Jews Jewing Jewishly

tengrim01-bigSome big academic jew got weinsteined last week. Setting aside the melodrama, articles in the jewsmedia aimed at keeping jews well informed provide some indication of the elaborate degree to which they obsess over their collective interests, in this case fretting about “jewish continuity” and “jewish survival” in the face of some blowback from the toxic feminist and race-mixing agendas they have long and shamelessly promoted amongst Whites.

How Jewish Academia Created A #MeToo Disaster, The Forward:

At the end of World War II, several Jewish communal bodies, most importantly the American Jewish Committee, funded scholars to study Jewish life and used those studies to prescribe communal priorities.

It is no accident that by the early 1970s, a so-called marriage crisis emerged as a core priority of Jewish communal institutions, fueled by population surveys and anecdotal evidence. The achievements of second-wave feminism seemed stacked against the blunt tools that Jewish social scientists used to measure what communal leaders increasingly termed “Jewish survival.”

Marriage, inmarriage, and fertility rates among American Jews all were declining, while women’s aspirations for careers, for public power, and for control over their bodies and sexuality all seemed to be on the rise.

Starting in the 1980s and growing in the 1990s and beyond, a Jewish communal infrastructure empowered a class of social researchers to generate the data from which policy decisions would be made.

The fall of a top sociologist could change the field of counting Jews, Jewish Telegraph Agency:

Over and over, across decades and cities throughout the United States, sociologist Steven M. Cohen painted a picture of American Jews using a consistent set of questions.

How much do Jews love Israel? How many Jewish friends do they have? Do they attend a synagogue? Do they belong to one? Perhaps above all, are they married to Jews and raising Jewish children?

The titles of articles that Cohen has written over the years reflect the demographic concerns — and anxieties — of a generation of Jewish planners: “Lessons Learned From Orthodoxy’s Dramatic Growth.” “Can Intermarriage Lead to an Increase in the Number of Jews in America?” “Conservative Jewry’s Numbers Plummeting, but Core Engagement Steady.”

“We would argue that numerical strength is inherently valuable and essential to the meaningful Jewish life of American Jewry,” he wrote with a colleague, Mijal Bitton, in a 2015 article titled “More Is Better When It Comes to Jewish Numbers.”.” “More engaged Jews mean stronger communities able to mobilize more people and more resources, critical to achieving political influence, social diversity, cultural creativity and religious vitality.

“Not just researchers, but the American Jewish community has been concerned with the size of the population and changes in the population of different communities,” Leonard Saxe, director of the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies at Brandeis University, wrote in an email to JTA.

Some take issue in particular with Cohen’s focus on Jewish continuity — the question of how many Jews will exist, identify as Jews and affiliate with Jewish institutions in future generations. Cohen has long cited statistics to conclude that the ever rising numbers of Jews marrying people of other faiths is “the greatest single threat to Jewish continuity today.”

“What I would love to see change are some of the questions that get asked, and specifically the questions that shape the debates over continuity and the birth rates of Jews,” said Deborah Dash Moore, a professor of American Jewish history at the University of Michigan. “Stop assuming that there are gradations of being Jewish that make one better than the other, that intermarriage is a bad thing or that intermarriage is a good thing.”

As usual, the conflict is fictitious, just jews arguing with jews about what’s best for jews.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

21 thoughts on “Jews Jewing Jewishly”

  1. In the book, The Bell Curve, it is written that the superior intellect of the Jews is confined to the verbal component. What this means of course is that they are very good at verbalizing their ideas. Coming up with good ideas though, at this they are not so good.

  2. Never forget. Two jews, three opinions – about what’s best for the jews.

    Many people fall for this LOOK LOOK THE JEWS OPPOSE EACH OTHER shtick, which they hype specifically whenever their monolithic jewing becomes too plain, as in this case with Cohen. Here’s house goy Dreher doing it for the Jew York Times, The Jewish Crossroads:

    a “liberalism without/conservatism within” combination is common to minority populations, and it’s a particularly reasonable reaction to the experience of Jewish history: An oft-persecuted people’s flourishing can both depend on maintaining a certain conservatism about its own patterns of marrying and begetting and cultural transmission (and, in the case of Israel, the safety of its lonely nation-state), and on encouraging liberalism and cosmopolitanism in the wider, potentially-hostile order in which the diaspora subsists.

    . . .

    As for whether this divergence will ultimately be, as they say, good for the Jews — well, that’s a question this Gentile columnist leaves to the chosen people to debate.

    Like Shufutinsky’s OY VEY, Dreher’s GOY VEY calls to mind the hasbara of the 1920s, as infamously recounted by shitbag Churchill. Herr Hitler, in stark contrast, saw through and called out the game for what it was.

    The point of their (fictitious) conflict narrative is to justify jews jewing the goyim any way jews see fit – zionist/bolshevist, zionist/liberal, old/neo, left/right – because blah blah blah (insert some combination of their oppression and chosen narratives, the two essential axes of the jew mindset).

