Jews Hunting King

anti-white_jews_attack_steve_kingIn the wake of yesterday’s midterm selections one of the top stories in the jewsmedia concerns the seething fear and loathing jews are directing at Steve King.

Steve King, dubbed America’s ‘white supremacist congressman,’ wins re-election – U.S. News –

King has been criticized by members of his own party for comments and support for candidates with white supremacist affiliations – The New York Times has dubbed him the “White Supremacist Congressman” in a recent article.

Last month, King tweeted a photo of multiple breeds of dogs, noting “all the diversity” at his annual pheasant hunt.

King has a long track record of remarks decried as racist, but the comments came under renewed scrutiny after a massacre at a Pittsburgh synagogue in late October.

. . .

During a recent trip to Europe financed by a Holocaust memorial group, King met with officials from an Austrian far-right party with ties to neo-Nazi groups after touring Holocaust sites, according to the Washington Post and other media outlets.

After the Pittsburgh shooting, King told the Washington Post he was not anti-Semitic. He also retweeted a Twitter post quoting the late Pope John Paul II saying that Jews are “dearly beloved brothers.”

White Nationalist Rep. Steve King Reelected In Iowa – The Forward:

In his interview, King also accused billionaire liberal megadonor George Soros, who is Jewish, of being behind the Great Replacement and funding the U.S. midterm elections, the Washington Post reported.

King also endorsed a white nationalist candidate for Toronto mayor who’s running to prevent “white genocide,” according to Esquire, and retweeted a British neo-Nazi.

Following the shooting at a Pittsburgh synagogue late last month, some religious communities in Iowa came together to denounce King and urge donors to dump him. Two Jewish leaders said he is “an enthusiastic crusader for the same types of abhorrent beliefs held by the Pittsburgh shooter.”

Antisemitic candidate wins tight race in U.S. House – American Politics – Jerusalem Post. The text of this article is a subset of the other two. The key word, “antisemitic”, is in the title.

The gist of these jewsmedia articles is to assert a very specific racial grievance. King is being attacked for acting too White. He is being attacked by jews, who are making it clear that they are anti-White because they are jews.

King’s jew problem stretches back several years. As King increasingly saw and described himself as a defender of Western civilization, jews have become increasingly hostile toward him. In March of 2017 yids flipped their lids when King indicated that he understood Western civilization as a racial construct, and more to the point, that he saw a difference between the us responsible for constructing it and the them who can only deconstruct it.

Are Jews Part Of Steve King’s ‘Western Civilization’?“, jews mockingly-aggressively ask. They know how crucial the perception of us and them is. They know the answer to their coy question.

Unfortunately for Whites, King and similar self-described defenders of Western civilization imagine jews and their jew-first state as part of the us they seek to defend. To the extent such people think in racial terms at all they see jews as “white”. They imagine the jew-first state as an outpost of Western civilization, its greatest ally, a bulwark against the muslim them who threaten us.

In fact, when called out directly on this point King defended himself by citing his life-long support for the jew-first state. Steve King shouts down question linking his worldview to Pittsburgh shooter’s | The Times of Israel:

Iowa Republican, who has been accused of supporting white nationalism, defends himself by pointing to his support of Israel

. . .

“Do not associate me with that shooter,” King interrupted, pointing at the questioner. “I knew you were an ambusher when you walked in the room, but there is no basis for that and you get no question and no answer.”

When the questioner, speaking calmly, attempted to speak, King said loudly: “No, you’re done, we don’t play those games in Iowa. You have crossed the line. It is not tolerable to accuse me of being associated with that guy who shot 11 people in Pittsburgh. I am a person who has supported Israel since the beginning. The length of that nation is the length of my life and I’ve been with them all along, and I will not answer your question and I will not listen to another word from you.”

The jews attacking King know all about his life-long support for the jew-first state. They condemn him in spite of this support, and specifically for also supporting a future for White babies. Will the pro-Israel community separate itself from Rep. Steve King? |

“Faith Goldy, an excellent candidate for Toronto mayor, pro Rule of Law, pro Make Canada Safe Again, pro balanced budget, &…BEST of all, Pro Western Civilization and a fighter for our values. @FaithGoldy will not be silenced,” tweeted King, who represents his state’s 3rd congressional district.

