is evil if you can somehow equate X to “nazis”. Whether it’s Bannon condemning eugenics or islamization, or the jewsmedia condemning Bannon, this same jewy formulation is behind it.

  12. Steve Bannon Compared Occupy Protesters to Nazi Brownshirts – Fast Forward – Forward.com:

    In interviews to promote his film “Occupy Unmasked,” Bannon made several comments likening the Occupy Wall Street protests against income inequality and financial industry predation to the actions of Nazi paramilitaries, CNN reported.

    “The Occupy movement is really a combination of the internet, the media and street thugs. Right? It’s a weapon of intimidation,” Bannon said in a September 2012 interview with the radio host Larry Sinclair. “It is the moral equivalent today of the Brownshirts of the 1930s. It’s going to be used as a weapon of intimidation.”

  13. Stephen Miller Is a ‘True Believer’ Behind Core Trump Policies – The New York Times, 11 Feb 2017:

    After the Republican National Convention in July, Mr. Miller became Mr. Trump’s principal day-to-day speechwriter once the candidate had switched from handwritten notes to a teleprompter in the middle of the campaign.

    The message in those speeches was so reflective of Mr. Trump’s views that it earned Mr. Miller a spot as the warm-up act for Mr. Trump’s campaign rallies. His words became Mr. Trump’s — “We’re going to build that wall, and we’re going to build it out of love,” Mr. Miller often said.

    “Steve is a true believer in every sense of the word, not just in this message of economic populism but in President Trump as a leader,” said Jason Miller, who worked with him in the Trump campaign and is not related. “Steve’s fiercely loyal and has a better understanding of the president’s vision than almost anyone.”

    Yet “President Bannon” is the main meme the jewsmedia echo chamber pushes. The Whitewashing here is:

    At Duke, Mr. Miller, who is Jewish, cut a similarly confrontational swath, and was briefly friendly with Richard Spencer, who later became a prominent white supremacist, when both were members of the university’s Young Conservatives chapter.

    As if Miller crossing paths with Spencer has as much or more to do with Trump/Miller’s worldview as “what’s best for the jews”.

  14. Tracing the Whitewashing backwards…

    Trump Advisor Stephen Miller Has White Supremacist And Neo-Nazi Ties, Kimberly Ricci, 30 Jan 2017:

    Mother Jones has dug into Miller’s past and come up with significant ties to white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

    Ricci links Trump’s Newest Senior Adviser Seen as a White Nationalist Ally, Josh Harkinson, 14 Dec 2016:

    “I have absolutely no relationship with Mr. Spencer,” he said in an email that month. “I completely repudiate his views, and his claims are 100 percent false.”

    Before joining the Trump campaign last year, Miller, who is 30, served as Sessions’ chief of communications. “Those who worked with them say that Sessions and Miller had a ‘mind meld,'” Julia Ioffe wrote in a June Politico profile of Miller.

    Harkinson links Stephen Miller Profile: The Believer, Julia Ioffe, 27 June 2016.

    Miller has been warming up the crowd at pretty much every Trump rally since March, with fiery speeches full of conspiratorial populism delivered with a nearly immobile face.

    He used the column and his position as the president of the Duke chapter of Horowitz’s Students for Academic Freedom to endorse students running for student government. He railed against Duke’s smoking ban and the “unrelenting health fascists” behind it.

    He wrote about black students’ racial “paranoia” and their mistaken understanding of where true racism resides. The problem is not rich, conservative white people, he wrote. It’s “Democrats [who] continue to fuel the destructive vision of a powerful, racist white oppressor from which they need to protect black voters in order to keep their lock on that vote.” He wrote that “worshipping at the altar of multiculturalism” undermines American culture and ignores the fact “we have shared with the world the cultural value of individualism and liberty, a value rooted in our unique and glorious history of settlers, pioneers and frontiersman [sic].” Although he identified himself as “a practicing Jew,” he lamented the “War on Christmas,” saying “you’d probably find more Christmas decorations at your local mosque.”

    The name he made for himself in fighting the university establishment, through his column and in inviting Horowitz to speak, would later reap benefits. It was Horowitz who, in 2009, would recommend Miller to his old friend, Jeff Sessions.

    Horowitz, Miller’s old mentor, also continues to be a player in this universe. In a recent column for Breitbart, he called Bill Kristol a “renegade Jew.”

    So months before Trump was selected Ioffe and the rest of the jewsmedia knew Miller was “a practicing jew”, whose mentor since college was David Horowitz, who first got Miller “mind-melding” with Sessions, which eventually got him doing much the same with Trump. Yet here we are, months after the selection, and the jewsmedia echo chamber is trying to invert reality by misrepresenting Trump’s ties to anti-“fascist” jewhadis as “neo-Nazi” influence.

    Ioffe’s title is likely a reference to The Believer, a jewsmedia film about a “neo-Nazi” jew, the insinuation being that Miller is a traitor to their tribe.

  15. Trump’s counter-jihad, Zack Beauchamp, 13 Feb 2017.

    The jewsmedia finally notices counter-jihad, neglects to mention that it’s thoroughly jewed. For example:

    In 2005, a Cairo-born woman named Gisèle Littman published a book warning of the dangers of this demographic shift, titled Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis. Littman, who publishes under the name Bat Ye’or (Hebrew for “daughter of the Nile”), dropped out of a master’s program at the University of Geneva in the 1960s. Nevertheless, she spent much of her life publishing “academic” tomes on Islam and Europe, arguing that the history of Islam is an unbroken history of theologically driven conquest.

