This Fictitious Conflict


Left-posing jew Weiss writes, Charlottesville is moment of truth for empowered U.S. Zionists (who name their children after Israeli generals):

For a long time, liberalism and Zionism have gotten along fine in America– just look at the Democratic Party and its love for Israel. But Charlottesville represents a crisis for liberal Zionists. When they condemn white nationalism in the U.S. and celebrate Jewish nationalism in Israel, the contradiction is obvious to all.

Just consider three prominent voices. Wolf Blitzer of CNN, the liberal Zionist group J Street, and blogger and Democratic Party thinker Josh Marshall.

Weiss cites three contemporary jew voices. Below I’ll cite a prominent opposing voice from the past.

The extent of the contradiction is worse than Weiss admits. The jews have an ethnostate, a state explicitly by for and of jews, whereas Whites have none. Not one. Even outside their explicit ethnostate the jews have laws specifically protecting themselves and their ethnostate from criticism. Jews claim that jews are White, that Whites have privilege and thus deserve to be oppressed, and that jews are oppressed by Whites and thus deserve their privilege. When Whites object even indirectly to any aspect of this jewing the jews swarm forth as a tribe and screech louder for even more special funding and protection from their ostensibly liberal host state.

So-called liberals and their liberal democratic states aren’t advertised as elevating one group above others. Quite the contrary. Yet they openly elevate the jews above all others, and especially above Whites. That’s the big contradiction. Zionists do not merely support a state for jews, they oppose any state for Whites. They regard Whites and jews as political opposites. That’s not a contradiction, it’s the parasite having its cake and eating its host too. Liberalism has always served the jews, providing the means by which any and all forms of jewing have been simultaneously advanced and defended.

Weiss continues:

Charlottesville makes this conversation urgent because the hypocrisy of the Democratic leadership hurts resistance to intolerance. You can’t be righteously anti-nationalist in the U.S. and evangelists for Jewish nationalism over there.

This is not just good liberal philosophy. It’s the best policy to fight anti-Semitism. Israel’s status as a human-rights abuser is now its global reputation; and Jews and Jewish organizations who blindly defend it are hurting the reputation of Jews.

It is behind the mask of liberalism that academia, corporations, and the mainstream media have issued a constant stream of increasingly hostile rhetoric psychopathologizing and demonizing Whites. Whites who collaborate are rewarded, even if only temporarily. Whites who resist, even if only rhetorically, are punished. And behind that same liberal mask the same powerful institutions actively denounce and suppress any criticism of jews.

The snarling illiberal reality of this anti-White/pro-jew regime is deliberately concealed behind its smiley weaponized buzzterms. The jews cry “tolerance”, “social justice”, “diversity”, and “equity” as they strike “nazis”, by which they mean Whites, then screech “anti-semitism” when they imagine some ricochet might possibly hit the jews.

Weiss is an apologist for his tribe posing as a critic. He postures as a liberal but frets specifically about the best interests of jews. He minimizes the harm jewing causes Whites. He’s concerned about the potential harm any backlash might cause jews.

Yair Rosenberg provides a more overt example of jew hostility toward Whites. Unlike Weiss, Rosenberg makes no pretense that he’s a liberal and offers no apologies for being obsessed with whatever is best for the jews, in or out of their jew state. Unlike Weiss, Rosenberg’s toxic anti-White opinions are shamelessly amplified by the corporate mainstream jewsmedia.

Rosenberg recently jewsplained Why There’s No Such Thing as White Zionism, directly addressing the anti-White/pro-jew cake-eating Weiss misidentifies. Rosenberg describes the problem as sneaky White nationalists stupidly trying to use liberal-zionist double-talk in the same way jews have. Smirking Rosenberg admits that the argument is senseless, because jews are oppressed and Whites are oppressors, i.e. because jews aren’t White.

Writing nearly a century ago Adolf Hitler discussed this same apparent contradiction and described how he came to understand that jews aren’t Germans, how this fictitious conflict between liberalism and zionism brought about this realization:

It was not until I was fourteen or fifteen years old that I frequently ran up against the word ‘Jew’, partly in connection with political controversies. These references aroused a slight aversion in me, and I could not avoid an uncomfortable feeling which always came over me when I had to listen to religious disputes. But at that time I had no other feelings about the Jewish question.

There were very few Jews in Linz. In the course of centuries the Jews who lived there had become Europeanized in external appearance and were so much like other human beings that I even looked upon them as Germans. The reason why I did not then perceive the absurdity of such an illusion was that the only external mark which I recognized as distinguishing them from us was the practice of their strange religion. As I thought that they were persecuted on account of their Faith my aversion to hearing remarks against them grew almost into a feeling of abhorrence. I did not in the least suspect that there could be such a thing as a systematic anti-Semitism.

Then I came to Vienna.

Once, when passing through the inner City, I suddenly encountered a phenomenon in a long caftan and wearing black side-locks. My first thought was: Is this a Jew? They certainly did not have this appearance in Linz. I watched the man stealthily and cautiously; but the longer I gazed at the strange countenance and examined it feature by feature, the more the question shaped itself in my brain: Is this a German?

As was always my habit with such experiences, I turned to books for help in removing my doubts. For the first time in my life I bought myself some anti-Semitic pamphlets for a few pence. But unfortunately they all began with the assumption that in principle the reader had at least a certain degree of information on the Jewish question or was even familiar with it. Moreover, the tone of most of these pamphlets was such that I became doubtful again, because the statements made were partly superficial and the proofs extraordinarily unscientific. For weeks, and indeed for months, I returned to my old way of thinking. The subject appeared so enormous and the accusations were so far-reaching that I was afraid of dealing with it unjustly and so I became again anxious and uncertain.

Naturally I could no longer doubt that here there was not a question of Germans who happened to be of a different religion but rather that there was question of an entirely different people. For as soon as I began to investigate the matter and observe the Jews, then Vienna appeared to me in a different light. Wherever I now went I saw Jews, and the more I saw of them the more strikingly and clearly they stood out as a different people from the other citizens. Especially the Inner City and the district northwards from the Danube Canal swarmed with a people who, even in outer appearance, bore no similarity to the Germans.