Members of the pro-Israel community slammed King’s endorsement.

“I fervently condemn any support for despicable, racist white supremacists,” national president of the Zionist Organization of America Mort Klein told JNS. “Congressman King should retract his support of this bigot immediately.”

Professional jews, openly organizing and speaking as jews, are accusing people like King (and Goldy, Gorka, Trump) of being too White, and for that reason attack them. They despise White Western civilization.

To objective observers it might seem bizarre to see professional jews so explicitly directing such bile and vehemence at Whites for being White in our own countries, for merely wanting some semblance of what jews have in their own jew-first state on the other side of the planet. It can only seem all the more bizarre that the people jews most viciously attack have only ever professed their deference and fealty to jews and their jew-first state.

This seemingly bizarre behavior is easily understood. Just accept the nature and substance of the accusation and reverse it. The jews agree there is an us and a them – they just see jews as us and Whites as them. They realize most people mistake jews for “white”, but know they identify as jews first and foremost. You can see them dancing around this distinction whenever they try to jewsplain how they feel about “White privilege”. And you can see it whenever unapologetic supporters of an alien jew-first state brazenly condemn domestic White nationalism.

39 thoughts on “Jews Hunting King”

  1. Jonathan Tobin, the same “right”-posing anti-White jew who, speaking to the goyim, condemned White nationalism and King as an threat to jews, here speaks to jews like himself, obsessed with the best interests of the jew-first state, comforting them that there is nothing to fear from the jew-led non-White left.

    Don’t expect Democrats to obstruct Trump’s Mideast policies – or punish Netanyahu – U.S. News –

    Yet though the outcome will alter the political landscape in Washington, the notion that Netanyahu’s tilt to the GOP will come back to bite him anytime soon doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. Even under new management, politicians who are resolutely pro-Israel, and by no means unfriendly to the government in Jerusalem, will still lead the House. Nor will the Democrats be in any position to impede Trump’s Middle East policies that please Jerusalem.

    . . .

    But as much as their presence in the House will provide a platform for radical critics of the U.S.-Israel alliance, and might be a harbinger of a shift to the left, the notion that Democrats are about to become the moral equivalent of the Jeremy Corbyn-led British Labour Party is a fantasy.

    . . .

    While the left has gained strength, the leadership of the Democrats, especially in Congress, remains solidly pro-Israel

    . . .

    No matter what happens in the next two years, or who wins in 2020, there is no reason to believe that the U.S.-Israel alliance is in any real danger.

  2. Trump First, Jews Later – Foreign Policy:

    The former American Jewish Congress head Henry Siegman, who was born in Germany in 1930, told Israeli Minister of Education Naftali Bennett in New York days after the attack that he knows about a thing or two about anti-Semitism, adding, “It is not very wise of you coming to tell us that this is not your problem just because he’s helping Israel.”

    Israel has never tried to hide its alliance with the Christian right. Netanyahu welcomed Trump as president despite anti-Semitic tropes in his election campaign and provided a decidedly overdue and muted response to neo-Nazis chanting “Jews will not replace us” in Charlottesville last year. Unlike in France, where Netanyahu has repeatedly called for French Jews to leave for Israel in the wake of terrorist attacks, there was no such call after the Pittsburgh synagogue massacre. The message seems to be that keeping diaspora Jews safe comes second to fawning over Trump.

    Notice that when jews refer to Charlottesville, in their minds the real crime is that White men shouted, “jews will not replace us”.

    Until the Squirrel Hillocaust this sort of inside-jewing op-ed – contrasting the jew-first dar-al-goyim view and jew-first state view on what’s best for jews – only appeared in jewsmedia outlets specifically aimed at jews.

    The jew-first dar-al-goyim jews are screeching ever louder that the kikeservative-in-chief is a “White nationalist/supremacist” not because they actually believe it, but because it reflects who they hate, who they regard as their enemy. These jews have no further use for Whites. Their agenda is to replace Whites, which is why they react with this schizophrenic combination of gloating and raging when Whites notice.