    In Eurabia, Ye’or posited that Muslim immigration to Europe was not the benign economic migration it seemed. It was, instead, a dark plot — a plan, dating back to 1973, “superimposed on Europe by powerful governmental lobbies.” The goal was to Islamize Europe, to reduce European whites to “dhimmitude” — a term she uses for second-class citizenship granted to non-Muslims in an Islamic society.

    Littman/Ye’or isn’t Egyptian or Swiss. She’s a jewess. The main theme of her oeuvre, and this book, which is essentially the jewhadi bible, is her overriding concern for jews and Israel. The “dark plot” is “anti-semitism”, specifically a conspiracy of “nazis” and “jihadis” against jews.

    What few reviews of these books could be found in mainstream publications were not kind. Yale lecturer Daniel Luban wrote that they “can justly be called the new McCarthyism” in a review of the genre published in the Jewish magazine Tablet.

    The jew at that Tablet link (from 2010) literally describes the jewhadi worldview as “islamophobia”/”the new anti-semitism”.

    Watching the video of Gaffney’s speech at the Western Conservative Summit no longer feels like watching the ramblings of a coot. It feels like peering through a window into the way the Trump White House sees the world.

    Indeed. And what I’m seeing is meta-jewing – with one thoroughly jewed group screeching about another, while they all try to pretend that none of it has anything to do with jews jewing.

  16. Meet the Jews in Donald Trump’s administration, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 26 Jan 2017. The article doesn’t even mention influential donors Steve Wynn or Sheldon Adelson.

    The jewsmedia keeps screeching that Trump has “significant ties to white supremacists and neo-Nazis”, deliberately inverting this totally jewed reality. And though this lie is a glaring example of “fake news”, not even the alt-jewsmedia (Breitbart, Drudge, Fox News) will call it out. Because jews.

  17. The jewsmedia house negro take on Beauchamp… Jamelle Bouie: “I’ll also note that this “counter-jihad” movement is just anti-Semitism with Muslims in the crosshairs instead of Jews.”

    As “left”-posing jews often put it when generalizing and extending their victim narrative: muslims are the “new jews”.

  18. In college, Trump aide Stephen Miller led ‘Terrorism Awareness Project’ warning of ‘Islamofascism’, Andrew Kaczynski, 15 Feb 2017:

    In February 2007, the group attempted to run an ad in campus newspapers nationwide, but newspapers refused to run it. Fox News reported at the time the ad was designed by Robert Spencer, a man who the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation league have labeled “anti-Muslim.” The ad argued that jihad “is about the global rule of radical Islam” and constitutes a war against Christians, Jews, women, and gays, alongside quotations attributed to Osama bin Laden and others.

    I.e. typical jewhadi behavior.

  19. I’ve been compiling a list of significant jews in the alt-media/counter-culture that is often the stepping-stone to WN/the JQ:

    JOOS: Jews On Our Side
    *and a few notable jews

    milo yianoppolous
    Ben Shapiro
    Andrew breitbart-jewish.
    Matt drudge-jewish
    rob dew (infowars)-jew
    aaron dikes (fmr infowars)-kike
    Mark Passio’s producer
    donald trump’s grandkids
    Alex Jones’ kids (Alex Jones Info Wars= AJIW)
    brother nathaniel kapner
    mike cernovich
    stefan molynjew

    Luke rudkowski
    Adam kokesh
    Mike Rivera
    Henry Makow
    seymour hersh
    Irwin&Peter Schiff = Jew

    bernstein bears guy
    dennis prager-jew
    mike savage
    jon rappoport
    John A. Chaffetz, was Jewish,
    TrigglyPuff is a Communist Jew
    george webb (braverman/haiti/dyncorp research)
    mitchell heisman
    Ezra Levant (duh)
    Lauren Southern (((simonsen)))
    Most of ‘Rebel Media’
    steve miller (trump advisor)

    Jon Ronson -The Men Who Stare at Goats
    Can the Goyim have anything?

    Bernie Sanders
    hillary’s dad (rodomski, rosenberg)
    Obama’s ‘Irish’ grandpa
    Jill Stein
    ayn rand (Zinov’yevna Rosenbaum) = Jew
    So are most original objectivists
    Ludwig von Mises = Jew
    William S. Volker = Jew (tall Paul’s Pa)
    Karl Popper = Jew
    Murray Rothbard = Jew
    Alan Greenspan (former goldbug)
    Milton Friedman.
    BS Bernanke, Stanley Fischer, Yellen
    Daniel Radcliffe
    Ken Starr

  20. You’ve compiled a list of dissembling dissimulating gatekeepers, along with a few overt kikes.

  21. Southern is definitely alt light, or at least she was. She recently defended Richard Spencer and left (((Rebel Media))) to go independent.

    She did a video for her 23andme results which say she’s Scandinavian, West European, and Spanish. Since these are regional markers they don’t flat-out state that her Iberian ancestors were actual Spaniards as opposed to Iberian Jews, but there’s no conclusive evidence either way.


    She doesn’t look Jewish to me (not even with her natural hair), and Karl Radl doesn’t think she is jewish either, so that’s good enough for me.

Comments are closed.