But any indecision which I may still have felt about that point was finally removed by the activities of a certain section of the Jews themselves. A great movement, called Zionism, arose among them. Its aim was to assert the national character of Judaism, and the movement was strongly represented in Vienna.

To outward appearances it seemed as if only one group of Jews championed this movement, while the great majority disapproved of it, or even repudiated it. But an investigation of the situation showed that those outward appearances were purposely misleading. These outward appearances emerged from a mist of theories which had been produced for reasons of expediency, if not for purposes of downright deception. For that part of Jewry which was styled Liberal did not disown the Zionists as if they were not members of their race but rather as brother Jews who publicly professed their faith in an unpractical way, so as to create a danger for Jewry itself.

Thus there was no real rift in their internal solidarity.

This fictitious conflict between the Zionists and the Liberal Jews soon disgusted me; for it was false through and through and in direct contradiction to the moral dignity and immaculate character on which that race had always prided itself.

Yes. Race and morality are key. Liberalism and zionism are simply code for death by jewing. They have mutated somewhat yet remain two faces of the same jew-first moral fraud. Both incite non-jews into fighting “racism” (Whites being White) and “anti-semitism” (anything that interferes with jews jewing). Both are championed by jews for the benefit of jews.

Hitler described accurately not only what was happening in Germany in his time, but also foresaw the jew-dominated future we’re now living:

The Jewish domination in the State seems now so fully assured that not only can he now afford to call himself a Jew once again, but he even acknowledges freely and openly what his ideas are on racial and political questions. A section of the Jews avows itself quite openly as an alien people, but even here there is another falsehood. When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other swindlers.

As a sign of their growing presumption and sense of security, a certain section of them openly and impudently proclaim their Jewish nationality while another section hypocritically pretend that they are German, French or English as the case may be. Their blatant behaviour in their relations with other people shows how clearly they envisage their day of triumph in the near future.

The jew war on Whites is waged stealthily under the fiction that jews are White. It started and will end with the realization that they aren’t.

77 thoughts on “This Fictitious Conflict”

  1. With White Nationalism Emboldened, American Jews Consider Exit Strategies:

    Contemplating worst-case scenarios is something practically encoded in the Jewish DNA, a legacy of 2,000 years of persecution culminating in the slaughter of 6 million Jews in the Holocaust less than a century ago.

    The telling difference between White flight and parasite flight: The jewsmedia treats the former, which is real, as if Whites are to blame, and the latter, which is fake, as if Whites are to blame.

    The telling difference between jew nationalism and White nationalism: There is actually a jew state which literally determines jewness by DNA.

    And the jew-first rationale for all this: M-muh six gorillion!

  2. ““I lie awake at night wondering how to get my kid out of the country.””

    I hope so.

    I will never understand how Whites can be so ignorant of the evil of this tribe after 2,000 years of treachery by them.

  3. The One Thing Jews Should Be Doing To Combat White Supremacy:

    What did you think when you heard the Neo-Nazis in Charlottesville chant, “Jews will not replace us?” Fear, of course. Bewilderment, perhaps, anger. But I bet a lot of Jews felt another emotion, which they’re less likely to articulate in public: Snobbery. “Replace you? Where, behind the counter at Wendy’s? We’re successful, industrious, upper-middle class. You’re the dregs of society. Replace you? Don’t kid yourselves. When it comes to America’s class hierarchy, we replaced you and your kind long ago.”

    Today’s anti-Semitism isn’t like the anti-Semitism of one hundred or even fifty years ago. Overwhelmingly, it comes not from society’s winners, but from its losers. Jews no longer press their noses against the gates of restrictive country clubs, Ivy League universities or white shoe law firms. Jews no longer yearn to be accepted by America’s elite WASP families. We already are. The man who currently occupies the White House watched with satisfaction as his eldest daughter became an Orthodox Jew. The woman he defeated watched happily as her daughter got married under a chuppah.

    The point is that because Jews occupy a different place in contemporary American society than did Jews in other societies facing rising anti-Semitism, we can respond in different ways. Of course, as Jews have for centuries, we must band together for self-protection. But as a successful, well-established, political influential community, we can also confront the dysfunction and despair that leads some of our fellow Americans to scapegoat us.

    Beinart regularly oy veys about the jew war on Whites, though he usually doesn’t mention both sides in the same article.

    The elite, thoroughly jewed, has already been effectively replaced. So now the jews are feeling secure enough to gloat as well as screech. This is the usual historic pattern. The difference is that the jews now seek to kill the White race rather than merely hobble and feed upon us.

  4. This is rather blackpill. If a studious Hitler barely got it, in prewar Vienna what chance has the average American today. The State can either lock up the few Everest summiteers or pay them off, if ignoring them becoes more difficult. A house and pension in Belarus or Sing Sing.

  5. Hitler had uncommon vision. Today, This Fictitious Conflict is in everyone’s face. In the wake of Charlottesville, with the unapologetically zionist jewed elite loudly screeching bloody murder against White nationalism, their duplicity is impossible to ignore. This is why jews like Weiss and Rosenberg are trying to jewsplain it.

  6. A conversation from 2013, wherein two jews jewsplain how their tribe jewed America from the top, and touch on This Fictitious Conflict.

    How the Jews Defeated Hitler, a Q&A:

    Well, this idea really could and should be a book of its own: In America today, the major East Coast ruling class faction is a fusion of Jews and WASPs. I call it the Judeo-Episcopate, and its manners are kind of fascinating. When I first encountered this grouping as an undergraduate at Harvard, there were clearly two sides—there were Jewish private-school kids from New York and L.A., and there were WASPy kids from prep schools in New England. I think it was more common for the Jewish men to date the WASPy girls, but it sometimes went the other way, too. As I’ve seen that class continue to cohere in the professional sphere, I say to myself, “Oh, that was a coherent social group, which turned out to wield some real power.”

    My son graduated from Harvard recently enough, and I quizzed him about this and he sort of looked blank. To him, the Jews and the WASPs are now the same people.