    The jew-first state jews recognize the kikeservative-in-chief is no “White nationalist/supremacist” and see no value in pretending he is. This enrages the jew-first dar-al-goyim jews, but their tribalism compels them to direct that anger outward, and thus it vomits forth as ever more overt displays of anti-White animus.

    Support for Israel also allows white supremacists to make the claim that they are immune from anti-Semitism.

    This was clearly on display last week when Iowa Rep. Steve King—a Republican who has openly endorsed Nazi sympathizers and white supremacists in the United States, Canada, and Europe—lashed out at a constituent who likened his racist rhetoric to that of the Pittsburgh shooter, responding, “It is not tolerable to accuse me of being associated with that guy who shot 11 people in Pittsburgh. I am a person who has supported Israel since the beginning.”

    It never ceases to amaze me how jews, so confident in the power of their jewsmedia, can so directly flip reality, without even trying to be subtle. How they can screech at the smirking rainbow-nationalist kikeservative-in-chief as if he’s an anti-jew/pro-White boogeyman. How they can screech about King’s trip to celebrate their six gorillion hoax, paid for by jews, as if it were an anti-jew/pro-White world tour. How they can screech about King’s servility toward the jew-first state as if it’s proof that he really wants to shoot jews. Screech screech screech, all day, every day. It’s just unreal.

  3. The FP article also quotes Zizek echoing the jew narrative – There’s a dangerous and popular fashion in Europe to be antisemitic and pro-Zionist at the same time – but clips out a bit in the middle:

    In the antisemitic imagination, the “Jew” is the invisible master who secretly pulls the strings, which is why Muslim immigrants are not today’s Jews [– they are all too visible, not invisible. They are clearly not integrated into our societies, and] nobody claims they secretly pull the strings – if one sees in their “invasion of Europe” a secret plot, then Jews have to be behind it.

    This is nonsense. The jew is invisible only in the sense that they are integrated and dissimulate as “white”. Until jews choose to reveal themselves they happily pass as “American” or “Hungarian” or “Russian”. Soros for instance. Though passing as their host to better pull the strings of that host is one characteristic behavior, the other is obsessively organizing to openly pull the strings as jews, screeching constant commands at the ostensible rulers of the host, who have already proven themselves eager servants of the jews, that they must now also say this and do that to better serve “everyone”/”humanity”/”democracy”/”refugees”/… (by which jews mean “the jew”).

    The assertion that nobody claims muslims secretly pull the strings is also false. This is precisely what the jewhadis of the “counter-jihad” claim. The claim is fashionable among the very people Zizek is talking about, the supposedly “anti-semitic” jew-first state supporters who describe themselves as defenders of Western civilization. One of their favorite books is Eurabia: The Euro-Arab Axis (against the jew-first state), written by an anti-White jewess who cares only about jews. Her thesis is that ever since the muh six gorillion war European and Arab “anti-semites” have secretly conspired to flood Europe with non-Whites. Why? Because “anti-semitism”. This is what people like Gorka and Bannon and the gelded jew-first state supporting civic nationalists of Europe and the Americas actually believe. I don’t know but wouldn’t be surprised if it’s also what King and Goldy and Trump believe.

  4. Guess who’s “ascendant” in the kikeservative party for people of discolor.

    N.Y. Delegation Ascendant As Democrats Take The House | Jewish Week:

    The poll found also that 70 percent of Jews disapproved of the way the Trump administration has dealt with the spike in anti-Semitic incidents, which surged 57 percent in 2017, according to the Anti-Defamation League. Some Jews believe Trump’s own language encourages white nationalists and anti-Semites.

    In the week prior to Tuesday’s election, there were a flurry of political ads and messages that were criticized for explicit or implicit anti-Semitism. One radio ad by the Green Party candidate in the Cincinnati area accused “anti-American Communist Jews like George Soros” of fixing elections.

    They’re sending in a trainload of jew-first jews. Why? To combat the other kikeservative party’s “white nationalism” and “anti-semitism” of course.

    In the article linked above Tobin described Engel, for one, as, “more or less a Likudnik on Middle East issues” – i.e. someone jews would condemn as a “white nationalist” and “anti-semite” if he weren’t a jew-first jew.

