Organized Jewry Screeches About Jew Privilege


Pictured is a screenshot of this twit from Jonathan Greenblatt, which in turn links an ADL blog post, New Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos: Promises Made, Promises to be Kept.

A search for the language in this twit brought up a more detailed account from a Jerusalem Post op-ed, US Jewish students now protected from anti-Semitic abuse, 17 November 2010:

After a six-year Zionist Organization of America campaign, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights announced an important policy benefiting Jewish students in elementary, secondary and post-secondary schools. In a letter issued on October 26, OCR declared that it will enforce Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect Jewish students from harassment, intimidation and discrimination at federally funded schools.

This is a breakthrough. Until this announcement, OCR wouldn’t enforce Title VI to protect Jewish students, leaving them without the same civil rights protections that have been afforded to other ethnic and racial groups since Title VI’s enactment in 1964.

It was OCR’s policy denying Jews the protection of Title VI that largely accounted for the agency’s decision to dismiss the complaint the ZOA filed in 2004 on behalf of Jewish students at the University of California at Irvine. UCI students had been subjected to years of anti-Semitic harassment and intimidation, described in detail in the ZOA’s 11-page complaint to OCR.

One of the authors of that op-ed was quoted saying something similar several years earlier. SPME: New Legal Tools Fight Anti-Semitism, CLJ’s Susan Tuchman Says, The Jewish Chronicle of Pittsburgh, 5 July 2007:

“Campus anti-Semitism is a serious problem,” [director of the Zionist Organization of America's Center for Law and Justice (CLJ), Susan] Tuchman said, “but the good news is there is a legal tool to address it.”

That legal tool is Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Thanks in part to the efforts of Tuchman, anti-Semitism can now be challenged under Title VI.

The good news, Tuchman said, is that the inclusion of Jews as a protected class under Title VI was recently endorsed by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, a bi-partisan agency that investigates and studies discrimination, reporting its findings to Congress and the president. In 2006, the Commission recognized that anti-Semitism encompasses more than name calling and threats, and that sometimes it is expressed as “anti-Israelism” or anti-Zionism.

The Commission accordingly recommended that colleges and universities come out and condemn anti-Semitism, Tuchman explained. The Commission rejected the argument that universities could remain silent because of the perpetrators’ right to free speech; instead, the Commission said, the schools had a moral obligation to take a stand against anti-Semitic speech.

The Commission’s findings have sent “a powerful message to colleges and universities,” Tuchman said.

The OCR had already publicly conceded to jew demands for special treatment in 2004 – Title VI and Title IX Religious Discrimination in Schools and Colleges, 13 September 2004:

OCR has recently addressed two kinds of race and sex discrimination allegations commingled with allegations of religious discrimination. First, since the attacks of September 11, 2001, OCR has received complaints of race or national origin harassment commingled with aspects of religious discrimination against Arab Muslim, Sikh, and Jewish students. Second, OCR has recently encountered allegations of racial and sex discrimination commingled with allegations of religious discrimination against Christian students. OCR does not tolerate either of these forms of harassment, which are prohibited by Title VI and Title IX.

As we pass the third anniversary of September 11, 2001, we must remain particularly attentive to the claims of students who may be targeted for harassment based on their membership in groups that exhibit both ethnic and religious characteristics, such as Arab Muslims, Jewish Americans and Sikhs. President George W. Bush and Secretary Rod Paige have both condemned such acts of bigotry. As President Bush has said, “those who feel like they can intimidate our fellow citizens to take out their anger don’t represent the best of America, they represent the worst of humankind, and they should be ashamed of their behavior.”

So the six-year campaign mentioned in the 2010 article appears to have actually been about cementing and/or broadening a special privileged status for jews. And now seven years beyond that organized jewry is still screeching as if at any moment jews might be treated as if they are White.

I touched on this particular point in Jews Versus Whites – Part 2. Behind the Orwellian language of civil rights – the disingenuous universalist moralizing against the evils of discrimination, disparate treatment, and disparate impact – lies a fundamental distinction between protected classes and everyone else.

So what the jews have been screeching about all this time, as if they are victims, is that the government, under the false pretext that “jew” is a religion, discriminates in favor of jews and assigns them special legal privilege as a protected class.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

A Tale of Two Steves: Decoding the Ongoing Bannonocaust


Last summer the jewsmedia mocked Trump’s economic advisory council with a variation on the usual “Too White” screech – “All of them are white, half of them are named some version of Steve”. Trump’s list, including most of the Steves, was actually chock full of jews, which is all the more remarkable in a country where there are far fewer jews than Whites.

Such incidents are among the most blatant examples of both the how and the why of the jewsmedia’s semitical correctness. By persistently exaggerating and so explicitly condemning the White this or White that of anything relating to Trump they effectively whitewash the gaggle of jews jewing jewishly all around him. And it is precisely this type of jew-serving anti-White “political correctness” that Trump never challenges.

During the past week another rash of this meta-jewing has broken out, the jewsmedia’s anti-White screeching once again rising to crescendo over a couple of Steves.