    . . .

    The relationship goes back even further, to the period after the Civil War

    . . .

    Then there was this horrible influx of filthy Eastern European Jews.

    . . .

    During the 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, the Jews, even if they have some money, are very much at the social margins. But then just before the beginning of the Second World War, the Jews and the WASPs re-ally again—against the Nazis.

    They re-ally not just against the Nazis, but internally they form an alliance against the American masses, who want no part of saving either European Jews or England.

    . . .

    One of the things that’s fascinating about my WASPy friends and compatriots is that so many dislike the State of Israel, to varying degrees. It bugs them. What interests me is trying to suss out the underlying or psychological impetus or sense of injury beneath these feelings, which are frankly less common in general among American gentiles than they are among American Jews. When I’ve asked them, “Why does this particular injustice bother you so much – why not Tibet?” the answers are very interesting. They come down to something like, “Why on one hand do you Jewish people come to us and say we have to be democratic and inclusive because otherwise we’re anti-Semites, and then back in the old country, where you go on your family vacations or Birthright trips, you get to strut around with automatic weapons and oppress everybody else, which isn’t fair, and is probably what we would want to do here, in some secret corner of our WASPy brains.”

    That is a very good line, and I think it’s totally true. The animus is some form of displaced anti-Semitism.

    Is that what I’m saying? I actually think that American Jews are in this sense way too quick to label such feelings as anti-Semitism, even when the effects may be anti-Semitic.

    I think you’ve characterized it very well. It’s not 1930s anti-Semitism, but it’s a resentment. It’s a resentment of a particular evil that the Jews have done, which is the Jews have undermined WASP America but refuse to do the same thing in their own country.

    . . .

    So, now the American Jewish community is divided on Israel. Some have decided that they are Jews first and liberals second, and those people are becoming Republicans, and they’re becoming more religious. Others have decided that they’re liberal Democrats first and Jews second. But it’s tough to be both these days.

    You don’t think that Michael Lerner and J Street have provided a third way by which liberal Democratic Jews in America can identify with the State of Israel as it should be—meaning, an instrument through which we Jews will continue our holy mission of tikkun olam, repairing the world?

    No. They are a stepping stone for Jews to leave the Jewish people. They’re a stepping stone into WASP-hood. That’s all they are. The third way is false. Sometimes there are only two ways. You can be a Jew, or you can be an American liberal.

    . . .

    On the one hand, when other people talk about “the Jews” or use phrases like “the Jews,” we immediately use language like, “You disgusting anti-Semite, take it back, there’s no such thing as ‘the Jews.’ ” But then, when we sit in our conclaves, like we are doing right now, we always talk about “the Jews” and how “the Jews” should feel or what “the Jews” should do. In the end there’s an interesting ambivalence about this idea of Jews as a collectivity—there’s obviously a fear that it is something that will be used to persecute us. On the other hand, it’s something that we are proud of.

    What we call nation wrecking, or jew-a-forming, the jews call “repairing the world”.

  7. [Liberal democratic jews in America] are a stepping stone for Jews to leave the Jewish people. They’re a stepping stone into WASP-hood. That’s all they are. The third way is false. Sometimes there are only two ways. You can be a Jew, or you can be an American liberal.

    This is the crux. Even after infiltrating and merging with a host elite it remains alien to the jews, who continue to recognize themselves as a distinct whole. Layers of euphemism and apologia and false division disguise the single-minded pursuit of the parasite’s interests.

  8. Hamish’s fisking of Beinart’s article is striking a chord.

    I had overlooked this point.

    “one of the most common background characteristics is some kind of family disruption”

    Intersectional jewing afoot. First the Frankfurt jews conspire to deconstruct the White family, because it is the root of “anti-semitism”. Now along comes Beinart saying, hole up, this mysterious White “family disruption” is bad for the jews.

  9. Jews have no special obligation to oppose Trump – Opinion – Israel News |

    Since Charlottesville, American Jews have been chastising other American Jews who work for or support Donald Trump by calling on them to crawl out of their hole, admit they were wrong, publicly condemn the president and resign.

    “Any Jew, anywhere, who does not act to oppose President Donald Trump and his administration acts in favor of anti-Semitism; any Jew who does not condemn the President, directly and by name, for his racism, white supremacism, intolerance and Jew hatred, condones all of those things.”

    No Jew is required to abide by any other Jew’s definition of what is Jewish morality. The notion that Jews are required to abide by a higher moral standard than others is essentially an anti-Semitic trope. This includes any Jewish group or individual who applies a specific understanding of Judaism on other Jews. The plea Jews should be making after Charlottesville is with all those people who share their values – not their religion/ethnicity.

    “Stop condemning jews and focus on telling the goyim what to think!”

    The insistence that Jews resign from the Trump administration is of course understandable. When a specific group is targeted – especially a minority, and certainly one that has suffered perennial persecution and genocide – the natural response is for that minority to unite and fight for their rights as a group. But this insistence follows the same essentialist logic: That if you are a Jew, you must necessarily be against Trump and against anti-Semites. This is simply not the case. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the leader of the Jewish state, is the most obvious case in point.

    The jew moral standard: Two jews, three opinions about what’s best for the jews.

  10. Here’s yet another jew trying to jewsplain away the double standard on ethnostates with the usual oppression narrative – the backhanded admission that jews aren’t White and have nothing but antipathy for Whites. Richard Spencer Might Be The Worst Person In America. But He Might Also Be Right About Israel:

    For starters, we Jews have a recent history in which we really could have used a country willing to stand up for us. That’s the historical rationale for establishing a Jewish state and that distinguishes us fundamentally from white nationalists. White nationalists in the U.S. are not facing any kind of discrimination whatsoever, despite their belief that they are.

    . . .

    Many of us see these [jew state] policies as alarming violations of human and civil rights, indeed, of our Jewish values. And the proof is in the pudding: Richard Spencer sees this as inspiration for his white nationalist vision.

    But we don’t have to rely on Richard Spencer to tell us that there are other disturbing places of intersection. There is a disturbing alliance between Zionists and white nationalists in the White House these days, and it doesn’t come from nowhere.

