Category Archives: Blog

Talking with John Friend

Jew-as-world-parasite

A week and a half ago I spoke with John Friend concerning various aspects of the jewish problem. His post on our conversation is here. Below are some additional links for context and reference.

The Jews – Who, What, Why and How sums up a comprehensive series of podcasts I did on the jewish problem. The Jewish Problem and “Anti-Semitism” addresses the importance of identity and point of view.

Kevin MacDonald’s Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review.

Radio Nordfront interview with Professor Macdonald, Part 1 and Part 2.

My criticism of “White pathology” traces back to “White Pathology” on Saturday Afternoon with Carolyn, recorded in November 2013. My criticism of “pathological altruism” started with Pathology and Pathogen, Fear and Genocide, and Gaslighting, recorded in February of this year. The comments on those posts contain further clarification and some debate. Solipsism and Narcissism, recorded in June, summed up the argument and added a couple of new points.

Regarding Jared Taylor: Pathological Altruism | American Renaissance, Jews and American Renaissance | American Renaissance, Tan Staafl on Twitter: “This is why Taylor’s “race realist” idea that jews are White is so pernicious. Whites are not extincting themselves. http://t.co/AueJUSyx6J”, “The Jewish Question” – Jared Taylor Vs. Brit.

Here’s a PDF of The Great Jewish Masque. This book came to my attention recently via a reading by The Editor who included his own insightful commentary.Start with Part 1 of 4.

My criticism of Wilmot Robertson’s majority/minority terminology – pussyfooting around the jews, to put it in his own terms – is laid out in the comments here.

Contrasting Francis Parker Yockey’s view of race in Imperium vis-a-vis what Adolf Hitler laid out 25 years earlier in Mein Kampf: Yockey on Culture and Race – Part 8, Part 9, and Part 11.

As John pointed out, the upshot of Pew Polls Jews is that the #1 “essential part of what being jewish means” to jews is “remembering the holocaust”. In How Anti-Whiteness is at the Heart of Jewish Identity I point out that the jews have been “remembering” (and advertising to anyone who will listen) their woe-is-us self-image as blameless victims. What’s so important about their “holocaust” narrative is that it explicitly paints Whites/Europeans as the collective victimizer/enemy.

My recent podcasts on cuckservatives and Trump: Calling Out the Cuckery and Treason is Trending (the associated image is a Rubin vase, named for “Danish” psychologist Edgar Rubin).

Jim Rizoli Interview with John Friend.

Pluralis Judaeis

genocide_by_semitical_correctness

You’ve heard of the royal “we”, here are two good examples of the jewy “we”.

After Paris Attacks, Don’t Close Doors to Refugees – Open Them, Jesse Berney, Rolling Stone:

When we see attacks like the horror in Paris, we should open our borders to a flood of refugees, not close them. We should shower those families with generosity. We should make sure they have jobs that fit their skills. We should educate their children. We should provide them health care and whatever social services they need.

In other words, “let’s you and them mix”, or, “let’s you serve them”.

A more familiar variant takes the form, “let’s you and them fight”. See, for example, French Jewish Council Calls for ‘World War’ Against ‘Jihadist Fanaticism’, Breitbart:

“Our country is bloodied by all those innocent lives cut short by the bullets of these new barbarians. The world war against the monstrosity of jihadist fanaticism must become the top priority of democratic nations,” [CRIF] said.

“We must combat them tirelessly and without pity, until they are defeated,” the group added.

The jewy “we”, pluralis judaeis, is deployed by jewhadis, “left” and “right”, not only to shamelessly lecture everyone else what they should think and do, but specifically to serve the interests of jews, whatever harm it will cause anyone else.

Talking with Henrik Palmgren

RIR-151014_big

The title of the Red Ice Radio podcast sums up our discussion very well: Tanstaafl – Race, Biology & Modus Operandi of Jewish Extremists – Hour 1.

Some relevant context is provided via the links in the bottom half of the RIR page. See these as well:

The Racial Roots of Europeans – Part 1 and William Pierce’s Who We Are: a Series of Articles on the History of the White Race.

The Country Club Thing describes Revilo Oliver’s take on Claudius’ letter of warning to the jews of Alexandria, dated 41 AD.

The inequality of human races : Gobineau, Arthur, comte de, 1816-1882, Internet Archive.

The Ugly Nationalist Politics of Human Origins, The Daily Beast, 12 September 2015.

French far-right leader to face trial for inciting racial hatred, Yahoo News, 22 Sep 2015.

German politician Gregor Gysi calls native Germans “Nazis” and their extinction “fortunate”, YouTube.

The real meaning of Jaws is the “JPost” article I referred to, it’s actually from The Jewish Chronicle.

A White Guide to the Jewish Narrative, What’s Flipping Yid Lids Today: The Coultercaust, and A Personal Disclosure.

UPDATE 4 April 2016: Talking with Henrik Palmgren, Hour 2.

What’s Flipping Yid Lids Today: The Coultercaust

fucking_jews

While watching the republican debate on Wednesday night pundit Ann Coulter let her kikeservative act slip when she twitted:

Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: “What will AMERICA look like after you are president.”

How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?

The response from incensed jews was swift, vehement, and continues to reverberate.

As Coulter’s old friend Joe Sobran once pointed out, “A hypocritical etiquette forces us to pretend that the jews are powerless victims; and if you don’t respect their victimhood, they’ll destroy you.” Time will tell whether the fucking jews actually destroy Coulter. In the meantime it is easy to make several other points.

