Tag Archives: andrew anglin

Blog

The Tautology of Jewing

29 Comments

Andrew Anglin has been reviewing the jewing revealed by Vicky Ward’s recent book abouth the Kushner crime family, highlighting the many previously unpublicized details and adding many relevant points of his own. It’s a great read.

How did such criminality, infiltrating and manipulating the very highest levels of government, avoid the scrutiny and criticism of the so-called Fourth Estate for so long? To paraphrase how I once described the similar situation around Jeffrey Epstein: All you need to know to understand why the jewsmedia, which supposedly hates hates hates Trump, has never made a big deal out of Trump’s connection to the Kushner crime family is that it’s the jewsmedia and the Kushners are jews.

Why is this criminality coming to light now? The jews are ruthless and their conspiracy is tribal, and this gives them tremendous power. But they aren’t omnipotent. They can’t keep everything supressed forever.

The Kushner jewing was well known and tolerated as such for years by the inner party jews and their tools in Jew York Shitty and Jew Jersey. What’s remarkable is how long it has taken the story to come out even after the agents of this sordid criminal jewing were ensconced in the White House. The national jewsmedia has spent the past three years screeching as if Russians and White nationalists were pulling Donald Trump’s strings. This is not because they are crazy, but because they’ve known all along the real string-pullers are jews.

To understand the slow disclosure and systematic distortion of this or any other kind of jew-related corruption you must understand the jewsmedia follows an unwritten code. The jewing they can’t hide, they spin. What they can’t spin, they White-wash. What they can’t White-wash, they simply grit their teeth and minimize. While the result is often a combination of these tactics, at this point there’s not much left for them to do with the Kushners but minimize.

Presumably the Mueller investigation has uncovered some of the campaign-related “Russian” jewing, so some of the truth about the “foreign influence” is coming out anyway. We must keep in mind that however damning the information about the Kushners that the jewsmedia finally discloses, it will be a limited hangout. Any connections implicating the larger ethnic network and totally jewed culture which birthed and fostered the Kushners will be downplayed, to the extent they’re revealed at all.

Ward’s book, for example, seems calculated to keeps the blast radius limited to the Kushners. The recent interview Ward did with Virginia Heffernan shows how it’s done. During the discussion jewing comes up directly only once, while discussing Jared Kushner’s mysterious acceptance into Harvard despite his mediocre rank in grade school. Heffernan, ever the good goy, knowingly brings up the fact that it was an exclusive jews-first/jews-only grade school, but only to praise it for supposedly being forthcoming about Kushner’s poor performance. After 50 minutes of even more superficial chit chat you’re left with the impression that what’s bad about Kushner, what shapes and drives his “vaguely zionist” worldview, is that he’s in bed with “the Saudis”.

Based on what Anglin has written, as far as Ward’s book covers jewing at all it seems to be trying to portray the Kushners as renegades, at odds with their tribe. From Karl Marx to George Soros this is one of the more common lines of apologia when jews get called out for doing something wrong. They’re not really jews, you see, or not good jews anyway. But you’re still an “anti-semite” for noticing.

This point I made about Weinstein applies far more generally than even the more jew-wise goyim realize. It applies in this case too. So it’s worth repeating:

Weinstein was able to carry on for as long as he did exactly because he is a member of a larger criminal tribe, whose methods he shared, and whose mutual protection he still enjoys. Indeed, across time and space Weinstein’s tribe has operated Weinstein-wise, as an ethnic gang – a widely-dispersed, obsessively-organized, now skulking, now screeching, genetically-related mafia. But in comparison to any other form of ethnic gangsterism jewing is far more insidious, more virulent, more chronic. Unlike others, the jews have repeatedly infiltrated and manipulated hosts so completely that they’ve repeatedly managed to privilege themselves and legalize their gangsterism.

Controlling the narrative, the perceptions, the thinking, the morality of their host has been integral to jewing. Properly understood, jewing is part pretense, part practice; part denial, part celebration; part carrot, part stick; part hidden, part in-your-fucking-face-and-whattaya-gonna-do-about-it-goyim. Jewing is parasitism so “successful” that none dare call it parasitism.

Suits and ties and jewsmedia fluff pieces may have gotten the Kushners this far, but under any scrutiny their minds and mores come across as so alien, so jewy, that they cannot be White-washed, they cannot be passed off as White. The fate and fortune of the Kushners has had nothing to do with “White privilege”. It has everything to do with jewing. That’s the crux of the scandal. Their identity as jews explains their motives, it explains their methods, and it explains the lack of scrutiny on them thus far. It will also dictate how the jewsmedia treats the story around them from this point on.

The jewing at the core of the story, the key to understanding it, is exactly what the jewsmedia will try hardest to minimize. Paradoxically, minimizing the criminal jewing will involve maximizing the OYYYY VEEEEYYYYYY jewing. Assuming the story gets mainstream traction, and a critical mass of goyim knowing starts to take form, articles will appear preemptively screeching that the Kushner kerfluffle is a terrible shanda fur die goyim.

No doubt some of this screeching will go so far as to imply that the jewsmedia is “anti-semitic”. We know Trump, who never says a word in defense of his White supporters, is totally comfortable championing jews as a collective. If and when necessary he will likely try to defend his criminal in-laws the same way.