    In other words, this is just more intersectional jewing. The down-low jew is afraid all the in-your-face jewing is not going to be good for the jews.

    Weiss again mischaracterizes, exulting, Jews argue whether Zionism is racism — in the Forward! Weiss, who married a White woman, is invested in hyping This Fictitious Conflict as cover for the jews’ underlying monolithic (ruthless, multi-faceted, full-court) pursuit of their own best interests as jews.

  11. Remember when it was edgy to notice that “anti-racist” is just code for anti-White? Now the jewsmedia is admitting “White supremacist” just means White.

    How ordinary people become ‘white supremacists by default’ – CNN:

    Blame President Trump for his tepid moral response. Call the neo-Nazis and white nationalists thugs. Fill your Facebook and Twitter accounts with moral outrage.

    But the tragedy that took place in Charlottesville this month could not have occurred without the tacit acceptance of millions of ordinary, law-abiding Americans who helped create such a racially explosive climate, some activists, historians and victims of extremism say.

    It’s easy to focus on the angry white men in paramilitary gear who looked like they were mobilizing for a race war in the Virginia college town. But it’s the ordinary people — the voters who elected a reality TV star with a record of making racially insensitive comments, the people who move out of the neighborhood when people of color move in, the family members who ignore a relative’s anti-Semitism — who give these type of men room to operate, they say.

    (((They))) say if you’re not anti-White and pro-jew, you’re the problem.

    That was the twisted formula that made the Holocaust and Rwanda possible and allowed Jim Crow segregation to survive: Nice people looked the other way while those with an appetite for violence did the dirty work, says Mark Naison, a political activist and history professor at Fordham University in New York City.

    ”You have to have millions of people who are willing to be bystanders, who push aside evidence of racism, Islamophobia or sexism. You can’t have one without the other,” Naison says.

    “We are a country with a few million passionate white supremacists — and tens of millions of white supremacists by default,” he says.

    What a cohencidence, Naison is a life-long professional anti-White jew.

  12. Worried About Anti-Semitism? Practice The Tolerance You Preach:

    I woke up last Saturday morning to images of Charlottesville — to accounts of the white supremacist chants “blood and soil” and “Jews will not replace us.” I saw pictures of angry white men with swastikas giving the Nazi salute, their faces twisted in rage. As a white Jewish woman, I have for years approached racial justice work from the position of “ally” or “accomplice.” But on that Saturday, it fully dawned on me that they were targeting me too.

    I am one of the national organizers of the Women’s March. This work is my life. I joined the fight for Black lives after the murder of Eric Garner, and I’ve stayed in this fight because I believe that when the most marginalized people are safe and free, we will all be safe and free — Jews included.

    I also believe that while anti-Semitism is invisibly systemic, in this current moment it is nowhere near as deadly to white Jews as anti-Black racism is to Black people, Islamophobia is to Muslims or the deportation of immigrants is to undocumented people. Because of this, I have always hesitated to push for the inclusion of Jews as a marginalized group in the racial justice movement.

    I cannot keep hesitating. Anti-Semitism is real, it is all around us, and it is central to upholding white supremacy. It is for this very reason that Jews need to be central to — but not centered in — the fight to eradicate white supremacy. White Jews and liberal Jewish institutions need to commit to the movement for racial justice and its current priorities, which are centered around destroying anti-Blackness and fighting Islamophobia, xenophobia, transphobia, misogyny, and fascism. And in return, the left must stop ignoring anti-Semitism, let alone actively perpetuating it.

    The reaction to anti-White jewing inspires the jew to anti-White harder.

  13. Why Trump’s Jewish Backers Love the Alt-Right:

    But I think these explanations miss the deeper reason for the Jewish right’s blasé attitude toward events like “Unite the Right”: that, in a way, they like them.

    The worldview of the Jewish right is that it’s us versus them. The world hates the Jews, always has hated the Jews, and if you don’t understand that, you’re naïve. (David Mamet once wrote an entire book making just that argument.)

    Together with that worldview is a political ideology that is first and foremost about Jewish power, both in the United States and, more importantly, Israel. Since all the goyim are out to get us, we have to be as strong as we possibly can. Violence is all they understand—whether “they” are neo-Nazis or Arabs or whomever—and so the only non-suicidal approach is to get as tough as possible.

    . . .

    On balance, Trump is still good for the Jews, this worldview believes.

    The simpler, saner explanation is that some jews are more anti-White and some are more pro-jew. While some jews focus on jew-a-forming dar-al-goyim, others prefer to provision the jew state. They’re all hyper-sensitive to who is or isn’t a jew, all agree that “what’s best for the jews” is the only legitimate worldview, and all quite consciously obscure these truths behind left versus right theatrics.

  14. “what’s best for the jews” is a major precept of the jews. The immediate corollary that follows “is it bad for the gentiles” and they use that by the barrel.

    “consciously obscure these truths “, in Hebrew, that’s called ‘atum’, it means ‘opaque’, so the gentiles can’t see what’s happening.

  15. ” As a white Jewish woman, I have for years approached racial justice work from the position of “ally” or “accomplice.”

    Sure, because it acts like poison in your enemies cup. The most effective and permanent way to deal with competition is to kill them off. Age old jewish practice.

    Jews know the consequences of race mixing, a weak, degraded,stupid people.
    It’s bad for the gentiles, good for jews.

  16. We Need To Start Befriending Neo Nazis – The Forward:

    She got to know me as a human being, not just a Jewish person, and whatever hatred she had been taught by someone in her family melted away, because she saw that Jewish people aren’t the evil subhumans she was led to believe.

    It’s time to admit that even in the wake of Charlottesville – especially in the wake of Charlottesville – the only way we’re going to get our country back is to change minds. This might mean we need to start befriending nazis.

    “Nazi” means “evil subhuman” to a “jewish person”. And Mandel is specifically talking to jews, about Whites. So the argument is: For our own good we jews must do a better job infiltrating and manipulating these evil subhuman Whites.