The Steve the jewsmedia is most fixated on demonizing is Steve Bannon. We’ve already reviewed the jewy nature of the hatred directed at him. Here we’ll dig more into his thinking. You can start with this article, which elaborates on Bannon’s background as “an ex-(((Goldman Sachs))) trader dabbling in (((the movie business)))”.

The other Steve the jewsmedia is screeching about is Stephen Miller, mainly concerning his work with Bannon on Trump’s inauguration speech and the travel ban. Miller is a jew, though the jewsmedia rarely mentions it and never faults him for it. While most of the jewsmedia focuses on demonizing Bannon, Rosie Gray literally portrayed her tribemate as a “scapegoat”.

In these first few weeks of the Trump administration there have been many short articles with titles like this one from Slate: Trump Gives Steve Bannon, Champion of White Nationalism, Key National Security Seat. The articles themselves describe almost nothing about Trump or Bannon’s ideology, much less what Whites have to do with it. In such cases “White” merely serves as a shibboleth.

There have been some jewsmedia articles that actually do try to explore Bannon’s thinking. For example, Steve Bannon’s own words show sharp break on security issues, from USA Today, 31 January 2017:

In dozens of hours of audio recordings reviewed by USA TODAY of his Breitbart News Daily radio show in 2015 and 2016, Bannon told his listeners that the United States and the Western world are engaged in a “global existential war,” and he entertained claims that a “fifth column” of Islamist sympathizers had infiltrated the U.S. government and news media. Those recordings, preserved online, offer an often unfiltered window into the thinking of Trump’s interview-averse senior adviser.

In January 2016, Bannon discussed various threats facing Europe in the late 1930s and evaluated Islam alongside fascism and Nazism.

“This is when Europe’s looking down the barrel of fascism — the rise of Mussolini in Italy, Stalin and the Russians and the communist Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union. And obviously Hitler and the Nazis,” he said. “I mean you’re looking at fascism, you’re looking at communism. And to say that — what so blows me away is the timing of it. You could look in 1938 and say, ‘Look, it’s pretty dark here in Europe right now, but there’s something actually much darker. And that is Islam.’ ”

Concern about brewing conflict, he said, was a fundamental concept behind Bannon’s media enterprise. “Our big belief, one of our central organizing principles at the site, is that we’re at war,” he said.

It’s war. It’s war. Every day, we put up: America’s at war, America’s at war. We’re at war,” he said in December 2015. “Note to self, beloved commander in chief: We’re at war.”

Bannon is concerned about a muslim war on a neoconservative figment called “the Judeo-Christian West”. This is the particular concern of a neoconnish fringe known as counter-jihad. And we might as well just call the true believers jewhadis. They speak of defending (((the West))), but when pressed they always put the interests of jews and the jew-state first. Many of its proponents are in fact jews, part-jews, or crypto-jews. The rest are useful idiots or outright cucks.

The typical jewhadist regards White nationalism as antithetical to their own position. As I’ve previously described it:

Counter-jihadists can be understood as quasi- or even pseudo-nationalist dissimulators. Their opposition to muslims and islamization is ultimately predicated upon support for jews and judaization. Full-throated advocacy for jewish nationalism is de rigueur. White nationalism is regarded with skepticism. White racial identity is regarded with contempt.

Counter-jihadists/jewhadis characteristically equate islamism with fascism. Despite obvious differences they regard them as in essence the same – a mortal threat to (((the West))) they love, as deracinated and degenerate and thoroughly jewed as it is.

A few jewsmedia articles go beyond Bannon’s jewhadist thinking and name some of the more prominent jewhadis he has associated with. Steve Bannon in 2010: ‘Islam is not a religion of peace. Islam is a religion of submission’, CNN, 31 January 2017:

President Trump’s chief strategist, former Breitbart executive Steve Bannon, once dismissed the notion that Islam is a religion of peace, describing it in a 2010 radio interview as “a religion of submission.”

Bannon made the comments on “Western Word Radio with Avi Davis,” an online right-wing radio station.

In the segment, Bannon, who at the time served on the board of Breitbart, criticized former President George W. Bush for what he and fellow guest conservative columnist Diana West described as injecting political correctness into the federal government.

Avi Davis was a jewhadi jew, Diana West still is.

Here’s another article naming more names. The Dark History of the White House Aides Who Crafted Trump’s “Muslim Ban”, Mother Jones, 30 January:

The Trump administration has insisted since Sunday that the president’s executive order banning travel to the United States from seven predominately Islamic countries “is not a Muslim ban.” But as Mother Jones first reported in a series of investigations starting last summer, the two top Trump advisers who reportedly crafted the immigration crackdown—Stephen Bannon and Stephen Miller—have a long history of promoting Islamophobia, courting anti-Muslim extremists, and boosting white nationalists.

Ambiguous jew Roger Stone and obnoxious jewhadi jewess Pamela Geller are specifically named. There’s also some more detail on Stephen Miller’s jewhadist views:

Miller has long been an advocate of framing the fight against terrorism in religious terms. In 2007, while an undergraduate at Duke University, he started the Terrorism Awareness Project, an effort to make “students aware of the Islamic jihad and the terrorist threat, and to mobilize support for the defense of America and the civilization of the West.” The group promoted “Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week” on college campuses and took out ads in college newspapers titled, “What Americans Need to Know About Jihad.”