  5. Adelsons joined Trump at White House to watch midterm election returns | Jewish Telegraphic Agency:

    Other Jewish donors who joined Trump on Tuesday night in the East Room were billionaire investor Steve Schwarzman, co-founder and CEO of the Blackstone Group; investor Michael Milken; and Dan Gilbert, majority owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers, Bloomberg News reported.

    That would be convicted junk bond fraudster Michael Milken.

    Based kikeservative-in-chief taunts the jewsmedia. They keep screeching RUSSIAN INFLUENCE!!1! and WHITE NATIONALISTS IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!1! to distract from the totally jewed reality.

  6. Regarding the Zionist attack on “despicable, racist, White supremacist” Toronto mayoral candidate Faith Goldy, weigh this against Faith’s consistent career of unctuous, solicitous pro-Zionism under Ezra Levant & thereafter, & her endorsement by Jewish Defense League boss Meir Weinstein:

    But then, race-screechers gonna screech racism, & this was intended as an attack on Steve King, justified or not.

  7. An all “white” crowd and Goldy didn’t even mention the 14 words or White genocide. I thought she might switch over to gibbering in yid at any minute. I mean, she did basically, just in English.

    Thanks for that link G.M.

  8. I’m only surprised that King – barely – won re-election. Once a hardLeft demoncrat or a republicuck strays off the shabbatz goy reservation (either re Israhell or the domestic Jew problem) they generally get Jew’d out of Congress right quick: cf. Cynthia McKinney, Paul Findley, etc. At a wild guess, in 2020 Steve K. will find himself facing a well-financed primary opponent with complete media access, while his own access is blocked and money dries up. If he gets by that, more of the same in the November election.

    he also made the same fundamental mistake that every cuck makes: “Oh no, I love Jews, I love Israel”, etc. etc., which simply tells the (((vultures))) they’ve got another easy kill.

  9. These kinds of examples are just great. Even amidst this much of a personal attack, the fool doesn’t even the insight, let alone the basic “defense reaction,” to stop sucking off Israel. Even if someone is so daft not to understand the kindergarten biology of things–Species J survives by attaching itself to Species W and stealing its toys and snacks forever–you’d hope that Whites would at least be able to respond to a situation where “These people are attacking me” by fighting back. But no. When they’re attacked, they keep trying to scream that they support their attacker, support their attacker’s ideology, and that their philosophy is in fact in complete agreement with their attacker. Such a basic function, supposedly, of an organism that survives…hit back…has been entirely subverted.

    I draw a little hope from the fact that, if someone did defend themselves, the Jews simply wouldn’t report on it, That should be a tip to people like that idiot King, that, if the Jews bring up his “white nationalism” he should immediately start issuing statements like, “If you don’t cut it out, I’m gonna stop voting for Israel.” Then we wouldn’t hear about him, and he’d finish out what would be his last term in peace. But no, when attacked, he exhibits behaviors helpful to his attacker, reaffirms their philosophy, et cetera.

    (Hopefully I will wake up tomorrow and find out he’s tried this and Tan’s written an article about it.)

  10. Iowa’s Steve King Takes the Low Road to Re-Election:

    Steve King has said and done a lot of indecent things. In October, he endorsed Faith Goldy, a white nationalist running for mayor of Toronto. Both King and Goldy have publicly embraced the “great replacement” theory, which posits a coordinated global conspiracy to repopulate countries with immigrants. Usually it’s the Jews who are blamed for this—there were chants of “Jews will not replace us” during the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville in 2017. And in August, while on a foundation-funded trip to visit Holocaust sites in Poland, King took a side trip to Austria to have dinner with members of the far-right Freedom party, which has historical ties to the Nazis. He gave an interview to the party’s website where he decried George Soros’s influence on U.S. elections, attacked immigration, and declared that “Western civilization is in decline.”

    . . .

    Little of the global condemnation resonates with King’s constituents, who are far more exercised by local difficulties: some real, some imagined.

    All the anti-White screeching aimed at King is coming from jews, and only jews, explicitly spelling out their jewy motives. Rubenstein’s five most recent articles at Weekly Standard have been attacks on King, the same screeching over and over.