    To learn to hate this parasitic tribe all you have to do is watch and listen to them.

  17. Is Violence the Way to Fight Racism? by Peter Singer – Project Syndicate:

    Some antifa activists trace the origin of the movement to groups that fought against fascists in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s. In Germany, in the years before Hitler came to power, the Nazis’ paramilitary Sturmabteilung (Stormtroopers, also known as the “Brownshirts”) beat up, sometimes fatally, Jews and political opponents. In self-defense, the left responded with its own militias: the Communist Party’s Red Front Fighters and the Social Democrats’ Iron Front.

    The result was an escalation of street violence, and a sense, among the wider public, that law and order were breaking down. Many came to believe that a firm hand was required to restore order and stability. A firm hand was exactly the image that Hitler was trying to project, and as the violence worsened, the Nazi vote rose. We all know how that tragedy played out.

    Is it far-fetched to think that history could repeat itself in this way? To antifa activists who see violence as the answer to the far right, it should not be. They are the ones who are drawing the historical parallels. The Times quotes an antifa activist: “If we just stand back, we are allowing them to build a movement whose end goal is genocide.” If that is the danger, we need to find a better way of combating it than the tactic that so plainly failed in Germany.

    A more honest title would be: Is Violence the Way to Wage the Jew-Led War on Whites?

    They already do use violence, but the jewsmedia either suppresses reports or inverts the cause, as in Charlottesville.

    Uninverted, Singer’s argument implies that Whites should use violence to stop our genocide. But Singer’s argument is incomplete. He omits the subsequent jew-led war on Germans and the ghoulish jew-led purimfest which followed. He also omits the lead up, the fact that national socialism was a reaction to centuries of jewing. The jews were unwelcome interlopers in Germany, part of a larger invasive and destructive tribe, whereas the German nationalists were responding in defense of their people and homeland. The anti-fascists in Germany, like the Allied militaries which later genocided Germans, were nothing more than violent proxies for the jews, just different forms of golem.

  18. Notice the new PR slogan being pushed,
    “There’s no place in America for”…..nazis, KKK, White Nationalism, etc.
    “No place for” ??? What happened to FREEDOM?

  19. On the Current Status of the Daily Stormer and the Weird Events Surrounding It | Andrew Anglin:

    Although explaining a joke kills the fun of it, I think at this point, this having become one of the most infamous jokes in history – and a joke which has in fact altered history – I can go ahead and explain it.

    We have a culture of outrage. The direction of our society is determined by who can become the most offended, and make the most noise about how offended they are. I have a belief, which is supported by logic and data which I may present on this personal blog at a later date, that this outrage culture is not only ridiculous, but sociologically unsustainable.

    The Daily Stormer is a Performance Art Project and the Andrew Anglin Who Writes for It is a Character I Have Invented

    I am not a “Neo-Nazi White Supremacist.” In fact, I do not even know what that is. It has not ever been defined by the people who use it, despite repeated requests for a definition. I am also not a “hater,” nor do I know what that term means when it is used to refer to me. It would seem to be self-explanatory – “a person who is driven by the emotion of hate” – and yet I am not driven by hate, but rather by a genuine desire to see Western civilization continue into the future. One could even say that I am driven by love, if one wanted to get sappy about it.

    I’m not sure how or why, but works like any ordinary non-darkweb URL, and has continued to work even while the other ordinary DNS names have come and gone.

  20. Monument Removal Is a Symptom of an Old Western Disease:

    My National Review colleague Kyle Smith reports that Mayor Bill de Blasio has ordered a 90-day review of “all statues and monuments that in any way may suggest hate or division or racism, anti-Semitism — any kind of message that is against the values of New York City.” Translation: de Blasio wants a carefully composed list of stuff to tear down.

    . . .

    But Osama bin Laden and his ilk read too much Noam Chomsky and caught the Western disease of victimization and resentment.

    That is the plague sweeping the land now. And tearing down some statues and renaming some streets isn’t a cure, it’s a symptom.

    Goldberg jewsplains the symptoms of pathogenic jewing.

  21. Nazi lives don’t matter – The Leveller:

    Fascism is not a political opinion, it is a cancer. Like cancer, fascism is not a project that can simply be carried out and completed, it is a toxic reaction that grows and grows until it has killed its host. It has reached such a point in its ascendency that America now has a straightforward and urgent choice: oncology, or genocide.

    . . .

    Since the denialist chorus ‘all lives matter’ had its meaning elucidated when white nationalists chanted it this year at several Nazi rallies nationwide, perhaps the Charlottesville invaders figured they may as well cast off one more layer of “classical liberal” pretense when they chanted ‘white lives matter’. Except, of course, any white people who disagree with their views. So when they say ‘white lives matter’, their genuine meaning is ‘Nazi lives matter’.

    The author appears to be a transracial transsexual jew.

  22. An idea:
    Could you put a button at the top of your front page, saying “Dailystormer” linking to stormers current address?
    It could help both your traffic and Anglin’s. This might catch on with other Pro- White sites and entirely defeat the anti’s scheme to silence Anglin. It would be a sure sign of Whites standing together to oppose our foe.

  23. Someone at should put a link to Stormfront at the top of his page, since the two are long time friends. I suppose none of them foresaw this sort of sabotage.

    This sort of “wreck the goy” strategy is right out of Theodor Fritsches “The Riddle of the Jew’s Success”. In the section on grain manipulation it discusses how Jews wrecked the mills of competing gentiles. Jews did much the same in wrecking the early gentile movie studios in Malibu and arson of the three big parks on Coney Island. I suppose these methods are 3000 years old. Nothing new, just the same devious tricks applied again and again.

  24. Just a thought.

    If Trump isn’t careful, one of his court Jews will stab him in the back, just like Joe McCarthy’s downfall.

  25. Stormfront shut down.

    “They crossed the line of permissible speech”
    Just (((who))) drew that line?

    No First Admendment, if you’re White!

  26. Classical Jewish Double Standard :

    Zionism is Nothing Like White Supremacy.