What’s missing from this article is any evidence that Trump or Bannon are “boosting white nationalists”. By its own account Miller has done the opposite.

The most sober and informative article about of the jewhadist worldview pervading Trump’s inner circle was published by The Jew York Times. Trump Pushes Dark View of Islam to Center of U.S. Policy-Making:

Mr. Trump was echoing a strain of anti-Islamic theorizing familiar to anyone who has been immersed in security and counterterrorism debates over the last 20 years. He has embraced a deeply suspicious view of Islam that several of his aides have promoted, notably retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn, now his national security adviser, and Stephen K. Bannon, the president’s top strategist.

This worldview borrows from the “clash of civilizations” thesis of the political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, and combines straightforward warnings about extremist violence with broad-brush critiques of Islam. It sometimes conflates terrorist groups like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State with largely nonviolent groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and its offshoots and, at times, with the 1.7 billion Muslims around the world. In its more extreme forms, this view promotes conspiracies about government infiltration and the danger that Shariah, the legal code of Islam, may take over in the United States.

Those espousing such views present Islam as an inherently hostile ideology whose adherents are enemies of Christianity and Judaism and seek to conquer nonbelievers either by violence or through a sort of stealthy brainwashing.

As I’ve already alluded, the “clash of civilizations” thesis is a neoconservative theme. It was promoted by the jew Bernard Lewis as well as Huntington. It is at odds with the jew golden age narrative, which jewhadis mostly ignore. It’s also difficult to square with the jew holocaust narrative, which jewhadis actually espouse (and seek to silence nonbelievers) just as fervently as the jewsmedia. These contradictions are a feature, not a bug. The general idea: clash you goyim. The common theme: jews lie, goyim die.

Among the most outspoken of those warning about Islam are Pamela Geller, of Stop Islamization of America, Robert Spencer, of Jihad Watch, and Frank Gaffney Jr., of the Center for Security Policy.

In an interview, [Gaffney] explained his view of Islam, which focuses less on the violent jihad of Al Qaeda and the Islamic State than on the quieter one he sees everywhere. By his account, potential enemies are hidden in plain sight — praying in mosques, recruiting at Muslim student associations and organizing through mainstream Muslim rights groups — and are engaged in “this stealthy, subversive kind of jihad.”

“They essentially, like termites, hollow out the structure of the civil society and other institutions,” Mr. Gaffney said, “for the purpose of creating conditions under which the jihad will succeed.”

Like Geller, Spencer and Gaffney are full-time professional jewhadis, all as hostile to White nationalism as they are to islamism.

Nearly any critique aimed at muslims and jihadis can be turned into a “conspiracy theory” which fits jews and jewhadis even better. Gaffney’s termite analogy is a good example. It is for this reason so many jews regard muslims as proxies for jews. They see a defense of muslims as serving the interests of jews. Thus they try to psychopathologize and make “islamophobia” taboo in much the same way they have already done with “racism” and “anti-semitism”. Jewhadi jews differ mainly in that they reject these semitically correct taboos around criticizing islam and muslims because that’s what they think is best for (((the West))).

As the Times article hints, this entirely jewy divide on islam and muslims isn’t entirely new. It confounded generals during the Bush and Obama “war on terror”. It will only cause more confusion during Trump’s “war on radical islamic terror”. All the while jewhadis like Andrew Bostom will only complain about symptoms, never the cause.

Prior to Trump’s selection the jewsmedia was content to ignore jewhadis. Now that Trump has thrust the jewhadist worldview into the limelight, and they’re compelled to explain it, it’s no surprise they’re trying to blame it on Whites. After all, that’s what jews usually do when their jewing get exposed.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

Somewhere Behind the Rainbow


Oh, somewhere over the rainbow way up high
And the dream that you dare to, why oh, why can’t I?

Some jews have been screeching about Trump’s rainbow nationalism because it includes Whites.

Now some jews are screeching about Trump’s rainbow lolocaustianity because it isn’t exclusively about jews.

And some jews, like Chemi Shalev, screech both forms of toxic jewing at the same time.

Shalev on Twitter, “David Duke-Pat Buchanan-Bannon’s alt-right-America First-Jewless Holocaust. Hey, GOP Jews, u don’t see a pattern?” links himself at Haaretz, “Adding insult to injury, Trump flirts with classic Holocaust denial”:

In her book “Denying the Holocaust, the Growing Assault on Truth and Memory” – the one that sparked her famous trial with Holocaust denier David Irving, now featured in the Hollywood film Denial – historian Deborah Lipstadt cites a “Yes, but” attitude of some historians towards the Holocaust. “It is a response that falls into the gray area between outright denial and relativism.” she writes. “It is the equivalent of David Duke without robes.”

The Trump administration’s lame excuse for not mentioning Jews on Holocaust Remembrance Day on Friday falls into the category of “Yes, but” excuses, but only if one wants to be generous. By less forgiving accounts, the White House is engaged in full-throttle denial of the Holocaust, which includes denying the centrality of Jews. Yes, six million Jews died, but so did many others, according to spokesperson Hope Hicks. “We took into account all of those who suffered,” she told CNN. “We are an incredibly inclusive group.”