I can hear him now. “THE ANTI-SEMITIC LYING MEDIA ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE IS TRYING TO SMEAR MY BRILLIANT SON-IN-LAW, HIS WONDERFUL FAMILY, AND THE STUPENDOUS JEWISH PEOPLE!!1!” Playing right along, the jewsmedia will just screech ever louder that Trump is “anti-semitic”, peddling age-old “tropes” and “canards” that have dogged the jews for millennia, wherever they wander.

This is the tautology of jewing. “Anti-semitism” everywhere, on the tip of everyone’s tongue, yet according to the jewsmedia jewing has nothing to do with it. If they can get away with this shtick even when the jewing is openly celebrated, why not under harsher light?

But then it may not even come to that. Take Epstein’s case for example. There was a cloak of secrecy around him and his network even before it was partially exposed and reburied. Epstein has been back in court over the past several months, and though he is directly connected to Trump, and the jewsmedia hates hates hates Trump, the self-professed speaking-truth-to-power types are all still mostly ignoring that story. At best they merely try to jewsplain it, providing lots of boring detail, glossing over the basic fact that Epstein’s network and the cover still afforded it is perfectly typically tribal.

Blog

Why the Jews Hate Those Who Love Them

21 Comments

Andrew Anglin points at Yori Yanover, who asks, Must Jews Dislike the Christians who Like Them? Yanover’s answer is an emphatic yes:

In other words, while I and my fellow faithful Jews like the fact that the next pogrom will not come from an Evangelical torch and pitchfork crowd, we still don’t trust you. You can’t say you love me for who I am, because who I am includes a thorough rejection of the essence of your ideology, all of it, completely, I hold that there’s no truth to it whatsoever.

But wait, there’s more.

Now do you love me? Do you love me in a future in which Jesus doesn’t come, and you continue to hold on to your faith, and I to mine?

Or, at least, can you keep the narrative about my seeing your light to yourselves?

That’s [what] we’re really asking.

Yanover imagines himself as a jewish superpope, who speaks for all the jews. It is a voice which is totally unselfconscious about jews force feeding others with their narrative, their tikkun olam and “light unto the nations” excuses for turning everyone else’s life upside down for their own benefit, never mind their noxious holocaust narrative, which they insist everyone else must learn and describe as they see fit, with special laws and fines and prison terms for heretics.

But I think Anglin’s response to Yanover gives Christians too much credit:

One might even go so far as to assert that continued existence of the Jews as a people is dependent on American Christian Zionists.

Surely, if it was not for them, we would cut the funding to the Jew state tomorrow, as aside from the weird cult, there is simply no logical reason to support these Jews. The fact that they use the money to commit genocide against the indigenous people of Palestine removes the humanitarian burden of protecting the allegedly persecuted Jews, even if you believe this Holocaust gibberish.

If it were not for the doctrine of Christian Zionism, most Christians would, by default, be Antisemitic, as this has been the default position of Christians since the beginnings of the religion. Thus, we would not continue to allow Jews to continue to run our government, economy and media.

Christians have bitterly opposed abortion and homosexuality, yet the jews have gotten their way on these domestic issues. Why would Christian opposition to Israel, or any other point of foreign policy, be different? Anglin knows it isn’t Christian Zionists who control the money, the media or the political parties, it’s the jews. It’s their money and media which moderate the policies of the United States, not the other way around. It has very little to do with what voters want, Christian or otherwise.

The jews make mountains out of molehills. They know there is a built-in limit to Christian “anti-semitism”. Yanover admits they’re all but toothless now, but even if Christians returned to a more traditional position, seeing jews as a separate people, as accursed Christ-killers even, they’d still also see jews, even jews as blatantly alien as Yanover, as potential Christians, potential brothers in spirit. Christians have always welcomed jews to “convert”, to infiltrate and manipulate them from within, even during the many brief periods of “persecution” that the jews complain most bitterly about.

The jews clearly wouldn’t have nearly as easy a time infiltrating and manipulating White societies if Christianity didn’t exist. Anglin’s argument that the jews wouldn’t exist if American Christian Zionists didn’t exist is far less plausible.

It seems to me that the Christians who love the jews who hate them are suffering from a form of Stockholm syndrome. The affliction in self-proclaimed Christian Zionists, like Vox Day, is particularly obvious and acute. They insist on seeing the jews as partners, or at least as peers, even after looking directly at evidence which indicates otherwise.

Having a faith in beliefs which can’t be proven one way or another is one thing. Maintaining a truth which has been demonstrated false is something else. The first is a form of spirituality common to most men. The second is pathological. In this case the cause, the pathogen, is jews.

Though Christians make a spectacular show of the symptoms, and bashing Christians is perfectly semitically correct under the current, thoroughly judaized regime, Christians aren’t the only ones afflicted. Christianity appears to be only one method by which jews “capture” the minds of their “hostages”. Sharing short-term measures of fame or wealth or power seems to explain more.

Why do the jews hate those who love them? Because that’s their nature. Race is real. The parasite’s interest is not in loving or assimilating or cooperating with its host. The parasite’s interest is in infiltrating, the better to manipulate, the better to exploit the host. Christians prefer a more purely spiritual view, which tends to preclude such an understanding. It’s more difficult to explain why those who are comfortable thinking in secular, biological terms refuse to understand.