    “Days after the horrific showcase of American far-right extremism in Charlottesville, America’s leading extremist, white supremacist leader Richard Spencer, appeared on an Israeli television newscast and compared his hate-filled ideology to Jewish nationalism, declaring it “white Zionism.”

    “First Spencer: He seems to be suggesting that in his call for a white state in America, he is articulating an idea that is conceptually similar to the Zionist idea of a Jewish state in the land of Israel. This, of course, is an outrageous comparison and a caricature of what Zionism is. Richard Spencer’s movement is based on hate, racism, negativity and exclusion. Zionism, the national liberation movement of the Jewish people in the Jews historic homeland, is based on providing for equal opportunity for the Jewish people, like others, to have sovereignty in their land while still fully protecting the rights of minorities who live within Israel. At its core, Zionism is a positive movement and is not intended to be “against” anyone.”

    Jonathan A. Greenblatt
    National Director ADL.

  27. Antifa Violence Is Ethical? This Author Explains Why – NBC News:

    Professor Mark Bray, a historian and lecturer at Dartmouth, has tried to fill the gap in his new book, “Antifa: The Anti-Fascist Handbook,” that chronicles its rise. While Bray doesn’t participate in the group’s protests, he nonetheless considers himself an ally.

    . . .

    You wrote in your book: “At the heart of the anti-fascist outlook is a rejection of the classical liberal phrase incorrectly ascribed to Voltaire that says I disapprove of what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” What do you mean by that?

    Anti-fascists are illiberal. They don’t see fascism or white supremacy as a view with which they disagree as a difference of opinion. They view organizing against them as a political struggle where the goal is not to establish a regime of rights that allow neo-Nazis and victims to coexist and exchange discourse, but rather the goal is to end their politics.

    If you establish that so-called fascist speech is illegitimate, then who decides who will be targeted as fascist? Can’t it lead more mainstream politics to end up being targeted?

    When anti-fascist groups successfully defeat the organizing of local neo-Nazis and fascists, what usually happens is their group falls apart and individuals go back to being labor organizers or environmentalists or whatever kind of leftist. The lifecycles of anti-fascist organizing rise and fall with the organizing of the far right.

    Anti-fascists oppose anti-Semitism and Islamophobia and there is a certain political lens that — agree or disagree with the lens — there is an element of continuity in terms of the types of groups targeted. I don’t know of any Democratic party events that have been ‘no platformed’ (shut down) by anti-fascists. So there is a political lens, people will quibble about what the lens is, who designs the lens, but I don’t think the slippery slope is actually, in practice, nearly as much of a concern as people imagine it would be.

    . . .

    The anti-fascist argument is that any amount of white supremacist or neo-Nazi organizing is worthy of emergency consideration — by no means can we allow this to take one step farther.

    Confirming “antifa” is anti-White and pro-jew, like the regime it serves.

  28. The Ugly Side of Antifa – Leighton Woodhouse:

    In one case, as a crowd of non-Black Bloc protesters yelled at the assailants to let their victim go, an Antifa activist yelled, “He’s a Nazi!” over and over again, justifying the assault. Then, abruptly, maybe after realizing that the victim was not, in fact, a white nationalist, he changed his mantra. “He doesn’t have to be a Nazi!” he now shouted. The suggestion was that even if the victim wasn’t a fascist, he still deserved to be beaten. For what was unclear. Maybe because he supported Trump? Or he objected to Antifa’s tactics? Or refused to do something they ordered him to do? Who knew?

    Typical jew behavior.

  29. Why Antifa Nazi-Punching Is Just a Gift to the Right:

    To be very clear, antifa and neo-Nazis do not reside on the same moral plane; white supremacists are demonstrably worse in both word and deed.

    I enjoy seeing Nazis punched as much as the next decent human being, but I still maintain that violence is wrong and is a failure of political thought, not a righteous tool of it. In the aftermath of Inauguration Day’s viral Spencer-punching, it was more than a little disconcerting to see so many people who heretofore were proponents of the rule of law cheering on antifa as the self-deputized arbiters of acceptable political violence. While social media flooded with images of Indiana Jones and Superman and Captain America punching Nazis, I wondered if the terms “Nazi” or “fascist” might come to lose their meaning when deployed by antifa in search of the thrill of a fight.

    “Decades of jew-driven anti-White mass media propaganda might be bad for the jews!!1!”

  30. Birds of a feather: White supremacy and Zionism | Middle East Eye:

    This is not to suggest that fascists, neo-Nazis, and white supremacists “like” Jews. There is no misinterpreting or minimising the hateful anti-Semitism of blood-curdling chants such as “Jews will not replace us.” Indeed, racists tend to dislike anyone and everyone who is not from their community, and white supremacists in particular are not only anti-Semitic, but also, obviously, anti-Black, anti-indigenous, anti-Latina, Islamophobes, homophobic and misogynist.

    The “national history” fascist rallies celebrate is one of the dispossession of the Indigenous people of this continent, alongside the enslavement of African Americans. The immigrants they would have their government deport come mostly from Latin America, as well as the Arab and Muslim world. Yes, racist whites are once again proudly proclaiming their heinous anti-Semitism. But with their embrace of Israel, they are also, indirectly, confirming that anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism are completely different worldviews.

    One, anti-Semitism, is a blanket, indiscriminate hatred of people simply for who they are, by accident of birth. The other, anti-Zionism, is grounded in the political conviction that a system of racial supremacy is wrong, regardless of who is engaging in it. Indeed, anti-Zionists fully understand that, with tens of thousands of churches in the US and around the globe supporting Israel, there are actually more Christian than Jewish Zionists in the world. Many of those Christian Zionists are also white supremacists.

    “Zionism” is a euphemism for jew parasitism, of which the jew state serves as glaring evidence. Weak “anti-zionist” rhetoric, such as above, serves only as a mask for full-blown anti-White jewing.