What all this screeching means is that Trump’s kikeservativism isn’t good enough for the jews. This screechfest is much like the tantrums jews pitched over Palin invoking “blood libel” and Perkins invoking “kristallnacht” – a horde of self-righteous kikes get out their bullhorns to jewsplain how the stupid goyim should just shut up and stop fumbling with buzzterms jews specifically weaponized for use by jews to benefit jews.

The solution, according to Podhoretz, is to just let his tribe, “the most beleaguered people in history”, dictate what can and can’t be said at the highest levels of government.

The irony of these jews now condemning Trump for being too inclusive, i.e. not jewy enough, is that they also condemn him for being too exclusive, i.e. too jewy. It is only because Trump worships the jews that he even imagines he can wall off his jew-first rainbow America and treat Mexicans/muslims/aliens approximately like the jew-first jew-state treats non-jews.

The jews think different.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

The First and Foremost Detrimental Alien Cries Out in Pain


On Friday Trump ordered a suspension of entry by aliens from certain countries for 90 days, entry by alien “refugees” for 120 days, and entry specifically from Syria indefinitely – proclaiming that such alien entry “would be detrimental to the interests of the United States”.

Even before this executive order was announced jews were screeching that Trump and other kikeservatives had neglected to sufficiently emphasize the jew-first moral of their WWII narrative. The screeching intensified with jews big and small slithering forth to jewsplain how Trump’s order threatened their sensibilities and interests as jews.

Beside the condemnations issued by organized jewry, social media was also full of individual jews directly invoking their muh six million narrative in support of their muh refugees agenda. The general thrust of the argument: It is irrational and immoral for you goyim to defend yourself from detrimental aliens, because that might be bad for the jews.

As one particularly noxious little jew, Lucas Neff, put it: “When you say ONLY Muslim countries, it is the exact same as saying it’s ONLY the Jews. Do you not get it??? Do you honestly not get it??” And: “I keep seeing ppl breathe a sigh of relief and say: “It’s ONLY Muslims countries. Not us.” AS A JEW, AS A HUMAN, I WANT TO SCREAM.” A few days earlier the scream was: “My wife is a permanent resident w a green card. Fuck u for voting 4 him. I do not forgive u. I will never forgive u.”

The jewsmedia social media echo chamber sent six gorillion twits along similar lines. Here’s a sampling.

Julia Ioffe: “I have to say: My family came here as refugees. You’ll never meet prouder Americans, or know how much this breaks my heart.”

David Rothkopf: “My father, his family came here as refugees too. If yours did, say so…let others understand how core that is to our country’s greatness.”

David Rothkopf: “Someone needs to take Trump to the Statue of Liberty and let him read the words at its base. They’re what make America great.”

(In the process of deconstructing America jews like to pretend their toxic tribemate Emma Lazarus was a Founding Father and her bit of doggerel praising “wretched refuse” should be treated like the Zeroth Amendment.)

Sen. Cory Booker: “On Holocaust Remembrance Day: never forget that the U.S. denied Anne Frank & her family entry into America as refugees. #RefugeesWelcome”

David Rothkopf: “Tweet of the day.”

At times there was even some lame pushback from alt-jews.

Seth Barron: “Trump reduced the number of Muslims who can come to the US in the next 90 days from 1.5 to 1.3 billion. #Holocaust #EmmaLazarusWept”

Will Saletan: “So no worries if we were to ban, say, just the Jews from countries that are populated by some violent Jewish extremists, right?”

Steve Sailer: “What hysteria over “Islamophobia” is mostly about is Jewish paranoia over completely hypothetical anti-Semitic persecution.”

Will Saletan: “Yes. So hypothetical.”

Steve Sailer: “Perfect illustration of my point: America can’t have a pro-American immigration policy because Auschwitz.”

In fact the jew agenda to destroy White America was already in motion well before WWII. America can’t have a pro-American immigration policy for the same reason American political discourse consists of so much screeching about “nazis” and “the holocaust”.

Because jews.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

Discussing Jewing and Alt-Jewing with John Friend


John and I spoke earlier this evening, mainly about the TRS debacle and the issues specifically around jew-mixing. In the course of the discussion we touched on LARPing vs fraud, poz/degeneracy reflecting the jew agenda, gaslighting as a metaphor for the relationship between Whites and jews, the insanity of the “good jew” argument, NRx, “left” vs “right” political theatre, and Trump.

More context:

Jews Denounce Trump’s ‘Dangerous Lie’ About Immigrant Voter Fraud,

Greg Johnson, “Why I Support Mike Enoch”.

Doxing Only Works Once, Greg Johnson speaking with Henrik Palmgren.

This is How We Jew It (webm), TixGirl = Peinovich’s turbokike wife.

Undeniable evidence that Michael Enoch is Jewish – “amongst other jews” – not sure what TDS episode this was, but it was some time prior to March 2016.

The following three snippets were taken from Rebel Shoah: Fashy Struggle Session, which has since been memory-holed.