    I got the link to this most recent one from King, who is well aware of Rubenstein’s jewhad against him. Steve King: “The Weekly “NO” Standard(s) has joined HuffPo at the bottom of the lying journalistic gutter. No question that now their purpose is to write willful lies to advance a Leftist agenda. We threw this WS writer out after he disqualified himself.”

    King will never threaten to withdraw his support for the jew-first state. He won’t even call out the explicit anti-White nature of the attacks on him. This is typical of self-described defenders of Western civilization – they ignore jewing even while its kicking them in the teeth.

  11. King will never threaten to withdraw his support for the jew-first state

    Every politician who has done that has come under concentrated fire from the
    Jmob and lost the following election.

  12. Organized kicking of organized licking in Germany.

    German Jews rail against AfD at Kristallnacht commemoration event – Europe –

    In a rare move, the Central Council recently rallied other mainstream Jewish organizations in a statement of opposition to the AfD and to a new group calling itself Jews for the AfD. Though the party purports to address popular concerns about the integration of more than a million refugees and immigrants of Muslim background who have arrived in Germany since 2015, critics insist that the AfD’s ideological connections to neo-Nazi parties make it anathema not only to Jewish voters but to the German democracy as a whole.

    The right-wing party had already received a slap this week when Berlin state legislator and AfD member Andreas Wild tried to join in the reading of names of murdered Jews at the central Holocaust memorial near the city’s Brandenburg Gate on Thursday. It was one of many events marking the 80th anniversary of the “Night of Broken Glass.”

  13. Why did French President Macron say France should ‘render homage’ to Nazi collaborator Petain? – World News –

    Unlike many countries that have acknowledge their guilt and paid reparations to their victims, there is precious little soul-searching among the French about their past; it remains a taboo and a threat to a still infantile national identity.

    . . .

    Macron has, ironically, begun an important process of recognizing France’s complicity in the Holocaust. This comes after decades of its leaders punishing only individual war criminals, but absolving the French nation of blame, of characterizing France solely as a victim of Nazi Germany and reframing the Vichy government as an externally imposed evil. Macron’s recent attempt to honor Pétain, however, demonstrates the fragility of the recognition process he himself initiated.

    While historians must be meticulous in recognizing all the facts of a historical period, national memory is constituted by those in power, by political decisions – of inclusion and exclusion, as the Haitian anthropologist Michel-Rolph Trouillot pointed out.

    Taking national responsibility for past crimes may evoke a feeling of malaise, but it is essential for a healthy transition to adulthood. Macron’s wish to honor Petain is symptomatic of a nation that still refuses to grow up.

    The ironic claims of an ancient relentlessly invasive and destructive parasitic tribe which never takes responsibility for its crimes, always shifts blame to its hosts even as it screeches ever more demands.

  14. It is whites who have civilized the world the last 2000 years, they were intrepid and daring enough to venture where nobody had gone before and braved death and hardship to make the white western world what we have now. If we wish to keep our hard fought countries WHITE we damned well will!!

    Screw the jews and their homicidal belief of ridding the world of all white christian people and countries!!!!!

  15. The Schnorrer’s montage contains a conspiracy theory that the US achieved a manned Moon landing. Who are they signalling?

    Something different:

    (Ian R. Crane / David Noakes: GcMaf prosecution, London Southwark Crown Court comm. 19 November 2018) HUMANITY vs INSANITY #108 – MHRA : UK STATE EXECUTIONER September 7, 2018
    Cancer cure or charlatan?

  16. King enters the debate with an argument he could never win: the fight for @Western Civilization.’

    It is a ludicrous notion that Wes. Civ. is under threat. Only Wes. Civ. is still standing!

    You walk down a street in Lagos or Beijing or Delhi or Port-au-Prince and all you see is Wes. Civ. Our clothes, our tech, our architecture, our political ideas, our maths, physics and chemistry making the whole street scene possible, our music and other entertainment (sometimes diluted for local tastes, but gradually replacing local styles their nationalists would observe correctly).

    Western Civilization needing defending is a dumb idea scripted by Jews for people who sense the more real racial and indeed Jewish problem but who lack the sense or courage to go there. It helps that it’s a dumb idea because someone like King would look absurd in a debate if someone pointed out the obvious points I made above.