  31. Even if one hasn’t read Spencer’s lengthy pro-Jewish screeds, the amount of attention their media apparatus is giving to him suggests that he’s serving them, whether or not he consciously intends to. I have yet to see mainstream media figures drive traffic here by saying, “Tanstaafl is seriously pro-goy, better avoid him.” For the ad-click alt-right goys who (1) are actually goys, and who (2) aren’t receiving talking points directly, I wonder if they ever think about why they’re getting so much attention. Probably not–I get the impression they’re like rap stars who actually believe the music industry went crazy over them because they personally composed excellent lyrics.

  32. From Chris’ link:

    Eighty years after the Holocaust, in which about 6 million Jews were killed in the name of purifying the Aryan “race,” the business of direct-to-consumer genetic testing is booming and it’s never been cooler to spit in a sterile plastic tube.

    Typical jew double-talk. 23andme is owned and operated by jews. The business can only exist because race is genetic. The business is booming because race matters. The business can only report % jew because jew is racial. Meanwhile jews like this one screech only because this is all true, because the parasite FEARS EXPOSURE.

  33. ‘ “antifa” is just another euphemism for jews jewing.’

    Yep, just another herd of mules. Like NAACP, C.O.R.E., Urban League etc.
    Without paid handlers, coordinators and field agents the streets would have been empty, save a few hecklers. Few Americans know that MLK’s famous speech at the Reflecting Pool was entirely synthetic. (((Masters))) of the rigged game.

  34. Yes, Spencer’s media attention is suspicious, especially when contrasted with the total blackout on Duke.

  35. Throwing urine and feces at Charlottesville . Which (((group))) has a fixation on urine and feces?

    Paging Dr. Freud, paging Dr. Freud.

  36. If this is a civil war, pick a side: Donald Trump, white nationalism and the future of America:

    Because see, now it is time for us to choose a side if we haven’t already, and to recommit to the fight. And by we, I mean those of us called white in this place. When David Duke and Matt Heimbach say that their movement is “speaking for white people,” they are trying to draft us into their army quite without our consent. When Andrew Anglin says this movement will “take over the country,” as he did this weekend, he is advocating the overthrow of the government. Yours. Mine. Ours. If you are white, and don’t resist this draft with every fiber of your being — if you don’t decide in fact to burn your draft card and insist that you will choose a different way to live in this skin — then you will have confirmed that they are right—that they do speak for you. And you will have revealed yourself as an enemy of all that is good about this land. Please know, history will not remember you well for it.

    Tim Wise is a professional anti-White jew who has literally made a living out of speaking for Whites, against Whites, while pretending to be White. Here he’s saying it’s time for Whites to choose a side in the jew war on Whites. I agree.

  37. Antifa=ISIS. And I don’t mean the upper reaches of the River Thames even where they flow past the Finishing School for Snakes.

    And now a small collection all illustrating the multidimensional War On Civilization:

    The drive to physically eliminate Whites has surpassed the intense and attained the status of ‘bizarre’.
    “I was a neo-Nazi. Then I fell in love with a black woman.”

    That’s a lesbian opining on revised race consciousness.
    A sexually confused woman is also an identity confused woman.
    *Contra Naturam* will do just as well. Why should you be concerned about needing an adult diaper? That might conflict with our *Transgender Agenda*.

    All against the ongoing humdrum backdrop of agitation for extending abortion rights in those few parts of the British Isles that don’t make paramount a so-called woman’s right to choose.

    Mayhem was the offence of self-harming to deprive the sovereign of a member of his armed forces. Why should women have rights to late term abortions of offspring?

    From 1hr 36m of
    Segregation as essential part of the evolutionary process.

    Standard media whore cucking

    Meantime deconstruction of the (White) nation state continues apace through regionalisation, devolution, and the growth of the City State:

    All professions are a conspiracy against the laity, but some against many of their own:
    Cui Bono? Not the White Man.

    Regrouped, the rearguard action inevitably commences

  38. The case against antifa – Vox:

    The argument for antifa activists is that the current crop of right-wing protesters — which are partly but not entirely made up of neo-Nazis, KKK members, and other white supremacists and nationalists — are so extreme that they must be stopped swiftly and even violently. Antifa supporters worry that if these groups’ views aren’t completely robbed of any kind of platform, they could gain legitimacy — and take advantage of democratic ideals like free speech to, ironically, promote their undemocratic messages. Violence is one way to get them off the stage.

    What this view misses is the backlash that may come from political violence: that such violence can reinforce right-wing views about the left. As Michael Kazin, a history professor at Georgetown University and editor of Dissent magazine, told me earlier this year, “[N]on-leftists often see [the left] as a disruptive, lawless force. Violence tends to confirm that view.”

    “It helps the goyim know, shut it down.”

  39. The Great Shuttening: You’re Either with Us, or You’re with the Enemies of America:

    We do not want Jews running our nation, we do not want to be overrun by Third Worlders, and we do not want our race and civilization destroyed – just as no sane person did prior to about the 1950s.

    The people who are now censoring us do want those things.

    They are part of a system that is hellbent on destroying us.

    Charlottesville made it clear for everyone that that is what this current system wants, and will stop at nothing to get.

    We are in a war, and the stakes have never been higher.

    Well put.

  40. No Strangers to the Homeland: Why It’s Wrong to Label Israeli Jews Colonizers | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson:

    There is an important —and increasingly urgent—question surrounding Arab-Israeli dialogue: Who can claim “indigenous” status in the Levantine region?

    Opinion pieces, including two in these pages this summer, have made important contributions to both sides of the debate. Both those who would indict the apartheid regime and those who would caution against hastily assessing Israeli self-defense tactics, which help to thwart Hamas, are deeply relevant. Yet nevertheless, the issue of “indigenous” status remains.

    To many spectators (particularly on the far left), the question is a settled one. In a recent op-ed for Al Jazeera, one commentator referred to the Jews who fled Europe for Israel after the Holocaust as “colonizers and conquerors,” contrasting Arab indigeneity with Jewish foreignness. The same piece charged “Wonder Woman” lead actress Gal Gadot with faking Jewish identity after her parents made aliyah: “Like most Zionists, her parents changed their names from Greenstein to ‘indigenize’ themselves, but that does not change who they are.” To this author, Gadot and her cohort of Israeli Jews are no different from white European imperialists, overseeing the “destruction of the indigenous society.”