Enoch admits he’s a jew part 1 by Cora 1488.

Enoch admits he’s a jew part2 by Cora 1488.

Enoch – “AltRight is not WN” by Cora 1488.

The Brown v. Board of Education Scam, by Paul Craig Roberts.

The Grave Dangers and Deep Sadness of ‘America First’, by Max Boot.

Full Event: President Donald Trump Full Speech at Department of Homeland Security (1/25/2017).

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

The Jew Wife Problem


I spent hours yesterday reading about the doxxing of the main TRS hosts – the dox themselves, and comments from others about it. I’ve enjoyed listening to their shoot-the-shit Daily Shoah podcast, the future of which is now uncertain, as well as the political analysis on Fash the Nation, which has been shut down by its own hosts, presumably to deter their own doxxing.

Whether any of what they discussed was to your liking, I think it’s fair to say that Whites talking to Whites about things that concern Whites is good for Whites. TRS not only did that, they inspired and facilitated many others to do so as well.

From what I can see, the initial doxxing – first Ghoul, then Bulbasaur, then Seventh Son – didn’t reveal anything especially interesting. They are the ordinary White Americans they presented themselves as. Their doxxing was personally punitive, the main result being that anyone who wants to give them grief IRL will have an easier time doing so now.

It’s not difficult to understand why so many of the few Whites who feel compelled to speak out choose to use a pseudonym. Those whose personal concerns prevail over racial concerns simply keep their mouths shut, and are far more numerous. Like White flight, this is as much a reflection of the utter wickedness of the current anti-White/pro-jew regime as it is an expression of collective White fear and demoralization.

Mike Enoch’s doxxing is qualitatively different. First, because he has been the most pensive and eloquent voice at TRS, its hub, its guru. Without Enoch, TRS would not exist and probably will not continue. The more important difference is the jew wife thing.

A few Daily Stormer commenters argued about the apparent similarity to my situation. The main difference is that I disclosed it myself. I’ve never wanted to be popular, or a leader, but I do care about my race and want to speak the truth about its foremost pathogen, the jews. I’m sure there are many other people in my situation, more than even most jew-aware people realize. Many see their situation differently than I do. I’m not at all surprised some would try to speak some truths while compartmentalizing others.

The truth is that race-mixing is an existential threat to any race, including Whites. Race-mixing with jews is the worst because it helps jews infiltrate and manipulate Whites to think otherwise. As a result even many Whites who aren’t race-mixing deal with such truths by denying them, by denying race exists, or that it matters. And among the Whites who don’t deny that race matters many won’t accept that jews are a racial, existential threat to Whites. The more Whites are forced to confront and overcome any form of this denial, the better.

The most important point that can be made about the jew wife thing is that it is a problem. It matters. It isn’t irrational or immoral for Whites to despise and reject race-mixers, as the jews want us to believe. Quite the contrary, those who deny the problem, lie about it, or try to hush it up are only making it worse.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

Dylann Roof’s Jail Journal


Pages from a journal Dylann Roof wrote in the weeks after his arrest were presented as evidence and read aloud in court last week. Many jewsmedia articles have appeared over the past several days providing certain excerpts, but none quote or link the full document.

Finding the document was not easy, and though Roof’s handwriting is clear, the scan quality is low, making some words difficult to read. To make the document more easily accessible to others I have transcribed it and present the bulk here in plain text – lightly edited for spelling, punctuation, and format.

The PDF has 40 pages, each with a unique page number (“-XX-”) printed in the lower left corner and an ID (“US-0606XX”) in the lower right. The sequence of page numbers and IDs correspond to each other, but for some reason these pages/IDs are presented partly out of order in the PDF. This is especially true for the first few pages in the PDF, which contain sketches and lists of Roof’s favorite music and films.

Each page in the PDF is labeled “RESTRICTED MATERIAL” in red at the top and bottom. The first/title page is labeled “Contents of cell search 8-3-15″ and “GOVERNMENT Exhibit 500″. The lowest page/ID is “-1-”/”US-060652″, the highest is “-42-”/”US-060693″. Pages/IDs “-40-”/”US-606091″ and “-41-”/”US-606092″ are missing.

Roof’s sketches include various arrangements of the following symbols: “14″, “88″, life rune, odal rune, sig and double-sig runes, swastika/hakenkreuz, celtic/Russian Orthodox cross, and “D S R” (Dylann Storm Roof).

The body of Roof’s prose begins on the 14th page of the PDF. A triple asterisk (***) denotes illegible words. A single asterisk is attached to words whose interpretation is uncertain.


I would like to finish writing my opinions, I was unable to finish before because I was in a hurry to get to Charleston. I would also like to make some clarifications.

Jews are an enigma

I can’t pretend to understand why the Jews do what they do. A person can only speculate. I don’t think the Jews themselves understand why they do these things.

I have tried, when I write, to not state statistics or facts or things people can read for themselves with a little research. This doesn’t mean I don’t know them or am ignorant. I would consider myself well-versed on almost* every issue* facing* White people around the world*.