    Any ‘idea for ideas sake’ as such that gains social traction is always liable to be Jewish scripted, including especially those within White Nationalist circles where no alternative power structure to Jewry is known to exist, not even the Chinks; and no other ‘idea’ is more appealing to Whites than the live and let live of WN; and nothing is known to divide White Nationalists more than extraneous ideas as such arguments over religion, history or social policy and other ‘ideas’ as such.

  17. CNN fired one of its’ house-niggers. No Whites are involved. The jews vs. Marc Lamont Hill. Have at it. But these shifty bastards will turn it on head and get Hill on their side and make him bow and lick their hand, and then find fault with Whitey.
    Kick and Lick

  18. Trump’s victory dance on the Weekly Standard’s grave is obnoxious, foolish – and dangerous – U.S. News –

    Despite the obvious and tragic policy failures of neo-conservative policy not least in the Mideast, it still declared its fidelity to a moral backbone, the Constitution and what were once more universally accepted as conservative American values.

    That was why the Weekly Standard had such a long-running feud with GOP Rep. Steve King, well-known as America’s white supremacist Congressman, who quickly jumped on the Trump bandwagon slamming the Weekly Standard after its demise. King tweeted, “.@RealDonaldTrump is right on The Weekly Standard’s deserved demise (“pathetic and dishonest”). If the articles targeting me were redacted until only truth remained, there would not be much left to read.”

    Anti-White jews disingenuously cite the authority of a constitution written by “White supremacists” to attack “America’s White supremacist Congressman”. Kristol and the broader jewsmedia’s “long-running feud” against kikeservative King is a microcosm of the jew hostility toward Whites, epitomizing the disgusting kick/lick dynamic so characteristic of jew rule.

  19. Before Trump, Steve King Set the Agenda for the Wall and Anti-Immigrant Politics – The Jew York Times:

    “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” Mr. King said. “Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?”

    After this article was published Thursday, Mr. King issued a public statement calling himself a “nationalist” and defending his support of “western civilization’s values,” and said he was not an advocate for “white nationalism and white supremacy.” “I want to make one thing abundantly clear: I reject those labels and the evil ideology they define,” he wrote.

    . . .

    Elected to Congress in 2002, Mr. King attracted the attention of hate-watch groups like the Anti-Defamation League as he spoke increasingly about preserving “Western culture” or “Western civilization.” The groups consider those buzzwords that signal support to white nationalists, along with an obsession with birthrates and abortion rates among different ethnic groups.

    “He uses the concepts of either ‘culture’ or ‘civilization’ to obfuscate that he’s talking about whiteness and race,” said Lawrence Rosenthal, chairman of the Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies.

    Rep. Steve King: how did being “white supremacist” become “offensive?” – Vox:

    King’s comments are about as clear a commitment to white racial politics as you can get. They weren’t from a private meeting that was recorded, or masked in coded language, but in an on-record interview with the country’s paper of record.

    King, who is perhaps the most aggressive advocate for immigration restrictionism in Congress, has never really bothered to hide the racial animus underlying his politics.

    . . .

    What these comments do is lay some of the stakes of our current political moment bare.

    Yes, they certainly do. The current regime is anti-White exactly because it is so thoroughly jewed.

  20. The Jew York Times left out this key bit:

    I want to make one thing abundantly clear: I reject those labels and the evil ideology they define. Further, I condemn anyone that supports this evil and bigoted ideology which saw in its ultimate expression the systematic murder of 6 million innocent jewish lives.

    Look at that. King knew who turned the word White into a slur after all.

  21. Boomers like King are operating under the original jewish lie of America being a proposition nation where all races are welcome and White Nationalism- or any kind of nationalism apart from Zionism- is the ultimate evil. Younger generations like Millennials and Zoomers operate under the newer jewish lie of Whites being evil and America having a sacred obligation to become non-White.

    Another problem with Boomers is their outdated reverence for the legacy media. They still see newspapers and television as the word of god and are easily-cowed into abandoning all their principles if some jew journalist calls them a Nazi. The Steve Kings of this country should have retired long ago and made way for younger and stronger Whites. Unfortunately they’re too self-centered for that.