    Sociological and genetic research has long shown that a recognizable Jewish nation first emerged in the Levantine region some 4,000 years ago.

    A more detailed history of the Jewish diaspora is too long to provide here, but the point is short: Jews have as much claim to the Levantine region as Arabs. To speak of the Jewish diaspora as though those people have always been splattered across the Earth is to deny their cohesive origin and the violent act through which they were divided. It also ignores the precarious position in which the diaspora finds itself currently, with anti-Semitism rising in Europe and the Middle East and with neo-Nazis marching at the University of Virginia.

    Clash of jew narratives, AKA intersectional jewing.

    That research link confirms that jew is a racial group, colonists everywhere, indigenous nowhere.

  41. “To learn to hate this parasitic tribe all you have to do is watch and listen to them.”


  42. Why America’s far-right is still obsessed with Jews – The Jewish Chronicle:

    They can hardly credit what they perceive as the inferior black race for the march of civil rights. But the dastardly, cunning, globalist yid? That works.

    From the American neo-Nazi perspective, the Jew seeks to subvert the natural order, elevating black over white to create a chaos in which they can wield power. They marched to express their rage at this “replacement”.

    One of the reasons their antisemitism is so persistent is because it works on multiple levels. They deride the Jew, but they also fear and respect the Jew’s ability to get one over on them. Antisemitism’s versatility gives it real explanatory power. For dull minds yearning for a clear and simple explanation of why things haven’t worked out the way they wanted, it’s a seductive vision.

    That’s a jewsplanation, typical jew psychobabble. The jew is a parasite, “anti-semitism” is anti-parasitism.

  43. BBC is now offering news in pidgin! Just another marker in social and cultural degradation. This has happened in many former Crown Colonies, going from a high standard of English to something that isn’t intelligible to anyone but the locals.

    As the older Brits die off and expatriate we’ll see an abrupt slide in British civilization. The country has little in natural resources and a tremendous need for them. Outside of Britains native ppl, are there even sustaining resources?

  44. It cost millions to finance the Antifa terrorism at Charlotteville, where did the funds come from, where is the FBI ?

  45. The ACLU’s free speech stance should be about social justice, not ‘timeless’ principles – LA Times:

    The balances have shifted dramatically since the 1930s. In recent years, nearly half of 1st Amendment victories have gone to corporations and trade groups challenging government regulation. Free speech has served to secure the political influence of wealthy donors. Labor’s strength has plummeted, and the Supreme Court is poised to recognize a 1st Amendment right of public sector employees to refuse to contribute to union expenses. Long-settled principles of American democracy are newly vulnerable, and hate has found fertile terrain.

    “The ACLU should not support free speech for Whites because [insert some jew bullshit].”

  46. “are there even sustaining resources?”

    Sure there are. Just kill all the niggers, grind them up, and sell them as dog food. Lulz

  47. Liberal American Jews are ‘basically anti-Israel,’ ex-Trump aide Gorka says – U.S. News –

    Former White House advisor Sebastian Gorka said on Tuesday that liberal elements of the American Jewish community “have basically become anti-Israel.”

    This Fictitious Conflict. The truth is that left-posing jews are more anti-White, right-posing jews more pro-jew. Both screech that the other is anti-jew because it’s real in their minds.

  48. “The truth is that left-posing jews are more anti-White, right-posing jews more pro-jew. ”

    Tearing from two directions. Guess who is in the middle ?

    Two dogs can kill a lion.

  49. Looking at murder rates.
    Boise, 0.5 pet 100,000
    St. Louis, 60 per 100,000

    Just what could make that much difference ? We’re all the same , right ?

    ( Bethcha , if we factored for race, the ratio would be much larger than 120 )

  50. Thought on crypto currencies:

    Could the wild speculation in crypto get so extreme it leads to an inevitable collapse pulling down world economies with a panic leading to gov legislation to control it ?
    Bitcoin @ $4800, mrkt cap 80 billion (not too bad), but another year at current grow rates means 0.5 trillion . For an asset with no intrinsic value ?

    Do we bugs suffocate when the elephant poops ?

  51. Bitcoin has intrinsic value coming out of its ears and cannot be ‘controlled’ if by controlled you mean anything like the way GBP or USD or gold and silver are so easily manipulated by big Jew and his governments.


  52. “Christianity did not forget the parasite, it put them front and center – granting them moral superiority, granting them authority over history, and creating a big beautiful door through which they could pass if and when it suited them.” TANSTAAFL

    Not to mention granting them exclusive rights on the hyper-lucrative usury biz, through which they amassed concealed fortunes which are now being used to buy our institutions, media, banking, gov etc.

    Also granting them immunity from prosecution, with expulsion the only punishment. The original ‘get out of jail free’ card.

  53. Liberal American Jews’ feelings towards Israel now include conspicuous contempt:

    Not all American Jews detest Trump, of course. Some, especially among the ultra-Orthodox, would willingly vote for him again. But for many American Jews, Trump is the stuff of which their worst nightmares are made. Not only is he dangerous, he is an embarrassment. His behavior, morals and decency are deplorable, but he is the President with which Israel and its elected leaders identify and support. Not Barack Obama, who they denigrated no end, but Donald Trump, who they greeted as the messiah. The fact that Trump is more popular in Israel than in any other country in the world is another, major-league shonda for the goyim as far as American Jews are concerned.

    Toxi is one of the many professional jews constantly hyperventilating about how he imagines the sky is falling on his tribe. “Shonda for the goyim” gives the fictitiousness of the conflict away, highlighting the fact that jews always view non-jews as the real enemy.

  54. Soros and reptilians controlling the world: Yair Netanyahu posts meme rife with anti-Semitic themes – Israel News –

    After Haaretz published a report about his meme, Yair Netanyahu dismissed the claim that he is anti-Semitic and accused the newspaper of being exactly that.

    This is so eminently emblematic of the political discourse today, in the jew state and their various bagel republics – jews and their tools screeching at jews and their tools about what’s best for the jews.

Comments are closed.