That being said, the Jews have played a major role in literally every thing that has proved destructive to our race, culture, and society. The truth is that at the moment it is much easier to talk about blacks or muslims or hispanics to other Whites because it is easier for them to relate.

I would not deny for a moment that the Jews have made many wonderful, and truly great contributions to the world. But the bad outweighs the good. Lets take Hollywood as an example. The Jewish control of Hollywood allows for Hollywood films to have bigger budgets because of the amount of Jewish money in the industry. Because of this some amazing films have been made. But this same networking has probably prevented some of the best films of all time from being made, beause a man who has a great idea, or script, or screenpay, may not be able to have it seen because he isn’t Jewish.

So the Jewish control of Hollywood has benefits and drawbacks. Obviously the other drawback of their control of the film industry, as well as every other media industry, is the introduction of vile, disgusting filth into our society. At the same time, some of the most wholesome classic films have been directed or produced by Jews.

Some of the best composers have been, and are, Jewish. Jews have written many great books and contributed greatly to world literature, and not always with dirty or degenerate writing. But just as with the film industry, who is more likely to have their manuscript read by a Jewish run publishing house? Therefore what have we missed out on that great White minds have or could have produced?

All this being said, the Jews are undoubtedly our enemies, indeed our greatest enemy and obstacle in saving our race. One could very well say that, all Jewish acheivments are a result of their White blood.

Hispanics are a tough issue. Living in South Carolina, I haven’t had too much contact with hispanics, but within the past few years I have witnessed their population spike in my area. Do we as Americans have to accept that we will always have a decent sized hispanic population? ABSOLUTELY NOT, and at the moment we have to do something before they completely overrun us.

The hispanic population percentile is rising very quickly, and it isn’t slowing down. Many hispanics have significant amounts of White blood, although the vast majority do not. I believe the White hispanics are worth saving as long as they wholeheartedly identify as White and align themselves in that fashion. This would also mean turning against part of their heritage, and indeed some of their relatives.

There is enough good White blood in the USA that we could survive and prosper even with a large non-White hispanic population. But even if that population wasn’t rising, it would still drag us down and definitely keep us from reaching our full potential. In the event of a race war, you would have the hispanics who would align with the blacks, the hispanics who would side with the Whites, and then the ones who didn’t align with anyone.

It is hard for me to write about the hispanic issue because I have little experience to draw on. The bottom line is that they are our enemies, and introduce crime and violence to our country, and therefore deserve no place in it. (***) – I realize that other minority populations have an increasing population, such as muslims. But the hispanic population poses the strongest immediate threat.

As a small, rather funny sidenote, I have noticed that hispanic television channels are actually more White than regular American stations.

If there is one group I have almost zero experience with, it would be muslims. I feel very sorry for my European brothers that their main adversary has to be so seriously formidable. In a way the muslims in Europe could be compared to the hispanics in the USA, the obvious difference being a toxic religion.

I would say that hispanics and muslims have similar IQs and violence levels, but unfortunately the muslim’s violent behavior is increased exponentially by their sick religion. Again I feel sorry for, and a little bit scared for my European brothers. Many of them don’t realize how serious their enemy is. Not that I think the muslims could stand half of a chance against a united White front.

I am not trying to give the muslims undue credit, but their presence is a huge issue for everyone.

Asians have and continue to endure the most discrimination in America, even more than Whites.

When I look at East Asian countries such as Japan and Korea, I see what White countries could be like if we win. Not only could we be as good, we could be 10 times better. But as of now these countries have passed us. I admire the East Asians just like they used to admire us. They are not better than Whites, but they are living better because the don’t face the problems we do. I can’t help but feel a small amount of jealously.


In the White Nationalist movement, many have the idea that Slavs are these great White warriors that won’t put up with the things Western Europeans do. Although this is true in a way, it have nothing to do with them being Slavic. It is simply because they haven’t been subjected to the same mental manipulation.

I will use Russia as an example. In Russia, most people are racist, or in the very least conservative, and all Russian people know this. So the far-right in Russia feels, and is, empowered. If in England, for example, the skinheads thought they had popular opinion’s support, they would and could act more brashly.

Now, is the reason Russia is a conservative, racially aware country because it is Slavic? Of course not. It is because their government supports these beliefs and has pride in its people, as well as the fact that their media doesn’t have a far-left agenda, and neither do their schools.

But I would also like to touch on the Slavic identity itself. I think the Slavic identity is needless and could end up being divisive. I think that once Europe has taken care of its immigration problem, it could become a source of tension, needlessly.

That being said, the Eastern Europeans will surely play an important, and positive role in the future of Europe if they choose to do so, hopefully without shedding the blood of their White brothers.

To wrap this up. White people are pretending. Grown adults waiting around playing pretend. Pretending we are all the same and equal, pretending that nothing bad is happening, and pretending like they have a future. Well unless we take real, possibly violent action, we have no future, literally. I am 21 years old and I don’t play pretend.

I couldn’t go another day without doing something, I couldn’t live with myself seeing these things happen to my people and doing nothing about it. Sometimes sitting in my cell, I think about how nice it would be to watch a movie, or eat some good food, or drive my car somewhere, but then I remember how I felt when I did these things, and how I knew I had to do something. And then I realize it was worth it.