That jews are able to so self-righteously swarm like this is a measure of their power – which would go without saying if not for the furtive and illegitimate nature of jew rule. Sobran was destroyed even before he spilled the beans on the jewed reality which confronts every jewsmedia pundit and would-be political “leader”. To work under jew rule one must understand not only that jews rule, but that you must not ever speak ill of this fact. Even praise makes some jews squirm.

Political/media jew-swarmings are a regular occurrence. Other recent examples include The Jew Republic layoffs, Tom “1% kristallnacht” Perkins, Chuck “I’m not an Israeli senator” Hagel, and Sarah “blood libel” Palin. And it’s not just full-time professional jews who swarm, a number of ambiguous jews ditch their disguise to fly to their tribe’s defense, and they fly right across the “left”/”right” divide the goyim regard as sacrosanct.

As Sobran noted, the dynamic of a jew-swarm is two-pronged. The multitude of jews who reflexively spring forth, either as individuals or as official mouthpieces for larger organs, all express a similar message in a similar way – screeching for someone’s head while whining that jews are the real victims.

It is no coincidence that the someone the jews swarm is always more jew-lover than hater. Coulter’s slip was to connect “f—ing” and “jews”, nullifying all her prior and subsequent pro-jew/pro-Israel groveling as far as jews are concerned. More often the trigger for the jew-swarm isn’t so clear-cut, and their target rushes even more eagerly to beg forgiveness. Even in Coulter’s case it’s plain that the hate-filled boogeywoman some of the more hysterical jews imagine is a mere projection of their own fathomless loxism.

Carolyn Yeager’s “Offer”

nope_key

Bill Rhyes, who I spoke with last month, spoke with Carolyn Yeager last week. I’ve wasted too much of my life on Carolyn Yeager and don’t wish to waste any more – but she directed a disingenuous “offer” to me, accompanied by a veiled threat. I think it calls for a clear response.

Her “offer” starts at 1:27:00. She begins by reading a prepared statement, her latest version of what she says happened between us and why. As far as I can tell she hasn’t posted the text anywhere online, and I’m not going to bother transcribing it all. It’s mostly the same combination of sobstory, gossip, and speculation that she’s been serving up since the day I ended our partnership. Her whole Danny-boy/Tanny-boy story, for example, is real only in her own mind. But it is telling that she prefers to imagine such inter-personal intrigue, fictional soap opera nonsense really, rather than accept the reasons I’ve actually provided.

I laid out those reasons in My Mistake. Most of what I had to say to or about her is in the comments of The End. In response Carolyn quickly shut down the original tWn server. A month or so later I got a new domain, set up a new server, restored the content from a backup copy, and added Why this Archive to explain the changes. Over time I also attached several updates to that one post, mostly to note Carolyn’s ongoing hostility and demands. (I’ll be adding a new update there linking to this post.)

Now, speaking with Bill Rhyes, she makes a fresh demand that she couchs instead as a diplomatic “offer” (skip to 1:36:00):

I wouldn’t mind having my shows, text and all, on his archive site, if he didn’t have all the stuff he added on there after saying he was gonna freeze the site as it was.

I’m not even slightly tempted to go along with this.

First, I know she is not speaking in good faith. She shut down the original server when the only thing on it was My Mistake and The End, without any additional comments. She shut down the whole site to suppress just that. She’s now all the more bitter about Why this Archive because it spells out this and more, liberally quoting and linking her own statements, detailing many telling things she said and did.

Second, I long ago addressed her phoney “he’s stealing my podcasts” claim here and here. I also long ago provided a definitive answer to her constant demands and claims of ownership. That answer has not changed.

Third, I know Carolyn wants ALL these critical posts of mine memory-holed because she thinks they make her look bad. She deleted everything when she had the chance. She really doesn’t care about the archive as a whole or even the redacted text and the podcast links that I’m supposedly stealing. Everything of hers has always been hosted in full on her own site, which I have never had anything to do with and have never interfered with in any way.

Fourth, all her bluster about ownership and stealing flies in the face of the fact that she paid all the tWn bills with other people’s money, handled and ultimately claimed all that donated money for herself personally, and never provided any accounting for any of it.

Last but certainly not least, her “offer” truly is just another self-serving demand, offered only out of concern for her own ego/reputation and followed directly by a clumsily-worded personal threat:

I think the whole thing is unseemly. What he’s done. So if he does not do what I ask, umm, I’m prepared to copyright all my programs and take legal action against him for stealing them from my website. And additionally I will put up a page using my domain name of thewhitenetwork.com – I do own that domain name, I always did – and tell the true story of Mr. Tanstaafl and the White network in a better and more complete way than I’ve done before. So I’m not trying to make threats here but I wanted to make this offer for a way to kind of bring this White network thing to a better ending than what it has come to.

That’s just it. She wants more. I don’t. I ended my relationship with Carolyn Yeager exactly because I no longer wanted to help her, to argue with her, or have anything whatsoever to do with her. I never took anything from her, I don’t need anything from her, and frankly I’m fine with the archive site as is. I’m not going to change anything to suit her, and I certainly will not delete the very documents which best capture what actually happened as it happened. She can blubber self-righteously about her imagined victimhood all she wants. The online record tells a different story.

Except for the part about suing me, her threat reminds me of Rodney Martin’s. My response to her is the same I made to him. I doubt there’s anything more to her “true story” that she hasn’t already gone on and on about. What she’s really implying is her intent to dox me. Some bullshit copyright suit is just a pretext for that. What she’ll discover is that everything I have ever said about myself is true. What I think is most important about Carolyn Yeager I discovered and stated last year. I should never have agreed to work with such an egotistic and vindictive woman. As I’ve said, my mistake.