  3. ” What this means of course is that they are very good at verbalizing their ideas. ” archer

    With the endless word acrobatics they learn in yeshiva and shiur they should have a verbal IQ of 500.

  4. “Many people fall for this LOOK LOOK THE JEWS OPPOSE EACH OTHER shtick” tans.

    “The whole secret lies in confusing the enemy, so that he cannot fathom our real intent.”
    Sun Tzu, The Art of War

  5. I think we are getting closer to the point where anti semitism is going to be punishable by death. Like Tan said the glory days of the USSR.

  6. Jewsmedia accusing Whites of behaving like jews. White Supremacists and the Psychology of Victimhood:

    It may seem puzzling that the racism of these white men—the most powerful group of people in the world—is motivated by a sense that they’ll be wiped away somehow. But according to research on white supremacists, a sense of victimhood is exactly what groups like these use to grow their cause.

    In a 2000 article, the sociologist Mitch Berbrier examined dozens of white supremacist media appearances and publications and discovered a pattern of carefully crafted victim ideology. Victimhood, it seemed, is how the groups assured themselves they weren’t being racist—the excuse being that, hey, they’re suffering too.

    . . .

    White supremacists fear the white “race” will be “eliminated” through intermarriage, immigration, and low birth rates among whites. The solution, to them, is racial segregation: the ultimate safe place in which to breed only among your own people. “Only in isolation, both physical-mental and genetic can Caucasians survive either here or in the world,” wrote one supremacist in a letter, according to Berbrier. “It has gotten to a point of not being a matter of ‘white, Caucasian’ supremacy but rather survival.”

    These claims of subjugation may seem silly coming from whites, a group that still earns more, lives longer, and feels overall happier than African Americans do. But as Berbrier shows, victimhood is a powerful psychological mechanism for recruiting members, galvanizing around a cause, and forming what is essentially a support group—for people who really don’t need support.

    Meanwhile in Britain, mocking jew victimology is a crime. Woman who posted Holocaust denial songs to YouTube convicted:

    The chair of the CAA, Gideon Falter, said: “Alison Chabloz has dedicated herself over the course of years to inciting others to hate Jews, principally by claiming that the Holocaust was a hoax perpetrated by Jews to defraud the world. She is now a convicted criminal. This verdict sends a strong message that in Britain Holocaust denial and antisemitic conspiracy theories will not be tolerated.”

  7. White liberal racism: Why progressives are unable to see their own bigotry:

    In a new book called White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism, Robin DiAngelo examines how a large chunk of white America got to a place where it is constantly feeling besieged and victimized, and why she thinks even white progressives are so unwilling—or unable—to acknowledge their own racism.

    BTW, just in case it wasn’t clear, “White supremacists” includes “White liberals” and “White progressives”.

  8. This is how is to read the Jews media.

    It may seem puzzling that the racism of these JEWS—the most powerful group of people in the world—is motivated by a sense that they’ll be wiped away somehow. But according to research on JEWS, a sense of victimhood is exactly what groups like these use to grow their cause.

    In a 2000 article, the sociologist Mitch Berbrier examined dozens of JEWISH media appearances and publications and discovered a pattern of carefully crafted victim ideology. Victimhood, it seemed, is how the groups assured themselves they weren’t being racist—the excuse being that, hey, they’re suffering too.

    . . .

    JEWS fear the “JEWISH people” will be “eliminated” through intermarriage, immigration, and low birth rates among JEWS. The solution, to them, is racial segregation: the ultimate safe place in which to breed only among your own people. “Only in isolation, both physical-mental and genetic can JEWS survive either here or in the world,” wrote one JEW in a letter, according to Berbrier. “It has gotten to a point of not being a matter of ‘JEW’ supremacy but rather survival.”

    These claims of subjugation may seem silly coming from JEWS, a group that still PARASITES more, lives longer, and feels overall happier than ALL OTHERS do. But as Berbrier shows, victimhood is a powerful psychological mechanism for recruiting members, galvanizing around a cause, and forming what is essentially a support group—for people who really don’t need support.

  9. jews do not fear miscegenation because for one, they’re already Asiatic-Negroid-European mongrels, and secondly breeding with a jew- whether male or female- only produces more jews.

  10. At this point I think miscegenation actually helps Jews in the diaspora. In Israel, I’m pretty sure it is either illegal or so stigmatized that it’s very rare but I would defer to you guys that have been studying the problem longer than me.

  11. The ADL is pushing a program called H.E.A.T, hate, extremism, anti- semitism, terrorism. They are ratcheting up their campaign to conflate speech with violence.
    I also keep seeing more Jews and government types say there is no room in America for white nationalists. I think they are proving Tan right. There isn’t room for Jews and whites in the same space given how Jews define hate. I wasn’t sure Tan was right a year ago but guys like Macdonald are deluding themselves. His books will be some of the first to be banned and he will be in a gulag defending Stephen Miller who helped put him there.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>