  22. Scratch that. The one vote against, hates us more than the others. So it’s official. Our government has unanimously voted White people as evil and bad. This is worse that I thought.

  23. The jewed anti-White regime makes it’s position overt and official. Again.

    H.Res.41 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Rejecting White nationalism and White supremacy. | | Library of Congress:

    Rejecting White nationalism and White supremacy.

    Whereas, on January 10, 2019, Representative Steve King was quoted as asking, “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization—how did that language become offensive?”;

    Whereas a 2006 Federal Bureau of Intelligence (FBI) assessment defined a White supremacist as follows: “White supremacists believe that the white race is superior to all other races and was created to rule them. They view non-whites as subhuman and usually refer to them in derogatory terms”;

    Whereas the same 2006 FBI intelligence assessment defined a White nationalist as follows: “To be a white nationalist is to be pro-white. The domestic white nationalist movement seeks to promote, honor, and defend the white race. They believe the white race is under attack from Jewish interests that dominate the government (referred to as the Zionist Occupied Government, or ZOG), the media, banking, and entertainment industries and act to the detriment of the white race. White nationalists view multiculturalism, diversity, and illegal immigration as direct assaults on the white race and race-mixing as akin to white genocide. They hope to appeal to mainstream whites, believing that the majority of white people do not understand the imminent or long-term threat to their race. Many contend that a race war, often referred to as RAHOWA, or Racial Holy War, is a certainty”;

    Whereas White supremacy and White nationalism are contrary to the ideals of the United States of America, which was established according to the principle stated in the Declaration of Independence that all men are created equal, a principle that was updated in 1848 in Seneca Falls, New York, to include all people;

    Whereas while our country has often fallen short of these ideals, patriotic Americans have sought to form a more perfect Union by rejecting White nationalism and White supremacy, embracing inclusive patriotism, and welcoming immigrants from across the globe who have continuously enriched our Nation;

    Steve King Says Yes to Resolution Rebuking His Own Comments: ‘Let’s Vote for This’:

    King concluded by saying of the resolution, “I agree with the language in it. So I want to ask my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, let’s vote for this resolution. I’m putting up a yes on the board here because what you state here is right and it’s true and it’s just.”

    Despite the congressman’s concerted effort to separate himself from the resolution, and to blame the New York Times, which is not mentioned in either a “whereas” or a “resolved”, the issue came before the House on Tuesday as a specific rebuke of King and his comments. It comes in the same week that his own party has stripped him of all committee assignments, and where he’s been roundly criticized by his colleagues. It was a condemnation of his own commentary, and he voted yes on that condemnation.

    . . .

    UPDATE: The resolution passed 424-1, with only Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL) against, on the grounds that it failed to censure King.

    King joins in condemning Whites, and himself, to serve jews.

  24. Trump signs into law genocide prevention act named for Elie Wiesel | The Times of Israel:

    The Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act aims to improve the US response to emerging or potential genocides and passed final votes last month in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

    The act ensures that the official policy of the United States deems the prevention of genocide and other crimes a matter of national security interest.

    As with “racism”, the non-White/anti-White bias is baked into the word genocide. Whites and jews are political and moral opposites – thus the anti-King legislation specifically condemns Whites for accusing jews of perpetrating genocide, and this legislation specifically cites jews as victims of genocide.

    “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”

  25. Steve King: “Having only one ticket, I invited one of two guests for the State of the Union tonight, #sotu Lynnette Hardaway & Rochelle Richardson, otherwise know as Diamond & Silk. Diamond won the coin toss. Both will be my guest speakers at COS in the morning.…”

    Checkmate jews.

  26. Steve King: “The attached document disproves a NYTimes Negative MisQuote beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Allegation: In a quote attributed to him by the New York Times, King is alleged to have wondered when the phrases “White nationalist, white supremacist, Western Civilization” became offensive, suggesting to some that he does not view the first two terms as disparaging.

    King’s response: King has consistently disputed this interpretation, maintaining that he was simply trying to ask when the phrase “Western Civilization” had gained a pejorative connotation, an assertion that is supported by the remaining section of the Times’ quote.

    King wants to make one thing clear: He is not in any way opposed to the anti-White regime which is explicitly censuring him for being too White.

Comments are closed.