I would rather live imprisoned knowing I took action for my race than to live with the torture of sitting idle. It isn’t up to me anymore. I did what I could do, I’ve done all I can do. I did what I thought would make the biggest wave. And now the fate of our race sits in the hands of my brothers who continue to live freely.

I would like to make it crystal clear. I do not regret what I did. I am not sorry. I have not shed a tear for the innocent people I killed. I do feel sorry for the innocent White children forced to live in this sick country, and I do feel sorry for the innocent White people that are killed daily at the hands of the lower races.

I have shed a tear of self pity for myself. I feel pity that I had to do what I did in the first place. I feel pity that I had to give up my life because of a situation that should never have existed.


I don’t believe homosexuality exists. I think it is nothing more than a sick fetish. I find evidence for this in the multitude of married men, with children, that come out, or lead secret gay lives. It is obvious that they can perform like a normal man. But that isn’t their preference.

In the very least, “homosexuality” should be reinstated as a mental illness, and a severe one at that. I will not lower myself to even comment on transgenderism.

Feminism is bad. Modern psychology is Jewish and evil. Abortion, of White children, is wrong. Social services are evil, sometimes.

I would have liked to adopt a White child if I had had the means.

My Race is My Nation. My only nation is my race.


I never planned on shooting up the College of Charleston. This is ridiculous and has no basis in reality.

I did not do it because of a girl.

Many of the people who claimed to have known me, I have never heard of in my life. Anything these so-called friends have said about me should be interpreted as lies.

I haven’t had a black friend in years, and have never had a close black friend.

I am not and have never been obsessed with the Trayvon Martin case. I simply use it a reference point for when I woke up. I couldn’t care less about it in reality.

I have never in my life been addicted to any drug.

I realize that if I was to receive life imprisonment, I would eventually be pardoned.

I was not suicidal or seen crying in my room. This is ridiculous. I was placed on suicide watch when I arrived at the jail, for no reason.

Anything anyone says about me, including family, should be taken with a huge grain of salt.

Never in my life have I stated that blacks are “taking over the country.” This is ignorant and I never said it. How are blacks “taking over the country” when their population percentile is stagnant? If any race is taking over the country, it would be hispanics.

During the shooting, I said “you blacks are killing White people on the streets everyday and raping White women everyday.”

I never wanted my writing to be called a “manifesto”. That is why I just put “text” on my website.

I did not have a so called troubled childhood. I had everything I needed and then some. Having divorced parents doesn’t mean that your have a “troubled childhood”. This accusation is asinine.

I never used drugs to “drown the pain.” I have never had any pain to drown.

I never intended to shoot the young girl in the church. I never aimed at her and never would have, therefore I resent the attempted murder charge. For the same reason, I resent the two other attempted murder charges.

You see, many White people don’t want to know the truth. Because once you know what is happening, you feel like something needs to be done about it. It is an irritating feeling. So even if they do stumble across or hear about what is happening to White people, they deny it, or say that it is lies, because they don’t want to believe it. Once you admit that it is true, you have two choices. You either do something about it, or you don’t.

At this point you fall into a “someday” mentality. You say “One day there will be a race war.” “One day things will change.” “One day we will live in this White utopia.” “One day someone else will do something, so I don’t need to.”

And this is where most White nationalists end up. So nothing happens. And this has to change. There is a lot of big talk from White nationalists, with no one backing it up.

Socialism is used as a sort of buzzword amongst so called conservatives. In reality socialism isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

For example, proponents, usually leftists, liked to point to the Scandinavian countries as successful examples of socialism at work. And for a long time they may have had a point. But these countries have rather small, homogeneous populations. Or at least they used to. The point is that socialism can work when a population is homogeneous, and even better when the population is smaller. But when a population is diverse, you are bound to have problems.

For example one group may notice that another, distinct, group uses a disproportionate amount of welfare, and get annoyed. But in a homogeneous population this is almost impossible, because everyone is the same, and there would be nothing to notice.

I believe one day that Adolf Hitler will be inducted as a Saint. I can see an icon of him in my mind.

I do not want to live in the past. I do not wish that I was was living in the 1850s, or the 1940s. I want to live now, with all the modern advancements and conveniences that we have, and I think we could have even more of these if we weren’t being dragged down. I wish some things were as they were in the past, but I want to live now. I want to see a future. I want to help make the way, to help create the path to that great future.

How can people blame young White people for having no ambition, when they have been given nothing, and have nothing, to look forward to? Even your most brain-dead White person can see that there is nothing good on the horizon. And even your most brain-dead White person can be saved. Almost no one is beyond saving.

We also need to remember that no one is stopping us. We are only stopping each other. White people are the ones keeping other White people from standing up for themselves.

If we were to, for example, become completely ruthless to the blacks, or implement a harsh eugenics program, who could stop us? Is Kenya or Nigeria or South Africa going to send troops to stop us? Of course not. If White people were united, would it matter if the whole of Africa put sanctions on us? Would the Asians or Arabs even care? Without White people telling them to, I doubt they would.

The saddest part when it comes to blacks is that it didn’t have to be this way. In other words, now we have to get revenge. If the Jews had never forced integration, the blacks would have never had a chance to do as much harm to us as they have. But its too late now, so they have to pay for what they have done, even though the Jews are the ones truly responsible.


I cannot agree with the form of Christianity most modern preachers preach. It seems to me that this form of Christianity says, “Leave it to God” “There is nothing you can do about it.” “Ok, well maybe you can do something, but don’t, because its not your place.” And I can’t agree with this.

I see some people who seem to use Christianity as an excuse for not doing anything. They tell themselves they are being pious, but they are really being cowardly. Their piety is their excuse. But Christianity doesn’t have to be this weak, feeble, cowardly religion. There is plenty of evidence to indicate that Christianity can be a warrior’s religion.

I think that once White Nationalists have gained control of their respective countries, we should sent troops, together, into South Africa to save the remaining Whites, and possibly help them reinstate a new White government if it is still feasible.

We could also encourage immigration from our countries into South Africa to boost the White population. If not, we could at least help them to secure the portions they want and let the blacks have the rest. If their numbers are very small by the time we are able to do this, then we could give remaining population citizenship and help them to move to our countries.

Not only is it our responsibility to help them, but it would also be symbolic and motivating to the worldwide White population.

Sometimes I think it would be nice and peaceful to be deaf. Specifically to go deaf. Ideally I wish I could just be very hard of hearing, like a very old person.

It is important to accept what you are. You cannot change where you come from. You can’t decide where you are born or who you are born to. So you must try to find pride and be proud of your heritage even if you don’t have anything to be proud of. Obviously this *** the case for White people. But even if it was.

We cannot just dwell and imagine a great future without taking the steps to attain that future. This could very well mean not being able to see or enjoy that future. Some would then say, “Then what is the point?” We are only a continuation of our ancestors, and our children are continuations of us. In a way, we are one and the same. So by making* the way and creating the path to that future for the ones who come after us to see, we are at the same time doing it for ourselves. By letting the future be stolen from our children we are letting it be stolen from ourselves.

I don’t have a child, but I wish I did and I regret not being able to before I did what I did. I can only imagine the love a parent must feel for their child, especially* when young. And for White men and women to be able to look at their children and know they are threatened and resign themselves and their children to that fate is shameful.

I find it quite comical when I hear White men talk about how they will defend their home and their family no matter what, or how they “dare someone” to break into their home. They feel courageous when they say “but if someone trys to harm me or my family…” when in reality they couldn’t be more pathetic cowards.

It is so nice to be able to say these things, to call my fellow White men pathetic cowards, because that is what they are, and with my deed behind me I have every right, possibly the most right, to say it. So they claim they will defend what is theirs, yet everything is being stolen from them in front of their eyes, and they know it. Yet they stand idle with their tails between their legs.

I enjoy self pity. It gives me great delight to pity myself. I am a realist, a strict one. I never, ever, ever lie to myself in order to make myself feel better or more comfortable. I think this may be my best, strongest trait.

I also, like many other people, find it pleasurable to be sad. I “get off” on it. I wonder why so many people enjoy being sad. I think it may be that they can be sad while remaining comfortable. So they can experience sadness without hardship, and therefore call feel a strong emotion, that much of the time is easier to induce than happiness, without suffering………any real injury from it.

Sadness is considered a bad feeling.

I don’t like it when people try to read into things, or try to find, or create meaning that isn’t there. I don’t like it when people put so much weight on the things I say. Sometimes, more now that before the incident, I feel that the people I talk to hang on my words as if they were all important or offer some sort of insight into my being. But this isn’t the case; it never is with anyone.

This is part of the reason I hate psychology. A psychologist, often with more mental issues than their “patient” proceeds to put labels on them and tell them they have issues that they don’t really have, and half the time are completely invented “diseases” that have no scientific foundation.

For example, I stated before that I never used drugs to “drown the pain”, or “self medicate”. I used drugs because they get you high. There is no deeper meaning behind this. There is no deeper meaning behind any of my behavior. These things don’t apply to me or any number of people.


I feel like I stated my opinions in the text I put on my website, but I can’t remember so I will put it here anyways.

Modern American patriotism, or really modern patriotism in most White countries, is an absolute joke. Firstly, what is there to be patriotic about? I find it beyond comical when I hear people thank veterans of any war after Vietnam for their service. Even more hilarious is that golden line, “Thank you for protecting us.”

Modern military men disgust me in a way. They walk around as if someone owes them something. I think many of them really believe that we do owe them something. They truly believe that they are “protecting our way of life.” What way of life they are referring to, I’m not sure of. Maybe they are referring to the homosexual, race-betraying, self-destructive, anti-White way of life. I think some of them have this mystical view of America, truly a delusional view that they are fighting or have fought for an America that in reality ceased to exist long ago.

If it is true that what doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger, then maybe there is a benefit to our race going through this trying time. Maybe when we come out of this we will truly be stronger, more aware, and smarter than ever before. And maybe, because this period is so severe, we won’t soon forget about it. And won’t soon let it happen again.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+

Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light